Purpose
=======
Purpose of this commit is to add a new group for the mail template designer.
Goal is to make roles clearer: managers edit templates, users use them. This
commit allow some designers / managers to make email template and to let
others users use those email templates.
Specifications
==============
When this feature is enabled in the Settings page, a new group is required to
modify email templates in a composer like wizard or to make dynamic content.
This allows to separate managers editing / composing templates from standard
users that use them.
If the current does not have this group, the email body will be in readonly
mode if he selected an email template. That way we force him to use the email
template that the manager made.
Technical
=========
New Group
---------
Only users in this group will be able to create / write email template or
to write Jinja code in the mail composer (including other fields like subject
in mailing).
By default, all internal users have this group. Mass mailing users also have
this group as writing mailings is about the same management level as writing
templates.
Mail Composer Mixin
-------------------
In comment mode, the template is rendered and then saved on the body field
so non-"Mail Template Editor" users can load email templates.
But in mass mode, the body of the template is saved and then rendered and
many things change the body (HTML sanitizer, web editor move inline CSS
properties, add / remove spaces...). So in this case, we can not know if
the user changed the body or not. That is why we put the body field in
readonly mode so, it is not modified by the web editor.
Jinja code detection
--------------------
To detect dynamic Jinja content, we compile the template, and we browse the
AST. If we do not have a single "Template Data" node, we assume that the
template is dynamic.
When we detect the template as static, we do not render it. That way we
avoid unnecessary rendering.
Code cleaning
-------------
Move Jinja import into tools so that it is outside of mail framework code.
Task-2187263
closesodoo/odoo#75840
Related: odoo/enterprise#20547
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
* = crm_livechat, hr, hr_holidays, im_livechat, mail_bot, purchase, sms,
snailmail, survey, test_discuss_full, test_mail, web_editor, website,
website_livechat
- Create new model `mail.guest` for guests.
- Rewrite some RPCs to target routes rather than model methods so that
guests are able to use them.
- Patch JS and python models to support guests.
- Create a stand-alone page and boot the channel in it.
task-2494829
closesodoo/odoo#75496
Related: odoo/enterprise#20417
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
- Channels
* "hash tag" avatar with different backgroud colors
* only private channels have lock thread icon
- DM groups
* "users" avatar with different background colors
* no thread icon
task-2584994
closesodoo/odoo#75653
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
The commit is to refactor the discuss sidebar
- threads are now organized in categories based on the thread type e.g. chat, channel
- categories can be folded or unfolded by clicking the category title
- for active thread, even if the category is folded, it remains under the category title
- for channel category, a new cog button is added to view all channels
- the active indicator bar is removed. The active item now is highlighted with a different background color
- thread avatar is used for livechat, chat and channel
- for livechat and chat, threads are now sorted by last activity time (pin or message exchange)
closesodoo/odoo#70986
Task-id: 2440073
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Purpose is to better understand the use of email_re regex (find emails in a
text) and email_split_tuples (find name and email in a string used in email
headers or as email_from / email_to / email_cc).
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
Since a few time, test_mail holds tests linked to specific test models.
Generic testing of mail features are located in mail. Followup of fix done
in 12 and forward ported until odoo/odoo@b7af68590e
Also rename test_mass_mailing_server.py unit test file to test_mailing_server
to match current naming of files.
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
PURPOSE
=======
We want to increase the score of the emails sent by Odoo and we want to
avoid them to be marked as spam by the mail clients (gmail, outook...).
SPECIFICATIONS
===============
From filter
-----------
Add a new field on the "ir.mail_server" which is "from_filter". This
field defines the email address for which the outgoing email server can
be used.
The "from_filter" can either define an email address or a domain name.
Use the system parameter "mail.default.from" which allow us to define
a default email address which is used to encapsulate the emails
(default: notifications@<catch.all.domain>).
Mail server priorities
----------------------
When sending an email, we read the FROM header and,
- We first look for a mail server which match the entire mail FROM
in that case, we do not change the email header (not needed)
- If not found, we search a mail server which matches the domain name of
the mail from (do not need to change the headers in that case)
- If not found, find the mail server linked to the "notifications"
email (defined in the system parameter). Then change the FROM header
to the notification email, and put the old one in the name part of
this header.
E.g.
Initial mail from: "Admin" < admin@example.com >
Final mail from: "Admin (admin@odoo.com)" < notifications@odoo.com >
- If no notification email is configured or if no mail server are
found for the notification email, fallback to the old system and
spoof the FROM header. In that case we do not have the choice if we
want to send the email, he will probably be marked as spam.
Sending method priority
-----------------------
In the mail server models, we defined some priorities,
1. Forced SMTP session
2. Forced mail server
3. Try to find the best mail server (see "Mail server priorities")
4. If not found, read the odoo-bin arguments
Bounce
------
As there's no standard for bounce address, we put it in the envelope
(smtp_from). But in some case, it might be considered as spoofing. So,
we use the bounce address ONLY if the mail server is configured for the
entire domain name.
One behavior which might be broken is the following; we send an email as
"std@gmail.com" and the bounce address is on the domain "odoo.com".
Before we received the bounce notifications but we were spoofing the
local part and the domain.
Now
- if a mail server is configured for GMAIL, we do not use the bounce
address (and we might not receive the bounce notification)
- if no mail server is configured for GMAIL, but one is configured for
"odoo.com"
- the FROM header will be "notifications@odoo.com"
- the FROM envelope will be the bounce address
=> In this situation we are spoofing only the local part of the email
but it's allowed as the mail server is configured for the entire
domain name
LINKS
=====
Task-2367946
odoo/odoo#61853odoo/upgrade#1903
In order to limit encoding decoding, the _render method returns a
unicode string in the markup safe object instead of a MarkupSafeBytes
closesodoo/odoo#68299
Related: odoo/upgrade#2454
Related: odoo/enterprise#17270
Signed-off-by: Antony Lesuisse (al) <al@openerp.com>
Opportunity is taken to clean the various follow/join/invite methods into only
one `add_members` method.
Part of task-2360169
closesodoo/odoo#74425
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Remove the "email_send" field on the <mail.channel> (mass_mailing named
on the JS side).
This feature will be introduced with a new model (<mail.group>) in a
new module in the next commit.
Remove the email notification support on the channel, so now the mail
channels work only by chat.
Remove the "subject" on the Discuss side because this was used only on
"email" channel.
Technical
=========
In the mail channel model we can drop the usage of the blacklist as well
as the usage of the "email_to" field. Those two features were mainly
used for mailing list and have no utility for "chat like" channel.
Links
=====
Task-2510267
See odoo/odoo/pull/71599
See odoo/enterprise/pull/19296
See odoo/upgrade/pull/2600
Rationale
=========
Currently, mail channels have 2 modes
- They can be used like Discuss channel (chat, livechat, group)
- They can be used like a Mailing List (with the "email_send" field)
The mix of both feature in the same model causes some code complexity.
Several fields are not used in both cases (moderation related field)
and the future "Discord like" Discuss will even push the mail channel
further than the usage of the mailing list.
Because of all those reasons, we want to split the 2 mains features of
the mail channels into 2 different modules and models.
Purpose
=======
This commit remove the moderation feature of the mail channel
(email_send=True). This will be re-implemented in a separate module
in the next commit.
Do not be able to check messages in Discuss anymore because this
feature is only used to moderate the message and this feature will be
spitted in a new module "mail_group".
Links
=====
Task-2510267
See odoo/odoo/pull/71599
See odoo/enterprise/pull/19296
See odoo/upgrade/pull/2600
Purpose of this commit is to prepare ground for future improvements by already
supporting QWeb rendering in ``mail.render.mixin``.
We temporarily support new field parameters allowing to tune the rendering
directly from field. Notaby choosing engine (jinja or qweb) can be done
from field directly. This is considered as experimental, used mainly to
prepare QWeb support.
Task ID-2534550 (Template usage improvement)
Task ID-2477164 (Composer mixin)
Prepares Task ID-27033 (QWeb in templates)
COM PR odoo/odoo#70889
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#18352
Currently ``mail.render.mixin`` offers rendering tools, some of them being
based on a ``model`` field. It allows to know which model to use to fetch
records on which we perform rendering. However this field is not defined at
mixin level but in inheriting models without being clearly implemented that
way (see ``mail.template`` or ``sms.template`` models).
In order to clean this mixin it is now defined at mixin level, using a
not stored computed field allowing to define how to find this model. Sub
models are updated accordingly.
Other cleaning is done in the render mixin
* rename ``_render_template_qweb`` to ``_render_template_qweb_view``
to indicate it works on views, not on raw qweb templates;
* extract some common available variables for rendering in a method then
called / upated for jinja and qweb views;
* correctly set same rendering context for jinja and qweb views rendering;
* allow to propagate an additional context from _render_field to sub
rendering methods;
* allow to propagate options through rendering methods (notably for escaping
or safe attributes in jinja);
* allow to specify engine used to render lang;
* clean or update some docstrings;
Some tests are also added, as render mixin lacks some more detailed test to
ensure various use cases will be correctly migrated to other engines like
QWeb.
Task ID-2534550 (Template usage improvement)
Task ID-2477164 (Composer mixin)
Prepares Task ID-27033 (QWeb in templates)
COM PR odoo/odoo#70889
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#18352
Co-Authored-By: Stéphane Debauche <std@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Bug
===
Since 4da64b3f3c , if multiple users of
different companies are in the same channel, and if the type of the
channel is "email", a traceback is raised when sending a message.
Technical
=========
"with_user" drop the SU flag and is not enough to bypass the multi
company ACLs. Moreover, we do not want to send a "channel_seen" bus
notifications and we can mark the message as seen on the JS side
directly.
Changes
=======
So now, the traceback is not raised anymore in that case, and the
message is marked as seen if the receiver has the web client open.
But, if the receiver has not the web client open, when he will login,
the message will not be marked as seen. This can be improved but at the
moment we just want to revert the fix that cause the traceback and fix
the issue in most cases.
Task 2427790
closesodoo/odoo#71320
X-original-commit: 8b5de95bea0087c48d17f40847750eb31fe97caf
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose of this commit is to add tests related to answers through mail gateway
when having reply-to mode of mailing set to either updating existing threads
(aka replying on mailed records), either creating new threads (aka using the
reply-to alias configuration).
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
PURPOSE
Purpose is to have more tests when sending mail mailings, notably about
canceled or failed mails or sms as well as jinja and links rendering.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we improve Email Marketing mailing tests. We notably
* add tests for void and invalid email and numbers. It allows to check they
correctly update their trace status;
* add tests for unsubscribe and view links embedded in mass mailing emails;
* add tests to simulate a click on links sent through mass mailing and
ensure click statistics are effectively updated;
* add tests to simulate bounce emails coming back to the mail gateway;
Default content of mailings used in test is updated to ensure jinja is
correctly rendered, including links and some corner cases. This will also
helps ensuring behavior is kept when converting to QWeb.
Various docstrings are added to helpers and custom asserts.
LINKS
Task ID-2508643
Followup of odoo/odoo#68874 (improve mail tests)
Prepares Task ID-27033 (support QWeb in templates)
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (clean trace and status management in mass mailing)
COM PR odoo/odoo#69461
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17780
X-original-commit: 7b940ad46bde30f9bf16837f7bff5a70cd88c640
When using assertMailMailWEmails custom assert we now check that a sent
mail.mail matches a sent email. It allows to have a complete check from
mailing traces to sent emails.
Task ID-2500615
COM PR odoo/odoo#68874
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17558
X-original-commit: 59da8627e0d732b12fb98faa6e66e43b8c75dc9c
PURPOSE
Add some tests for ``mail.render.mixin`` in order to assert its base behavior.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add tests for
* jinja rendering tools;
* QWeb rendering tools;
* translation support;
Also add tests for jinja markers: block, variable and line statement markers
should be tested.
Also improve docstrings of tool methods. Add notably explanation of parameters
and better explain methods purpose.
LINKS
Task ID-2500615
Prepares Task ID-2484296 (improve markers use in Jinja)
Prepares Task ID-27033 (support QWeb in templates)
COM PR odoo/odoo#68874
X-original-commit: f3dba8e020a0be72321427ed839b80ad77386946
In this commit we backport some of 14.1+ improvements done in mail tools
in order to keep a coherent definition through sub versions. We also
improve docstring and add some explanations on available toold and asserts.
Task ID-2500615
COM PR odoo/odoo#68874
X-original-commit: d44c47697389866603f28ff2d5da60a97574ec5f
This commits is a bit a followup of odoo/odoo#62061 where new composer tests
were added. This commit finalize this work by merging all composer related
tests within the same file. It also backports some of tooling update done
in odoo/odoo#64459 or odoo/odoo#63677 in order to have coherent naming
through 14+ versions.
Some additional or deeper tests are added. Notably it now more cleanly
uses asserts for created mail.mail and sent emails.
Task ID-2500615
COM PR odoo/odoo#68874
X-Original-Commit odoo/odoo@67f31cbfcd
X-original-commit: e147ca2eb51a7008251f20f134bd021a1ae3705c
Before the commit, `_action_unfollow()` can be called by
`_message_receive_bounce()` and then multiple leave notifications
can be sent even if the partner has been removed from the channel,
when the partner is a follower of the channel and without a
valid email address.
Unfollow action should also remove the partner from the followers,
and only be processed if the partner is still a member of the channel.
Task id: 2456233
closesodoo/odoo#68314
X-original-commit: 5cf22425eb68f15d94a8b283c50198561bbc240a
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
In this commit we improve event communication scheduling tests. We make tests
more detailed and use mail tools to ensure content. We also check scheduled
dates and use freezegun to ease date management.
Related to Task ID-2414658
COM PR odoo/odoo#68158
X-original-commit: 1a66d9cb57dc17b697b7a56effa91de3a4b50bd7
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we force messages to belong to a single document using
``model`` / ``res_id`` pair. It is not possible anymore to link a message
to channels using ``channel_ids``. A message belongs to a document and
is displayed in that document's chatter.
This change implies modifying a lot of domains, notably in chatter. Indeed
discuss for channels does not use ``('channel_ids', 'in', [3])`` domains.
They now use ``('model', '=', 'mail.channel'), ('res_id', 'in', [3])`` like
other documents fetching their messages.
This commit also removes ``channel_message_ids`` field on ``mail.channel``
model. As channels are now considered as standard documents they will use
``message_ids`` field like all other documents. Linking a channel on a message
is possible only as a link in message from now on. It is not possible to push
it into a channel anymore (no more listener channels, no more channel link).
Finally a global cleaning also linked to all previous commits is done.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``message_channel_ids`` field from ``mail.thread``. As we removed
support of (un)subscribing channel-based followers there is no need anymore
to have a field to access them. We can now safely remove this field as it
has no use anymore.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``channel_ids`` argument and support from ``message_subscribe`` and
``message_unsubscribe`` API. Indeed we do not support adding channel-based
followers anymore. Only partners should be added or removed from followers.
It also allows to simplify API and understanding of both methods.
Various addons are updated to match the simplified (un)subscribe API. Some
enterprise addons may also be impacted.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
Support mentioning partners on channels like done on other documents. When
there is an user input (comment or email) that mentions someone that specific
recipient is not notified. Its notification will be done in Inbox or email
depending on its choice or customer state.
This feature somehow replaces the follower-based support that is now removed
on channels. It allows to ping people and send them notifications. It is
less broad (limited to a post with ping) but already gives flexibility when
using channels.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models..
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we remove the auto-follow mechanism on mail.channel. It is
used as a trick to have self-notifying channels. When posting on a channel
it listens itself. When a channel listens to a record its members are notified
depending on channel type. It means that a channel following itself notifies
its members in a magic way.
We decided to remove this magic and instead do a cleaner implementation of
this mechanism. ``_notify_compute_recipients`` method from ``mail.thread`` is
now overridden on channel model. It computes recipients to notify using a
custom SQL instead of the generic one given by ``mail.thread``. Some other
code adaptation is done to ensure notification on channel model is done as
intended on that specific model.
As channel model is somewhat different from classic mail.thread enabled
models let us implement its features in a more traditional way. More overrides
and less magic !
QUERY COUNTERS
Due to changes in ``channel_partner_ids`` fields being a computed inverse
searchable field there may be an additional query when performing a message
post as indicated by ``test_complete_message_post`` test. This is due notably
to message_format fetching channel_ids information. A call to ir rules on
channel is performed that uses ``channel_partner_ids`` as part its rule domain.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose of this commit is to better differentiate channel members technical
model from partner members in code :
* ``channel_partner_ids``: contacts member of a channel, filtering notably
on active and checking ACLs on res.partner business model. This one
should be used whenever we deal with members of a channel at business
level;
* ``channel_last_seen_partner_ids``: memberships of a channel and technical
model. This one should be used for internal processes and members
management;
Also containing
* clean naming or API of methods managing channel members. This should
not change anything functionally as only code renaming / cleaning is
performed;
* improve performances of channel member auto subscription by aggregating
all members to add and creating them at once;
* check the use of ``mail.channel.partner`` and ``res.partner`` records
through ``channel_last_seen_partner_ids`` and ``channel_partner_ids``
Channel fields;
Functionally nothing should change with this commit. It only cleans code
in order to prepare future modifications.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
Purpose is to use available tools, easier for debug and asserts than doing
everything manually. It prepares future changes in channel model that may
have an impact on bus notifications.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
Before this commit:
When deleting/archiving any user, the user’s related chat changed name due to
losing one of its members.
After this commit:
Chat name should remain the same after archiving/deleting the user.
Reasoning:
The unsubscribe was meant to target channels of type channel specifically.
`test_channel_auto_unsubscribe_archived_or_deleted_users` has been reintroduced
after having been removed by mistake in eda542c82f84d7b5589846691b9cb6b7f1021947
task-2442235
closesodoo/odoo#67884
X-original-commit: cb4bd4cbc4a36276cc6c9cb68e51c260e7c0d761
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Behavior before the commit
--------------------------
find_or_create define in mail module called
super if no partner is found based on the email_normalized
super call find_or_create define in base that make
a search again on the email before the creation
This cost two search every time a new partner should be created
and the search on email is less efficient than the search on
email_normalized
after the commit
----------------
Only the search on email_normalized is done before the creation
drawback: if a module that does not depends on mail module
override find_or_create the code will not be triggered anymore
the module should depends on mail module
closesodoo/odoo#65565
X-original-commit: 49d5b3813e57f2cd91d582de9b9bb534f05d2dc3
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Add the currency symbol for the monetary tracking field to better
represent the change of a monetary field.
The currency will be fetch from the currency defined in the
monetary field or on the record's company in case there is not.
For example, if we have a record with a monetary field displaying
"$ 500". If we modify the currency and the value to have "450 €",
the message containing the tracking values will display:
"500 € -> 450 €".
We only use one field to track the currency of a monetary field.
Indeed, in the case where the currency is changed with the value
of a monetary field, only the new currency is tracked. We focus
on the fact that the more important thing is the new value.
Furthermore, when modifying a currency of a monetary field, the
user can already see the new currency before saving the changes.
This allows him to adapt the value of the field if he needs it.
(N.B. we assume that this case will happen very rarely)
Using only one field takes also into account that there are
millions of record for this model and adding a new field would
take a lot of memory.
odoo/odoo#61999odoo/upgrade#2060
task-2387268
Purpose of this commit is to move moderation tests directly into mail channel
test file. That way it is easier to maintain or update them as they are
linked to that specific model and not global to mail.thread.
Also containing
* remove unnecessary tests or merge tests belonging to the same category;
* make tests more readable;
Followup of odoo/odoo@e9571a4
Followup of odoo/odoo@1fadb3ec5d
Task ID-2421795
closesodoo/odoo#64501
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose of this commit is to rewrite channel tests, notably moderation
tests. In this commit we
* use standard users instead of admin/root: this allows to test ACLs and
more real life oriented use cases;
* remove unnecessary tests or merge tests belonging to the same category;
* add some coverage for corner cases;
* make tests more readable;
We also improve some notification code and error messages that are not
really helpful for users.
Followup of odoo/odoo@e9571a403e
Task ID-2421795
closesodoo/odoo#64459
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Notification may be sent using a generic mail.thread record, notably when
sending user notifications. In that case links to view document are
incorrect.
HOW TO REPRODUCE
Issue
- Install "Approvals"
- Submit new approval with you as "Request Owner"
- Click on "View Approval Request" in your mailbox
The link redirects to a 505 error
Cause
The model is not the correct one and the res_id is undefined
Solution
Specify the model and the res_id to _notify_get_action_link
when creating the link with kwargs
SPECIFICATIONS
Propagate message value through various notification sub methods. That way
we can rely on them if model seems void.
Also limit values given as URL parameters to some white listed values.
LINKS
opw-2358846
Task ID-2379766
Followup of odoo/odoo#60998
Followup of odoo/odoo#61545Closesodoo/odoo#63292Closesodoo/enterprise#15585closesodoo/odoo#64229
X-original-commit: 58bac5d242d6548d54f0163328fa64b319852e40
Related: odoo/enterprise#15634
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Achraf Ben Azzouz <abz@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Forward port fixes done in stable versions and not correclty forward ported
into master at merge time.
ORIGINAL COMMIT
Purpose
=======
Before, by default, if a user create a channel, he will not be member
of this channel.
After, the current user will always be member of the new channel.
LINKS
Task ID-2421795
COM PR odoo/odoo#63677
X-Original-commit odoo/odoo@eda542c82f
X-Original-Task ID-1963414
X-original-commit: 1d5d7871d72c8b747ab2e1b3597f6b8b8e371b26
Improve channel related test content, notably
* use more often real users to avoid doing all tests as admin;
* remove unnecessary variables creation, use content created during
setUp;
* improve overall code;
* remove join/leave channel custom tool method and add real methods on
channel model;
Moderation tests are left untouched because... well.
LINKS
Task ID-2421795
COM PR odoo/odoo#63677
X-original-commit: 19de1303d015613973115cc01941ae8ca0e82cec
SPECIFICATIONS
Move channel tests from test_mail directly into mail module. Those tests do
not use models specifically introduced in test_mail. As those tests do not
target mail.thread features but rather mail models they can be moved into mail
directly.
LINKS
Task ID-2421795
COM PR odoo/odoo#63677
X-original-commit: 8c044735e8e30a80f85bd670eb61daba7645f62c
Python 3.8 changed the equality rules for bound methods to be based on
the *identity* of the receiver (`__self__`) rather than its *equality*.
This means that in 3.7, methods from different instances will compare
(and hash) equal, thereby landing in the same map "slot", but that isn't
the case in 3.8.
While it's usually not relevant, it's an issue for `GroupCalls` which is
indexed by a function: in 3.7, that being a method from recordsets
comparing equal will deduplicate them, but not anymore in 3.8, leading
to duplicated callbacks (exactly the thing GroupCalls aims to avoid).
Also, the API of `GroupCalls` turned out to be unusual and weird. The
bug above is fixed by using a plain list for callbacks, thereby avoiding
comparisons between registered functions. The API is now:
callbacks.add(func) # add func to callbacks
callbacks.run() # run all callbacks in addition order
callbacks.clear() # remove all callbacks
In order to handle aggregated data, the `callbacks` object provides a
dictionary `callbacks.data` that any callback function can freely use.
For the sake of consistency, the `callbacks.data` dict is automatically
cleared upon execution of callbacks.
Discovered by @william-andre
Related to odoo#56583
References:
* https://bugs.python.org/issue1617161
* python/cpython#7848
* https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-8-0-alpha-1
(no direct link because individual entries are not linkable, look for
bpo-1617161)
X-original-commit: d4b2e9224839aed8fc160ebe5a89e0f7d4c6a5bb
Purpose of this commit is to add some mass mailing tests in test mail full
(with all community mailing capabilities installed). In this commit we notably
tests unsubscribe and view URLs computation in sent emails, as well as
the invisible preview block for email clients.
Task ID-2239327
Task ID-2239327
PR #49886
Related: odoo/enterprise#10091
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Modules holding tests and helpers
* link_tracker: mainly mock, asserts and tools for link tracker tests
(MockLinkTracker);
* mail: mainly gateway mock and base for mail tests
* MockEmail -> mocks for mail gateway;
* MailCase -> tools and asserts for mail tests;
* MailCommon -> base for mail functional tests);
* sms: mainly SMS gateway mock and base for sms tests
* MockSMS -> mocks for SMS gateway;
* SMS Case -> tools and asserts for mail / SMS tests;
* SMSCommon -> update of MailCommon with SMS capabilities);
* mass_mailing: mainly asserts and tools for mass mailing tests
* MassMailCase -> update of MailCase for mass mailing tools and asserts;
* MassMailCommon -> update of MailCommon with mass mailing);
* mass_mailing_sms: mainly asserts and tools for mass SMS tests
* MockMassSMS -> update of MockSMS for mass SMS tools and asserts;
* MassSMSCommon -> update of MassMailCommon with SMS capabilities);
Modules for tests
* test_mail: module for mail app tests (TestMailCommon);
* test_mass_mailing: module for mass mailing app tests (TestMassMailCommon);
* test_mail_full: tests integrating all discuss features, currently mainly
mail and SMS (TestMailFullCommon);
Enterprise: update test_mail_enterprise and test_marketing_automation
Task ID 2247037
Community PR odoo/odoo#50384
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#10266
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1122
Consider an email going through the mail gateway. Its headers References
and In-Reply-To are used in mail gateway to find if it is an answer to an
existing discussion thread.
Notably in mass mailing it is used to set mailing traces (called statistics
before 13.0) as opened and replied. However currently only the References
header is used.
In this commit we now use References or In-Reply-To like what is done in
mail gateway.
== 13.2 FORWARD PORT SPECIFIC ==
Code in tests has been updated to use new mockups tools and variables available
in test_mail
LINKS
Task ID 2257717
PR #51445
Forward-port-of: #51319
Forward-port-of: #51247
X-original-commit: 9921e38692e7dc4547afc34acc395da340eca410
In this commit we order fields more logically to ease reading and prepare
future modifications. We also rename the class and some field strings to
be more user friendly.
LINKS
Prepares Task ID 2238597 (clean notification models)
Prepares Task ID 2083854 (improve mass mailing technical flows)
PR #49891
Co-Authored-By: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Have a cleaner test_mail addons
SPECIFICATIONS
Keep only mail-related tests, move odoobot in test mail full, send "update
notification" tests in mail (specific to mail). Merge some test files to
lessen number of files, perform light file renaming.
Split test mail models file to prepare some cleaning in those models and tests.
LINKS
Prepares Task ID 2238597 (clean notification models)
Prepares Task ID 2083854 (improve mass mailing technical flows)
PR #49891
The purpose is to have more common code for failure and notifications, with less
override in `sms` and `snailmail`.
task-2176017
closesodoo/odoo#44170
Related: odoo/enterprise#9140
Related: odoo/upgrade#918
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Rewrite code parsing name (_parse_partner_name) to make it easier to
understand. Tweak find_or_create to return directly a recordset with the
found partner / new partner instead of a name_get result.
Also inherit Partner.find_or_create() in mail in order to benefits from
email_normalized field, allowing to improve the search on matching emails
and avoid duplicates.
LINKS
Task ID 1963529
Community PR odoo/odoo#32397
Raphael Collet