Commit 5804246e0f introduced some improvements to speed up performances.
One of them was to check if a customize_show view was active or not but the
condition was on view.customize_show instead of view.active.
Thus, as that view is always a customize_show, the condition would always be
met.
closesodoo/odoo#29414
- The `_write` override on `sale.order` create a Next Activity for the
SO's salesperson when changing the SO `invoice_status` to upselling.
If the SO doesn't have a salesperson this code crashes since `user_id`
is required on Next Activities.
To avoid this crash we create the Next Activity only if a salesperson
is set on the SO.
OPW-1914087
The definition of `attachment_ids` on model `email_template.preview` is wrong,
because its table/columns refer to the model `mail.template`. As the field is
only used to preview a result in a wizard form, it does not need to be stored.
closesodoo/odoo#29349
used to fetch debit & credit recorded in Tax Cash Basis Journal Entries
Main
-
By allowing to change the `amount_mnt` var we will be able to change the
values recorded in Tax Cash Basis Journal Entries, i.e, debit & credit
values.
Explanation
-
We want to keep the `amount` just the way it has been computed because
that is right. We don't want to change that.
Our issue is the`rounded_amt` which is the value that is passed to the
debit and credit downwards.
We have only hooked a new method to allow us later inherit that method
and make our own computations regarding the `rounded_amt` which is the
main subject of this PR and later pass it down to the debit & credit
fields as need for localizations that could be facing the problem of
having the computation of taxes at date of invoicing instead of date of
payment.
`amount` var is used here:
`
'amount_currency': self.amount_currency and
line.currency_id.round(-line.amount_currency * amount / line.balance) or
0.0,`
and we are not intending to change that because the value written to the
`amount_currency` field is right.
What we intend is to compute the values for debit and credit fields
which were computed in this method at invoice date, some l18n need them
at payment date, e.g, l18n_mx.
Be aware
-
Do not be mislead by the fact that `rounded_amt` var is the one taken to
do those computations. It is just a mean to the final goal. Rounding is
not an issue and has never been.
Background
-
By allowing this merge to flow we will be able to address the following issues:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/25057https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/17196https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/9972
Final Goal
-
Being able to perform the computation of the debits and credits
according to l10n_mx in odoo/enterprise#3137closesodoo/odoo#28991
When activating a filter on a list view,
the environment of the action contained a context with an orderedBy key
which was then used by every controller and model in the various
parallel flows, i.e. changing actions
After this commit, we prevent it by excluding the key when executing an action
OPW 1913190, 1914019
closes#29190
required: [('chart_template_id','!=',False)] doesn't work because you need to fill the chart_template_id
to install a chart of accounts for your company. Then, the transfer_account becomes required before its installation
and then, you are not able to install a chart of accounts for your company.
If installed along with `auth_signup`, it sends an email when creating a missing user authenticated through LDAP.
It is a confusing message that makes no sense, because the user is, from his POV, not actually creating a new user, but just authenticating with a new app with his known company-wide credentials.
Besides, that invitation leads the user to change his password in Odoo, although he probably doesn't want to do that and have a password for Odoo and another in the LDAP server.
The best option is to disable that email completely, which is what this commit does.
closesodoo/odoo#29243
The module `vatnumber` (which is not maintained anymore) uses an
incorrect validation method for Albanian VAT numbers. Therefore, we use
the library `stdnum`, on which `vatnumber` relies for most cases.
opw-1912680
closesodoo/odoo#29280
When analysing the code thanks to Pyflame it cames that the 'prefetch_fields()'
function was runing most of the time. In order to improve the global performance,
I change the context of the move_lines : 'prefetch_fields = False'. It permit to reduce the
time of computation of the prefetch_fields and to avoid the MemoryError.
N.B.: The database of the customer (on saas) contains 1.3 millions of entry and to reproduce the issue
I have to set the HardMemlimit to 0.9 Go and the SoftMemLimit to 0.5Go.
OPW-1910422
closesodoo/odoo#29231
In case there is a large amount of data to display, the 'Manual
Reconciliation' widget suffers from high CPU consumption, and therefore
slowness.
This is mainly due to the line rendering (function `_renderLines`).
Indeed, unlike the 'Bank Statement Reconciliation' widget which
retrieves the data partially, the 'Manual Reconciliation' widget
retrieves and renders all the data. No offset is implemented in this
case, neither for data retrieval nor rendering.
With this commit, we implement a partial rendering of the data
retrieved. This means that all data are fetched when loading the widget,
but only a part of it is rendered. We make use of the existing 'Load
More' mechanism to display more data. By default, 30 accounts or
partners are loaded.
By combining this with PR #28958, we aim to make the widget more usable
for large data volumes.
opw-1903575
closesodoo/odoo#28959
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172closesodoo/odoo#29086
On a record with a large x2many, the web client does not load all the data of
the lines (because of paging). If a line is modified by an onchange, at some
point the client will determine whether lines are valid (all required fields
are provided). It is possible that the client cannot evaluate the validity of
the modified line because of missing fields. In order to avoid this situaion,
the server sends all fields on modified lines.
Set a BOM to create 10^k units of Product P, using n units of raw material R.
On R, put rounding to 1 unit.
Create a MO to produce 1 unit of P.
Since it needs n/10^k units and rounding is set to 1,
it sets 1 unit of R to consume.
Now "update" (quantity to produce) to 10^k'.
It correctly updates the quantity to consume.
However, since it doesn't update the unit_factor, when you "produce",
it will consume 10^k' units instead of 1.
We copy the way the unit_factor is initially computed when updating the lines.
opw 1903776
closesodoo/odoo#29067
The translation had wrongly `</ i>` which from a report broke some
initialization of some snippet of the website editor.
es_CO, es_DO, es_EC languages are not available in transifex so this
change is done manually for them.
opw-1907752
closes#29135
1. Update tax Groups with N07-2018
Restrict Tax groups just to the 5 available in Norma 07-2018:
* ITBIS
* ISR
* ISC
* Propina
* Otros Impuestos
2. Do not use 'none' to hide taxes
This affect taxes reports, as those reports evaluate the
type_tax_use field
3. Rename Taxes and Description for N07-2018
4. Change group taxes name and missing childrens
5. Add account groups to template and CoA
6. Add various missing data
opw-1912626
closesodoo/odoo#27172
**Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:**
Addon hr_attendance adds a check_in/check_out status icon in every card of the employee kanban view. The status is figured out using computed field ``attendance_state``, itself relying on a computed Many2one field, ``last_attendance_id``.
The current way to compute the latter field seems to fetch all attendances before getting the most recent one. For each employee. Which causes the employee kanban view to load very slowly (~30 sec in 90-employee Camptocamp's instance).
This PR suggests to load only the last attendance entry.
Co-authored with @guewen
**Current behavior before PR:**
Employee kanban view loads very slowly.
**Desired behavior after PR is merged:**
Employee kanban view loads reasonably fast.
--
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
closesodoo/odoo#28953
Create a "Cash Rounding Method" C with
Rounding Precision: 0.05,
Rounding Strategy: Modify tax amount,
Rounding Method: DOWN.
Create an invoice I with rounding of currency C, with some tax line and nonzero
rounding.
When you now print the invoice, the tax amount is not the same,
as it shows the field "amount" instead of "amount_total".
Fix courtesy of Olivier Jossen, Braintec
opw 1909215
closesodoo/odoo#29079
* web_editor
When an user saves its website, all the animations are destroyed so that
a clean DOM is saved. This is particularly important for snippets like
the latest post one that would crash the page if not cleaned before
saving.
Two cases were found where animations were not cleaned before saving and
this is what this commit fixes:
- When an user used the undo/redo system, all animations were lost as
the DOM is recreated.
- When an user duplicated a snippet, animations were not restarted on
the cloned element.
closesodoo/odoo#29159
Steps to reproduce the bug:
Let's consider a product P with a unit price = 10
- Create a SO for two lines of the same product P
- Validate the SO and create the invoice
- Refund the invoice and validate it
- Go to Reporting > Sale report and select "Invoiced amount" as measures
Bug= -20 was displayed for the invoiced amount.
Technically, the two refund invoice lines of P were used two times in function
_compute_invoice_amount because for each SO line we catched all the refund lines
of the same product.
opw:1906445
closesodoo/odoo#29095
Suppose that a Task is added on a task via a studio customisation.
Then the _get_message_needaction method gets called on the onchange of the
toplevel task, which triggers another call to _get_message_needaction.
During that update, we get a self with a model.newID; its ids field is empty,
so the list of tasks res itself is empty.
As a result the method crashes on a malformed query.
This can in turn prevent the completion of some higher-level operation,
e.g. a state change on the task.
opw 1909043
closesodoo/odoo#29084
Have:
- Model A with a x2m to model B
- Object A with multiple objects B in x2m (that will be sorted)
- On the list view of model A, click on a column to sort by a field
- this field shall not exist in B
- open a record A (towards form view)
Before this commit, the sorting of the x2m crashed, because the key orderedBy was propagated
Due to commit e713ed2a69
After this commit, it doesn't crash
OPW 1913133
closesodoo/odoo#29094
Usecase to reproduce:
- Enable 'Managers must approve orders'
- Set agreement type as 'exclusive'
- Connect as purchase user
- Create a requisition and an RFQ linked to it
- Confirm the RFQ
It raises a usererror that ask to close other PO linked
to requisition.
It happens because the purchase requisition code do not take
care of double validation on PO. It will try to close the requisition
once button_confirm is called. However it will only write 'to approve'
on PO state and thus trigger the requistion error will be raise since
all linked PO are not 'done' or 'cancel'.
In order to fix it, the action_done on requisition should be call
on button_approve instead of button_confirm. (button_approve is
automatically called when double validation is not enable).
Task: #1884410Closes#28068closesodoo/odoo#29049
Christophe Simonis