The commit 3c4bb08 fixed an issue about reservation from transit location
for versions from 11.0 to 12.0 by soften the record rule on stock.move
From 12.3, we need to additionnaly soften the stock.move.line rule
to have the same result as this model has a record rule too since that version
closesodoo/odoo#39859
X-original-commit: b8b63d387b5af5928001ca7a53ef66916bc070b9
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
On a delivery type picking, adds a button to able the partner to sign
the delivery on receipt.
task-1878607
closesodoo/odoo#39183
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: sle-odoo <sle@odoo.com>
Ensure proper domains are applied and enforced on relation fields thanks
to the `check_company` attributes.
product.template
- make responsible a property field in order to ensure proper next activities when a product
is used between multiple companies
stock.putaway.rule
- added a company_id field
stock.move.line
- company_id is not related anymore since a move line can exist without a move until its validation
stock.package_level
- added a company_id field
stock.picking.type
- company_id is now required
stock.production.lot
- added a company_id field, adapted the constraint accordingly
stock.quant
- check the consistency only in inventory mode
stock.quant.package
- company_id is now empty if the package is empty
stock.picking
- company_id is now related to the one of its picking type
Added some tests.
Moved stock_traceability in the `report` directory.
Removed useless /tests/tours/route.js.
task-1985992
-In the action menu, the manager has no rights to delete the scrap order thus
added the access rights for the manager in the main csv file.
task-1959647
Usecase to reproduce
- Create company A and company B with one warehouse each
- Warehouse from A resupply warehouse in company B
- Create a product and check the route MTO and resupply from warehouse A
- Connect as Demo User that only have access to company B
- Do a delivery order in company B for this product -> it creates a
receipt from warehouse A
- Deliver in warehouse A to company transit
- Try to reserve the receipt in company B
-> It does nothing.
It happens because the receipt move is in company A and the delivery
order is in company B. The move is tagged as make_to_order so the
reservation is based on move_orig_ids. However the move_orig_ids is
empty due to record rule that hide since it's in the other company.
In order to fix it, allow to see move from other companies that goes
to transit location.
opw-2033066
closesodoo/odoo#35223
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
This table tracked standard price changes.
It was used to compute the valuation at date in AVCO and standard
through `get_history_price`.
The next commits will introduce the stock valuation layers, separating
the valuation from the stock move. As a valuation layer will be created
when a standard price is updated on the product or when a stock move
impacts the valuation, the information from this table will be
duplicated.
We don't plan to adapt `get_history_price` to work with the valuation
layer since the valuation report at date and today will be the same: a
grouped list on the valuation layers with eventually a domain on the
date.
task-1875873
Create a new report in order to see quantity in the past
and in the future. Also display the planned in and out moves
at their schedule date. The view available for this report is
a graph view even if it could be display with other views.
Technically it's an SQL views based on stock.quant and stock.move
Currently the interval for the report is -3 months, +3 months because
the forecast quantity is based on quants - moves during this interval
in order to keep a linear performance that's not growing with the data.
task: 2000948
closesodoo/odoo#34898
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
This commit adds fields 'company_id' on stock.scrap model.
The company will filter locations and stock moves linked to the scrap
document.
We add also a specific sequence by company.
Task-1930055
closesodoo/odoo#30498
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Commit 240d191ba3 introduced the field
company_id on model stock.move.line and a python constraint that check
if the company is the same on the move line and on the related move.
In order to avoid performance issue, this commit replace the constraint
by a 'related' parameter on the company field.
As the company_id is not editable we suppose this change will not introduced
unwanted errors
Task : 1970012
closesodoo/odoo#32738
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Access group terminology is missleading. Yous have to be manager to administrate
an application. This task consists to rename groups to be understandable for everyone.
Groups should be reorganised on the users form to be more explicit.
Specification
=============
1/ Rename 'Manager' to 'Administrator' in users groups.
2/ Define a hierarchy on access groups by using the category_id in the manifests
A category 'Operations/Project' will create a category Project with a parent
category 'Operations', and something smart is already developed (in modules/db.py)
to avoid duplicating categories.
3/ Add a group in expenses to be able to approve expenses reports for my team.
4/ Add a group in timesheets to be able to approve timesheets for my team.
5/ Remove partially the useless crap in ir_module_category_data.xml
6/ Sort access rights groups on users form according to its parent category
closesodoo/odoo#29362
Signed-off-by: "Yannick Tivisse (yti)" <yti@odoo.com>
PutAwayStrategy model was deleted and FixedPutAwayStrategy model was
renamed into PutAwayRule.
Now, each location can contain multiple putaway rules, each rule
applying either on product or on product category.
The purpose is to:
- Add more visibility on putaway settings (with a stat
button on product, product category and location views, and a
submenu item in Product configuration menu).
- Change putaway model to avoid redundancy.
Task #1935169closesodoo/odoo#30889
There is no company_id field on stock.move.line and it is so impossible
to restrict easily the access rights on move lines (except by passing
through stock.move, but all stock move line don't always have a
stock.move)
To resolve this we've added a field company_id on stock.move.line, and a
constraint to force it having the same company_id than the one on stock
move.
Task ID : 1905232closesodoo/odoo#28575
The field sale_id on model stock.picking is not defined in stock module.
So the rule was wrong when sale_stock was uninstalled.
opw:1912564
closesodoo/odoo#29145
Targets commit d3530eb07e
Purpose
=======
[Follow up AL review]
Code cleanup and some improved models naming for the product configurator feature (see targeted commit).
Mostly changes the "product.attribute" related models.
Updated models:
- "product.product.attribute.value" to "product.template.attribute.value"
- "product.attribute.filter.line" to "product.template.attribute.exclusion"
- "product.attribute.line" to "product.template.attribute.line"
Updated fields:
- [sale_order_line in sale/sale.py] "product_custom_variant_values" to "product_custom_attribute_value_ids"
- [product_template_attribute_value in product/product_attribute.py] excluded_for is now a o2m instead of a m2m
- [product.attribute in sale/product_product.py] "create_variant" field is now a Selection with "no_variant" (old false), "always" (old true), "dynamic" (new value)
- [product in product/product.py] "product_attribute_value_ids" to "product_template_attribute_value_ids"
Task #1871557
Purpose
=======
- Configure a product from a sales order as easily as in the ecommerce
The backend uses the same template as the frontend to configure a products and its options
- Display optionnal products of optionnal products in the "sale options" section
- Allow adding exlusions to some combinations of the product and/or
to some combinations of the optionnal and accessory products
Specification
=============
PHASE I
1. Improve the "Add to cart" with optional products
- When you add an option to cart, move the product to the cart & show the options of this option
- Don't open the option wizard if no option available (in case this module becomes generic,
it's better to skip this step when it's not needed)
- Display the options right under their related product in the cart
2. Do not allow to add the product as an optional product for itself
Why ?
- No functional sense
- Creates issues in the add to cart wizard
3. Exclude some attribute combinations within the product or with related options and accessory products
- Rename VARIANT PRICES button -> CONFIGURE VARIANTS
- When you click this button and select a value, open form view rather than inline edition
- Form view of variant values:
- Attribute
- Value
- HTML Color Index
- Attribute Price Extra
- Not Compatible with: o2m tab with 2 fields: Product AND Attribute Value (of this product)
[m2m tag selection]
- in any new line, autocomplete the current product by default
- Tooltip: A list of product and attribute values that you want to exclude for
this product's attribue value. Also applies on optionnal and accessory products.
4. New option to configure a product in a sales order line
- This option is only visible if the corresponding option is activated in the sales settings
- It opens a wizard to select a product template, configure related attribute values
and select optional products (based on frontend view)
- Attributes not compatible with other selected attributes should not be selectable
- Must work like in the frontend
This will allow to use the same core for all intrastat reports and benefit from the dynamic financial reports engine.
Incoterms have been move to account, as we want to provide a light intrastat report for people not having the stock app installed
Was task: 35850
Was PR #23805
Usability improvement:
- Common view for push and pull rules
- Add an help text in order to describe the rule
- Rules menu
- Warehouse checked by default on route created by a warehouse
- Lower the MTO route sequence in order to take it first.
- Tooltip cleaning
Technical improvement:
The purpose of this task was also to merge stock.location.path(push rule) and
procrement.rule. Those two model were design to execute the same task
but in a different direction. Thus it contains duplicate code.
Task ID 1852969.
We added a model to work easily with packages, using the quant packages
was not a good solution to move entire package and plan package moves,
because we always had to give the picking in context, and create some
move lines, so it was only possible when state was assigned (when move
lines exists)
So we created a model package level, linked to picking, move and move
lines allowing to easily plan package transfer and put in pack.
Moves UoM models, test and data to a new addon in
order to be able to use uom without product.
A simple example is be to be able to use UoM for
timesheets.
This commit only move code, and adapt xml ids
without chaging any feature or functionnal
behavior.
Note: 'product' module now depends on new
'uom' module.
After commit 996a817071
The portal report on picking only check if
the user has a 'read' access on picking.
If he can read it, sudo is called and thus
record rule/access right on component objects
are not necessary.
This commit removes useless rights for portal users.
This removes the procurement.order model. To fufill their needs SO, PO, MO and
stock moves now call the _run method of the relevant procurement.group.
This mecanism is now only used for stockable product, tasks now uses their own
independent mecanism.
The _run method will check all the applicable rules and create directly the
needed model to fufill the need.
The modules stock, purchase, mrp, extends the _run method to implement their
specific strategy relevant for the rule type they define.
If an exception happens the message will be logged as a mail messsage on the
source model, for example, if a sales order cannot be fufilled the salesperson
will now see directly the reason.
OLD commit messages:
[WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
fixup! [WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
[IMP] Basic tests
[FIX] test not necessary anymore
[FIX] remove unnecessary print statement
[FIX] unnecessary test + why passing warehouse worked before?
[IMP] purchase: one move by purchase order line
[FIX] purchase: correct inventory tests and pass move_dest_ids among procurements
[FIX] because of bad cherry-pick merge
[IMP] make mrp pass by adding move_dest_ids there too
[IMP] tests of sale_mrp, no need for cancelpropagation then
[IMP] better to consistently use recordsets also for one2many
[FIX] purchase_requisition
[FIX] Exceptions should trigger errors, which should be caught in the tests
[FIX] sale_mrp: remove usage of procurement.order and use sale order name instead of sol
[FIX] stock_dropshipping: add sale_line_id on purchase_line_id
[FIX] Remove pdb
[IMP] add stock_dropshipping files
[IMP] stock: search carrier through sale line instead of procurement group
[IMP] add procrule test and preision needed when updating sol
[FIX] sale_order_dates + [IMP] procurement exceptions by scheduler
[FIX] No need to return task
[IMP] move file as name changes and add corrections
[FIX] Continue Run Schedulers wizard fix
[FIX] name issues of takss
[FIX] updating sale order line, but there is still a problem with the recompute
The big change is that we have now a many2many between the move and a
one2many between a move and its pack.operation (note: this model is
renamed as stock.move.line in a further commit).
Due to these changes, `action_done` had to be rewritten intierely, as it
depended and stock.pack.operation.lot and stock.move.operation.link,
that are now removed. This method was laregly inspired by the one in the
mrp module, and a further commit will make MRP uses all the core of
stock.
Due to the previous commit that refactored the stock.quant
implementation, the new concept is that the `product_qty` that will
always be in the uom of the quant (`product_qty` is a computed field in
the same style as the one of stock.move).
This commit also implements the logic that a manager is able to edit
done stock.pack.operation.
The stock.move has now a "partially_available" state (it was previously
a flag). The "split_from" field is removed now that we have a many2many
between moves (a sibling move is always a move that was splitted, or
with the backorder_id field).
The done quantity of a stock move is computed across the done quantity
of the move lines. There is an inverse method that allows user to fill
the done quantity directly on a stock move.
The reserve quantity of stock move is computed accross the
`product_qty` of the linked pack operations.
`do_unreserve` will simply unlink the associated pack operation.
Unlinking a pack operation will unreserve.
`force_assign` will mark the move as available, in order to allow the
user to create pack operations (none are created because nothing was
reserved).
`action_assign` is rewritten and splitted in two parts: if the move has
a parent (mto) or not (mts). In the mto, we'll check the available move
lines and only reserve accordingly. In the mts, we'll reserve directly
on the quants.
`action_cancel` has changd a lot: in case of a delivery, the first step
does not anymore propagate cancellation to following moves and SO. As a
result it does not propagate in the other side in case of MTO or production.
It does not delete them if we delete the related sale order for example. In
order to correct this next activities will be added in the future. Technically
action cancel on move is based on procurment rule, this commit will set
the propagate field to false on the rule if the picking_type is 'pick'
or if we are in one step delivery.
We use this commit to reimplement `action_assign` (wiped by the new
quant implentation). A move is reserved if its move lines exist, so we
introduce a one2many between stock.move and stock.pack.operation (note:
a further commit renamed this model into stock.move.line)
We use this commit to implement `action_done` (wiped by the removal of the
models making the link between stock.move and stock.pack.operations). We
can use the one2many to the pack operations.
blabla manymany au lieu de one2many
blabla mto mts
Remove get_ancestors, as orig_ids will be used instead
validation
when we are creating some packe operation with lot name, the
pack_operation are unlink and a new picking is craeted.
This is caused the function _create_lot_for_picking that unlink pack
operation having no quantity reserved instead of ones having no quantity
done.
To fix this we changed product_qty to qty_done and move the code from
action_done of picking to action_done of move
fixup! [IMP] Merge_moves functionality + many2many procurement and original moves instead of one2many
fixup! [REF] stock: basics of new model and stock.move reservation
edit reserved move line
This is the 1st commit message:
[REM] stock: stock.pack.operation.lot, stock.move.operation.link
These models will become useless once a one2many will be made between
stock.move and stock.pack.operation.
The `action_done` method on stock move has been wiped, as it depended
completely on the removed models.
Joint work with Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com>, amoyaux <arm@odoo.com>
and Pierre Masereel <pim@odoo.com>
fw-bot