[FIX] P3: crm: dead code removal + simplify

Merge wizard contained dead code with references to an unused lib for
validating emails. Removing everything is easier.

+ remove unnecessary pycompat wrapping for safe use of dict.items()
This commit is contained in:
Olivier Dony
2017-08-20 23:25:54 +02:00
parent 555ff9ab84
commit 92e8a342c9
2 changed files with 3 additions and 164 deletions
+3 -41
View File
@@ -2,56 +2,18 @@
# Part of Odoo. See LICENSE file for full copyright and licensing details.
from ast import literal_eval
from email.utils import parseaddr
import functools
try:
from html.entities import entitydefs
except ImportError:
from htmlentitydefs import entitydefs # pylint: disable=deprecated-module
import itertools
import logging
import operator
import psycopg2
import re
# Validation Library https://pypi.python.org/pypi/validate_email/1.1
from .validate_email import validate_email
from odoo import api, fields, models
from odoo import SUPERUSER_ID, _
from odoo.exceptions import ValidationError, UserError
from odoo.tools import mute_logger, pycompat
from odoo.tools import mute_logger
_logger = logging.getLogger('base.partner.merge')
# http://www.php2python.com/wiki/function.html-entity-decode/
def html_entity_decode_char(m, defs=entitydefs):
try:
return defs[m.group(1)]
except KeyError:
return m.group(0)
def html_entity_decode(string):
pattern = re.compile("&(\w+?);")
return pattern.sub(html_entity_decode_char, string)
def sanitize_email(email):
assert isinstance(email, pycompat.string_types) and email
result = re.subn(r';|/|:', ',', html_entity_decode(email or ''))[0].split(',')
emails = [parseaddr(email)[1]
for item in result
for email in item.split()]
return [email.lower()
for email in emails
if validate_email(email)]
class MergePartnerLine(models.TransientModel):
_name = 'base.partner.merge.line'
@@ -271,7 +233,7 @@ class MergePartnerAutomatic(models.TransientModel):
return item
# get all fields that are not computed or x2many
values = dict()
for column, field in pycompat.items(model_fields):
for column, field in model_fields.items():
if field.type not in ('many2many', 'one2many') and field.compute is None:
for item in itertools.chain(src_partners, [dst_partner]):
if item[column]:
@@ -409,7 +371,7 @@ class MergePartnerAutomatic(models.TransientModel):
"""
return any(
self.env[model].search_count([(field, 'in', aggr_ids)])
for model, field in pycompat.items(models)
for model, field in models.items()
)
@api.model
-123
View File
@@ -1,123 +0,0 @@
# RFC 2822 - style email validation for Python
# (c) 2012 Syrus Akbary <me@syrusakbary.com>
# Extended from (c) 2011 Noel Bush <noel@aitools.org>
# for support of mx and user check
# This code is made available to you under the GNU LGPL v3.
#
# This module provides a single method, valid_email_address(),
# which returns True or False to indicate whether a given address
# is valid according to the 'addr-spec' part of the specification
# given in RFC 2822. Ideally, we would like to find this
# in some other library, already thoroughly tested and well-
# maintained. The standard Python library email.utils
# contains a parse_addr() function, but it is not sufficient
# to detect many malformed addresses.
#
# This implementation aims to be faithful to the RFC, with the
# exception of a circular definition (see comments below), and
# with the omission of the pattern components marked as "obsolete".
import re
import smtplib
import socket
try:
import DNS
ServerError = DNS.ServerError
except:
DNS = None
class ServerError(Exception): pass
# All we are really doing is comparing the input string to one
# gigantic regular expression. But building that regexp, and
# ensuring its correctness, is made much easier by assembling it
# from the "tokens" defined by the RFC. Each of these tokens is
# tested in the accompanying unit test file.
#
# The section of RFC 2822 from which each pattern component is
# derived is given in an accompanying comment.
#
# (To make things simple, every string below is given as 'raw',
# even when it's not strictly necessary. This way we don't forget
# when it is necessary.)
#
WSP = r'[ \t]' # see 2.2.2. Structured Header Field Bodies
CRLF = r'(?:\r\n)' # see 2.2.3. Long Header Fields
NO_WS_CTL = r'\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0f-\x1f\x7f' # see 3.2.1. Primitive Tokens
QUOTED_PAIR = r'(?:\\.)' # see 3.2.2. Quoted characters
FWS = r'(?:(?:' + WSP + r'*' + CRLF + r')?' + \
WSP + r'+)' # see 3.2.3. Folding white space and comments
CTEXT = r'[' + NO_WS_CTL + \
r'\x21-\x27\x2a-\x5b\x5d-\x7e]' # see 3.2.3
CCONTENT = r'(?:' + CTEXT + r'|' + \
QUOTED_PAIR + r')' # see 3.2.3 (NB: The RFC includes COMMENT here
# as well, but that would be circular.)
COMMENT = r'\((?:' + FWS + r'?' + CCONTENT + \
r')*' + FWS + r'?\)' # see 3.2.3
CFWS = r'(?:' + FWS + r'?' + COMMENT + ')*(?:' + \
FWS + '?' + COMMENT + '|' + FWS + ')' # see 3.2.3
ATEXT = r'[\w!#$%&\'\*\+\-/=\?\^`\{\|\}~]' # see 3.2.4. Atom
ATOM = CFWS + r'?' + ATEXT + r'+' + CFWS + r'?' # see 3.2.4
DOT_ATOM_TEXT = ATEXT + r'+(?:\.' + ATEXT + r'+)*' # see 3.2.4
DOT_ATOM = CFWS + r'?' + DOT_ATOM_TEXT + CFWS + r'?' # see 3.2.4
QTEXT = r'[' + NO_WS_CTL + \
r'\x21\x23-\x5b\x5d-\x7e]' # see 3.2.5. Quoted strings
QCONTENT = r'(?:' + QTEXT + r'|' + \
QUOTED_PAIR + r')' # see 3.2.5
QUOTED_STRING = CFWS + r'?' + r'"(?:' + FWS + \
r'?' + QCONTENT + r')*' + FWS + \
r'?' + r'"' + CFWS + r'?'
LOCAL_PART = r'(?:' + DOT_ATOM + r'|' + \
QUOTED_STRING + r')' # see 3.4.1. Addr-spec specification
DTEXT = r'[' + NO_WS_CTL + r'\x21-\x5a\x5e-\x7e]' # see 3.4.1
DCONTENT = r'(?:' + DTEXT + r'|' + \
QUOTED_PAIR + r')' # see 3.4.1
DOMAIN_LITERAL = CFWS + r'?' + r'\[' + \
r'(?:' + FWS + r'?' + DCONTENT + \
r')*' + FWS + r'?\]' + CFWS + r'?' # see 3.4.1
DOMAIN = r'(?:' + DOT_ATOM + r'|' + \
DOMAIN_LITERAL + r')' # see 3.4.1
ADDR_SPEC = LOCAL_PART + r'@' + DOMAIN # see 3.4.1
# A valid address will match exactly the 3.4.1 addr-spec.
VALID_ADDRESS_REGEXP = '^' + ADDR_SPEC + '$'
def validate_email(email, check_mx=False,verify=False):
"""Indicate whether the given string is a valid email address
according to the 'addr-spec' portion of RFC 2822 (see section
3.4.1). Parts of the spec that are marked obsolete are *not*
included in this test, and certain arcane constructions that
depend on circular definitions in the spec may not pass, but in
general this should correctly identify any email address likely
to be in use as of 2011."""
try:
assert re.match(VALID_ADDRESS_REGEXP, email) is not None
check_mx |= verify
if check_mx:
if not DNS: raise Exception('For check the mx records or check if the email exists you must have installed pyDNS python package')
DNS.DiscoverNameServers()
hostname = email[email.find('@')+1:]
mx_hosts = DNS.mxlookup(hostname)
for mx in mx_hosts:
try:
smtp = smtplib.SMTP()
smtp.connect(mx[1])
if not verify: return True
status, _ = smtp.helo()
if status != 250: continue
smtp.mail('')
status, _ = smtp.rcpt(email)
if status != 250: return False
break
except smtplib.SMTPServerDisconnected: #Server not permits verify user
break
except smtplib.SMTPConnectError:
continue
except (AssertionError, ServerError):
return False
return True
# import sys
# sys.modules[__name__],sys.modules['validate_email_module'] = validate_email,sys.modules[__name__]
# from validate_email_module import *