pengyuthon/odoo_source
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[IMP] test_mail: introduce performance test for message_format

Browse Source 
It was partially tested already as part of some other performance tests, but
this new test will cover more specific cases of `message_format` and
`_message_read_dict_postprocess`.

The goal is to ensure the performances are not made worse by the following
commits, or even to be able to notice when they are made better.

Part of task-2180311
PR: #43841
This commit is contained in:
Sébastien Theys
2020-03-06 16:15:42 +00:00
parent 70eeb2ece9
commit b9e1f0d700
1 changed files with 113 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
addons/test_mail/tests/test_performance.py
+113
View File
@@ -696,6 +696,119 @@ class TestMailComplexPerformance(BaseMailPerformance):
self.assertEqual(rec1.message_ids[2].notified_partner_ids, self.partners | self.user_portal.partner_id)
self.assertEqual(len(rec1.message_ids), 3)
@mute_logger('odoo.tests', 'odoo.addons.mail.models.mail_mail', 'odoo.models.unlink')
@users('emp')
@warmup
def test_message_format(self):
"""Test performance of `_message_read_dict_postprocess` and of
`message_format` with multiple messages with multiple attachments,
different authors, various notifications, and different tracking values.
Those messages might not make sense functionally but they are crafted to
cover as much of the code as possible in regard to number of queries.
"""
name_field = self.env['ir.model.fields']._get(self.umbrella._name, 'name')
customer_id_field = self.env['ir.model.fields']._get(self.umbrella._name, 'customer_id')
messages = self.env['mail.message'].sudo().create([{
'subject': 'Test 0',
'body': '<p>Test 0</p>',
'author_id': self.partners[0].id,
'email_from': self.partners[0].email,
'model': 'mail.test',
'res_id': self.umbrella.id,
'subtype_id': self.env['ir.model.data'].xmlid_to_res_id('mail.mt_comment'),
'attachment_ids': [
(0, 0, {
'name': 'test file 0 - %d' % j,
'datas': 'data',
}) for j in range(2)
],
'notification_ids': [
(0, 0, {
'res_partner_id': self.partners[3].id,
'notification_type': 'inbox',
}),
(0, 0, {
'res_partner_id': self.partners[4].id,
'notification_type': 'email',
'notification_status': 'exception',
}),
(0, 0, {
'res_partner_id': self.partners[6].id,
'notification_type': 'email',
'notification_status': 'exception',
}),
],
'tracking_value_ids': [
(0, 0, {
'field': name_field.id,
'field_desc': 'Name',
'old_value_char': 'old 0',
'new_value_char': 'new 0',
}),
(0, 0, {
'field': customer_id_field.id,
'field_desc': 'Customer',
'old_value_integer': self.partners[7].id,
'new_value_integer': self.partners[8].id,
}),
]
}, {
'subject': 'Test 1',
'body': '<p>Test 1</p>',
'author_id': self.partners[1].id,
'email_from': self.partners[1].email,
'model': 'mail.test',
'res_id': self.umbrella.id,
'subtype_id': self.env['ir.model.data'].xmlid_to_res_id('mail.mt_note'),
'attachment_ids': [
(0, 0, {
'name': 'test file 1 - %d' % j,
'datas': 'data',
}) for j in range(2)
],
'notification_ids': [
(0, 0, {
'res_partner_id': self.partners[5].id,
'notification_type': 'inbox',
}),
(0, 0, {
'res_partner_id': self.partners[6].id,
'notification_type': 'email',
'notification_status': 'exception',
}),
],
'tracking_value_ids': [
(0, 0, {
'field': name_field.id,
'field_desc': 'Name',
'old_value_char': 'old 1',
'new_value_char': 'new 1',
}),
(0, 0, {
'field': customer_id_field.id,
'field_desc': 'Customer',
'old_value_integer': self.partners[7].id,
'new_value_integer': self.partners[8].id,
}),
]
}])
with self.assertQueryCount(emp=13):
res = messages.message_format()
self.assertEqual(len(res), 2)
for message in res:
self.assertEqual(len(message['attachment_ids']), 2)
messages.flush()
messages.invalidate_cache()
with self.assertQueryCount(emp=19):
res = messages.message_format()
self.assertEqual(len(res), 2)
for message in res:
self.assertEqual(len(message['attachment_ids']), 2)
@tagged('mail_performance')
class TestMailHeavyPerformancePost(BaseMailPerformance):