This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
[IMP] account: make all tax report lines accessible in every company
The former implementation, with a record rule, did not support the new multicompany implementation. Furthermore, making the tax reports accessible by every company whatever their contries is more consistent with the way other accounting reports work.
closesodoo/odoo#34154
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
This table tracked standard price changes.
It was used to compute the valuation at date in AVCO and standard
through `get_history_price`.
The next commits will introduce the stock valuation layers, separating
the valuation from the stock move. As a valuation layer will be created
when a standard price is updated on the product or when a stock move
impacts the valuation, the information from this table will be
duplicated.
We don't plan to adapt `get_history_price` to work with the valuation
layer since the valuation report at date and today will be the same: a
grouped list on the valuation layers with eventually a domain on the
date.
task-1875873
This commit removes some groups that are now useless since their
only purpose was to allow the user to hide or show some fields
depending on its value, but those fields are optional now.
Task-1902765
closesodoo/odoo#31944
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
- Add repartition lines on taxes
- Link account tags directly to account.move.line; remove the tag_ids field from account.tag
- Add a new report engine dedicated to tax reports, directly generating account tags. It is called as an alternate mode of generic tax report, with a dedicated "Use tax grids" toggle.
>> The biggest change lies in the way the new tax report computes its values.
Everything is now aggregated directly using the tags set on the account move lines. Thanks to that,
modifying the configuration of a tax today will not impact the report for the previous periods anymore.
This is a big improvement, as it means the report will keep on reflecting the values that were submitted
to the state before, whatever the configuration change.
- Add an audit char field to account.move.line telling with tax grids are impacted by the line, with the corresponding amount
- Modify the behavior of cash basis taxes: the cash basis account is now used as the transition account, while the regular account given in tax declaration is used to store the final entry (it was the opposite before)
- Modify every l10n_* module in order to keep them consistent with these changes
closesodoo/odoo#32833
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
When validate an invoice, if the user is member of the timesheet user
group and the billing user group, it is forbidden to create an analytic
line without a project set. The previous commit (81218a8) allow the user
to create an analytic account line by adding a record rule in the
sale_timesheet module.
If only the account and timesheet modules' are installed, before this
commit, an error was raised when trying to validate an invoice in the
account module. This issue occurs because the record rule to allow the
user to create an analytic account line is found in sale_timesheet
module, and this one is not installed.
As an invoice can be validated without the need of the sales module's,
from the purchase module, or directly in the account module.
In this commit, the record rule was move to the account module.
opw-1948132
closesodoo/odoo#31661
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
It can be useful to be able to select several journals in 1 click in the
financial reports
Task: 1857934
closesodoo/odoo#26711
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert (csn) <csn@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Access group terminology is missleading. Yous have to be manager to administrate
an application. This task consists to rename groups to be understandable for everyone.
Groups should be reorganised on the users form to be more explicit.
Specification
=============
1/ Rename 'Manager' to 'Administrator' in users groups.
2/ Define a hierarchy on access groups by using the category_id in the manifests
A category 'Operations/Project' will create a category Project with a parent
category 'Operations', and something smart is already developed (in modules/db.py)
to avoid duplicating categories.
3/ Add a group in expenses to be able to approve expenses reports for my team.
4/ Add a group in timesheets to be able to approve timesheets for my team.
5/ Remove partially the useless crap in ir_module_category_data.xml
6/ Sort access rights groups on users form according to its parent category
closesodoo/odoo#29362
Signed-off-by: "Yannick Tivisse (yti)" <yti@odoo.com>
In multi-company, create a new company C.
Set the chart of account in settings, save.
You get an access right violation on account.reconcile.model.template
because you need account_user.
Since this group is supposedly dependent on another module,
a user is supposedly never in this group without that module.
Obviously, this should supposedly not happen.
opw 1938539
closesodoo/odoo#31003
* = account, sale_management, website
Settings that are using groups internally should not appear on the user form
without using debug mode.
The admin should not get the idea that he should configure those per user,
because they are going to be reset if/when changing the general setting.
closes#29842
PR: #29860
Before that, the administrator could use accounting features by default. This is not what we want, the group only gets assigned by default when installing account_accountant, on enterprise.
Before that, the administrator could use accounting features by default. This is not what we want, the group only gets assigned by default when installing account_accountant, on enterprise.
This will allow to use the same core for all intrastat reports and benefit from the dynamic financial reports engine.
Incoterms have been move to account, as we want to provide a light intrastat report for people not having the stock app installed
Was task: 35850
Was PR #23805
Since sale depends on account and not the other way around, it's better to have this setting inside account.
Functionally it will allow the user to benefit from this setting also if he uses only invoice without sale.
Technically it will allow us to remove all of the overrides that were previously necessary for this setting.
While we moved the setting, we also renamed the different variables so their name better convey their meaning.
PR #25209
This reverts commit 7642754122.
The reason is that we finally decided to implement that in another way and we want to avoid people start using this feature as it would be replaced in next saas. Yes, I know, that sucks.
New task ID: 1823153
- One need to first enable this from Accounting Settings to use this feature
- This feature works for Vendor Bills which are validated/paid
- Once activated, user can see one option in Vendor Bills to set particular record to be recurrent document and can define the recurrency period. This will automatically create draft documents(by mean of Scheduled Actions) as per recurrency configuration.
Was PR #21411. was task 34884.
1. Create a new user with all the permissions as manager (or at least
Accounting) except Inventory
2. Login and then go to Invoicing --> Settings
3. Do a minor change, save
An access error occurs.
Since the settings of all modules are smartly loaded in v11, it now
implies that a user must have extra manager access rights to be allowed
to save them. We could have kept separate actions for each setting page,
but we would have missed the fun of access errors.
Anyway, security-wise this is not an issue to force the manager groups
since a user with 'Settings' access rights can change his own rights.
It's just very annoying. Or fun.
Complement of aa65a46fc5Fixes#21766
opw-801210
In some countries, we need to be able to make appear on an invoice a rounding line, appearing there only because the smallest
coinage has been removed from the circulation.
For example, in Switerzland invoices have to be rounded to 0.05 CHF because coins of 0.01 CHF and 0.02 CHF aren't used anymore.
Was PR #15231
Was task 30904
Purpose
=======
We want to clear the accounting access groups when only the Invoicing application is installed as follows:
If only Invoicing is installed, we should only have 2 groups: `Billing` and `Billing Manager`
If Accouting and Finance is installed, we should have the current groups: `Billing`, `Accountant` and `Advisor`
Specification
=============
1/ If we have only Invoicing the should have the following hierarchy:
group_account_manager (Billing Manager) ---Implies---> group_account_invoice (Billing)
group_account_user (Accountant) is a technical group out the Accouting groups hierarchy
2/ If we have Accouting and Finance installed, we should then have:
group_account_manager (Advisor) ---Implies---> group_account_user (Accountant) ---Implies---> group_account_invoice (Billing)
The reason we want to keep the group_account_user is that we will hide the accouting fields (account_id,...) with this group, allowing the consultants to show the accouting related information on support.
As already done for sale, customer portal for account is moved to account
module directly. Account now depends on portal module and website module
is not necessary anymore to display the account customer portal.
Purpose
=======
we use to make proforma invoice to get payment before the creation of the real invoice. In the current odoo, the proforma state is too late. Because you have to confirm the SO to generate the draft invoice and so the proforma. But, if you do that, you have generated a subscription or a delivery order in the mean time. A proforma is actually a quote. In old ERP they used to make proforma to send a quote and don't generate invoice number.
Specification
=============
- Remove everything related to Proforma from accounting
- Remove the configuration of pro-forma from account setting
- Invoice form, remove "Pro-froma" button, stage, report title
- Add proforma configuration option in sales setting under "Quotation and Sales" section
- In quote/sale, add Pro-forma under Print
- A pro-forma is a quote, but the title of the report is Pro-Forma and not Quotation
- button (secondary) on quotation form "SEND PRO-FORMA" to send proforma by mail attached with related report.
- button
- mail template
- when preparing a quotation this button is visible but if even one invoice this should be invisible (as confirming SO doesn't generate invoice currently)
This record rule added in the below revision:
1950fc4216
has been removed for an unknown reason during the account refactoring
c04065abd8
Without this rule, a user can see invoices from other companies
through the invoices analysis.
opw-705718
Laurent Smet