Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a product "My Test Product" (no attribute)
2. Create a quotation, select the "My Test Product" product and confirm the sale order
3. Go back to product and add an attribute "Size" with values "L", "XL"
4. Create another quotation, select the ""My Test Product" product => crash
We consider archived combination of attributes as forbidden combination in
the configurator, but when the archived product doesn't have any attribute,
the `archived_combination` was an empty list, which wasn't supported well
by the product configurator logic (client-side).
To quickly fix this issue, we can simply stop sending empty archived combination
(i.e. when the archived product had no attributes).
opw-3410383
closesodoo/odoo#127335
X-original-commit: ca1ac1a115fe06a0a2d2de0fb131a58019f73631
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Field `product.product.lst_price` is not recomputed after changing
`product.template.attribute.value.price_extra`.
Computation of `product.product.lst_price` is not triggered because
`product.product.price_extra` is not recomputed because of the missing
decorator.
closesodoo/odoo#126968
X-original-commit: c7034cb9973532da8011f5fc78d50d859b704500
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The previous commit introduced an optimization to reduce the number of
queries and fields fetched when we call `name_search`. But it works much
better when the dependencies of `display_name` contain field names used
in the calculation (on the same record/model).
Then, to improve the performance and the cache coherency, add `depends`
and `depends_context` depending on the custom `_compute_display_name`.
Add only the first level of dependencies (never traverse relational
field) because only these have a positive impact on the previous
optimization and the cost is very low (see `modified`).
About `depends_context`, we don't include `lang` because (when `_` is
used by example) it is unlikely to get the same display_name in the same
request with two different lang.
closesodoo/odoo#122085
Related: odoo/documentation#4639
Related: odoo/enterprise#42599
Related: odoo/upgrade#4780
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Rationale
=========
Since v8, the `display_name` field is present on all models. By default,
`display_name` uses `name_get` which has pretty much the same purpose
(return record name used by the web client). Gradually, many (backend)
developers (and the ORM: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/6da1c3ac4c036eac289597602976538e243cb939)
started using `display_name` (more convenient than
`record.name_get()[0][1]`) but it still had the `name_get` override.
It becomes more complex than necessary and poeple start to misunderstand
the two (and sometimes override both, leading to inconstiencies between
`display_name`/`name_get`).
To simplify the ORM and the API, we decided to keep only one of them,
the `display_name` field:
- It is much more convenient from a backend point of view
(`record.name_get()[0][1]` vs `record.display_name`)
- It is cached during the same transaction (and invalidated if
its dependencies change)
- It can be overridden like any other compute field (override
`_compute_display_name` with any extra dependencies)
- `name_get` is replaced by `read(['display_name'])`
(API perceptive), which can actually be more efficient
(if `display_name`'s depends are correct, the ORM will only fetch the
fields it needs instead of every prefetchable field)
Changes
=======
- Deprecates `name_get` for the v17 and based the method on
`display_name` (the opposite of before)
- Converts all usage of `name_get`
- Overrides of `name_get` are now overrides of `_compute_display_name`
- For `res.partner`, rename the field store `display_name` into
`complete_name` because `display_name` context-dependent and it makes
no sense to have a compute store that is context-dependent.
- Previously, it was possible to return multiple names for the same
record with `name_get`, but it was tricky and most of the usage of
this `name_get` didn't take this into account. The only example of
this is the `name_get` of `product.product`
(now use `", ".join(<names>)`).
Part-of: odoo/odoo#122085
The whole contextual price of products relies on multiple context keys:
* uom
* pricelist
* quantity
* date
The related logic has already been partly removed/deprecated on products,
but the computation of discounts for events/event booths are still relying
on that logic, though imperfectly.
This commit makes sure this hacky logic (relying on those contextual keys)
is as clear and reliable as possible.
We factorize and harmonize the remaining use cases, with a dedicated constant
and specific methods, making sure:
* currency conversion
* price & discount computations
are coherent, while clearly explaining that it should not be used for
any new feature/logic/code.
We also restrict context updates as much as possible (there won't be
any discount when the pricelist is configured to hide the discount from the customer)
closesodoo/odoo#123848
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
This commit improves the performance of `_is_applicable_for`, by:
1) Leveraging the `product.category.parent_path` field.
2) Use `applied_on` for the `if` conditions, which is ~100% faster than using
the many2one fields due to the related record initialization.
These micro-optimizations are important because of the way `_is_applicable_for`
is used.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0a5d84289/addons/product/models/product_pricelist.py#L169-L193
Which, for demostration purposes, could be simplified to:
```
for product, qty, partner in products_qty_partner:
for rule in items:
if not rule._is_applicable_for(product, qty_in_product_uom):
continue
```
On a database with 470 products, and about the same number of pricelist items,
these optimization result in a ~30% speedup when computing prices for all
products at once. It may be even better depending on how many nested product
categories are used in the database and in the pricelist rules.
closesodoo/odoo#125670
X-original-commit: 3619f77c73092e800aab10f0df09ca5775545da3
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
1 - activate "Print GS1 Barcodes for Lots & Serial Numbers"
2 - create a product P tracked by lot
3 - print the "Lot/Serial Number (PDF)" from the stock.lot form/list
view
Bug:
contrary to previous versions, the current template doesn't allow the
field to overflow into multiple lines
Fix:
change the css class `o_label_4x12` as it is only used in usecases
where overflow show be allowed
OPW-3336476
closesodoo/odoo#124557
X-original-commit: a5924bfe11cd9324e2ba056e0ac1d449aed730c8
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mohamed Megahed Abbas Megahed SALLAM (mome) <mome@odoo.com>
- Standard price (cost price) is there for variants and for product template when there are no
variant, as it has no sense the have one otherwise. Templates with variantS have a cost of 0.
- On the website, product shown are the product templates, but you select and then buy the product
product (variants).
- The pricelist can be set to make a discount based on the cost.
==> If such a pricelist is used, the product templates having more than 1 variant are shown with a
price of 0 until you can select the wanted variant
opw-3232621
closesodoo/odoo#124594
X-original-commit: 561eba8f2adece4c21ea46c1bd050779ea3dc676
Signed-off-by: Morgane Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
When no product is linked to a given tag there is no need to display
a void many2many. Indeed tags are configured mainly from products and
this field is used as a reminder of its usage.
closesodoo/odoo#124342
X-original-commit: 42ab359785fb38c098a524d03535c3aa6cca1173
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
add chatter to product pricelist to improve collaboration. Track
currency, company, country groups, discount policy and website fields.
task-3316528
closesodoo/odoo#121244
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
So that we can in the future harmonize more easily the discount
computation between sale, point_of_sale, e-commerce, ...
closesodoo/odoo#123849
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
If applied, this commit will solve the issue of the rounding method
AssertionError while configuring any negative value in pricelists.
Steps to produce:
- Open Sale > Products > Pricelists > Create/Open any Pricelist.
- Add a new line in Pricelist Rules.
- Set computation as 'Formula'.
- In the Rounding Method field configure any negative value i.e. -1.56.
- Error will be raised.
Fix this issue by preventing the user from entering the negative value in
Rounding Method.
Sentry-4208813474
closesodoo/odoo#123539
X-original-commit: f7b0eddf3124b15bb223379a513965fa2a017851
Signed-off-by: Parth Solanki (paso) <paso@odoo.com>
In specific situation, unlink can lead to raise a `RecursionError`:
- The model `A` has a many2one `b_id` field toward a model `B`.
This field is set with `ondelete='cascade'`.
- The model `A` has one **store** related field **no-sudo** named
`a_related` (`related='b_id.b_other_field`).
- With `ir.rule` on model `A` with a domain containing `a_related`
You have one record B `b_1` with 20 records A linked to it
(`a_1, ..., a_20`). When you try to unlink `b_1`:
Stack:
File "...", line 543, in ...
b_1.unlink()
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 3594, in unlink
self.env.flush_all()
=> At this point, `a_1, ..., a_20` have already been deleted from the
database because of the 'cascade' deletion. But the ORM doesn't have
any information about this, and `a_related` (for `a_1, ..., a_20`) are
flagged to be recomputed (because it depends on `b_id.b_other_field`)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/api.py", line 732, in flush_all
self._recompute_all()
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/api.py", line 728, in _recompute_all
self[field.model_name]._recompute_field(field)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 6165, in _recompute_field
field.recompute(records)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 1348, in recompute
self.compute_value(record)
=> `self.compute_value(recs)` raised a `MissingError` before recalling
`compute_value` with only the first `record` (but others are still in
the prefetch)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 1368, in compute_value
records._compute_field_value(self)
=> `a_related` of `record` is removed from to_compute, but only the
first record, not the rest of the records present in the prefetch set.
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 4194, in _compute_field_value
fields.determine(field.compute, self)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 100, in determine
return needle(records, *args)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 689, in _compute_related
values = [first(value[name]) for value in values]
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 689, in <listcomp>
values = [first(value[name]) for value in values]
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 5860, in __getitem__
return self._fields[key].__get__(self, type(self))
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 2772, in __get__
return super().__get__(records, owner)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 1186, in __get__
recs._fetch_field(self)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 3162, in _fetch_field
self._read(fnames)
=> `_read` tries to read the first record + others from the prefetch set
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 3215, in _read
self.with_context(active_test=False)._flush_search([], order='id')
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 4607, in _flush_search
self.env[model_name].flush_model(field_names)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 5560, in flush_model
self._recompute_model(fnames)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 6134, in _recompute_model
self._recompute_field(field)
=> This is where the recursion starts, record compute will move forward
one by one. But sadly, the stack grows very fast, and with only a few
(already deleted) records to recompute, the issue will be generated.
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 6165, in _recompute_field
field.recompute(records)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 1348, in recompute
self.compute_value(record)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 1368, in compute_value
records._compute_field_value(self)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 4194, in _compute_field_value
fields.determine(field.compute, self)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 100, in determine
return needle(records, *args)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 689, in _compute_related
values = [first(value[name]) for value in values]
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 689, in <listcomp>
values = [first(value[name]) for value in values]
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 5860, in __getitem__
return self._fields[key].__get__(self, type(self))
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 2772, in __get__
return super().__get__(records, owner)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/fields.py", line 1186, in __get__
recs._fetch_field(self)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 3162, in _fetch_field
self._read(fnames)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 3215, in _read
self.with_context(active_test=False)._flush_search([], order='id')
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 4607, in _flush_search
self.env[model_name].flush_model(field_names)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 5560, in flush_model
self._recompute_model(fnames)
File "/home/odoo/Documents/dev/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 6134, in _recompute_model
self._recompute_field(field)
How to fix it:
Move the logic of the MissingError of `_recompute_field` inside the
`recompute` directly.
X-original-commit: c2aac02ac4f8c5cc4a9324134535393bd97338ce
Part-of: odoo/odoo#122147
Currently, only stable releases see their translations updated. This has
resulted in master accumulating outdated stuff for years, which can be
confusing for users testing master on runbot.
This one-shot commit resynchronizes master translations based on the
content from 16.0 and removes empty PO files (i.e. no longer containing
translations).
closesodoo/odoo#121629
Related: odoo/enterprise#41171
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Following 459760c, the `barcode` field wouldn't appear on a new product
form until the form was saved at least once.
This was due to the new product not having any variants until it was
saved.
In the case of the product not having any variants, we check if it does
have a least one attribute at the same time (which would be the case for
dynamic attributes).
closesodoo/odoo#121925
X-original-commit: 5f3db6683ab191cb68af4c8d6bb2e86a5b114ee1
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Prior to this commit, the SVG's viewBox attribute was missing, which
prevented svgs from being scaled.
This commit fixes this issue.
task-3326633
Part of task-3326263
X-original-commit: 30300c373ad1c63a6cf8b035cae0785a09c6933f
Part-of: odoo/odoo#121886
*: hr_holidays, stock, sale, product, web, sale, purchase, stock,
website, survey
Adapt some custom control panels (mainly for custom reports) to the
milk controlpanel.
hr_holidays:
Move the buttons to create a new time off or a new allocation to the
"create button" slot and transform it into a dropdown (creating
allocation requests is clearly a secondary action, not a primary one)
stock:
3 lines does not fit, must be on 2 lines
Part-of: odoo/odoo#116641
While creating a new product in product category with barcode value in inventory
module, `_check_barcode_uniqueness` method is called. In which variable 'domain'
is passed, and getting wrong value.
Steps to Produce:-
1) Go to Inventory then configuration
2) Click on 'Product Categories' under products
3) Click/Create Product Category
4) Click stat button 'product'
5) Create a product
6) Then add barcode value
7) Click on Save
8) Trace-back will be generated
Reason:-
While creating new product from product category when user add the barcode value
in product form, the '_check_barcode_uniqueness' method is called. In this
method the value of 'domain' is getting updated by reference from variable
'domain' from method '_search' present in the same model.
This results in a traceback with the message
'Invalid field product.packaging.categ_id'.
Applying these changes will resolve this issue.
sentry - 4073963761
closesodoo/odoo#121072
X-original-commit: ce9889e314ae696773ce040f662569e281abe700
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Inventory -> Configuration -> [Products] Attributes
- Create new Attribute with 'Variants Creation Mode' set to
'Dynamically' with a few values
- Inventory -> Products -> Products -> New
- Set the new dynamic attribute to the product and save
- If you try to set a barcode, the field will empty itself at each save
When a product is created with 'Dynamic' attributes, the variants will
only be created once the combination of attributes is used. So initially
there is no variant, hence nowhere to set the barcode.
So we avoid letting the attribute being set when there is still no
variant.
Part of task-3218314
Part-of: odoo/odoo#119381
This commit follows the addition of the OWL date picker and intends to:
- update views calling daterange widgets to use the new syntax (and
remove the end date field from the view in most cases);
- change the remaining components extending the previous DatePicker and
DateTimePicker components.
Part of task 3121497
Part-of: odoo/odoo#112171
What are the steps to reproduce your issue?
- Create a product with more than one attribute.
- Let say color White, black and purple
- Create a 'draft' invoice for the purple product variant
- Remove the 'purple' attribute value from the product
- It will archive that variant (because the account.move linked to it)
- Try to delete the attribute value from menu Sales > Cofinfiguration > Attribute
What is the current behavior that you observe?
- technical error message
What would be your expected behavior in this case?
- non-technical message for end-users
Solution :
- Change both message to tell user he cannot delete the value if the value has been referenced somewhere else.
opw-2623583
missing forward-port of db1e52f0234f73e1bda22a411baba7b1f0994d5a
closesodoo/odoo#120495
X-original-commit: 0c8c43d50a574d73d9d5ac925eb16faf730a76ba
Signed-off-by: Morgane Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
Following 83c52575d0 we activated or created pricelists as soon as a
currency was activated/created/deleted, for every company that might already have another
pricelist setup done, which was quite confusing.
With this fix, we ensure this will only happen:
- at company creation
- when enabling the pricelist feature
- when enabling the multi-currency setting (only the first time, unless the pricelists were
disabled manually afterward)
closesodoo/odoo#120039
X-original-commit: 4c0146d939e40e9433794802388cf06147e716f2
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Morgane Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
before this commit, when deleting a product
category from a db where expense category
is already deleted before this commit [1]
is raising exception
after this commit, exception wont be shown
in existing db where expense category is
deleted.
1 https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/09e4b2fb586ac83adb984672e027ce6dd62affb2closesodoo/odoo#119754
X-original-commit: 20b5518110b233ba3b59158a8362db04b9a89aad
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
This commit adds two autoresize hooks for text inputs and textareas to
make it adapt their size (width for text inputs, height for textareas)
depending on their content.
The commit therefore solves the issue of several form view task titles
being restricted to 1 line while it can be annoying if the title is too
long. The autoresizeTextarea feature was moved from TextField to the
autoresizeTextarea hook and the autoresizeInput feature was moved from
the AutoresizeInput mail component to the autoresizeInput hook.
The TextField component has a new option for disabling linebreaks.
task-3138826
closesodoo/odoo#117355
Related: odoo/enterprise#39493
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
When your pricelist item price is based on an other prcicelist in
another currency, the wrong currency is given to the function
_get_product_price. we sould give the currency of the base_pricelist
instead of the target one.
Here is a example:
We have a priclist in INR based on a pricelist in USD. And the company
currency is euro.
When we go for the first time in '_compute_base_price', where we'll call
_get_product_price to get the price from the base pricelist (the $ one)
We get as src_currency the USD and target the INR. Since we are calling
_get_product_price with INR as currency, when _get_product_price will
call _compute_base_price, we'll get EUR as src_currency and INR as
target.
This will lead to apply on the EU price (the one on the product) the
rate of EUR->INR then apply over it USD -> INR. Instead of EUR -> USD
and then USD -> INR
closesodoo/odoo#119505
X-original-commit: 8ace9942368688dc1183133f451ea788a03e0f14
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Masereel Pierre <pim@odoo.com>
The product configurator dialog was still in legacy code as it was not
required for the migration of the views to OWL. Now that we're moving
forward with the removal of other parts of the legacy code, this dialog
had to be converted as well.
Some parts of the logic have now been rewritten in OWL, getting a better
share of the logic between the server and the client.
The product configurator in e-commerce still uses the old implementation
and will be refactored in another task.
task-3056806
closesodoo/odoo#106511
Related: odoo/enterprise#39525
Related: odoo/upgrade#4550
Signed-off-by: Valentin Chevalier <vcr@odoo.com>
Purpose of the commit is to do the generic improvements for project.
So in this commit did the following changes:
- adding a label 'last update' to the stat button in project form view.
- indicate 'my project' in the tab instead of 'project sharing view in portal' in project sharing.
- set the first non-folded stage of the project as default on newly created tasks.
- remove user confirming the SO as the default project manager.
- hide fields service_tracking, service_upsell_threshold if sale_ok is false.
- set purchase_method to purchase by default if product is of service type.
- remove the : next to the totals labels and decrease the font-size for values of 'total hours'
and 'remaining hours' in timesheets notebook in project task form view.
task-2897867
closesodoo/odoo#96548
Related: odoo/enterprise#29774
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Manisha Tulsiyani <matu@odoo.com>
When printing the label of a lot, the datamatrix may overlap the
product/lot name and will overlap the 'best before' date.
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings:
- Barcode Nomenclature: GS1
- Enable "Print GS1 barcodes for lots [...]"
2. Create a product P:
- Name: a long name
- Type: Storable
- Barcode: 1111111111113
- Tracking: USN
- Expiration Date: True
- Dates > Expiration Date: 1 days
3. Process a receipt with 1 x P
- The serial number should be long
4. Print Labels
- To Print: Lot/SN Labels
- (Confirm)
- Format: 4 x 12
Error: the datamatrix overlaps the product name, the serial number,
and the 'best before' date
For the product/lot names, we can only improve the situation. If the
user define a too long name, the issue will still happen and nothing
can be done
For the dates, we can shorten the labels. That way, the dates will
always be correctly displayed
OPW-3193836
closesodoo/odoo#116541
X-original-commit: f175897cefd1db149e94a50882d9e7babfc6293d
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
According to Wiktionary, French spacing is "the archaic practice (though
still current in French) of inserting a space around colons, semicolons,
question marks, and exclamation marks". This is not standard practice in
English and most languages of the world.
The purpose of this commit is to start purging the code from this typo,
as it may reflect poorly on the software for some people.
closesodoo/odoo#116167
Related: odoo/enterprise#38542
Signed-off-by: Louis Wicket (wil) <wil@odoo.com>
They dates from < 2027 and are quite outdated. Favour the nl
translation instead.
n_BE is not on Transifex so it was not possible to correct bad
translations.
closesodoo/odoo#115845
X-original-commit: d04c8b7e484db8306d858c891a7a2b11885fdcd9
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
According to Wiktionary, French spacing is "the archaic practice (though
still current in French) of inserting a space around colons, semicolons,
question marks, and exclamation marks". This is not standard practice in
English and most languages of the world.
The purpose of this commit is to start purging the code from this typo,
as it may reflect poorly on the software for some people.
closesodoo/odoo#114533
Related: odoo/enterprise#37853
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
The main objective of this commit is to make checkboxes consistent
and fix their spacing issues.
Prior to these changes, the checkboxes on the `product_view` were
too close to their neighboring option labels, making it difficult to
know which checkbox to tick.
The new changes fixes inconsistencies in general such as undesired
hovering effects and the cursor behaviors on disabled inputs.
This commit also removes the margin in the checkbox template since the
padding from the checkbox wrapper compensates for the spacing between
the checkboxes and their respective labels.
Tweaking the selector in `settings_form_view.scss` to ignore boolean
field inputs allows us to get rid of max-width and margin overrides
introduced in commit b90059e936.
Most checkboxes were already falling under their labels on mobile, but
this change impacted those that were not. To address this issue, we
decided to consistently change the position of the checkboxes left to
their labels for small devices in form view.
This required slight adjustments to the `form_group.xml` template.
Still in form_view, for some of the specific checkboxes such as
`o_checkbox_optional_field` the changes in `form_controller.scss` are
made to mimic the new behavior for mobile sized screen.
However, if they are using the form_group template, their behavior
is unchanged at the moment.
Finally, even if these changes makes it better for most of them, some
checkboxes in `settings` still require some minor adjustments and will
be addressed in task-3113372.
task-3094083
closesodoo/odoo#114612
X-original-commit: ddb7574f97f11e69f0304c8bd8d55c2c53ab53fd
Related: odoo/enterprise#37887
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
The type fields of actions already defaults to
the model name in the base model definition.
Therefore, specifying `ir.actions.server`, `ir.actions.act_window`
& so on as type is useless (and adds noise since it's the same as
the action model).
closesodoo/odoo#114539
Related: odoo/enterprise#37855
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux (juc) <juc@odoo.com>
This API is much more sensible for making subqueries. Specifically, one
can generate a subquery without the clauses LIMIT and ORDER BY.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#112126
This simplifies the use of subqueries by avoiding some costly default
order on the model or the idiotic order='id'. Method _flush_search()
has been adapted accordingly.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#112126
The parameter in search() is redundant with method search_count(), and
was making the calls less readable.
The method _search() is aimed at always returning a Query object. The
method can therefore never return an integer, hence the removal of the
parameter. This does not actually remove any functionality from the
method; counting result is simply given by using it differently.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#112126
Steps to reproduce:
- Go to a product with a long name
- Inside the product page go to "print labels"
- Choose "Dymo" as label type and print.
(For barcode you need to add a barcode number to the product.)
Issue:
The product name is not displayed correctly on the label because
is too long.
Solution:
Removing the fixed height int he label seem to have good behavior with
sizing the text.
opw-3120807
closesodoo/odoo#114097
X-original-commit: 37b49c6ced839cd82b77819845a52ba2cf8c4ab8
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Victor Feyens