[FIX] models, fields: cache consistency for one2many fields

Issue: after many2one updates, the cache of the corresponding one2many
fields was inconsistent when the latter depends on `active_test`.  One
of the values in cache was updated, while the other was left intact.

We simplify the cache by not making the field depend on context: the
cache value contains all the records in the relation (corresponding to
`active_test=False`).  The value of the field is automatically filtered
by the `active` field when the value is accessed.

This makes it easier to maintain the cache value, guarantees its
consistency, and avoids queries to read the one2many field with
`active_test=False`, after having set it with `active_test=True`.
This commit is contained in:
Raphael Collet
2019-09-30 15:42:36 +00:00
parent 333f1087cf
commit 4b1cb41cf7
4 changed files with 73 additions and 20 deletions
@@ -41,3 +41,4 @@ access_test_new_api_model_parent,access_test_new_api_model_parent,model_test_new
access_test_new_api_model_child,access_test_new_api_model_child,model_test_new_api_model_child,,1,1,1,1
access_test_new_api_model_child_nocheck,access_test_new_api_model_child_nocheck,model_test_new_api_model_child_nocheck,,1,1,1,1
access_test_new_api_display,access_test_new_api_display,model_test_new_api_display,,1,1,1,1
access_test_new_api_model_active_field,access_test_new_api_model_active_field,model_test_new_api_model_active_field,,1,1,1,1
1 id name model_id:id group_id:id perm_read perm_write perm_create perm_unlink
41 access_test_new_api_model_child access_test_new_api_model_child model_test_new_api_model_child 1 1 1 1
42 access_test_new_api_model_child_nocheck access_test_new_api_model_child_nocheck model_test_new_api_model_child_nocheck 1 1 1 1
43 access_test_new_api_display access_test_new_api_display model_test_new_api_display 1 1 1 1
44 access_test_new_api_model_active_field access_test_new_api_model_active_field model_test_new_api_model_active_field 1 1 1 1
+10 -1
View File
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ class Message(models.Model):
@api.constrains('author', 'discussion')
def _check_author(self):
for message in self:
for message in self.with_context(active_test=False):
if message.discussion and message.author not in message.discussion.participants:
raise ValidationError(_("Author must be among the discussion participants."))
@@ -716,3 +716,12 @@ class Mixin(models.AbstractModel):
class ExtendedDisplay(models.Model):
_name = 'test_new_api.display'
_inherit = ['test_new_api.mixin', 'test_new_api.display']
class ModelActiveField(models.Model):
_name = 'test_new_api.model_active_field'
_description = 'A model with active field'
active = fields.Boolean(default=True)
parent_id = fields.Many2one('test_new_api.model_active_field')
children_ids = fields.One2many('test_new_api.model_active_field', 'parent_id')
@@ -1539,6 +1539,50 @@ class TestX2many(common.TransactionCase):
record_a.unlink()
self.assertFalse(record_a.exists())
def test_12_active_test_one2many(self):
Model = self.env['test_new_api.model_active_field']
parent = Model.create({})
self.assertFalse(parent.children_ids)
# create with implicit active_test=True in context
child1, child2 = Model.create([
{'parent_id': parent.id, 'active': True},
{'parent_id': parent.id, 'active': False},
])
act_children = child1
all_children = child1 + child2
self.assertEqual(parent.children_ids, act_children)
self.assertEqual(parent.with_context(active_test=True).children_ids, act_children)
self.assertEqual(parent.with_context(active_test=False).children_ids, all_children)
# create with active_test=False in context
child3, child4 = Model.with_context(active_test=False).create([
{'parent_id': parent.id, 'active': True},
{'parent_id': parent.id, 'active': False},
])
act_children = child1 + child3
all_children = child1 + child2 + child3 + child4
self.assertEqual(parent.children_ids, act_children)
self.assertEqual(parent.with_context(active_test=True).children_ids, act_children)
self.assertEqual(parent.with_context(active_test=False).children_ids, all_children)
# replace active children
parent.write({'children_ids': [(6, 0, [child1.id])]})
act_children = child1
all_children = child1 + child2 + child4
self.assertEqual(parent.children_ids, act_children)
self.assertEqual(parent.with_context(active_test=True).children_ids, act_children)
self.assertEqual(parent.with_context(active_test=False).children_ids, all_children)
# replace all children
parent.with_context(active_test=False).write({'children_ids': [(6, 0, [child1.id])]})
act_children = child1
all_children = child1
self.assertEqual(parent.children_ids, act_children)
self.assertEqual(parent.with_context(active_test=True).children_ids, act_children)
self.assertEqual(parent.with_context(active_test=False).children_ids, all_children)
def test_search_many2many(self):
""" Tests search on many2many fields. """
tags = self.env['test_new_api.multi.tag']
+18 -19
View File
@@ -2562,6 +2562,10 @@ class Many2oneReference(Integer):
class _RelationalMulti(_Relational):
""" Abstract class for relational fields *2many. """
# Important: the cache contains the ids of all the records in the relation,
# including inactive records. Inactive records are filtered out by
# convert_to_record(), depending on the context.
def _update(self, records, value):
""" Update the cached value of ``self`` for ``records`` with ``value``,
and return whether everything is in cache.
@@ -2575,26 +2579,17 @@ class _RelationalMulti(_Relational):
return
records = model.browse(records)
cache = records.env.cache
result = True
if 'active_test' in (self.depends_context or ()):
updates = [
(value.sudo().filtered('active'), records.with_context(active_test=True)),
(value, records.with_context(active_test=False)),
]
else:
updates = [(value, records)]
for value, recs in updates:
if not value:
continue
for record in recs:
if value:
cache = records.env.cache
for record in records:
if cache.contains(record, self):
val = self.convert_to_cache(record[self.name] | value, record, validate=False)
cache.set(record, self, val)
else:
result = False
recs.modified([self.name])
records.modified([self.name])
return result
@@ -2654,7 +2649,10 @@ class _RelationalMulti(_Relational):
def convert_to_record(self, value, record):
# use registry to avoid creating a recordset for the model
prefetch_ids = IterableGenerator(prefetch_x2many_ids, record, self)
return record.pool[self.comodel_name]._browse(record.env, value, prefetch_ids)
corecords = record.pool[self.comodel_name]._browse(record.env, value, prefetch_ids)
if 'active' in corecords and record.env.context.get('active_test', True):
corecords = corecords.filtered('active').with_prefetch(prefetch_ids)
return corecords
def convert_to_read(self, value, record, use_name_get=True):
return value.ids
@@ -2711,9 +2709,6 @@ class _RelationalMulti(_Relational):
for arg in self.domain
if isinstance(arg, (tuple, list)) and isinstance(arg[0], str)
)
# make self depend on 'active_test' if there is a field 'active' in the comodel
if 'active' in model.env[self.comodel_name] and 'active_test' not in (self.depends_context or ()):
self.depends_context = (self.depends_context or ()) + ('active_test',)
def create(self, record_values):
""" Write the value of ``self`` on the given records, which have just
@@ -2824,7 +2819,9 @@ class One2many(_RelationalMulti):
def read(self, records):
# retrieve the lines in the comodel
comodel = records.env[self.comodel_name].with_context(**self.context)
context = {'active_test': False}
context.update(self.context)
comodel = records.env[self.comodel_name].with_context(**context)
inverse = self.inverse_name
inverse_field = comodel._fields[inverse]
get_id = (lambda rec: rec.id) if inverse_field.type == 'many2one' else int
@@ -3184,7 +3181,9 @@ class Many2many(_RelationalMulti):
reflect(model, '%s_%s_fkey' % (self.relation, self.column2), 'f', None, self._module)
def read(self, records):
comodel = records.env[self.comodel_name].with_context(**self.context)
context = {'active_test': False}
context.update(self.context)
comodel = records.env[self.comodel_name].with_context(**context)
domain = self.get_domain_list(records)
wquery = comodel._where_calc(domain)
comodel._apply_ir_rules(wquery, 'read')