Joining on a case is far to be optimal. doing 3 left joins and a coalesce is faster.
partner_id is a required field in res.partner.bank, but some migrated database have
records in res.partner.bank model without id. To keep existing behaviour, the third
join (the one on the name) is kept for backward compatibility.
closesodoo/odoo#29276
The fields amount_total, amount_total_signed, residual, residual_signed,
all sum values that are unsigned or in different units, as they may be in
different currencies.
Therefore their display in the pivot view can be confusing, misleading,
and may lead people to file bug reports.
Since support for hiding measures has been added in commit 24f7c7ce7f,
we remove these fields from view.
opw 1909046
closesodoo/odoo#29211
Try to print a survey answer which has a date question
Before this commit there was a traceback because the value_date
which is a Date field was not JSON dumpable
After this commit, the survey answer prints well
OPW 1914984
closesodoo/odoo#29250
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Configure to use UoM
- Make an inventory adjustment for all product
- Select one product one the inventory line, and select the UoM
Bug:
All the UoMs were selectable but only the uoms in the same category of
the product are allowed.
opw:1911941
closesodoo/odoo#29238
When analysing the code thanks to Pyflame it cames that the 'prefetch_fields()'
function was runing most of the time. In order to improve the global performance,
I change the context of the move_lines : 'prefetch_fields = False'. It permit to reduce the
time of computation of the prefetch_fields and to avoid the MemoryError.
N.B.: The database of the customer (on saas) contains 1.3 millions of entry and to reproduce the issue
I have to set the HardMemlimit to 0.9 Go and the SoftMemLimit to 0.5Go.
OPW-1910422
closesodoo/odoo#29231
The pivot view may sum fields that are not really summable:
unsigned values (e.g. in the case of refunds)
values in different UOM, currencies (any different units really)
Which causes confusion when these fields are displayed.
We add support for the string and invisible attributes in the pivot view,
so that a field can be given a more informative name or hidden altogether.
opw 1909046
closesodoo/odoo#29144
In case there is a large amount of data to display, the 'Manual
Reconciliation' widget suffers from high CPU consumption, and therefore
slowness.
This is mainly due to the line rendering (function `_renderLines`).
Indeed, unlike the 'Bank Statement Reconciliation' widget which
retrieves the data partially, the 'Manual Reconciliation' widget
retrieves and renders all the data. No offset is implemented in this
case, neither for data retrieval nor rendering.
With this commit, we implement a partial rendering of the data
retrieved. This means that all data are fetched when loading the widget,
but only a part of it is rendered. We make use of the existing 'Load
More' mechanism to display more data. By default, 30 accounts or
partners are loaded.
By combining this with PR #28958, we aim to make the widget more usable
for large data volumes.
opw-1903575
closesodoo/odoo#28959
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172closesodoo/odoo#29086
On a record with a large x2many, the web client does not load all the data of
the lines (because of paging). If a line is modified by an onchange, at some
point the client will determine whether lines are valid (all required fields
are provided). It is possible that the client cannot evaluate the validity of
the modified line because of missing fields. In order to avoid this situaion,
the server sends all fields on modified lines.
Set a BOM to create 10^k units of Product P, using n units of raw material R.
On R, put rounding to 1 unit.
Create a MO to produce 1 unit of P.
Since it needs n/10^k units and rounding is set to 1,
it sets 1 unit of R to consume.
Now "update" (quantity to produce) to 10^k'.
It correctly updates the quantity to consume.
However, since it doesn't update the unit_factor, when you "produce",
it will consume 10^k' units instead of 1.
We copy the way the unit_factor is initially computed when updating the lines.
opw 1903776
closesodoo/odoo#29067
The translation had wrongly `</ i>` which from a report broke some
initialization of some snippet of the website editor.
es_CO, es_DO, es_EC languages are not available in transifex so this
change is done manually for them.
opw-1907752
closes#29135
When installing ecommerce app in a fresh v12 database
the fields invoice_policy and description_sale were missing in
the product.template view form
opw:1911612
closesodoo/odoo#29059
Survey has troubles displaying correctly the datetime picker widget
especially when more than one has to be instanciated. This merge fixes
several issues related to the datetime widget when displaying the survey
in customer (front-end like) view.
See sub-commits for more details about each change.
This merge is related to task ID 1912194.
closesodoo/odoo#28966
The link "Manage your payment methods" didn't work on the website because
the variable acquirers is a list of records.
This list has been created in function "payment_method" with the route
'/my/payment_method'
opw:1913299
closesodoo/odoo#29142
1. Update tax Groups with N07-2018
Restrict Tax groups just to the 5 available in Norma 07-2018:
* ITBIS
* ISR
* ISC
* Propina
* Otros Impuestos
2. Do not use 'none' to hide taxes
This affect taxes reports, as those reports evaluate the
type_tax_use field
3. Rename Taxes and Description for N07-2018
4. Change group taxes name and missing childrens
5. Add account groups to template and CoA
6. Add various missing data
opw-1912626
closesodoo/odoo#27172
When printing the badge of an attendee, several information are not
shown. This is due to the BS4 migration.
Closes#29195
opw-1912074
closesodoo/odoo#29221
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/cd34f6de727d5b3858420cff3c9d3c5995c4e75c
Before this commit, when receiving a new message from a new DM
or livechat, the newly opened chat window was automatically
focused and marking messages as read.
Chat windows that are automatically opened without any user
interaction, such as when receiving a new message from a chat,
should not be focused. Those chat windows are "passive", and
the user must click on them in order to have focus and mark
messages as read (the chat window is no longer passive as a
result). The bug has been introduced by the refactoring from
the commit above.
In fact, there was a very short period of time during which the
chat window was passive. However, due to the way chat window
server-side state synchronization works, the chat window was
automatically closed then re-opened. This resulted in some visual
flickering of the chat window ('open' > 'close' > 'open'), and
the conversation was automatically marked as read. This was a
consequence of the actions 'open' > 'close' > 'open' that removed
the passive property of the chat window.
Chat window server-side synchronization relies on a notification
that tells the state of the conversation. Due to bad design, this
notification had exactly the same format as the one for notifying
all browser tabs of a newly joined conversation.
This commit fixes the issue by distinguishing "channel join"
and "chat window state" notification, so that the former is not
treated as a chat window notification. It fixes the problem
because it was precisely the "channel join" notification that caused
the chat window to close and loose its passive property.
Task-ID 1914735
opw-1914371
closesodoo/odoo#29223
It has been reported that it would be nice to have font OCRB all over
the report and number in boxes (for the ISR version of amount with
boxes).
This commit do some tweaks and adapt positions and font-size to do this.
Also a shortcut for an account number can be used in switzerland
(see d9448d7389), but in the ISR scanline the account number must be
fully printed so this commit do the zero padding (on the middle part of
the account number).
opw-1903608
closes#29000
Commit 2ab6ce80d6 introduced an issue where the
URL for new job offer was added in the DOM even when website_hr_recruitment is
not installed.
This is a problem because the crawler tries to navigate that URL and returns an
error because the route does not exist without website_hr_recruitment.
closesodoo/odoo#29217
Commit a6e1eb9f0a
introduced the show_vat context key, that displays the Tax ID of a customer
after its name when present, similarly to show_address.
However it appears on the field when being edited, then disappears at save,
which is confusing.
Other unclean things tended to happen: you would have "name - taxid" on customer
field, but "name" on invoice address and delivery address.
Furthermore a client could edit the name manually to erase the Tax ID, and thus
recreate a new record for the same customer.
We introduce a method to clean the name from the Tax ID, and use it so that it
is directly the client's name that is selected at edit.
Note that we also replace the standard dash in the 'name - taxid'
by a figuredash (‒, U+2012) so as to avoid potential egregious splits
because of legitimate customer names.
Similar to commit: 3cbfc40303
(same thing for show_address)
opw 1911954
closesodoo/odoo#29189
Take explanation of
commit d94e8a0
but this time, have a suffix with a flavor of %(year)s
Before this commit, validating the invoice crashes
After this commit it doesn't.
OPW 1912954
closesodoo/odoo#29160
- When a payment is done through a `payment.transaction` the
communication should be the transaction's reference instead of its
invoices reference.
closesodoo/odoo#29187
On a record with a large x2many, the web client does not load all the data of
the lines (because of paging). If a line is modified by an onchange, at some
point the client will determine whether lines are valid (all required fields
are provided). It is possible that the client cannot evaluate the validity of
the modified line because of missing fields. In order to avoid this situaion,
the server sends all fields on modified lines.
closesodoo/odoo#29177
Once we log an exception via next activity in a production, we search moves that have been updated uphill to write the useful information about the change. The issue is by default, the key 'move_orig_id' is searched while some moves could be linked with 'created_purchase_line_id' key.
This commit avoid mapping 'move_orig_id' on empty recordset and so avoid a traceback.
opw:1911399
closesodoo/odoo#29087
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172
Fix Error:
`ERROR: syntax error at or near ")"
LINE 7: ... WHERE full_reconcile_id IS NULL and account_id IN ()`
This can occurs when:
- using write to some account like:
`some_account.write({'reconcile': True})`
closesodoo/odoo#29164
Nicolas Seinlet