Currently rating globally allows 3 values for customers through email
requests: 5, 3 and 1. Through other means (frontend use of rating widget)
values from 5 to 1 are possible.
Only 5 is considered as a valid value for parent container satisfaction.
This leads to strange situation where a document with 4, 4, 4 and 5 has
only 25% of satisfaction.
This is considered as a bit harsh. In this commit we move the "satisfied"
limit of parent container as being above the "ok" value (aka, 4 and 5).
X-original-commit: c884a29b6b0f2cbc8b0aebbaed93d6f211621d1d
Mainly transifex issues but also some errors found through 'grep' checks.
Fix typos and obscure english strings in xml contents, fields strings/helps, some docstrings, ...
ensuring correct translations base (and fallback when translations isn't available).
closesodoo/odoo#57276
X-original-commit: 4214f05d454bca2b60fda3a288d529c098e84f77
Related: odoo/enterprise#13053
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Lessen use of mail-specific calls and variables
SPECIFICATIONS
Use mail_new_test_user tool in tests, lessening use of mail-specific context
keys in tests.
LINKS
Task ID-2326281 (context keys use cleaning)
PR odoo/odoo#56631
PR odoo/enterprise#12707
X-original-commit: 910559c092dc7dfa00b91339a5423e16cd4668e1
Main flow tour mobile was still deactivated when #55995 was merged.
For a strange reason, a compute is called with a newId in mobile and not in the base
version of the main flow tour. This commit fixes the compute to handle such a case.
closesodoo/odoo#56281
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
In an app using rating (e.g. eLearning), get 3 ratings:
- A 5-star review
- A 3-star review
- A 0-star review
The average is 2.5 stars, while it should be 4 stars.
This happens because the 0-star review is taken into account in the
average computation, while it shouldn't. Indeed, zero star means no
review.
We apply the same login than:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0028a602bea6a48aaa2747127ec075394732b324/addons/rating/models/rating_mixin.py#L205
opw-2290617
closesodoo/odoo#54279
X-original-commit: 4f7981f80fb55ab4bf8b30d137e45b4fda4013cd
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
This commit sets attribute sample="1" in a bunch of list and
kanban views, to enable the new sample data feature when views are
empty.
Task 2232801
X-original-commit: 5471309b35619f307242c2704c7681ba63d2be42
Purpose
=======
Task 2195254 introduced many wonderful widgets to pimp the list view.
This task aims at implemeting them into the Services apps: project,
timesheets, helpdesk, expense, planning and field service.
Remaining days: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1o4Wn47445GxLqBkw-ifH9MgtFU_437xz/view
Avatar: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yDwJWP0MZCUKZbqCa8hte1ziVTYRMMtb/view
Activities: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1e_rXH50eZq4zY2HOzw7_pfgiD39SoRIl/view
Field-specific decorations: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WFnqJ-jkyDFftRHxWW4bgomoWrOpOuaY/view
More control on buttons
Specifications
==============
You will find below a list of which widgets to apply to which fields by
model. Some changes have to be done in the form/kanban views as well.
1) project.task
remaining days -> date_deadline -> list + kanban + form views
hide this field if is_closed is true
avatar -> user_id -> list view
activities -> 'next activity' field to be added -> list view
field-specific decorations
https://nimb.ws/ACewrY remove the current orange/red decorations we have
if planned_hours > 0, display the remaining_hours field in (list view):
red if progress is > 100%
orange if progress is between 80% and 100%
green if progress is <80%
display unit_amount in red if > 24:00 -> form view
2) rating.rating
display the rating in:
green = satisfied
orange = not_satisfied
red = highly_dissatisfied
list + form views
3) project.project
avatar -> user_id -> list + form views
4) account.analytic.line
avatar -> employee_id -> list view
display unit_amount in red if > 24:00 -> list + kanban + form view
https://nimb.ws/eIWa7E merge the timer and duration fields together
5) helpdesk.ticket
avatar
user_id -> list view
employee_id under timesheet_ids -> form view
remaining hours -> sla_deadline
activities -> 'next activity' field to be added -> list view
field specific decoration -> display unit_amount in red if > 24:00 -> form view
6) hr.expense
avatar -> employee_id -> list view
activities -> 'next activity' field to be added -> list view
badge -> state -> list view
draft = blue
reported = green
approved = green
done = green
refused = red
combine the unit_amount and the currency_id fields (see the total_amount field for reference) -> list view (idem for the expense_line_ids one2many on hr.expense.sheet)
display the total_amount in bold
move 'company_id' before 'amount'
7) hr.expense.sheet
avatar
employee_id -> list view
user_id -> list view
activities -> 'next activity' field to be added -> list view
badge -> state -> list view
draft = blue
submit = green
approve = green
post = green
done = green
cancel = red
display the total_amount in bold
move 'company_id' before 'amount'
8) planning.slot
avatar -> employee_id -> list view
decoration
display the allocated_percentage field in red if > 100% -> list + form view
display the forecast_hours field in red if > planned hours and if planned_hours > 0 -> form view
display the effective_hours field in red if > forecast_hours and if forecast_hours > 0 -> form view
9) misc
calendar.event -> avatar -> user_id -> form view
mail.activity.type -> combine the delay_count and delay_unit fields together -> list view
note.note -> 'next activity' field to be added -> list view
crm.lead.mining.request
combine the lead_number and lead_type fields together -> list view
display the name in bold
badge -> state
draft = blue
done = green
error = red
planning.slot.template -> display the duration field in red if it is = 0
closesodoo/odoo#51271
Taskid: 2248351
Related: odoo/enterprise#10605
Related: odoo/upgrade#1252
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
render, render_template, load, activity_schedule_with_view,
get_website_pages should all be private:
It should not be possible to render an aribtrary template only with
its name or id
Still need to render some qweb views from js so the method
render_template is kept public.
This explains why the website editor still need read access on
ir.ui.view as we want to allow any snippet to be rendered.
Purpose
=======
Even if the routes are correctly updated and the existing data is
correctly updated, the emails that were already sent to the customers
will be problematic, as we will provide a value which is not handled
anymore (10 for example).
To provide a retrocompatibility, deprecated the old route and
introduce a new one.
closesodoo/odoo#46296
Taskid: 2083096
Related: odoo/upgrade#889
Related: odoo/enterprise#10312
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
- Rename the 'Use Rating on Project' feature into 'Customer Ratings'
- Rename the 'Set Email Template to Stages' link to 'Set a Rating Email Template on Stages'
- Add an optional list view for the Stages menu
- display warning if the rating_template_id field is set and if one of the selected project_ids doesn't have the rating_status field set to true
- Project form view revamp
- rename the '% on tasks' stat button into 'Customer Satisfaction'
- Remove the 'no option' for the rating frequency field because it is required
- project form : Add a 'Go to Website' stat button
- Project dashboard: remove the 'Customer Ratings' menu item in more
- Ratings page: the 'Last 30 days' filter include ratings from today
- remove the Appointment / Helpdesk Customer Satisfaction / Live Support menu items
TASK ID : 1251
Steps to reproduce:
- install project, studio
- activate ratings for projects and create a kanban view with the rating model
(trough studio)
Previous behavior:
some images in the kanban view are not displayed
Current behavior:
all images are displayed properly
opw-2205549
closesodoo/odoo#48462
X-original-commit: 4b5691dee5a397551ca92a9ac78571ce7f82f276
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Clean dead actions.
SPECIFICATIONS
An action (action_view_rating) is used only in helpdesk who rewrites the
domain anyway. Let us use the generic rating_rating_view action
instead and remove the other unnecessary one.
LINKS
Task ID 2188942 (original)
Task ID 2196183 (Social/Marketing specific)
Community PR odoo/odoo#46435
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#8846
Issue
- Install eLearning
- Delete a rating
- Go to the course page, review tab
Only the stars disappeared.
Cause
Review = rating + message, the rating is the stars and
publisher_comment
So this is normal if the review is not completely deleted
Solution
Seen with SBU and he said that the message should be deleted
too.
OPW-2181568
closesodoo/odoo#44529
X-original-commit: 1f41c7ae9de061ec861a3a3db9c403510861cc76
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Fix the access error you could get when filtering on ratings when not logged
in or when the user has no rights to access ratings.
How to reproduce: filter on channel review ratings in eLearning frontend
when being anonymous le portal.
As rating is a technical model, we have to first retrieve messages linked
to that rating value and afterwards return a new domain used to build
the final search.
Task ID : 2167776
PR : #42847closesodoo/odoo#44380
X-original-commit: 7a241e9c21046dababc2744dd94b0c47e2d8a931
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Without demo data, for the odoo-master transifex project
closesodoo/odoo#41935
X-original-commit: dab7670b73506fb3a835695ee3bd735e0c5e5c2b
Related: odoo/enterprise#7287
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Followup of a425695e
The terms were back in 12.0
Courtesy of Juan José Scarafía
closesodoo/odoo#41624
X-original-commit: 85d0c7001a997748d7691205bbb8d066597591a5
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit is to add some missing fields in message view, notably
is_internal newly added flag and its ratings. Rating form view is also
updated to display is_internal flag, and form view is a bit reorganized.
Task ID 2071556
PR #38692
PURPOSE
Clean posting process and improve mail.message definition and comprehension.
SPECIFICATIONS
Website mail defines a website_published field allowing to publish / unpublish
comments on the frontend of some modules. This field has several drawbacks :
* it is used only for front-end people (portal, public) and has no real
effect in chatter / classic discussions;
* it is used only in some advanced front-end module and is not available
in portal by default;
* its naming is not really correct as it is not linked to fields coming
from the website_published mixin and its behavior is not really
the same;
* its use is a bit duplicated with internal flag coming from subtype
allowing to hide messages related to an internal subtype;
* there are overrides of standard mail.message methods just to handle
this flag;
In this commit we change that field by an is_internal flag directly on
mail.message model itself. It tells if share people (customers, share users)
are allowed to read the message. This field can be given through posting
API or set manually using widgets. It is also used in access rights custom
methods and managed like the internal flag of subtypes.
Mailgateway was already using an internal flag for internal note replies. It
is renamed to is_internal and propagated as it is now a standard field. It
also eases code understanding.
Portal is updated to allow managing the flag directly. It means customer portal
now natively allows to moderate customer comments without any need of website
modules.
Rating is updated accordingly. An is_internal field is added, replacing the
related on website published.
LINKS
Task ID 2071556
PR #38692
PURPOSE
Clean posting process and improve mail.message definition and comprehension.
SPECIFICATIONS
In order to be more explicit subtype parameter is renamed to subtype_xmlid.
It therefore clearly indicates it should be a valid subtype Xml ID. Support
of ill formatted Xml IDs is removed because there is no reason to try to
add some random prefix. Give something that exists or go to hell, punk !
LINKS
Task ID 2071556
PR #38692
PURPOSE
Rating model should be available only for internal users. External users
access them only through dedicated routes or controllers using sudo and/or
granting access through tokens. Therefore simplifying ACLs should be feasible.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove access to rating.rating for public and portal users. Only employees
can access it, with full access given to system admins.
Update various functional flows to use sudo() and check that access is
verified before using sudo.
Impacted modules
* rating / mail: add groups on some rating related fields as only
internal users should access them now;
* rating / mail: set some statistics fields using compute_sudo as their
value should be accessible for external people even without access to
the underlying rating.rating records;
* project: makes some use of rating and has to be updated, notably for
the public rating page;
* website_{livechat, rating, slides}: add sudo in public routes as access
is already granted;
* website_slides: set statistics field using compute_sudo as their
value should be accessible for external people;
TASK ID 2053096
PR #36592
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Before this commit, when user land after clicking on the smiley in the
e-mail for rating, user cannot change its rating. Its click limits the
available choice.
Now users will be able to choose rating and write feedback before submitting
its rating.
Task ID 1936849
Closes PR #33979
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Shreya Thakrar<sht@odoo.com>
en_US may not be activated as it is possible to create a database in
another language using the database manager.
When trying to install a chart of account, the tax return entry tried
to format a date at the installation of the module, with no lang in
the context. The fallback was made on en_US but an error is raised if
that language is not activated.
As it is a very common scenario to retrieve a language from the
context, add a generic tool method to do it.
Replace and closesodoo/odoo#37629closesodoo/odoo#37568
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
It's a non sense to be able to write on rating_last_image/feedback field as it is a related
to a computed field based on the last rating, given by someone.
We should not even try to corrupt data !
Task ID: 2076656
PR #37511
Currently if we try to display image of a rating having a different value of
0/1/5/10 there is an infinite loading. Indeed images for rating are limited
to those values.
In this commit we fix that by computing a rounded value to find the closest
image.
Text display in form view is also centered for better wow onboarding back 2
basics demo usability fiximp effect.
Purpose is to set review message on both message and rating so that reviews
are correctly displayed in eLearning backend as well as correctly displayed
in chatter frontend.
Task ID 2058595
PR #36281
Purpose of this commit is to
* delete rating when deleting message. Otherwise rating coming from
frontend portal review chatter are lost in the void;
* allow system users to delete ratings;
Task ID 2058595
PR #36281
PURPOSE
Allow publishers to add a comment on frontend reviews with ratings. Purpose
is to allow to give some feedback or context on published reviews.
SPECIFICATIONS
In order to answer to a rating message (review) of a course (eLearning) or a
product (eCommerce) we add a way to the publisher to directly comment a review
inside the website rating chatter.
Any publisher can add/edit/remove comment of a rating message from the website.
The goal is not to enter into a discussion but just to give a feedback. This
comment is not sent or propagated to anyone, just displayed for information
purpose.
In portal chatter
* add 1 button below a review "Comment" (for publishers of the website only)
* only one comment possible by review/rating
* when the comment is added, display
* author name, date, comment
* 2 buttons, only visible by the website publisher: edit and delete
LINKS
Task ID : 2026911
closesodoo/odoo#35956
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Nasreddin (bon)