When creating a SO line and clicking on search more for product_id
Before this commit, every user had the button "Create" to create a product.product
After this commit, only user in groups that actually can create a product have the button
OPW 1910371
closesodoo/odoo#28924
related to: #28446
On a pure list view, click on a column to sort the records by that field.
Save the filter as favorite
Reload, now apply the filter
Before this commit, there were two issues:
1. The order of the list was never propagated to search view, which couldn't save
the filter with its attribute "sort"
2. There was no mechanism to load the attribute sort from a loading Filter
After this commit, those two issues are corrected
Unfortunately, complex search view flows are not testable in v11.0
OPW 1906968
closesodoo/odoo#28766
On a form view (of model A), define a many2one (model B) with a [form|tree]_view_ref context key
In that view, have a x2m field (model C) with a different [form|tree]_view_ref context key
Before this commit, the second load_views (i.e. on the model C) crashed because
the wrong context key was sent to the server, which returned the view to which the _view_ref points
i.e. the view of the model B
After this commit, we clean the context of subviews loading, because those keys are only useful for the python
and one shot. Hence, there is no crash
OPW 1903780
closesodoo/odoo#28260
When creating a record in a grouped kanban view, it tries to add
the record to the first column but if no column exist, it fails
to find the first one and raise an exception.
This PR correct that bevahior by checking it exists a column and
fallback to the view form when it does not.
opw-1902851
closesodoo/odoo#28262
when grouped on field types for which it isn't supported.
Rev. 42e1efd disabled the quick create feature when the view is
grouped by date(time) fields. However, it hasn't been correctly
forwardported to 11.0 (with the new views). Indeed, the check was
done only once, at the initilization of the view. So if the user
selected another field to group by afterwards, the quick create
feature wasn't enabled/disabled accordingly.
Moreover, we didn't check if it was available when the user clicked
on CREATE in the control panel. So even if it wasn't (and thus if
there were no '+' icon in the columns), when the user clicked on
CREATE, the quick create widget was inserted in the first column.
This rev. fixes both issues.
Task 1878254
closesodoo/odoo#27867
Before this commit, when clicking on a link in a kanban
record having `href` that is set, it was opening the record
and accessing the `href`.
The intended behaviour is to not open a record if any children
component of the record contains either a click event or is
a link with `href`. The former was correctly handled, but not
the latter.
This commit fixes the issue by preventing opening the record
when clicking on a inner link with href from a kanban record.
Closes#24664closesodoo/odoo#27529
Commit:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/818c18e55d0718286ff5bf332186a10f4d7a58ef
Updated the resequence logic in a way that was almost falser than before.
The added test however did work by coincidence, as index values were equal to
the sequence field values.
To be sure that we synchronize with what happens on the server, we do a read
after the resequence.
Additionnally, we take into account the result of the server resequence return;
if it is false, it means no resequencing happened, so we should not do a read.
opw 1867049
closesodoo/odoo#27184
In Firefox, the input behavior and visual representation (navigation, caret
placement, value selection, etc.) was broken when using a datepicker (easily
reproductible on date and datetime widgets).
This was due to the `focus` event being stopped on the input, which doesn't
seem to be correctly supported by Firefox.
The deleted code was supposed to toggle the picker when the field was clicked
(see odoo/odoo@89093a1) (toggle on click and disable focus) but the lib
correctly supports on focus without extra code.
This also fixes the fact that the datepicker was not open on focus (only on
clicked). In some tests where the field was the first in the form view, it is
now correctly autofocused.
Forward-port: not useful from 12.0 because the code has changed with BS4 and
this has already been applied in odoo/odoo@6692919 and odoo/odoo@c63630d.
Closes#23438closesodoo/odoo#27657
The resequence mechanism works if the sequence is sorted by its handle field.
Therefore sorting on another field should lock the handle, while sorting on the
handle field should unlock the handle.
opw 1867049
This reverts commit 4cb585ab4f.
When creating from the kanban view:
- crm.stage
- hr.recruitment.stage
- project.task.type
- helpdesk.type
- mrp.eco.stage
We go from a dashboard of eg. "GroupRecord" named "group_id" in the
record. And when a stage is created, "default_group_id" is used. With
the change the stage was not linked to the current "grouping".
We could probably use "search_default_group_id" instead but the behavior
may be present in existing customization.
opw-1884217
closes#26943
The resequence mechanism works if the sequence is sorted by its handle field.
Therefore sorting on another field should lock the handle, while sorting on the
handle field should unlock the handle.
opw 1867049
When a column is created in the kanban view, the context of the window
action is fully given but it may contain default_{field_name} context
keys that are intended for the action model.
eg. on a product.product view we could have {default_type:'product'} in
the context, if we grouped by company_id and created a new company, we
would the context is propagated and we would try to set type='product'
on the company (which causes an error).
Without the change, the added test fails with:
default_* should be removed from context, actual: "true", expected: "false"
opw-1879064
closes#26676
Be in a grouped kanban view with progressbar with limit 10:
- records 1 to 10 are loaded on a column
- do "Load more..." on a column => records 11 up to 20 are loaded
- do "Load more..." 2nd time => records 11 up to 20 are loaded
- do "Load more..." 3rd time => records 11 up to 20 are loaded
- ...
While in reality it should be:
- do "Load more..." 2nd time => records 21 up to 30 are loaded
- do "Load more..." 3rd time => records 31 up to 40 are loaded
- ...
This was caused by the progressbar reloading the column's group. This
set the loadMoreOffset to 0 thus forgetting the current state.
Without the change, added tests failed with:
records of column are loaded => actual: "1,2,2", expected: "1,2,3"
opw-1878359
closes#26628
The pivot view didn't take into account the widget set on the fields.
In particular this was a problem for float fields that store time values.
They are now displayed with float_time if declared as such in the view.
opw 1876445
Before this commit, when we applied two or more groupbys in line
graph, the groups displayed on the X axis where shifted to the left,
and the first one wasn't displayed at all.
related task: #1848289Closes: #25037
Let x_1, ..., x_a, x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} be a record
sequence ordered by its 'sequence' field.
Suppose the reordering occurs between elements x_{a+k} and x_{a+1}.
If the subsequence x_1, ..., x_a is ordered, then it does not change.
This is also true of the subsequence x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n}.
The resquence function makes exactly this assumption, and only sends the server
the subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} to update its 'sequence' field.
The update of x is done as follows: it is index + offset, where index is the
position of x in the subsequence, and offset is the 'sequence' of the first
element of the sequence (i.e. x_{a+1}.sequence).
It is easy to see that we need another hypothesis: that the sequence numbers are
unique. To show it, suppose that the sequence of x_1, ..., x_a is 0, then all
x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} have sequence 1, and lastly all x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ...,
x_{n} have sequence 2. Then after the call to the server resequence, the
subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} would have sequence numbers 1, 2,..., k.
Since the x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} subsequence have 'sequence' value 1, this would
obviously be incorrect.
We fix the reordering of the data in the js frontend to be consistent with
what is done by the server.
Note that this is only pertinent for sequences of reordering moves, since
otherwise the data comes directly from the server.
opw 1867049
You:
- open a grouping in a list view
- check a line of this grouping
- open another grouping
=> all checkbox are unchecked
With this commit, 0982ceaa is improved so the selection is only reset
when the list has been reloaded.
opw-1865736
closes#26213
In a one2many, if the user clicked the trash button while editing another line,
the row was not unselected.
Thus the modal was not triggered, which entailed that the currently edited line
was always saved.
In particular, it allowed to give empty values to required fields.
opw 1834346
Before this commit, there was a traceback in the following scenario:
Let's have a kanban view with groupby and a domain.
If we clear the domain then clear the groupby, there could be a crash.
This crash occurs because when we clear the groupby, it performs a `reload`,
and assumes that the datapoint contains grouped data. However, if this
computation takes some time, it is possible to overwrite the datapoint so that
there is no longer grouped data.
This commit fixes the issue by enforcing at most 1 execution of the method
`reload` active at any time. Consequently, successive reloads operations are
now much slower.
Note that it uses the single non-reentrant mutex on the basic_model to enforce
this rule, which means:
- No more concurrent `reload` and `save`.
- If an execution having the mutex in `reload` come accross the same mutex,
it is blocked forever. This is hopefully not the case at the moment,
however a reentrant mutex should be considered in the future.
Let's assume the following scenario in a Kanban view with a default
filter. The user removes the filter, and quickly adds a new one.
On a slow network, it may happen that the second reload request
returns before the first one. On odoo.com, this is easy to
reproduce on the tasks Kanban view.
Before this rev., when this occured, the result of the first
request was displayed, whereas it should have been ignored as
another request was done later on.
Recently, rev. c0809dd41 removed a protection in the reload of
Kanban views with progressbars. This protection ensured that the
manual reload of the progressbars was only done when one of the
records of the Kanban view was updated (and not when a column, or
the whole view was).
However, removing it highlighted a bug linked to the manual reload
of progressbars, which messed up the list of ids in the
environment. As a consequence, for instance, if the user archived
the records of a column, and then opendc a record in form view,
it couldn't use the pager anymore.
Besides fixing this bug, this rev. re-introduces the protection,
and refines it to prevent 2 useless RPCs when the whole Kanban
view was reloaded.
opw~1841276
opw~1841342
The way the calendar view selected its form view was broken for two
reasons:
- any value given in the form_view_id attribute was kept as string,
which means that the string value would be sent to the server, and
this is not good.
- if no value was set, the calendar view then simply did a do_action
with the form view id set to false, which means that the default form
view is used. This is mostly ok, except when we are in the context of
an action with a form view which is not the default one. In that
case, we clearly prefer the form view from the action.
For example, before this commit, the form view in the timesheet
application (community) is not the same as the default form view on
account.analytic.line.
Note that this commit also adds a small tweak to the mock server to
better simulate errors like the web client does (in session.js).
Before this, the progressbar values were not updated (both count and progress)
after archiving all the records of a column.
Multiple things have been done here to update it.
Firstly, a optimization had been done to avoid reloading the progressbar when
updating a column ; this optimization was not correct due to this precise use
case. This will update the progressbar.
Secondly, the `aggregateValues` are reset when putting empty groups back in the
datapoint. This attribute is used to compute the counter if a `sum_field` is set
on the progressbar widget. It needs to be reset because the loop that computes
it won't iterate on empty groups.
Eventually, the mockRPC of the progressbar route was not taking the `group_by`
argument into account (probably a typo).
When doing several grouping quickly (or if the system is slow) on the
pivot view, we may try to display data that now doesn't corresponds to
the current selected groupBys.
This commit ensures that when we load data of the pivot view, we drop
the previous data loading that are currently being carried out.
Without the fix, the added test failed with:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'length' of undefined
because the test does:
- select one level of group by
- select two levels of group by
- resolve the first level of group by
- resolve the second level of group by
Without the fix, we would try to display the data for one level of group
by when the pivot view had two levels selected.
With the fix, displaying the first level of group by was discarded once
a second one was being requested.
opw-1825892
closes#24396
When a user creates a new column in a kanban view, leave the action and
comes back, the order is not preserved. With this commit, we force a
call to resequence to ensure that the order does not change.
and keep all those filters at last. (PR#20463)
e.g. If field used in color attribute of calendar view does not have value then such sidebar filters will not have string besides filter checkbox
in such cases we should set Undefined string and put all those filters at last in filter list
Currently we can see issue in calendar of manufacturing orders in db with demo data
Related to Issue #1778360
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
Here is a scenario that could happen before this commit:
1. go to a list view with more than one record, say 3
2. click on the 3rd record to open the form view
3. the pager says 3/3
4. click on edit button
5. click on discard button
6. the pager says 1/3 (but the record displayed is still the same)
It is often necessary to restore the offset for the sub records, because
the number of pages in a one2many could have changed. However, it is
not a good idea to do that for the main record, since it interferes with
the usual flow of operations.
On a pivot view expand a field in column
another one in row
Then put a domain in the search view
Save the whole thing (ir.filter) as favorite
Before this commit, the ir.filter was not saved the right way when a domain was present
(Let alone its restoration)
This was because of
- the internal default groupbys of the pivot model was not updated, and what we got in the params was overwritten
by what existed before
- a slight typo in the code made the row updated with the col values
OPW 1835865
OPW 1829925
closes#24215
In the calendar view there is some mixing of moment with:
- a local date with given timezone
- a UTC date with added timezone manually applied
The setDate function of calendar model sometimes received either of the
two types, and always transforms them to UTC date with added timezone.
This cause eg. the following issues:
- in the minicalendar, if we click on a day (eg. 12) the day highlighed
will be the one of 12th at midnight with timezone applied. So with a
negative timezone the 11th would be highlighted in the mini calendar
(but the 12th would still be the day shown).
- if we change scale (week/day/month) or open calendar or use next or
previous button: we call `setDate` with a UTC+timezone moment. So each
time this is done, we get an additional timezone
eg. when opening the calendar view on the 12th at 5:00 with GMT-0200:
-> the target date is 12th at 1:00
-> if we set the day mode: target date is 11th at 23:00
-> if we set the week mode: target date is 11th at 21:00
With this change we keep target_date and highlight_date as local date so
setDate always receives a local date and jquery-ui DatePicker gets the
date in the expected format.
opw-1831368
closes#24188
In a kanban grouped by many2one with a progressbar, after emptying a column
by moving all records, the column wasn't correctly updated. This was causing,
in the best case, a record duplication or, in the worst case, a traceback.
This issue comes from the fact that, with a progressbar, a read_group is
performed each time a record is moved. When the group (column) becomes empty,
the read_group won't return this group even though the group still appears in
the kankan. When moving back the record in this empty column, there is a
desynchronization between the kanban controller data and the model.
To fix this issue, an option `keepEmptyGroups` is passed when performing the
mentioned read_group ; this mimics the kanban display that keeps empty groups
displayed and there is no desync anymore.
Fixes#23982
To reproduce the error, go to Accounting > Import Statement, then
Cancel. An error occurs because `belongs_to_company` is not in the data.
Indeed, it is directly set on the action
`open_account_journal_dashboard_kanban`.
Commit 9961bbf4eb re-evaluates if a record should be displayed in the
Kanban view after applying an action (in particular, archive a record).
However, the domain evaluated might contain values which are not in the
data. This is for example the case if there is a domain on an action.
Fixes#24142
opw-1835216
opw-1835123
When a user click on an action button, we need to check if the record
match with the domain to remove it from the view if this action change
the record value.
Special case: we filter by active field equal true, if the active field
is available in the data (field present in the kanban view).
opw-1832879
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Martinelli <nim@odoo.com>
- Create a vendor bill, save and validate
- Duplicate the bill, save
- Click on "Create"
A customer invoice is created, while the user expects a vendor bill.
After duplication, the new record is loaded but the context is lost.
Since the default value for the invoice type is based on the context key
`type`, a loss of context leads to an incorrect invoice type.
opw-1826453
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
- Set the OS timezone to GMT-6
- Create a project task with a date deadline on D day
- The tasks appears at D-1 in the calendar
This was supposed to be fixed with 0c0fb63b0d, but actually no.
opw-1815446
opw-1828130
On an editable line with a many2one
Click to create a record
Click on create a record in the many2one
It opens the form view of the object in a modal, which has a many2many list, which choices are domainized
Click 'add an item' on this list
It should open a modal with the filtered choices
Click on any of the existing record
Before this commit:
There was a traceback in JS
That was because the event bubbled up to a parent, when it shouldn't
After this commit:
The whole flow unfolds without errors
OPW 1823205
Before this rev., this attribute was ignored for groups containing
sub groups.
Task 1786309
Closes#23514
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
In some cases, the footer in a form view dialog could be duplicated.
The reason was that the form view was rerendered completely, footer
included, by the renderer, out of the formcontroller control (it is the
formcontroller's job to move the footer buttons to the footer).
A possible fix is to work on the form renderer to make it aware that the footer
buttons are expected to be only rendered once, but it has the disadvantage to
be a fix specific to this issue, and any other form view behaviour with some
side effects may have the same issue.
This commit tries to prevent the form view from rerendering itself
completely in those cases. This also has the disadvantage of possibly
not being a complete fix, if some edge cases are missed. However, I
have the feeling that we still want to avoid rerendering the full view
if possible.
Before this rev., it crashed when trying to create records of the
res.users model. This is due to commit ad1cceb.
The 'default_get' of 'res.users' always returns a value for field
'groups_id', whereas the docstring of 'default_get' states that it
only returns default values for fields given in arguments.
Rev. ad1cceb changed a bit the way the result of 'default_get' was
processed, by iterating over the values instead of over the fields
in the view. So, before ad1cceb, 'groups_id' was simply ignored,
and after, the BasicModel tried to process it and it crashed when it
attempted to retrieve its fieldsInfo, as this field isn't in the
view.
This rev. restores the previous behavior.
Fixes#23303Fixes#23305
Before this rev., an issue occurred on grouped editable list views
that became ungrouped after a reload (i.e. when the grouped part in
the search view was removed). In this scenario, the click handler
outside the list used to leave the edition wasn't bound (because
the list was grouped at the beginning, and thus not editable). So,
it was impossible to leave the edition, even by clicking on 'Save'.
Fixes#23061
Create a new column in Project, add a record and then hit 'Archive Records' : a
traceback occurs.
When creating the new column, the `groupedBy` attribute on the datapoint is set
according to the parent list datapoint, which makes no sense as the records are
not grouped inside the column.
The mentioned attribute is now removed as the records cannot be grouped inside
the column.
Before this rev., the aggregates values displayed in the footer of
list views were formatted according to the field type, and the
field's widget was ignored, whereas it should be used by default.
For instance, if the 'float_time' widget is set on a float field,
the sum should be formatted as FloatTime as well.
Closes#22724.
Before this rev., the list of selected records wasn't correctly
reset when the list was reloaded (e.g. when coming back using the
breadcrumbs). In the UI, the records weren't selected anymore, but
in javascript, the list of selected records wasn't empty. As a
consequence, the aggregates were wrongly computed, and always
displayed 0.
Closes#22725.
Since the <widget> tag is not used anymore in any of our views, it was
not really properly supported. In particular, the form widget was not
notified when the state of the form view has changed, which makes it
very difficult to actually do any useful work.
With this commit, we make sure that the widget method 'updateState' (if
it exists) is called with the new state whenever it changed.
This should allow developers to do useful work without having to work
around the issue. Note that this is not really a perfect solution, since
the updateState methot may or may not have been implemented.
I think that we need some kind of ViewWidget abstraction, which could be
used to have a better and more complete API for widgets in a basic view.
And AbstractField could inherit from ViewWidget.
Rev. dbdd742 introduced the 'baseMode' parameter of field's nodes
in the BasicRenderer. Its purpose is to encode the generic mode
of the field, regardless of its readonly modifier (i.e. in form
views, the baseMode of all fields is the mode of the renderer and
in list views, the baseMode of all fields is 'readonly', except for
fields in the row being edited, whose baseMode is 'edit').
Unfortunately, when the value of the readonly modifier of a field
was 'readonly', its baseMode was changed from 'edit' to 'readonly',
which shouldn't, as the baseMode's value should not be affected by
the modifiers.
This produced a bug when a field had a readonly modifier, as once
its value became true, the field was rendered in 'readonly', and
whatever the value of the modifier afterwards, it always remained
in 'readonly'.
The rev. ensures that the baseMode is no longer impacted by the
value of the readonly modifier.
Closes#22729
Before this rev., it might happen that the parent of BasicModel instances
wasn't correctly set to the Controller instance. It was actually set to the
ActionManager instance, which is never destroyed. So when this happened,
the BasicModel instance wasn't destroyed when it's controller was.
This is a small correction of odoo/odoo@3aad756 ; a traceback occured when ESC
was pressed in a list view with modifiers.
The `confirmChange` was done on the parent datapoint (of type list) which has no
attribute `evalModifiers`.
`confirmChange` is now called on the record datapoint. Note that for x2m, it
means that all modifiers linked to the parent record won't be re-evaluated (but
this wasn't probably intended as this is a bit overkill).
Closes#22718
Lucas Perais (lpe)