Ensure the code works fine even if countries are deleted.
Also consider "re"-created countries after deletion, by only considering
the country code, not the data reference.
This should reduce support requests related to deleted countries, and
ease the resolution of such problems by the users themselves.
TASK ID - 2368842
closesodoo/odoo#60558
X-original-commit: 037012bc4e2935eb00a7f353529bb7ec55066733
Related: odoo/enterprise#14347
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
- removed simple check vat for columbia
- removed document type field from partner
- document type will be managed by latam type
- updated city name for colombia
- added data for for latam identification type
- Added depdencies
- base_address_city
- account_debit_note
- l10n_latam_base
task- 2190843closesodoo/odoo#53040
Related: odoo/upgrade#1589
Related: odoo/enterprise#9567
Signed-off-by: Josse Colpaert <jco@openerp.com>
The RUT is the Registro Único Tributario;
the NIT is the Número de Identificación Tributaria.
The number that is used is thus the NIT.
opw 2082599
closesodoo/odoo#38533
X-original-commit: 1db209acaf44731f1740f038d9fadf464677baf4
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
Install l10n_co,contacts. Open contacts.
Several crash messages will popup because the override in l10n_co of
res_partner is not computing the 'l10n_co_verification_code' field for
every record. Changing the implementation to be sure to store some value
for every record fix the issue.
opw-2082583
closesodoo/odoo#38473
X-original-commit: 2489c40507abba5df833b0db7b5a02749b2f749a
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Removed by b341b5ca73. This function
copied the check_vat constrains decorator before that commit. Instead
replace with country_id because the l10n_co check_vat function still
uses that field.
In Colombia customers can legally identify themselves with various
codes, one of which is the RUT. This is the traditional TIN and
adheres to the rules implement by base_vat. The other types however
don't and so shouldn't be checked by base_vat.
opw-781247
The l10n_co_verification_code field shouldn't have been added in
l10n_co. Instead users should simply append the verification code to
the VAT. This way the vatnumber module used by base_vat will handle
validation correctly.
Removing this is necessary because otherwise we give the impression
that the verification code doesn't have to be included in the VAT
number which makes base_vat complain.
The l10n_co_verification_code will be removed in master.
opw-781247
This simplifies the chart of accounts and taxes to only the common
ones used. It also updates some changes that took place (eg. the VAT
increase from 16% to 19%). Lastly it implements some additional fields
on res.partner: a document type and a verification code that is
calculated based on the VAT.
william-andre