Currently both incoming and outgoing emails are using the same 'email'
message_type. However both flows are not linked in any way.
Purpose of 'message_type' is to distinguish who generated the message.
In this case incoming emails are generated by the mailgateway while outgoing
emails are generated by mailins e.g. using the composer in mailing mode.
We now distinguish outgoing emails from incoming emails by using a specific
type for outgoing emails. Addons are updated accordingly.
Default 'message_type' value when removing sms/snailmail/whatsapp is now
'comment' instead of 'email', as default value of messages should be
comment as discuss is the main source of messages.
Task-3285720
closesodoo/odoo#139814
Related: odoo/enterprise#49597
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
This commit contains the following changes:
- Mobile view for devices with a width under 'SIZE.MD'
- Align mobile view bottom buttons
- Reduce size of category bar when images
closesodoo/odoo#139686
Signed-off-by: Joseph Caburnay (jcb) <jcb@odoo.com>
tl;dr : it may be smaller in the SCSS file, but definitely not in the
generated CSS file. Do'nt repeat want can be set once.
These changes result in roughly 130KB gain in the backend bundle.
Follow-up of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/138670
task-3546717
closesodoo/odoo#139683
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: stefanorigano (SRI) <sri@odoo.com>
Main changes:
Consolidate the relation between a sale order line and the repair
order it has created.
Before:
When a product trigger the creation of a repair order from a
sale order line, the 'Repair Request' field of the repair order
is defined by the product name.
After:
When a product trigger the creation of a repair order from a
sale order line, set the product and its quantity on the created
repair order if the product is of type storable or consumable.
Moreover, define the 'Repair Request' field of the repair order
by the description of the sale line rather than by the product
name.
closesodoo/odoo#139177
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Since the redesign of the default theme [1], `website_forum` needed to
be fine-tuned in order to fit with the other website modules.
This commit adapts the sidebar to maintain consistency with the other
website modules.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/120302
task-3559011
Part of task-3097005
closesodoo/odoo#139003
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Currently creating a record with 'is_published' being False (aka not published)
crashes when people can't publish. However 'is_published' being False is the
default value, and create should work in both cases.
It now correctly checks that published records could effectively be published.
This allows to remove a small workaround done in eLearning.
See odoo/odoo@4086f344d8 for ref.
Only failing use case would be having
def _default_is_published(self):
return True
def _compute_can_publish(self):
for record in self:
record.can_publish = self.env.user.has_group('something')
But this would not be a really valid use case: not being able to publish
but having default publish to True makes no sense: what matters is publishing
records as it gives more visibility to records, not the flag change itself.
Followup of odoo/odoo#70291
Task-3299702
closesodoo/odoo#137900
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Previously proposed formating was trying to normalize extra in one part
of the path. This means that no extra needed a placeholder.
The implementation was meant to be more generic and extendible since a
part of the logic has to be in website.
A suggestion was made to make it more restricted but explicite by
keeping the url simple in web/controllers/binary.py but adding a
controller in website to add this extra part.
The base extra direction is now in the extension, as the min part.
Initial urls:
/web/assets/{unique}/[{website_id}/][rtl/]{bundle_name}[.min].{extension}
New urls:
/web/assets/[{website_id}]/{unique}/{bundle_name}[.rtl][.min].{extension}
Managed by two routes:
/web/assets/<string:unique>/<string:filename>
/web/assets/<int:website_id>/<string:unique>/<string:filename>
Where filename is in the format {bundle_name}[.rtl][.min].{extension}
Multiple possibilities where proposed
- /web/assets/website/<int:website_id>/<string:unique>/<string:filename>
More explicit but prefixing by /website was considered
- /website/assets/<int:website_id>/<string:unique>/<string:filename>
This one is a litle painfull to match similar attachement, where
website is ignored.
- /website/<int:website_id>/assets/<string:unique>/<string:filename>
Almost accepted but subjective, and anyway two previous solution breaks
the cdn mecanism and would need a migration
- /web/assets/<int:website_id>/<string:unique>/<string:filename>
Almost accepted but subjective, and anyway two previous solution breaks
the cdn mecanism and would need a migration
This last solution was not ideal to match without unique
/web/assets/%/<string:filename> can match both
/web/assets/123456/<string:filename>
and
/web/assets/1/123456/<string:filename>
Anyway, matching without unique shouldn't be supported for al (even if
it is kind of supported with any right now) but it will work by changing
unique wildcard to a more specific one (_ * 7)
closesodoo/odoo#131353
Related: odoo/enterprise#47313
Related: odoo/design-themes#730
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
The generation inside the rendering has some drawbacks:
- `commit_assetsbundle` is needed for reports rendering because the
template rendering may generate some assets that will be accessed by
another transaction before the transaction is committed. But this
solution is not ideal since the transaction is committed in the middle
of the request
- when the first rendered page is a 404, the assets are not committed
and the page is broken.
- when starting, deleting an attachment can create a concurrent update
error and the request is retried. This will occur once per attachment
and for all worker trying to access the same resource. The whole
transaction is rollbacked, even the previously created assets bundle.
- The cold page load is a slower since there is more work to do.
- Implementing a readonly request is difficult because it could be
transformed to read write and re-executed if the assets bundle does not
exist.
Generating assets when needed solves those issues. The concurrency
when deleting an assets could still occur but only once per bundle, and
in a smaller transaction. This could be solved with a lock now that we
have more control on the transaction. The commit_assetsbundle can be
removed and 404 page should have a correct layout. The cold page load
could be a little faster because the assets bundle can be generated in
parallel requests instead of sequentially when rendering the page.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#131353
This is a small improvement to reduce the dependency between attachment
and link generation. This will help to move the generation in the
web assets route in next commit.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#131353
The current solution returns two node, one for the css itself, another
for the script managing the error. This means that we must know if we
have a css error when generating the assets links, when rendering a
t-call-assets.
The proposed solution will solve this issue by managing the error
in the css file itself. A slight change will also save the error in the
attachment instead of choosing the previous one, meaning that the
error will be saved and the bundle won't be recomputed anymore.
This solution also removes the only case when a t-call-assets can return
content instead of a link, this will be cleaned in the next commit.
As a slight change, a warning will alway be displayed on the bottom of
the page, to manage the case where the javascript managing the error is
not in the page.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#131353
The main motivation is to be able to generate assets bundle outside
the t-call-assets call.
The need of an id in the url makes it mandatory to have an attachment
when adding the url in the page. Without this restriction, we can guess
the url without generating the assets.
This can also have other useful side effect:
There are corner case when a worked could have an invalid url in
cache because, if the transaction is rollbacked or if another request
generates the same attachment at the same time. This should be
partially solved by removing the id: The url remains valid even if the
attachment does not exist.
Note that the extra part of the url was made explicit, always there and
taking one / to remove complexity and ambiguity.
Note that an additional query appeared in .test_50_perf_sql_web_assets
because of the search, this but two of them were in _find_record. One of
them was an `exist`, not making much sense since we are not getting the
id from the attachment url anymore but from a search, and the other one
was prefetch of the "public field" since the call to _find_record does
not go in other cases (xmlid, website published, access token, ....). A
attachment of a asset is always public, and this part of the security
was moved to the search domain. The final result is one less query:
- one query to search
- one query to read the fields (_get_stream_from) (the prefetch could
actually be set to avoid prefetching everything)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#131353
If upgrading a database across an addition of a new field to
ir.module.module (which is uncommon but does happen), the field
prefetching would try to load the field before the database schema had
been upgraded, leading to a loading error.
Since we *only* want / need the module's name, we can `search_fetch`
to preload just the field we need, and avoid ancillary
prefetching. It's a bit of an unnecessary optimisation compared to
just turning prefetching off, but it's also simpler (shorter) here
so...
closesodoo/odoo#140010
X-original-commit: c0102ca5dc3507c39f5ae6406fd962419fb09c6e
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
When ReferenceField uses an M2O field. The model is not updated along
with the props when the model field is updated.
Because of this, the onWillUpdateProps hook will keep trying to update
its value. This results in an infinite render loop.
task-3248500
closesodoo/odoo#139954
X-original-commit: f8f6aaa5e32967d6c7cd888fbe574acdc6f79dc6
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Renaud Thiry (reth) <reth@odoo.com>
Since [1], guest is added to the channel immediately instead of
waiting for the guest name to be set. Since the guest is not in
the context when posting je "join" message, the author of the
message is the public user instead of the guest. This results in
an incorrect message ("public user joined the channel") since the
frontend relies on the author to set the name. This commit fixes
the issue by adding the guest to the context.
Steps to reproduce:
- Go to a channel
- Copy the invitation link
- Join the channel with this link
- The message is incorrect
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/138330closesodoo/odoo#139892
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Stockbauer (tsm) <tsm@odoo.com>
Issue:
------
Using the website editor, we can add a content block
to the ribbon (using drag and drop on the product image)
on the shop page of ecommerce.
Solution:
---------
Make the ribbon non-editable so that it will not have the `o_editable`
class added via the `editableElements` function of `WysiwygAdapterComponent`.
opw-3515908
closesodoo/odoo#139993
X-original-commit: 712edead528c6db8b97a8957bcf7bb3c8005d14a
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lefebvre (thle) <thle@odoo.com>
When upgrading mail across the addition of the linked record's company
and mail alias, if the `composer.model` is not part of a module that's
already loaded (which is very likely) the compute will blow up when it
tries to look up the model in the env.
Add that check to the condition.
closesodoo/odoo#139845
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
SO/PO accrued entries date should be the last day of the previous month since it necessarily concern
In the test, move the date as a user would input it in a form
closesodoo/odoo#111535
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
* clean and improve docstrings in orm
* fix typos found with codespell
* rely on the Environment class docstring instead of doc content (and
therefore move part of the doc inside the class docstring)
closesodoo/odoo#102969
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
For a better handling on onchanges.
By default, `move_type` is readonly and is therefore
not sent to the web client during an onchange.
During onchanges, `new` is used to pass values into records.
The `move_type` of the invoice was passed to that `new`
thanks to an `default_move_type` passed in the window action.
But, if the view was used outside of this action,
without `default_move_type`
the `move_type` wasn't correctly set and the invoice/move
type wasn't correctly passed
closesodoo/odoo#41723
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
* clean and improve docstrings in orm
* fix typos found with codespell
* rely on the Environment class docstring instead of doc content (and
therefore move part of the doc inside the class docstring)
closesodoo/odoo#102969
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the `visitor_leave_session` route was called
when a user logged in: the session of the visitor is outdated and
will never be activated again. This causes an error with portal
users since channel members are not based on the guest but on the
current user when available. This commit fixes the issue by not
calling the route: the session will be garbage collected as all
the others.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
- Go to website livechat (public user)
- Start a chat and send a message
- Log in as portal user
- An error occurs
closesodoo/odoo#139631
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Unwittingly broken by the removal of `__implements__` in
a6d601dc4e, these lints don't run
correctly with the old pylint, allowing new errors to creep in since.
closesodoo/odoo#139605
X-original-commit: 99cec73f585c8759142a707b06934d9c23aa5478
Related: odoo/enterprise#49473
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Since the new RelationalModel (PR 114024), when you click Save and New in X2ManyFieldDialog,
the new record has its sequence correctly incremented by 1 compared with the previous record.
So the patch on X2ManyFieldDialog in im_livechat_chatbot_steps_one2many.js is
no longer necessary. So we're going to remove it.
closesodoo/odoo#139551
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
When the user clicks the checkbox to add a warehouse, the field next
to it is invisible, making it difficult to notice.
This commit highlights the field and adds a placeholder to make it
obvious.
task-3486780
closesodoo/odoo#139528
X-original-commit: a60c94203072fd2343f6ca3a33a2cc1813757bea
Signed-off-by: Bouvy Damien (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
So that `Message.insert()` in JS becomes trivial, as it doesn't have
to infer the author of message to current user.
closesodoo/odoo#139501
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
This utils file was added because removing item in JS based on
item content sucks, so some higher-order functions were introduced
to ease it slightly.
As many of its uses has been replaced with `RecordList.delete()`
where data is uniquely linked to a model, in the end the functions
were only used once. These functions have been moved to the only file
that still use them, so that we don't encourage using them.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#139501
Before this commit, when having an array of data to insert
in a model, we had to iterate and insert data item on by one:
```js
messageDataList.forEach(data => this.store.Message.insert(data));
```
With this commit, we can simply insert the array of data to
insert:
```js
this.store.Message.insert(messageDataList);
```
This helps simplifying the business code further, less LOCs is
usually better!
Part-of: odoo/odoo#139501
This commit allows to define html fields in discuss models,
so that when insert is trusted they are automatically markup.
By default, all model insert are untrusted. To make a trusted
insertion, we should pass 2nd parameter `{ html: true }` to
an `insert()` method. The param is intentionally named `html`
instead of `trusted`, so that it triggers ci/security for
reviewers awareness.
It's still possible to immediately assign a markup on the html
fields, like before.
This changes simplifies the code, so that we don't have to dissect
model data everytime and make sure all bits are properly markup.
The dissect operation added many LOCs and we frequently missed to
markup the data in some flows. Being able to flag html fields at
model definition and flagging an insert safe keeps the security
concern while helping properly markup-ing all the data.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#139501
Since https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/137098, `display_name`
can be false (from the default behavior in BaseModel). It isn't
handle correctly in domain_selector Component, which trigger a
traceback trying to `split` false.
closesodoo/odoo#139450
X-original-commit: 06f3cbb95b2e4cfb271039a19660991c743c2ba8
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine (dam) <dam@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet (ryv) <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Polymorphe57 <dam@odoo.com>
Summary
-------
Currently, adding a CPF tax ID on a Brazilian contact always fails.
Steps to reproduce
------------------
* install `contacts` and `base_vat`
* create a new contact with country Brazil
* enter a valid CPF (ex: 11144477735)
You should be met with an error
Cause
-----
The CPF check is only implemented in `l10n_br`. Without this module, the
default vat check is applied, but it fails for CPF numbers.
Fix
---
Move the CPF/CNPJ check from `l10n_br` to `base_vat`
opw-3421476
closesodoo/odoo#139222
X-original-commit: 5dc5832f438006a9a4b9abeb1f093d7ed520c771
Signed-off-by: Florian Gilbert (flg) <flg@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Séna Serge Nshimiyimana (sesn) <sesn@odoo.com>
Since [1], `qweb.render` was replaced in all Odoo by `renderToElement`
and `renderToFragment`. However, in the case of the template
`website.delete_google_font_btn`, if the font is served from Google, the
template contains multiple root elements, which means it should be
rendered by `renderToFragment`. This commit fixes that.
Steps to reproduce:
- Install Website.
- Go to website and start edit mode.
- Go to theme menu and open the "Font Family" menu.
- Click on Add custom font.
- Add a Google font (e.g. https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Tilt+Neon).
- Make sure serve from Google is selected.
- Try to open the theme menu again.
=> Traceback
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f956e83c744bd9c970d3f16ce1cb3cff8bba2f6b
task-3557794
closesodoo/odoo#138927
Signed-off-by: Colin Louis (loco) <loco@odoo.com>
Since server actions names are computed automatically when (and only
when) they are linked to an automation, not having a dependency at all
between `sms` and `base_automation` meant that we would have either needed
a link module or an ugly `_fields` introspection to correctly name server
actions that send SMSes created through automation rules.
Since `sms` is a rather basic module which has very little impact on the
UI and no impact on pricing, it makes sense to add it to the list of
dependencies of base_automation instead, similarly to `mail`.
Task-3450200
closesodoo/odoo#138804
Related: odoo/enterprise#48987
Signed-off-by: Bouvy Damien (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Changes to the UX of boolean field updates via server actions
required some adaptations of the views of base_automation.
Task-3450200
Part-of: odoo/odoo#138804
The goal of this commit is to make it simpler for users to match an
incoming Odoo webhook automation rules with an outgoing webhook action
from another Odoo by having a default record_getter that uses the same
syntax as the default payload of a webhook action.
Task-3450200
Part-of: odoo/odoo#138804
Before this commit, updating a boolean field through a server action was
possible but unintuitive: if you wanted to set the field to `False`, you
had to leave the value empty - worse, writing down `False` would be
considered truth-y since it was evaluated as a string!
This commit introduces a simpler UX for these cases, where the user can
select Yes/No in a selection field if the field they're trying to update
is a boolean field.
Task-3450200
Part-of: odoo/odoo#138804