Purpose is to clean the use of tracking parameters on fields. Parameters are
merged and is now tracking=<int> or tracking=True.
This commit is linked to task ID 1903814 and PR #28430.
The _name_search did override the domain's search
by OR'ing it with a loose condition on the driver_id.
As a result if an upstanding Odooer added a strict filter on the driver_id,
it was ignored in favour of the loose one.
opw 1915639
closesodoo/odoo#29515
Check that it makes custom binary fields into attachment as that's the
main reason for the change: when users create binary fields via Studio,
they're necessarily db-stored (as the interface doesn't allow altering
the attachment attribute and it's unclear how we'd handle users
switching it on/off every time), which significantly bloats their
database (and burns storage & backup space), especially as the primary
use case for binary fields is adding images and documents to records.
* check that binary fields are properly created as attachment=True
* add attachment=False on fields where that seems relevant (most but not
all of the fields previously using the default)
* remove occurrences of attachment=True
closesodoo/odoo#29308
This commit adapts the business code to changes introduced by
the parent commit in order to keep the same behaviour as before.
All readonly=False fields will have to be checked afterwards to confirm
that the business case requires write access to the source field.
Purpose of this commit is to give description more "business oriented"
because those descriptions appears in Odoo Studio which is supposed to be used by end users, not only by developers.
Related Task ID : 37311
Purpose of this commit is to improve automated activities in fleet.
Currently they are not always updated or rescheduled. Specifically when
updating the expiration date or the responsible automated activities should
be updated accordingly.
This commit is linked to task ID 1838956 and PR #25899.
From this commit onwards, Date fields will return datetime.date objects and Datetime fields will return datetime.datetime objects, this implies a number of things that are clearly explained both in the ORM API for master.
This commit also introduces a number of helper functions for dates and datetimes that are exposed in tools.date_utils and fields.Date[time], explained in the documentation as well.
Task-ID: 47189
Add grouping possibility on model make for vehicles in the fleet.
Deleted redundent controll on make image for vehicles if model changed.
fixed _name_search for FleetVehicle
project : RD for Dummies
task : [Fleet] Allow to filter/group by Make on vehicles
Purpose
=======
We can not get the list of vehicles who have been assigned to a driver.
Specification
=============
The user is able to get the list of the vehicles assigned to a specific driver, by searching the driver's name with the "Assigned to" filter.
Purpose
=======
The method _name_search and _search add support to search as another user.
All the overrides of name_search and search redefine the behavior of the search.
This bring inconsistencies as the result of a call to _name_search and name_search
could differ on certain modules, which is not acceptable.
Specification
=============
Example:
~~~~~~~~
If the name_search method is overridden to search also on the driver name,
then calling name_search with a label 'JF' will return all the cars with a name containing
'JF' or all the cars with a driver name containing 'JF'. Let's say that we have a ir.rule
preventing a user to read the cars of another company. Then the call to name search only returns
the cars satisfying the previous condition AND belonging to his company.
Now, we want to overpass this constraint. We call _name_search with the attribute name_get_uid=1.
Then the call to _name_search returns all the cars from all the companies with a name like 'JF',
but nothing is done about the driver_name.
Example of wrong search redefinition on a model
-----------------------------------------------
@api.model
def name_search(self, name, args=None, operator='ilike', limit=100):
domain = args or []
domain = expression.AND([domain, [('name', 'ilike', name)]])
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search([('name', operator, name)])
if partners and name:
domain = expression.OR([domain, ['|', ('driver_id', 'in', partners.ids), ('driver_id', '=', False)]])
rec = self.search(domain, limit=limit)
return rec.name_get()
Example of correct search redefinition on a model
-------------------------------------------------
@api.model
def _name_search(self, name, args=None, operator='ilike', limit=100, name_get_uid=None):
domain = args or []
domain = expression.AND([domain, [('name', operator, name)]])
partner_ids = self.env['res.partner']._search([('name', operator, name)], access_rights_uid=name_get_uid)
if partner_ids:
domain = expression.OR([domain, ['|', ('driver_id', 'in', partner_ids), ('driver_id', '=', False)]])
rec = self._search(domain, limit=limit, access_rights_uid=name_get_uid)
return self.browse(rec).name_get()
The same logic should be applied on the overrides of the search method.
1/ Use track_visibility instead of overriding write method on a fleet.vehicle
Instead of posting messages in the write method to notify that the record value
changes, use the attribute track_visibility='onchange' instead.
2/ Add track_visibility='onchange' on some fields
3/ Track visibility on 'recurring_cost_amount_depreciated'
Purpose
=======
Currently it's impossible to know who was driving a given car at a given time.
We have some piece of information like the immatriculation date of a vehicle
or the date of the first contract. But it's not enough.
This is problematic to solve a rather common issue:
- Who is gonna pay the fine for having exceeded the speed limit?
Specification
=============
Introduce a simple model fleet.vehicle.assignation.log, containing info about:
- The driver
- The vehicle
- The start Date
- The end Date
A simple button on the fleet vehicle should be sufficient to solve the issue.
We cannot generate data from the salary package as these dates can't be predicted
at the contract signature.
The goal of this field is to be able to keep the value of the first contract
even if it has been closed/deteled.
It could be used to compute the depreciation of the car.
The reified view on the res users will be dropped in the following commit.
The previous commit adds support to define each group as a computed field on the res users.
This commit defines:
- A boolean field for each 'isolated' res.group, i.e. a group in the hidden category.
- A selection field for each 'Application' res.group, i.e. a group in a application category.
Example:
- The group to manage pricelist in sales becomes a boolean field
- The groups project user/manager become a selection field
This commit improves fleet contracts management through a better integration
of activities and addition of automated activities. Several things are done
in this commit :
* fleet vehicle log contract does not inherit from mail.activity.mixin.
This commit adds the inherit so that fleet users and managers can now
schedule and manage activities on vehicle contracts. This will help them
in their daily job;
* automatic activities generation is added when contracts are nearly expired
and renewal is required;
* a menu to configure activity types is added. Indeed fleet managers should
be able to see and configure activity types related to their job;
* filters are added to be able to use the systray and to filter the kanban
view based on activities
Having automated activities allow to replace some messages posted on the
contract. Indeed currently there are messages posted on vehicles about
contracts to renew. As we now have automated activities on contracts to
remind assigned people to renew it the log can be safely removed. It will
lessen noise generated on chatter.
Currently there is no place to indicate who is responsible of managing
fleet contracts. As we plan to integrate activities to fleet app having
responsible to push notifications is necessary.
This commit adds a responsible field following Odoo convention, aka a
user_id field linking res.users records. It is also added on the view.
Currently a note is posted on the fleet with 'name has been added to
the fleet'. It is not really interesting as it is no notified to
anyone and it makes some noise. Let us therefore fall back on the
standard behavior.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go to Fleet
- Group by status
- Click on a vehicule
- Click on Costs
Bug: A traceback was raised because a group_by was made on the model "fleet.vehicle.cost"
for the field "state_id" and this field doesn't exist on this model.
opw:1815454
Christophe Simonis