When trying to list db's, the db_user is searched and verified before
searching for the databases.
As it's enclosed in a db.cursor context manager, we can assume that
there is a db user at this very moment.
This commit uses a single query to find databases that belongs to this
cursor user.
Also, this commit adds a message in the logs when an exception occurs
to facilitate debugging instead of silently returning an empty list.
Rev [1] was intended to be applied when changing the lot of the produced
product on the manufacturing order, somewhere along the line the code
was also called when setting the lot_id on the work order. When used in
this context, it broke the reconciliation between the reserved move
lines and the temporary move lines because a lot_produced_id was wrongly
set.
We fix the issue by only applying the code on prod move. This is done by
checking if the move is a production one through the stock move, because
there we are able to differenciate the raw material and production move,
not on the move line where production_id is always set.
[1] 471115b06aFixes#20964
Before this fix, when adding the attribute delete=0
on a listview, it was still possible to delete records
via the menu 'Delete' in the sidebar.
After this fix, this should not be possible to delete
records when delete=0.
The attribute delete was hard-coded to true, as there was
a traceback when it was set to false. It was simply due
to a misplaced closing brackets that was hiding an
assignment, which resulted to calling a method on undefined.
Before this fix, when adding the attribute delete=0
on a listview, it was still possible to delete records
via the menu 'Delete' in the sidebar.
After this fix, this should not be possible to delete
records when delete=0.
The attribute delete was hard-coded to true, as there was
a traceback when it was set to false. It was simply due
to a misplaced closing brackets that was hiding an
assignment, which resulted to calling a method on undefined.
Before this commit, it was not possible to reexecute functions using the
_.throttle function in the same test (e.g. drag and drop two elements in the
studio tests).
Do not forward-port this after 11.0
After sending a message, if one switched in edit mode in the form view, the
created message disappeared.
This is because the model is not aware of messages (they are created through
their own routes, message are not handled as other one2many fields with commands)
and the widget was reset with a new datapoint instance when switching in edit mode.
In this rev. we keep the model informed of the new messages by directly writing
the message ids in the datapoint.
Note that the includes on FormController and BasicModel are one in the
form_renderer.js file to fix this issue in existing database without adding
files. Another revision will be done in master to add the correct files.
opw-781353
Purpose
=======
From product stat button (purchase) on click of purchase lines open Purchase line's form view, the view is not correct and it is not intended.
Specification
=============
Stat button of purchase orders in product form view, on click of line do not open form view of purchase order line only list view...not form view (restrict to open form view).
- Create manually an account move
- Add a line with a credit != 0
- Click on "Add a line" => crash
`line_ids` does not contain the credit since it was not filled in.
opw-782980
This commits make the computation of amount to invoice
and amout already invoiced on sale order line works
with invoice policy based on delivered quantities.
Before this, the upselling of delivered quantities
was not working: you were seeing the upsell amount
in the amount to invoice (qty delivered > qty ordered).
Notes:
- When a product is not delivered (qty delivered = 0), its
amount to invoice is zero too
- Draft invoice are not take into account really; they are
included at sale order price (discount on draft invoice does
not impact amounts to invoice/invoiced)
Also, when a SO in state 'draft' or 'cancel', its amount
to invoice should be zero, but its invoiced amount should
take all validated invoices into account.
Finally, more correct trigger are set on the compute
method, to trigger recomputation on right moment.
This commit also compute the 2 amount fields as sudo, since
the amount should not be dependent of access right of current
user.
To check those different points, this commit provide some
more tests with ordered and delivered product, SO cancelling,
upselling or delivery, ...
Always return a `sale.order` object, otherwise calling method may crash
since they expect receiving such an object.
opw-761344
Manual forward-port of 0888602831 which has
been lost during normal one.
Using `with_context({'use_babel': True})` overrides completely the
environment context. Therefore, the lang is lost and the date is
formatted in the default language.
opw-779753
After commit 996a817071
The portal report on picking only check if
the user has a 'read' access on picking.
If he can read it, sudo is called and thus
record rule/access right on component objects
are not necessary.
This commit removes useless rights for portal users.
Purpose
=======
Stripe is now a payment acquirer that can be used to manage subscriptions, just like Authorize and Ingenico.
Specification
=============
For Stripe : add "Subscriptions" and "Save Cards" as features on the payment acquirer selection screen
Purpose
=======
If a method doesn't exist when running scheduler, log an error instead of raising an AttributeError
The goal of a cron method is to go ad far as possible.
Purpose
=======
This bidouille on the ORM command seems to be from another age where the onchange on o2m list were not working well.
The issue is that _convert_to_write could return commands like (6, 0, []).
In that case the last tuple element is not dictionary, but a list.
Specification
=============
Fix that brol.
Purpose
=======
As there's no 'xfa_account_id' configured on the module installation, the demo data are not created.
Specification
=============
Remove them.
The pad_project addon has a simple mission: allow the user to choose if
he wants to use pads in all tasks from a given project.
This is a noble goal, and the code actually works for projects which
have a 'use_pad' field set to true. However, when a project has
'use_pad' set to false, we have a critical issue, due to the way the pad
widget works.
The pad widget is kind of strange, because it is set on a field which
contains the url for a pad, and it should write itself (the same value),
whenever someone writes on the pad, so the server knows it has to fetch
the result and write it on the 'real' field. This means that the pad
widget has to write its value each time the user modifies the pad
content and press save. However, fun fact, we have no way of knowing
when something was changed inside the pad iframe, so we actually save
the value each time the form view is saved.
So, we have a problem now: the description field AND the description_pad
field are always saved, and they interfere with each other.
In this commit, we put the description_pad in readonly mode when it is
invisible, so we do not save its value at all for each edit/save cycle
(and prevent interference). It actually prevent calling the
generate_pad_url method, but a pad is still created by the server code
each time a task is created.
Before this commit, asynchronous field widgets (with willStart async),
with a non empty template had a problem: the invisible modifier was not
applied properly.
The reason is that the code that applied the modifiers was called
directly after the widget was 'willStarted'. This means that if this is
async, and if there is a template, the $el in willStart will be replaced
by another $el after, which will remove the invisible modifier.
This was an interesting problem with the pad widget (it is asynchronous
the first time a pad widget is instantiated)
Before this commit, asynchronous field widgets (with willStart async),
with a non empty template had a problem: the invisible modifier was not
applied properly.
The reason is that the code that applied the modifiers was called
directly after the widget was 'willStarted'. This means that if this is
async, and if there is a template, the $el in willStart will be replaced
by another $el after, which will remove the invisible modifier.
This was an interesting problem with the pad widget (it is asynchronous
the first time a pad widget is instantiated)
Christophe Monniez