This commit was not correct and was a quick fix to avoid blocking daily use
of odoo saas-11.3. Next commit will fix access rights and enforce their
definition through more detailed tests.
This reverts commit ae34db3221.
This commit is linked to task ID 1876795 and PR #26656 .
Before this, CRUD leaves was limited to department
After this, we go back to what was in 11.2: CRUD for the whole company, and children of it
OPW 1878869
closes#26516
Before this commit, when we applied two or more groupbys in line
graph, the groups displayed on the X axis where shifted to the left,
and the first one wasn't displayed at all.
related task: #1848289Closes: #25037
Let x_1, ..., x_a, x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} be a record
sequence ordered by its 'sequence' field.
Suppose the reordering occurs between elements x_{a+k} and x_{a+1}.
If the subsequence x_1, ..., x_a is ordered, then it does not change.
This is also true of the subsequence x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n}.
The resquence function makes exactly this assumption, and only sends the server
the subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} to update its 'sequence' field.
The update of x is done as follows: it is index + offset, where index is the
position of x in the subsequence, and offset is the 'sequence' of the first
element of the sequence (i.e. x_{a+1}.sequence).
It is easy to see that we need another hypothesis: that the sequence numbers are
unique. To show it, suppose that the sequence of x_1, ..., x_a is 0, then all
x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} have sequence 1, and lastly all x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ...,
x_{n} have sequence 2. Then after the call to the server resequence, the
subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} would have sequence numbers 1, 2,..., k.
Since the x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} subsequence have 'sequence' value 1, this would
obviously be incorrect.
We fix the reordering of the data in the js frontend to be consistent with
what is done by the server.
Note that this is only pertinent for sequences of reordering moves, since
otherwise the data comes directly from the server.
opw 1867049
Related to the bug: 1874270
Purpose
=======
Keyboard shortcuts working on BlockUI and can cause some issues when used.
Specification
=============
It should not work and should not be display while some process is being executed.
- add function to remove the "accesskey" attributes to avoid the use of the
access keys while the blockUI is enable.
- add function to reset the "accesskey" attributes when the blockUI is disable.
- add condition to avoid the "Alt" key to reattribute access keys.
In the reconciliation widget, search for an amount like 5361.61
Before this commit, if the targetted line that you want to see was represented as 5361.61000001
you did not see it in the results of the search
After this commit, you do!
OPW 1872543
closes#26523
Following 50ab18176 an access token is added in the URL, but there may
not be an existing access token. If so this commit generate one.
opw-1877347
closes#26526
- When accessing an image from an "ir.attachment" which doesn't have an
access_token, the code crashes if you provide the argument access_token
on the URL.
This is due to a comparison between a boolean and a string using the
consteq function.
Before the models split in a0f4f65 the Leaves Summary report inherited
the message_needaction from mail.thread. Now the hr.leave.report model
does not have this field and leads to a traceback.
With this commit, the filter is removed from the search view of the
report.
Display the field date_open in the crm.lead form view
Create a new record
Before this commit, there was a crash because since the record is a virtual one
there is no create_date, hence the crash
After this commit, we make sure we select records that have a create_date, and there is no crash
OPW 1877080
closes#26499
- In some cases (merge of partners, etc ...) there might be mail.channel
that have two mail.channel.partner with the same res.partner.
When you try to open a discuss window with a partner for which you
have no existing mail.channel.
The channel opened is the one where your partner is duplicated.
This is due to the fact that the SQL request to find the mail.channel
doesn't take in account that a mail.channel may have twice the same
partner.
To fix this issue, we try to exactly match the partners we search.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a receipt for 1 dozen.
- Mark as todo
- Unlock and update initial demand to 3 dozen.
The reserved quantity on move line is 36 dozen.
It happens because reserved_availability and product_qty are
compare. However reserved_availability is in move UoM and product_qty
is in move's product UoM.
This commit clean the code in order to compare field that use the same
UoM.
Close#26504
- If a CDN is used, this might cause issues for images that need access
rights to be display.
This is due to the fact that users are not connected on their account
under the CDN domain, which makes the CDN requests reject since it is
not authorized to access to those resources.
The pdf_viewer widget has been moved from mrp to web in rev. odoo/odoo@a7b521f
but the corresponding style was still in the mrp module. It's now put in the
right place.
Closes#26449
- Go to a contact C1 > Membership tab > Buy membership
- Create an invoice with the membership
=> It creates a membership line on C1
- Change the partner on the invoice to C2
The membership line and the membership status is not transfered to C2.
We first need to recompute on C1, and we also need to explicitly write
the new partner C2 on the membership lines.
opw-1875673
- Go to a contact > Membership tab > Buy membership
- Create an invoice with the membership
=> The status of the member goes to 'Waiting membership'
- Validate the invoice
=> The status of the member goes to 'Invoiced membership'
- Create a credit note to cancel the membership
=> The status of the member goes to 'Paid members'.
It shouldn't be the case because the client has canceled his membership.
We look on `payment_move_line_ids` instead of `payment_ids`. Indeed, the
latter doesn't list credit notes, while the first one lists all move
lines used for payment.
opw-1875673
In recruitment, clicking on configuration > job positions > kanban view
leads to an odoo client error.
The qweb template cannot evaluate the condition on the client side.
With this commit, the ternary condition is properly evaluated.
Also, an unnecessary t-attf is removed.
Closes#26486
This commit fixes two issues:
- If a partner has multiple users and if any of these users is a
share user, then the access button on mail notifications is not displayed.
- If a project.task is either assigned or has its stage folded
the access button may not be displayed for certain users.
The users affected by this bug are the one who have their user's
partner is linked to multiple users with at least one flagged as a share user.
Thibault Delavallée