*: account,event_sale,fleet,hr_attendance,hr_contract,hr_timesheet,
im_livechat,point_of_sale,project
When the user tries to delete a record(s) from the reporting views, this
traceback will be generated.
Steps to produce (Example only):
- Settings > Technical > Actions > Window Actions
- Search for the Work Entries Analysis. Open it and add a 'tree' as view_mode
in that action.
- Payroll > Reporting > Work Entries Analysis menu and select the tree view.
- Select one or more records and try to delete these records.
Error: A traceback appears: "cannot delete from view "hr_work_entry_report"
Handled the unlink access by using their model access of the reporting models.
similarly, this issue resolves in other reporting models.
Sentry-3975590063
closesodoo/odoo#125697
X-original-commit: 209d8c76ce9bb1d6cc7084d55b5623e939af8fbc
Related: odoo/enterprise#42825
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
THese are rarely intended for all users but often intended only for
employees.
account:
account.incoterms: only used within internal business models
account.journal.group: same as account.journal, add sudo in computed field
account_edi: need access to accounting objects
base_address_extended:
res.city: only employees should access address data
board: only employees uses this (old) module
crm:
crm.stage: internal users business object
hr_recruitment: employees can read
im_livechat: apply same as for the steps
l10n_ar: used on partner, not only invoices
l10n_ec: accessed only through account.move
l10n_latam: accessed on res.partner
mail:
publisher.warrenty.contract: no data, only static models
mail.channel: group_user has already his own rule
mail.group: group_user has already his own rule
mail.message.subtype: group_user has already his own rule
mail.message.all: remove, already has a portal and employee rule
partner_autocomplete: no interaction with public
project:
project.tags: only needed for project sharing
sale_management:
sale.order.option: same as sale.order
utm: employee already has write access
web_editor: test models that have nothing to do here
web_tour: only employees uses tours
website_sale:
product.ribbon: add sudo for access
base:
ir.default: only employees uses set (could probably be converted to group_system)
ir.ui.view.custom: same as ir.ui.view, add sudo when needed
report.*: portal users don't configure reports
res.users.log: create in sudo, no access needed (adapt test to use another model)
res.lang: still needed for public
closesodoo/odoo#118701
Related: odoo/enterprise#41285
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
This commit reviews the UX and UI in Project app and improves the usability of the
new features recently added (subtasks list in kanban card, state field replacing
kanban_state field, etc).
The following changes are made in this commit:
- swap of user_id icon in the kanban box and the removal of the allow_unassign field and setting
- change the ordering of the fields in the subtask list
- make small layout changes in the project.task and project.project kanban cards
- remove the "lock-icon private" sub-title of private tasks, replace it with a
little lock icon on the bottom right icons of the kanban card.
- remove the break tag in the project.task kanban card that was unecessary
given the new display and margin style settings
- lock icon is bigger
- kanban icons are better aligned
- state is as big as avatar
- remove the 'remaining hours on SO' field
- deadline field will be optional and hidden by default in project.task list view
- remove the rating field
- add stage field as optional in project.task list views
- priority and state fields will no longer be optional
- stage_id will be copied when duplicating a task, except when the task is
generated through the recurrence
- remove the tooltip of the tag_ids field
- When duplicating a task having sub-tasks, '(copy)' is no longer
added to the name of the sub-tasks of this task.
- project.task kanban view:
* (+ x tasks) mention next to the name is removed
* The caret is replaced with 'fa-check-square-o x/y'
which will represent the number of sub-tasks closed
compared to the total number of sub-tasks
* Only open subtasks are displayed
* When changing the state of a sub-task to a closing one,
the sub-task is muted and removed from the list on the view reload
* The name of the parent task on the kanban card of sub-tasks is
displayed except when viewing the sub-tasks of a particular task
through the sub-tasks stat button
* project.project kanban view: the fa-check-square-o icon of
milestones is replaced with fa-flag-o
* project.task kanban card: the fa-play and fa-pause icons
are moved on the right of the remaining hours widge.
* Allow users to edit the stage_id in batch from the list view of tasks
if all of the selected tasks are part of the same project.
* the state will have the same size as the avatar
* change the opacity of the tasks that are closed
* state is at the right of subtask list
* the striked should be replaced by the opacity on the kanban card
Enterprise PR: odoo/enterprise#38132
Task-3229873
closesodoo/odoo#116628
X-original-commit: 09b5d5843096d27b5a4ab0f603ad44bdb2e74723
Related: odoo/upgrade#4478
Related: odoo/enterprise#38771
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Panagiotis Kyriakou <paky@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastien (bvdn) <bvdn@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the `display_project_id` field was a bit confusing
for the user to know what is the goal of this field. Also this field is
available when the user wants to import his data into Odoo, if he does not
know the goal of this field then he could be lost to know which field he
should for his data to import (or even export).
This commit removes the display_project_id field and so a task will be
private one if the project and the parent fields are not set. The
project to set to the timesheet will be the one set on the task or the
one set on one of its parent tasks.
task-3230063
X-original-commit: 22eda5a5ddcfcda9fa6597d6fe21eb20f525799f
Part-of: odoo/odoo#115781
Before this commit, when a Project user opens the "Burndown Chart"
report from Project app, a traceback is occured due to an invalid
domain in the `ir.rule` for this report.
This commit fixes the issue by updating the domain since the `task_id`
field no longer exists on that report.
task-2982150
closesodoo/odoo#104107
X-original-commit: ce60532b0c5c77a80038298a27550ab5f9eeb012
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit (and its enterprise equivalent) purpose is to smooth the
user experience and remove unnecessary steps.
The commits:
- Remove all stat buttons except the status and collaborators one from
the project edit form.
- Add multiple small changes to string/name fo fields in views
- Change the custom O2M widget for a standard M2M for the management of
child tasks
- Add the milestone field to the portal page of shared project.
- Remove the wizard 'marked_as_reached_milestone'
- Add the automatic generation of milestone when a SO is confirmed if
some SOL need it
task-2941835
closesodoo/odoo#98546
Related: odoo/enterprise#30628
Related: odoo/upgrade#3798
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit to improve generic usage of project app.
So in this commit done following changes:
- when deleting a project, delete all of its tasks in the process instead of
raising an error
- make the list view editable bottom
- add a 'view task' button to open the task form view
- the 'download' and 'print' buttons should be centred
- rename 'planned hours' into 'allocated hours' (or 'allocated days' if the
timesheet encoding unit is in days)
- when a project is linked to an SO manually, he should appear in the
'projects' stat button of the SO; same goes for tasks
- remove the 'profitability' setting
- display the SOL and the quantity in red as well if the milestone hasn't been
reached yet for update right side panel
- add a project field for quickcreate in kanban view
- 'fa-check-square-o x/y' in muted on the project kanban cards
task-2838372
closesodoo/odoo#92262
Related: odoo/enterprise#27758
Related: odoo/upgrade#3561
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this committ:
- Stats buttons were hidden when records are zero
- Some wordings were insignificant
- Existing filters don't allow us to check blocked, blocking and tasks soon in overtime and some other information
- Product form fields need some changes in their order
After this commit:
- All stats button are displayed when records are zero
- Wordings fixed
- New filters added to check blocked, blocking tasks and tasks in overtime soon
- Fields were rearanged
task-2726465
closesodoo/odoo#82253
Related: odoo/enterprise#23257
Related: odoo/upgrade#3185
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the user changes the stage of a task linked to
a milestone, he cannot know if after that task, there is another one
before reaching the milestone related.
This commit displays a wizard to allow the current user to directly
mark as reached the milestone when the user changes the stage of a
task linked to a milestone to a closed stage and all tasks linked to
that milestone are done too. However, if the milestone is already
reached, no wizard will be displayed.
task-2829542
Before this commit, the milestones are only linked to a project without
any link to the tasks of the same project. However, the tasks could be
considered as steps to reach a project milestone.
This commit adds a link between the `project.task` and
`project.milestone` models. This link is added in the `project.task`
model with the Many2One field called `milestone_id`. With this field,
the user will be able to link a milestone to a task.
task-2829542
Before this commit, the current user can create a private task for
another user.
This commit fixes the access rights to avoid the user to create private
tasks for another user.
closesodoo/odoo#90938
X-original-commit: 106826b1ffcd9a18ce5d4674c526bce4f2efca9e
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the Project Manager wants to see the burndown
chart report, he cannot see all the tasks if the project visibility is
follower and he do not follow the project. Indeed, he can only see the
ones in which he is assigned or follower. This behaviour is not expected
for a project manager but only expected for a project user.
This commit adds a rule to avoid filtering the records from burndown
chart report when the current user is a Project Manager.
Related PR: #82634closesodoo/odoo#89284
X-original-commit: f045bd78d562ec48762479138bc8388af252d06a
Related: odoo/enterprise#26457
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the internal user can access to all milestones
created in Project app even if he has no access to the project related.
This commit adds the rules for the project.milestone to filter the
records when the user is not a Project Manager.
closes odoo/odoo#88819
X-original-commit: 6438d8e690229b27ab08ecac436e54a85096eb0f
Forward-port-of: #88546
Forward-port-of: #88509
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the portal user can read the `project.update`
and `project.milestone` records but there is no reason to grant this
access for those models.
This commit removes the read access for thoses models since we don't
show the data in its portal.
X-original-commit: f0331531826974ddaab5dff28739115c37a351c0
Forward-port-of: #88546
Forward-port-of: #88509
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88819
* hr_timesheet_{attendance}, project, rating, sale_timesheet
- removed the 'admin' group on the reporting menu items so that 'users' can
access these menus.
- 'timesheet / attendance' menu should only show if user has access for both
the attendance and timesheet.
- Project/User should access 'Task Analysis' report And Added rule for user.
- customer ratings: only show ratings which has access of their project/task.
- ratings: user should not able to edit ratings.
task-2467564
closesodoo/odoo#82634
Related: odoo/enterprise#23439
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Priyanka Kakadiya <pka@odoo.com>
Purpose of the commit is to improve the generic UX of task
and project views.
task-2590412
closesodoo/odoo#75509
Related: odoo/enterprise#20423
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when a project user wants to see the project form
view, he has an access error because he does not have any access to
`project.collaborators`.
This commit adds `ir.model.access` to give read access to the project
user to `project.collaborators` model.
task-2692587
closesodoo/odoo#79899
X-original-commit: 012b014d0b95f10f7b512ac547b166e28bf32b65
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
In project, private tasks (with no project) are visible to other users even if
they have project admin rights.
SPECIFICATION
Private tasks will not be visible to other users even if they have project admin
rights.
Task-2656512
closesodoo/odoo#78601
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
* = hr_timesheet, sale_project, test_main_flows
Smaller changes:
- Projects created on the fly (through `name_create`) will now come with a
default `new` stage in order for them to not be empty.
- Removed task auto assign upon creation besides in FSM's 'My tasks' menu.
- Allow the reordering of projects without needing to group by
anything.
- Make `project.task`.`description` and `project.tags`.`name`
translatable.
- Disable the creation of records in the view when clicking on `Tasks
in recurrence` stat button.
- Track the planned date of the task in the chatter
- Disable the creation of records in the view when clicking on
'invoices' stat button and add the kanban view to that action.
- Make milestones completely available to regular project users.
- Remove the 'Documents' button in the project's kanban settings menu.
- Add kanban, pivot and graph views to the 'Hours Recorded' stat button
on projects
- Add the calendar view on the 'Hours Forecast' stat button on projects
- The 'Sales Orders' stat button on the `project.project`'s form view
will now display the amount of sales order linked to the whole
project. So the one linked to the project itself if it exists + all
the tasks. It will also open them, form view if 1 else list view.
- Fix a typo in the settings 'projets' => 'projects'
- The analytic account of the project will now be assigned to the
sales order when a task is created through the 'Create a task in an
existing project' option.
Changed the portal task view to include a sidebar similar to sales
orders, with a simple menu leading to different parts of the screen.
Changed the `project.task` 'rating' stat button:
- The icon will now represent the latest review.
- The action will directly lead to the record's form view if there is
only 1 rating.
- Make some fields readonly in the form view.
- Display the % of satisfaction instead of the number of ratings.
Reorder all stat buttons on the `project.task` form view in this order:
- Products, Worksheet, Sales Order(s), Invoices, Ratings, Hours
Forecast, Parent Task, Tasks in recurrence, Tickets, Quotations and
lastly Customer Preview
Make the status of the project editable directly through the kanban
view. A new widget has been added to handle that properly. When editing
the status through that means, a `project.update` will be created with
the current date and the appropriate status. In addition to that a new
status has been added (only on `project.task`, not `project.status`)
namely `to_define` in order to differentiate new and running projects.
Projects now start with the `to_define` status.
The `project.project`'s rating stat button has been changed in the
following ways:
- The icon will now change in function of the satisfaction percentage,
smile above 66%, meh between 33% and 66% and frown below 33%.
- The color will also change depending on the rate, smile is green, meh
is orange and frown is red.
- The ratings will now be in function of the last 30 days instead of
all time and the action will also filter on those 30 days.
- Change the action name from 'Rating' to 'Ratings'.
`project.project` ticket stat button:
- Will now open the form view when there is only one record.
- Added the activity view.
- Disable the creation of new records.
- Rename the action to 'Tickets'.
Closes: odoo/odoo#75269
See: odoo/enterprise#20334
Task ID: 2611006
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Adds personal stages to tasks.
Users assigned to tasks will be able to have their own pipeline to
handle their tasks independently of the project's pipeline.
The assignee field on Tasks has also been changed to a Many2many to
support multiple assignees on one task.
The same table is used to store those information, essentially a triplet
(task, user, stage), to ensure that:
1) personal stages only apply to tasks to which you are assigned to.
2) synchronizing to make sure that you don't have a personal stage for a
task on which you are not assigned anymore.
Alongside those changes, some minor changes have also been made:
- Modified the task's tree view.
- Renamed the Tasks menu to 'My Tasks'.
- The default view is now the kanban view for the 'My Tasks' action.
- project_id is not required anymore, tasks with no project are
considered 'private', those tasks are only visible to those that are
assigned to it.
- Added tracking of both user_ids and depend_on_ids in the chatter.
Closesodoo/odoo#74087
Task ID: 2398734
Before this commit, the project sharing feature is enabled by default
when the Project app is installed but the user could never use the
feature and thus we add more access rights to portal user for nothing.
To avoid this, this commit removes by default all additional access
rights given by project sharing feature and adds this access rights only
when a collaborator is added.
If the user removes all collaborators for all projects then we need
to disable the feature. That is, we will remove the access rights and
ir.rule records added.
So, the feature will not really disable but we remove the additionnal
access rights and ir.rule records added with this feature.
task-2379518
closes#73341
This reverts commit fc7778f8c512202dc3361d6b87be8c28b299c3c8 because of
a change in the spec.
The access mode are removed and replaced by this access mode for portal
user:
- read: the user goes to the classic portal view
- edit: the user is added as collaborator of the shared project and can
access to project sharing views.
To do this, the portal share is inherited by the project share wizard.
This new wizard can be open to share in readonly and open to share in
edit mode via 2 buttons in the form view of the shared project.
A new stat button is added to form view of project to see the
collaborators of this project. That is, the ones can access to the
project sharing views. The project manager will can remove or also add
new collaborators via the views in this stat button.
task-2379518
closes#73341
Before this commit, the portal user could see archived tasks by filtering the
tasks with the search view.
This commit adds a condition in the domain of the `ir.rule` for this user
to allow him to see only the active tasks.
task-2379518
closes#73341
Before this commit, when the portal user can access to project sharing
views, he can just read. If we just add ir.rule to allow the edition,
the portal could create/edit. We have to allow the project manager to
define the access rights of portal users when he want to share them a
project with the project sharing feature.
This commit adds 3 access modes portal users in project sharing views.
1. **Readonly**: the portal can only see the tasks in the different views.
2. **Comment**: the portal can use the chatter in task form view.
3. **Edit**: the portal user can create and edit tasks.
task-2379518
closes#73341
Co-Authored-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the portal users can only see the tasks in the
project sharing views.
This commit allows these users can also create tasks and edit some
fields in task.
task-2379518
closes#73341
Adds new optional stages for the project.project model.
Previously projects would stay dormant when they were finished, we can
now define stages for those projects to determine where a stage is in
it's lifecycle.
Also adds some small changes to the project itself, such as adding tags.
Closesodoo/odoo#73648
Task ID: 2581575
Related: odoo/upgrade#2646
Signed-off-by: LTU-Odoo <IT-Ideas@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds project updates in project to take in stock the current
status of the project : which task or milestone changed in the past 30
days.
The project manager is able to add a status on the project update, and
edit the description of the update. There is also a chatter in which
he/she can discuss some points with other project users.
The description is build with informations retrieved from mail tracking
values or from project.* models. Those informations are collected in a
dict and rendered in a template to ease the inheritence in further
modules needs.
Following commits will add behaviour to handle those updates and
milestones in the various views. See PR for further information.
PR : #68899
task-2393768
This reverts commit odoo/odoo@7059b17.
This commit translates tests introduced in this reverted commit to be
aligned with the current workflow.
This commit reverts functionality or business logic linked to the
reverted commit :
- odoo/odoo#47248 : You no longer have to be an allowed user to see the
timesheets but only a message partner.
- odoo/odoo#49021 : We no longer deal with allowed_user_ids or
allowed_portal_user_ids
- odoo/odoo@f2a1a00 : We no longer deal with the allowed users lists.
This commit removes the button project_privacy_visibility for functional
reasons.
Closes: #65367
task-2439329
Related: odoo/upgrade#2128
Related: odoo/enterprise#16067
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit we have reports that depict the status of a
project at a certain point in time, but we don't have any reports
representing the actual progress of the project in time.
This commit adds a burndown chart, this chart would help users see
the evolution of the project and determine whether it is on the
right track or not.
task-2458017
This commit brings a new feature for the Project App and project
configuration. This feature is called "Task Dependencies" and it allows
to the user to determine the order in which to perform tasks in a
project.
task-2387984
closes#66740
Some interventions are done on a regular basis (e.g. maintenance of
fire alarms, safety inspections). Having tasks auto-generate would
facilitate the process and would ensure that the next intervention
isn't missed/forgotten.
closesodoo/odoo#55517
Taskid: 2172156
Related: odoo/enterprise#12246
Related: odoo/upgrade#1604
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Before this commit, deleting a stage with tasks, the user received an
error.
With this commit, when deleting a stage containing tasks, a wizard
offers the choice to move the tasks to another stage.
closesodoo/odoo#46410
Taskid: 1869030
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit is to allow multi-create in alias mixin by correctly
creating / updating aliases in batch.
Task ID 1919277
Community PR odoo/odoo#41160
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6983
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#872
Co-Authored-By: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
* Reword tasks in the sample project
* Add a "Create and Edit" button on the project creation modal
* Open the file chooser in "Set a cover image" if there are no images
set
* Correclty display the kanban state button on archived task
* Add a button to list the tasks when deleting a project
* Open file chooser for cover image: Automatically open the file chooser
when setting a cover image on a task if there are no attachments to chose
from.
closesodoo/odoo#47306
Taskid: 2209133
Related: odoo/enterprise#9141
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
The current kanban view is messy. It is difficult to identify which
apps are installed or not. The user can completely miss a module
that might have interested him. A search panel would make things way
more readable.
closesodoo/odoo#44401
Taskid: 2181557
Related: odoo/enterprise#8144
Related: odoo/upgrade#879
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
=======
Purpose
=======
Currently for a user to be allowed to see a private project they must follow the
project. This means that they will be added as a follower of all new tasks in the
project which causes them to receive 1000000 notifications, especially if there are a
lot of tasks in a project.
==============
Specifications
==============
1) Add an Employee m2m field on project next to 'Invited Employees'
- only visible if the 'Invited Employees' option is selected
- the project should only be visible to employees selected there (regardless if they
are followers or not)
2) Add an Employee m2m field on tasks below the 'Email cc' one in debug mode
- only visible if the 'Invited Employees' option is selected on the related project
- should be pre-filled with what is set on the project
- the task should be visible to employees selected there (regardless if they are
followers or not)
3) Add a Portal users m2m field on project next to 'Portal users and all employees'
- only visible if the 'Portal users and all employees' option is selected
- the project should only be visible to portal users selected there (regardless if
they are followers or not)
- rename the option into 'Invited portal users and all employees'
4) Add a Portal users m2m field on tasks below the 'Email cc' one in debug mode
- only visible if the 'Portal users and all employees' option is selected
- should be pre-filled with what is set on the project
- the task should be visible to portal users selected there (regardless if they are
followers or not)
5) Following a project/task should not grant the user/employee the ability to see the
project/task
Task 2031527
closesodoo/odoo#40505
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
For historical reason (problably the inheritS between project and AA, removed in 12.0), portal
user can read Analytic Account. This makes no sense, as it is a purely internal resource
for companies. Removing the access rights don't change anything for portal user and make
those data secure.
Task-1911581
As task can be billed, it became a important business model. To avoid mistakes in a multi company
environment, we need to make the company_id field required. Indeed shared task can be problematic
with access rights when a employee will log timesheet from another company in a task that is not in
the same company as its project.
To populate this field, we recommend to take the company of task's project, or to fallback on
the company of the user that created one.
Task-1999686
When we remove the inheritS between project and analytic account, we move the
analytic_accound_id field in timesheet because it was the only use case for
a project to be linked to an analytic account.
This commit prepares new cost origin for a project (other that timesheet).
Register costs on project will required an analytic account to keep analytic
costs tracking. The analytic account management is now moved to project, like
it was in 10.0, but without the inheritS.
Task-1911581
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a channels C with user A linked to an employee E
- Create project P with privacy_visibility='followers' meaning only visible for employees that follow P
- Add the channel C as a follower of P
- Log as user A go to Project app
Bug:
The project P is not readable for A
opw:1958386
closesodoo/odoo#32324
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Access group terminology is missleading. Yous have to be manager to administrate
an application. This task consists to rename groups to be understandable for everyone.
Groups should be reorganised on the users form to be more explicit.
Specification
=============
1/ Rename 'Manager' to 'Administrator' in users groups.
2/ Define a hierarchy on access groups by using the category_id in the manifests
A category 'Operations/Project' will create a category Project with a parent
category 'Operations', and something smart is already developed (in modules/db.py)
to avoid duplicating categories.
3/ Add a group in expenses to be able to approve expenses reports for my team.
4/ Add a group in timesheets to be able to approve timesheets for my team.
5/ Remove partially the useless crap in ir_module_category_data.xml
6/ Sort access rights groups on users form according to its parent category
closesodoo/odoo#29362
Signed-off-by: "Yannick Tivisse (yti)" <yti@odoo.com>
prye-odoo