pengyuthon/odoo_source
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[FIX]: base_calendar: Corrected wrong interpretation of editing event with recurrence

Browse Source 
bzr revid: rpa@tinyerp.com-20100809134854-6cu1rm7bsuif3fcn
This commit is contained in:
rpa (Open ERP)
2010-08-09 19:18:54 +05:30
parent 2134d4a411
commit 5f2a464a8c
1 changed files with 2 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
addons/base_calendar/base_calendar.py
+2 -7
View File
@@ -1212,17 +1212,12 @@ true, it will allow you to hide the event alarm information without removing it.
"""
event_id = base_calendar_id2real_id(event_id)
datas = self.read(cr, uid, event_id, context=context)
defaults.update({
'recurrent_uid': base_calendar_id2real_id(datas['id']),
'recurrent_id': defaults.get('date') or real_date,
'recurrent_uid': base_calendar_id2real_id(event_id),
'recurrent_id': real_date,
'rrule_type': 'none',
'rrule': ''
})
exdate = datas['exdate'] and datas['exdate'].split(',') or []
if real_date and defaults.get('date'):
exdate.append(real_date)
self.write(cr, uid, event_id, {'exdate': ','.join(exdate)}, context=context)
new_id = self.copy(cr, uid, event_id, default=defaults, context=context)
return new_id