This branch introduces a large-scale reorganization of the
component tree generated by the web client. The short version is
that now, the control panel is a child of the view controller and
no longer a sibling. Graphically (and simplified), we go from
this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
/ \
controlPanel viewController
/ \
to this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
|
viewController
/ | \
ControlPanelController
/ \
CPRenderer CPModel
The motivation is that this work moves the code where it should be.
Before this commit, it was kind of weird to have code in the
controllers to render buttons outside of their root node (in
renderButtons). Also, the action manager had to take care of
coordinating search view states between view transitions.
So, this work simplifies the code. It also makes it easier to
extend. We see day after day that Odoo needs to take care of more
complex UI needs, and in many cases, these needs were quite
difficult to implement (we prefer spaghettis in our plates, not in
our code). The changes in this branch should open the way to
implement these features.
For example,
- it will now be easy to add the possibility of views (for example,
the search view or a new ControlPanel view) to add custom buttons
(of type action or object) in the control panel.
- Another need will be to serialize/ restore the state of the
search view across action boundaries (needed by the dashboard).
- Another example is the possibility for views to customize easily
the presence/absence of sub menus (filters/groupbys/favorites/
time range/...)
- Another need is an easier way for views/client action to customize
their control panel.
This commit also contains a large rewrite of the search view (so it
is more inline with our architecture and easier to maintain).
Part of task 1893568
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172
Have:
- Model A with a x2m to model B
- Object A with multiple objects B in x2m (that will be sorted)
- On the list view of model A, click on a column to sort by a field
- this field shall not exist in B
- open a record A (towards form view)
Before this commit, the sorting of the x2m crashed, because the key orderedBy was propagated
Due to commit e713ed2a69
After this commit, it doesn't crash
OPW 1913133
closesodoo/odoo#29094
Steps:
- open a modal form view from tree view first line and make a change
- open a modal from the second line and make a change
- open the second line back: the change were lost
In a given number of conditions (a many2one inside the form view, there
is a one2many in the form view not inside the tree view, ....) this
happened because:
- when we save the first line, we get onchange data for the second one
- this onchange data can't be applied before second line is loaded, but
it is saved so it can be applied if second line is ever opened
- when the second line is opened the saved change is applied => OK
- when the second line is opened a second time the saved change is
applied again, possibly overwriting posterious change => BAD
With this changeset, when the record with unapplied onchange is loaded
for the first time, the unapplied onchange is applied only once.
Added test without the change failed with:
- only 1 turtle for second partner (result: 0 not 1)
- second partner turtle is Michelangelo (result: "" not "Michelangelo")
opw-1846820
closes#28644
This rev. introduces robust helpers to use in the JS tests suite to
interact with DOM and components, and starts using them (almost)
everywhere.
All the helpers are exposed though testUtils.js.
There are 2 kinds of helpers:
1. Assertions
-------------
* assert.containsNone, containsN, containsOnce check that the DOM
(or a specific part of the DOM) contains a `selector`. It
generates a correct error message automatically.
ex: assert.strictEqual(form.$('.o_form_editable'), 1, "msg");
-> assert.containsOnce(form, '.o_form_editable');
* assert.isVisible, isNotVisible check that the DOM has an element
visible or not. They also check that the element is actually in
the DOM (before most tests didn't verify this).
* assert.hasClass, doesNotHaveClass, hasAttrVAlue, check specific
properties of a DOM element, and also validate that it is
applied on a single existing DOM element (before most tests
didn't verify this).
ex: assert.notOk(form.$('button').hasClass('btn-primary'));
-> assert.doesNotHaveClass(form.$('button'), 'btn-primary');
2. Utilities
------------
The goal of the utilities is to centralize the definition of many
standard components and interactions, ensuring that when we
refactor the JS framework, we do not need to change all the tests.
Existing mock utilities (addMockEnvironment, intercept, path,
patchDate, unpatch and fieldsViewGet) are moved to
'testUtils.mock.*'.
Existing DOM utilities are moved to 'testUtils.dom.*'.
New dom utilities are created for opendDatePicker, click,
clickFirst and clickLast. Helper `click` verifies that there is
exactly 1 element visible in the DOM you click on, `clickFirst`
and `clickLast` verify that there are more than one element on the
DOM.
ex: form.$('button').click();
-> testUtils.dom.click(form.$('button'));
New Form utilities: (testUtils.form.*)
clickEdit, clickSave, clickCreate, clickDiscard, all clicks on
the control panel buttons of the form.
`reload` reloads the form data.
New modal, graph, kanban and pivot utils (testUtils.pivot.*,
testUtils.kanban.*, etc.).
New fields utils: (testUtils.fields.*)
* editInput, editSelect: allow to change the value of a field,
using a selector to identify it. They validate that the input
exists and trigger the change event automatically.
* editAndTrigger: allow to modify a field and trigger specific
events after the value change
* many2one (testUtils.fields.many2one.*)
clickOpenDropdown, clickHighlightedItem, clickItem,
searchAndClickItem: use a field name instead of a selector and
do all the complex mechanism to open, filter and highlight
many2one fields.
Joint work with aab, dam, ged, mge, svs and vsc.
The file relation_fields_tests.js was a huge 12K lines files for which some editors have a
hard time managing.
We have split it in 4 files to be more managable and removed remove unused data
and import.
closesodoo/odoo#28561
Suppose you are editing a SO to add a new line. Depending on the configuration,
a sale order line wizard may open (e.g. if packages are activated).
This wizard is a form view, opened from the tree view of the sale order lines.
We have commit 8e5156938a
that adds extra fields from the originating view.
(However it doesn't work if the other view is inlined, so we modify this part to
add the extra field even in this case.)
Then we need the field info from the origin view in the target view;
we do so by extending the former with the content of the latter.
opw 1904337
closesodoo/odoo#28441
Define a x2m tree view with a default_sort including more than 1 field to order the list against
Before this commit, the second field was never used
After this commit, it is used
OPW 1909785
closesodoo/odoo#28840
Let's assume a form view with field A and B (a one2many list), with
a column with attrs column_invisible depending on A.
If the user sets A manually, everything works fine (the column is
hidden/shown directly). However, if A is updated by an onchange
(e.g. depending on the number of rows in B), it doesn't. This
rev. fixes that issue.
Related to Issue: 1851451
Co-authored-by: Priyanka Kaakdiya <pka@odoo.com>
When a view is loaded, it checks which fields it has to load.
In the case of a many2one, it could be the case that a context key is present in
one view and not in the other; if it happens, we should reload the data, as a
name_get result could vary.
opw 1891295
closesodoo/odoo#28298
Before this commit, when loading the data and calling the prostprocess,
the viewType was not correctly passed which could lead to broken
behaviour. For example, if one was to load a record from a list view
embedded in a form view, the viewtype passed was the list which
prevented to load the data from the form view.
OPW 1891295
closesodoo/odoo#28279
Let's assume a one2many editable list containing a many2one field
(e.g. in a sales order, the product_id m2o in order_line o2m), and
the scenario where the user clicks on 'Create and Edit' in the o2m,
and then presses ESCAPE in the opened dialog.
Before this rev., it crashed because the 'navigation_move' (cancel)
event wasn't stop propagated by the form renderer (the one of the
dialog), and thus bubbled up to the list editable renderer, which
asked its basic model to discard a record it didn't know.
Note: same fix as in 8445baa (done in saas-11.3), but with a
simpler test.
Task 1878254
Before this commit, the compute sequence was relying on the fact the ID was used
as a secondary order key to get the right result.
This is necessary when adding items between pages because we don't resequence
the following elements.
However this was not necessary when adding new elements on the last page since
there are no following elements to resesquence in that case.
PR: #27639
stopPropagation of navigation_move event for where direction=cancel,
currently if navigation_move event throws error when user press escape
in dialog where dialog is opened from editable list record
Scenario: Install website_sale -> Open Product form(variant enable) ->
open variant tab -> open Attribute m2o form popup and press Escape on dialog
Result: Error
Expected: It should close dialog and keep editable list view record open,
btw m2o field should also be focused when dialog is closed but that's
another issue, will be fixed in another ongoing task
Related to Issue: #1873919
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when we click on the 1st control in
an editable list (usually 'Add an item') then press ESCAPE,
the focus was not on the 1st control.
The intended behaviour is to have the focus on the 1st control,
so that we may navigate left/right between controls solely with
the keyboard.
With this commit, when a cancel keyboard navigation event is
triggered in an editable list, it auto-sets the focus on the
first control.
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
This commit fixes a few issues with the previous implementation of the
automatic addition of new lines in x2many inside forms
1. Before this commit, when there is a change of mode in a formview
`edit` -> `readonly` -> `edit`, there may be some cases that
mistakenly and automatically opens a modal.
This case occurs in a form view with a x2many field whose 1st inner
focusable element opens a modal (e.g. "Add an item").
In `edit` mode:
1. Open this modal from the x2many
2. Close the modal
3. Change mode to `readonly`
4. Change mode to `edit`
> the same modal is automatically open.
This is due to the tracking of the last activated field that persists
after a change of mode. Since the last activated field in the 1st
`edit` is the x2many, it is granted the focus at the beginning of the
2nd `edit`, which automatically opens the modal.
This commit fixes the issue by resetting the tracking of the last
activated field when there is a change of mode. As a result, at the
beginning of the 2nd `edit`, the focus should always be on the 1st
field.
2. Before this commit, if the focus was moved out of the form (to a modal
for instance) then back, the form would re-activate the last field, which
is the x2many and would re-add a new line. This behavior is not correct
and now going back from a modal to a form does not add a new line.
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
Before this change, when the focus was on the first field on a x2many
field, and the user pressed TAB, the line would be discarded and the
focus moved to the next field (at the level of the x2many) in the form.
This was an issue because if the first field was required, the focus
could not be moved out of the field with TAB so the user had to discard
the line manually (with ESC) before moving to the next field
This change works with 2 changes:
1. detecting if a line is dirty (has been modified by the user) and at
the end of the line, decide to either
- discard the line and move the next field, if the line is not dirty
- commit the line and add a new line, if the line is dirty
2. allow users to use TAB through required field inside x2many so they
can easilly go to the end of the line.
Task id : 1872248
This rev. is similar to db9b91ff, but treats the x2many case.
Calls to the 'commitChange' function of renderers must not be done
inside a mutex, mainly since 241704536, as they could end up in a
deadlock. For x2manys, it was actually the case in practice in
Inventory > Operations > Inventory Adjustments > Create > select
'One product only' > select a product > try to edit the real
quantity in the editable list > focusout > deadlock.
The reason why the deadlock occurred in this view and not in, e.g.
sale.order, is due to the presence of the field_float_scannable
widget. Indeed, the barcode engine intercepts input events and
manually re-triggers them. As a consequence, the 'change' event is
not triggered on the field, and it does not notify the environment
of its new value by itself, until the field x2many asks it to
commit its value. Note that this might be an issue as well, as
onchanges are thus not triggered.
Task 1878254
Rev. f241441 recently added the possibiliy to define custom
controls (instead of the single 'Add a line') in editable list
views. However, it didn't take into account keyboard navigation.
Suppose that the focus is on the field preceeding the list, and
the user clicks on TAB, the code assumed that there was only one
control, and focused it. However, when there were several control,
the last one was focused (which is typically the less common one),
and there was no way to navigate to the others.
This rev. focuses the first control by default, and allows to
navigate through controls with RIGHT and LEFT. Pressing TAB still
moves out of the list, to the next field.
Note that i'm not happy with this fix, as the logic doesn't seem
to be in the right place. Indeed, the notion of controls is the
concern of the editable list, not the x2many field, so the list
should handle this logic by itself. Unfortenately, this is not that
easy to change, as for now the list doesn't even know that we are
navigating to/from its control(s), until we click on it/them.
Changing that will be for later, in master.
We also did a linting pass on the concerned code.
Task 1878254
Before this rev., if the user clicked on a tag to open the color
picker, and then clicked in the dropdown, but not on a color, the
color picker closed itself, and it was no longer possible to open
it again.
This issue came with the migration to BS4 and its following fixes.
As the color picker is now a classical BS dropdown, it closes
itself automatically, so we don't need to manually close it on
focusout.
Task 1878254.
Suppose you select a customer for a sale order.
You type the beginning of his name "think", and a name_search is triggered
which finds matching results, with first result "Think Big Systems".
There are three ways to select it: click, enter or tab.
Now there can be a warning set on this customer
("Bad client, only accept cash", or "good client, offer discount").
In that case, clicking on tab would trigger the onchange displaying the warning,
but it would also set floating to true, which means a dialog to create client
"think" would appear.
This happens if the onchange is delayed, and thus the call to reset the floating
state is triggered only after the focusout completed, instead of before.
Coauthored with @aab-odoo
opw 1866619
opw 1874475
289adeb63f introduced a bug where we tried to trigger an event on an element that didn't exist. Indeed there is no input if it's not in edit mode.
This commit fixes it.
PR: none
Task: none
When there is no handle field, there was an unnecessary margin-left. When there was a handle field, the margin-left wasn't the correct way to align it.
PR: #26566
Task: 1869469
* mail, calendar
- Fix traceback when clicking on a tag without color field (introduced
in recent changes)
- Properly allow to delete tags on firefox (a button obviously cannot
contain another button)
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/26547
Thanks to @hbh-odoo
In a one2many, pressing ENTER or TAB from a required input (of type text or char) that is on the last editable column of its line would fail to navigate to next line.
The issue was that the validation of the required field would happen before the change to its value was actually applied.
This commit fixes it.
PR: #26430
Task: 1869469
This rev. allows to navigate, in mobile, through records in form
views by swiping.
We also moved mobile-specific tests involving a form view to the
mobile test suite, since those tests became async because of the
lazy loading of the swipe lib (in the mobile suite, that lib is
already loaded).
Related to task #34727
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
Currently, to remove link of x2m field from any record, sometimes there's no way.
For example, if we are on mobile and open any Quotation, it's linked quotation lines
are automatically converted in kanban, and there is no way to delete a line from
that quotation. However, in some of the manually designed kanban, there is special 'x'
for removing / unlinking x2m record, for example, Contacts of Partner.
This commit makes the behavior more consistent. During edition (mobile and desktop), if
a view dialog is opened on click of x2m field, it will have one 'Remove' button (based
on user rights) on right side of dialog footer, allowing users to delete / unlink the
record. Moreover, in mobile, the modal is opened fullscreen, with sticky header and
footer.
Related Task# : 31641
Closes PR #15857
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
example: <field name="product_id" options="{'no_open': True}" readonly="1"/>
This has been broken by rev. 43d21dd9c due to misplaced parentheses
(an empty object in javascript being truthy).
From this rev., the empty value isn't available in the options of
required selection fields, thus preventing the user to unset it.
Related to task #49262Closes#24404
