Purpose
=======
The main definition of 'assignation' is the following:
"an appointment to meet someone in secret, typically one made by lovers"
The correct word we should be using is 'assignment':
"the allocation of someone or something as belonging to a particular group or category"
So in this commit change every iteration of the word
'assignation' to 'assignment', across all modules.
closes odoo/odoo#45041
Taskid: 1966215
Closes: #45041
Related: odoo/enterprise#8375
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
With a user with only Fleet Administrator rights.
Assign an internal user as the driver of a vehicle (other than the
current user) => access error, you cannot write on model `res.user`.
Writing on a partner linked to an internal user requires write access to
this user.
closesodoo/odoo#47572
X-original-commit: a693b368d3faddef6774004d40567e26b7d59cec
Signed-off-by: lul-odoo <LucasLefevre@users.noreply.github.com>
Purpose
=======
If you set a future driver and click on "apply change", a new assignation log is
automatically created for the new driver.
But the end date of the former assignation isn't populate.
Specifications
==============
Set the date "end date" for the former driver with the "start date" of the
new driver.
closesodoo/odoo#44635
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Currently when user change the image on a vehicle, it change it
for the car manufacturer and the goal of this image is to recognize
the manufacturer of the vehicle.
After this commit is applied, the model and vehicle image will be
fixed as per the selected brand image. user will not be able to
change from the vehicle and model.
closes odoo/odoo#44153
Taskid: 2168922
Closes: #44153
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Create analytic account from fleet (and link it to vehicle) based
on the plate and the fiscal deduction rate (if l10n_hr_payroll_fleet
is installed).
Add on employee a Mobility Card number. This number is set on vehicle
when we put a partner linked to employee on a vehicle.
taskID: 2127641
Purpose
=======
It is currently difficult to know exactly what is used for costs
and services on the contracts.
Hence it make it difficult to evolve the fleet application
We should clean the models in order to have something that is clearer
Specification
=============
Cleanup of models: removed Fuel and Cost. Contract and Services are no
longer inheriting Cost and are seperate models simplifying the use of
Fleet. A contract now has included services and they are no longer
generating cost.
closesodoo/odoo#34090
Taskid: 1931775
Related: odoo/enterprise#4572
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
To avoid slowing down search like "{relational_field}" contains "{value}"
we always need to return the lazy name_get() for each [_]name_search method
closesodoo/odoo#36735
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
When the many2xxx field relates to a model where company_id is required, set
this domain [('company_id','=',company_id.id)]
When the company_id field of the related model is not required, set this domain
['|',('company_id','=',company_id.id),('company_id','=',False)]
When setting the domain on a field which is in the treeview of a xxx2many field
evaluate against the company_id of the 'parent'.
Some constraints have been added on sereval models. Take a look at the complete
specification for more details.
TaskID: 2024446
Closes: #35266
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The big images are probably never going to be used for the following models:
- pos category
- fleet brand
- livechat channel
- mail channel
- payment acquirer
And if big images are needed some day the model should use image.mixin instead.
PR: #34925
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
Purpose
=======
Some formviews are useless since there are so few relevant fields https://nimb.ws/1EdMV7
For instance, to create a new lost reason the user is forced to:
1. Hit create
2. Type in the name of the record
3. Hit save
4. Go back to the treeview
While he could simply type them away in an editable treeview.
The goal of this task is to allow for creation/edition of records in such models
directly from the treeview.
Specification
=============
Modify tree views from a given list of models for which the
treeview has to be made editable bottom.
If not specified otherwise, the content treeview should stay the same.
If a field is readonly/required/etc. in the formview, it should be in the
editable treeview as well.
Relabeling has to be done of the field itself, not in the view.
TaskID: 2026126
closesodoo/odoo#34577
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Basically when someone requests a new car, getting that car ready takes
some time, this means that during the waiting period, that person is
still driving its old car.
This commit adds a field future_driver_id on fleet.vehicle to tackle
that problem and a boolean plan_to_change_car on the partner to track
who wants to change car.
+ Apply some linting to the files
This commit cleans the vehicle form view, the vehicle contract form
view, the cost list view and adds a manager_id field on the
vehicle.model which is then used as a related on the vehicle.
Task: 1930298
closesodoo/odoo#31197
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Instead of searching for the driver name and return thousands of partner
ids in the vehicule search, use a database join and a search on the
driver name.
closesodoo/odoo#29288
The _name_search did override the domain's search
by OR'ing it with a loose condition on the driver_id.
As a result if an upstanding Odooer added a strict filter on the driver_id,
it was ignored in favour of the loose one.
opw 1915639
closesodoo/odoo#29515
Specification
=============
- Adapt the formula used in the code with the current legal value.
- Add the LPG fuel type in standard fleet module.
- Adapt the atn furmula in the code with the current legal value.
closesodoo/odoo#29833
Purpose
=======
An alert is sent when the vehicle contract will be outdated in less than a month.
This could be a parameter than could be set on the res.config.
Specification
=============
Use ir.config.parameter in all the cases
Default value is 30 days
Consider 'diesoon' contract as an 'in progress' contract
closesodoo/odoo#29704
Purpose is to clean the use of tracking parameters on fields. Parameters are
merged and is now tracking=<int> or tracking=True.
This commit is linked to task ID 1903814 and PR #28430.
This commit adapts the business code to changes introduced by
the parent commit in order to keep the same behaviour as before.
All readonly=False fields will have to be checked afterwards to confirm
that the business case requires write access to the source field.
Purpose of this commit is to give description more "business oriented"
because those descriptions appears in Odoo Studio which is supposed to be used by end users, not only by developers.
Related Task ID : 37311
From this commit onwards, Date fields will return datetime.date objects and Datetime fields will return datetime.datetime objects, this implies a number of things that are clearly explained both in the ORM API for master.
This commit also introduces a number of helper functions for dates and datetimes that are exposed in tools.date_utils and fields.Date[time], explained in the documentation as well.
Task-ID: 47189
Add grouping possibility on model make for vehicles in the fleet.
Deleted redundent controll on make image for vehicles if model changed.
fixed _name_search for FleetVehicle
project : RD for Dummies
task : [Fleet] Allow to filter/group by Make on vehicles
Purpose
=======
We can not get the list of vehicles who have been assigned to a driver.
Specification
=============
The user is able to get the list of the vehicles assigned to a specific driver, by searching the driver's name with the "Assigned to" filter.
Purpose
=======
The method _name_search and _search add support to search as another user.
All the overrides of name_search and search redefine the behavior of the search.
This bring inconsistencies as the result of a call to _name_search and name_search
could differ on certain modules, which is not acceptable.
Specification
=============
Example:
~~~~~~~~
If the name_search method is overridden to search also on the driver name,
then calling name_search with a label 'JF' will return all the cars with a name containing
'JF' or all the cars with a driver name containing 'JF'. Let's say that we have a ir.rule
preventing a user to read the cars of another company. Then the call to name search only returns
the cars satisfying the previous condition AND belonging to his company.
Now, we want to overpass this constraint. We call _name_search with the attribute name_get_uid=1.
Then the call to _name_search returns all the cars from all the companies with a name like 'JF',
but nothing is done about the driver_name.
Example of wrong search redefinition on a model
-----------------------------------------------
@api.model
def name_search(self, name, args=None, operator='ilike', limit=100):
domain = args or []
domain = expression.AND([domain, [('name', 'ilike', name)]])
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search([('name', operator, name)])
if partners and name:
domain = expression.OR([domain, ['|', ('driver_id', 'in', partners.ids), ('driver_id', '=', False)]])
rec = self.search(domain, limit=limit)
return rec.name_get()
Example of correct search redefinition on a model
-------------------------------------------------
@api.model
def _name_search(self, name, args=None, operator='ilike', limit=100, name_get_uid=None):
domain = args or []
domain = expression.AND([domain, [('name', operator, name)]])
partner_ids = self.env['res.partner']._search([('name', operator, name)], access_rights_uid=name_get_uid)
if partner_ids:
domain = expression.OR([domain, ['|', ('driver_id', 'in', partner_ids), ('driver_id', '=', False)]])
rec = self._search(domain, limit=limit, access_rights_uid=name_get_uid)
return self.browse(rec).name_get()
The same logic should be applied on the overrides of the search method.
1/ Use track_visibility instead of overriding write method on a fleet.vehicle
Instead of posting messages in the write method to notify that the record value
changes, use the attribute track_visibility='onchange' instead.
2/ Add track_visibility='onchange' on some fields
3/ Track visibility on 'recurring_cost_amount_depreciated'
Purpose
=======
Currently it's impossible to know who was driving a given car at a given time.
We have some piece of information like the immatriculation date of a vehicle
or the date of the first contract. But it's not enough.
This is problematic to solve a rather common issue:
- Who is gonna pay the fine for having exceeded the speed limit?
Specification
=============
Introduce a simple model fleet.vehicle.assignation.log, containing info about:
- The driver
- The vehicle
- The start Date
- The end Date
A simple button on the fleet vehicle should be sufficient to solve the issue.
We cannot generate data from the salary package as these dates can't be predicted
at the contract signature.
Yannick Tivisse