Currently, `generate_work_entry` has a different behavior
if the type of parameters is `date` or `datetime`:
If the type is `date`, it implicitely set hours and minutes
to 00:00.
It is particularly confusing when `date_stop` is a `date`:
work entries are not generated for this day because it's
actually outside of the range.
This commit makes it consistent in all cases:
-hours and minutes are set to 00:00 for start date
-hours and minutes are set to 23:59 for end date
closesodoo/odoo#33906
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The feature was broken by #28404 which made the JS make use of the
"animations" system.
Currently, on the website, we have an option 'Track this page' in promote
section, which will give us the URL of the landing page.
However, this option is not working and shows the default placeholder
provided on the input.
This commit will fix the issue. From now 'Track this page' option will get
the URL of the landing page and it will be shown on input rather than the
default placeholder value.
task-1998160
closes#33603
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
- Create 5 vendor bills with a long reference (> 1000 characters), for
the same partner.
- Select the bills and register a payment
An error arise: 'psycopg2.OperationalError: index row size 3256 exceeds
maximum 2712 for index "account_move_line_partner_id_ref_idx"'.
As mentioned, the index row size limit is 2712 bytes, which is exceeded
in that use case. Indeed, the reference of the payment is computed based
on the vendor reference of all bills.
We limit the number of characters to 2000. This seems reasonable knowing
that UTF-8 characters use sequences of 1 to 4 bytes [1]. Characters with
a code less than 128 require 1 byte only, and it is expected that most
vendor references will only use these characters. It is indeed unlikely
that special characters (such as Chinese characters, taking up to 4
bytes) are used for such references.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3629
opw-1998823
closesodoo/odoo#33457
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Traceback generated when trying to pass a datetime object into a function tag
in xml.
<function name="action_name" model="model_name" eval="datetime.date.today"/>
Used to fail.
With this commit now one can pass time, datetime, timedelta, relativedelta,
version, ref, pytz in function tag in xml
Task-id: 1772614
Closesodoo/odoo#29212
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhaval Limbuwala <dli@odoo.com>
If destroy is called before start, there will be a crash before this commit.
At the time of this commit, this can be reproduced in master by dropping the
image gallery snippet, clicking on add images (double click, which opens the
media dialog twice for some reason), selecting 2 images to add on the
media dialog, and clicking on add. The error will be in the JS console.
closesodoo/odoo#33440
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Open a mail.compose.message wizard.
Select a template that generates an attachment.
Reselect it. A second attachment has been generated.
Can be repeated ad infinitum.
At template onchange, the template is rendered to overwrite the composers values
This includes the attachments.
Let L1 be the list of attachments generated by the template.
When _convert_to_write(values) is called with {'attachment_ids': L1},
it gets self.attachments_ids = L2, and generates a [(6, 0, L1 + L2)] command.
As a result attachments are only added,
the previous ones need to be removed manually.
Since c6d718f, the semantics of _convert_to_write changed.
Before, it always returned an empty list for new records (without an id).
In other words, wa always had L2 == [].
As a result we need to adapt the wizard to keep its old behaviour.
To solve it we bypass the _convert_to_write for 'attachment_ids' and directly
generate the 6 command with the list of ids L1 generated by the template.
We only do this for templates that add attachments to keep the templates
composable (a template only overwrites the values it defines).
Unfortunately, we don't have any way to know which attachments have been added
manually, so we can't preserve these (which was the old behaviour anyway).
opw 1997430
opw 1987169
opw 1998115
opw 1998782
closesodoo/odoo#33387
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
When multiple emails (`mail.mail`) are linked
to the same message (`mail.message`),
all the message notifications were being marked as sent
as soon as one of the mail was sent, and not all of them.
This is indeed possible to have multiple emails linked to a single
message, for instance when there are employees and customers in
the followers of a thread, and some must therefore have
the buttons meant for the employees ("Assign me") and some not.
In other words, it was possible notifications were marked
as sent while their associated email was not sent yet.
This revision also comes as an addition to
5d6656d739
as it was possible to receive a bounce coming from
the previous mail sent which wrote on the same notifications `email_status`
than the current message being sent before we could acquire the lock on
them (see commit message of the above mentioned revision),
as it was writing the `email_status` on more notifications that it
should have, including notifications of the previous email.
e.g
- Mail 1
- Message 1
- Recipient A, B, C
- Mail 2
- Message 1
- Recipient D, E
Let's say recipient A bounces
If the email notifying the bounce arrives during the processing of the "Mail 1",
it will be blocked until we release the lock on the `mail.notification` `email_status`
we acquire thanks to having written `exception` on `email_status` before sending the email.
But, as soon as it is unblocked (after the `cr.commit()`),
it will immediately re-attempt the delivery of the bounce email,
therefore writting "bounced" in `email_status` of recipient A,
while the transaction of the second email already began.
When the second email sending will try to write the `email_status`
of recipient A as well
(as it used to write the `email_status` on all the message notifications,
not just the one related to the current email),
it raised a concurrent update.
Therefore:
1. Interrupting the loop, as psycopg2 exceptions are raised and not passed,
2. Replay the sending of the second email a second time.
opw-1984293
closesodoo/odoo#33431
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Since cdca5d4751, the field company_id
on account.payment is not stored anymore, so, it doesn't make sense to be able to group on it
OPW 1998427
closesodoo/odoo#33428
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
If the smtp session was dead, it would lead the whole mail batch to fail.
opw 1949270
closesodoo/odoo#32424
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
closesodoo/odoo#33350
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
When an exception is raised during the course of a normal SMTP session,
smtplib's `sendmail()` method will close the channel automatically,
so any further attempt at sending SMTP commands will fail with an
SMTPServerDisconnected error, even just calling `smtp.quit()`.
This will shadow the original error, and make debugging harder.
Fixes#1493
When website_customer is not installed, some endpoints are not handled
by the router, causing the following tests to fail:
- test_10_crawl_public
- test_20_crawl_demo
- test_30_crawl_admin
Those tests were failing due to /customers responding with 404.
Indeed, the route /customers is defined in website_customer, but had
some usage within website_crm_partner_assign, causing tests to fail when
the former module is not installed.
The new behavior can be explained as follows:
- module website_crm_partner_assign on its own will lose the hyperlink.
- module website_customer will now inherit the view definition in order
to wrap the targeted HTML text elements with an anchor tag.
Closes#33344
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
Purpose: filter product by location of warehouse failed due to the
control panel refactoring (odoo#29106). This commit fix the way the
product quantities are computed when location/warehouse into filter
context.
Task:1941639
Co-Authored-By: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
closesodoo/odoo#31316
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Creating a new database with only sale_stock installed will lead the
boot_tests.js test to fail.
That's because commit 033608eb11
introduces an implicit dependency on a sale_management tour. This seems
to be a mistake since sale_stock does not depend on sale_management.
The tour only makes sense if both sale_stock and sale_management are
installed though. That's why the additional steps will be run
conditionally.
After this commit, the extra steps will only be run when sale_management
is installed.
Technically, this is done by checking whether odoo._modules contains
sale_management.
opw-1964469
closes#33275
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
- specify the correct separators on the language
- add the address format
- add street addres format for croatia
closesodoo/odoo#33205
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
avoid to get journal_entry_ids, to avoid pushing those ids in cache and
having them read uselessly when accessing an account.move.line
recordset.
Use search and search_read instead of ORM __get__
closesodoo/odoo#33192
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: william-andre <wan@odoo.com>
Commit c7773f9f introduced a duplicated term to the file .pot, which
causes the following error when trying to re-load translations:
```
ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE command cannot affect row a second time
HINT: Ensure that no rows proposed for insertion within the same
command have duplicate constrained values.
```
This commit removes on eof the duplicates, leaving only the valid one.
In addition, field string is modified to match the one defined at the
`website_sale` module, to prevent this from happening again, as had also
in 6af6da5c.
closesodoo/odoo#33223
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
When a new request of leave is created, some fields are computed to
calculate if it's possible or not, to take the leave
(virtual_remaining_leaves, leaves_taken, remaining_leaves and
max_leaves).
These fields are computed using the fields :
allocation : hr_leave_allocation.number_of_days.
and request : hr_leave.number_of_days.
When a leave type is in hours, both of these fields are calculated
differently:
allocation: The allocation field is calculated dividing the number of
hours registered by the user per the average hour per working day.
(https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d809b476819968837b61bdd78fbf101caac73adc/addons/hr_holidays/models/hr_leave_allocation.py#L236)
request : The request field is calculated by finding the real number of
requested days.
(https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d809b476819968837b61bdd78fbf101caac73adc/addons/hr_holidays/models/hr_leave.py#L360)
If in the company each day have different working hour, then the number
of days calculated with the average hours didn't represent the real
number of days that the employee can take. This issue can avoid the
employee to take a leave even if he has the correct number of hours to
take it.
Now, the fields (virtual_remaining_leaves, leaves_taken,
remaining_leaves and max_leaves) are calculated using either the days
fields or the hours fields depending on the leave type.
opw-1972133
closesodoo/odoo#33244
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
When a leave type is in hours, before this commit, in the allocation
list the allocation is shown in days. The problem is that the number of
days its calculated with the average hour per day. If in the company
each day have different working hour, then the number of days calculated
with the average didn't represent the actual number of days that the
employee can take.
Now, in the allocation list, the allocation is shown either with days or
hours depending on the leave type.
opw-1972133
- Activate cash basis
- Set a tax
Tax Due: Based on Payment
Include in Analytic Cost: true
- Create an invoice, add the tax and an analytic account on the invoice
line
- Validate and pay
The analytic account is correctly set on the tax line, but it is not set
on any of the cash basis entries.
Partial backport of 079a13a349.
opw-1971751
closesodoo/odoo#33236
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
The `_search` is override in `calendar.event` to return both ids and
virtual ids of recurrent events. Calling `.get_recurrent_ids` after the
search is wrong.
The entire request has been copied from the original
`_find_allowed_model_wise` function defined in `mail.message` to ensure
his correctness.
The purpose here is to ensure every virtual event id is mapped to the
real event id so the original function doesn't throw KeyErrors for
virtual ids.
opw-1972563
closesodoo/odoo#33246
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
- Set a product barcode to a 8 letters value, e.g. 'AAAAAAAA'
- Print 'Product Barcode (PDF)' (or any other report containing the
barcode)
The barcode doesn't print.
All templates assume that:
- a 13 characters barcode is EAN13
- a 8 characters barcode is EAN8
But this assumption is too restrictive: one could want to generate
barcodes with such length without following the EAN13 or EAN8 structure.
We fall back on Code128 when the barcode generation fails.
Backport of 06cfdbaab8
opw-1981988
closesodoo/odoo#33240
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
There was a syntax improvment in the commit merged but it was not
intended to be unfinished.
fixes#33228
opw-1981839
closes#33239
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Lucas Lefèvre