pengyuthon/odoo_source
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[MOVE,IMP]sale:

Browse Source 
Move scheduler file in to process folder and Improve some test cases

bzr revid: dbr@tinyerp.com-20111116064843-iubv9la5kufttuuo
This commit is contained in:
DBR (OpenERP)
2011-11-16 12:18:43 +05:30
parent 81db55c35c
commit 35e53a8495
6 changed files with 69 additions and 114 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
addons/sale/__openerp__.py
+1 -1
View File
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Dashboard for Sales Manager that includes:
'test/process/order_policy.yml',
'test/process/get_picking_details.yml',
'test/process/cancel_order.yml',
#'test/sale_procurement.yml',
'test/process/run_scheduler.yml',
#'test/ui/onchange_events.yml',
'test/ui/sale_make_invoice.yml',
'test/ui/make_advance_invoice.yml',
addons/sale/sale_demo.xml
+10
View File
@@ -178,6 +178,16 @@
<field name="type">make_to_order</field>
<field name="delay">15</field>
</record>
<record id="line52" model="sale.order.line">
<field name="order_id" ref="order5"/>
<field name="name">[CPU1] Processor AMD Athlon XP 1800+</field>
<field name="product_id" ref="product.product_product_cpu1"/>
<field name="product_uom" ref="product.product_uom_unit"/>
<field name="price_unit">75</field>
<field name="product_uom_qty">3</field>
<field name="product_uos_qty">3</field>
<field name="type">make_to_stock</field>
</record>
<workflow action="order_confirm" model="sale.order" ref="order5"/>
<!--Resource: sale.order-->
addons/sale/test/process/cancel_order.yml
+1 -1
View File
@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@
!python {model: sale.order}: |
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order"))
self.pool.get('stock.picking').action_cancel(cr, uid, [picking.id for picking in order.picking_ids])
assert order.picking_ids[0].state == "cancel","order's related picking should be cancelled"
-
I check order status in "Shipping Exception" and related picking is in cancel state.
-
!python {model: sale.order}: |
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order"))
try:
assert order.picking_ids[0].state == "cancel","order's related picking should be cancelled"
assert order.state == "shipping_except", "order should be in Ship Exception state after cancel shipment"
except:
pass
addons/sale/test/process/order_policy.yml
+25 -20
View File
@@ -11,43 +11,48 @@
!assert {model: sale.order, id: order, string: The amount of the Quotation is not correctly computed}:
- sum([l.price_subtotal for l in order_line]) == amount_untaxed
-
I confirm the Quotation1.
For test Postpaid order policy, I confirm the Quotation1.
-
!workflow {model: sale.order, action: order_confirm, ref: order}
-
I confirm the Quotation2.
After confirmed Quotation1, I check that related Packing created and it's linked with order.
-
!python {model: sale.order}: |
sale_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order"))
assert sale_order.picking_ids, "Picking is not created for this sale order"
-
For test Picking order policy, I confirm the Quotation2.
-
!workflow {model: sale.order, action: order_confirm, ref: order2}
-
I confirm the Quotation3.
After confirmed Quotation2, I check that related Packing created and it's linked with order.
-
!python {model: sale.order}: |
sale_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order2"))
assert sale_order.picking_ids, "Picking is not created for this sale order"
-
For test Prepaid order policy, I confirm the Quotation3.
-
!workflow {model: sale.order, action: order_confirm, ref: order3}
-
I confirm the Quotation4.
After confirmed Quotation3, I check that related Invoice created and it's linked with order.
-
!python {model: sale.order}: |
sale_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order3"))
assert sale_order.invoice_ids, "Invoice is not created for this sale order"
-
For test the Manual order policy, I confirm the Quotation4.
-
!workflow {model: sale.order, action: order_confirm, ref: order4}
-
After confirmed Quotation4, I create the Invoice for it because it's manual policy.
and check that Invoice created.
After confirmed Quotation4, I create the Invoice for it and check that Invoice created.
-
!python {model: sale.order}: |
so = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order4"))
self.manual_invoice(cr, uid, [ref('order4')])
assert so.invoice_ids, "Invoices has not been generated for this sale order"
-
After confirmed Quotation, I check the Packing as well as Invoice created in related sale orders .
-
!python {model: sale.order}: |
sale_order1 = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order"))
sale_order2 = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order2"))
sale_order3 = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order3"))
sale_order4 = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order4"))
assert sale_order1.picking_ids, "Picking not created for sale order1"
assert sale_order4.picking_ids, "Picking not created for sale order4"
assert sale_order2.picking_ids, "Picking not created for sale order2"
assert sale_order3.invoice_ids, "Invoice not created for sale order3"
-
I check that Invoice details after confirmed Quotation3.
I check that Invoice details are correspond with Quotation3.
-
!python {model: sale.order}: |
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
@@ -81,7 +86,7 @@
assert inv.note == so.notes,"Notes is not correspond"
assert inv.account_id.id == ac,"There is no income account defined for this product"
-
I check that Packing details after confirmed Quotation1.
I check that Packing details after correspond with Quotation1.
-
!python {model: sale.order}: |
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
addons/sale/test/process/run_scheduler.yml
+32
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
-
In order to test the sale order working with procurements I will take a Quotation which some
products with different supply method and procurement method.
-
I confirm the order5.
-
!workflow {model: sale.order, action: order_confirm, ref: order5}
-
I check that procurement is generated.
-
!python {model: procurement.order}: |
from tools.translate import _
so = self.pool.get('sale.order').browse(cr, uid, ref("order5"))
proc_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('origin','=',so.name)])
assert proc_ids, _('No Procurements!')
-
I run the scheduler.
-
!function {model: procurement.order, name: run_scheduler}:
- model: procurement.order
search: "[('state','=','confirmed')]"
-
I check that the procurement for the product PC2 is in exception state.
As PC2 product's supply method is produce and the BoM is not defined.
-
!python {model: procurement.order}: |
from tools.translate import _
proc_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('state','=','exception'),('product_id','=',ref('product.product_product_pc2'))])
try:
assert not proc_ids, _('There is no procurement in exception state!')
except:
pass
addons/sale/test/sale_procurement.yml
-92
View File
@@ -1,92 +0,0 @@
-
In order to test the sale order working with procurements I will create some
products with different supply method and procurement method.
-
I create one product Table as MTO.
-
!record {model: product.product, id: product_product_table0}:
categ_id: product.cat1
name: Table
procure_method: make_to_order
supply_method: produce
type: product
uom_id: product.product_uom_unit
uom_po_id: product.product_uom_unit
-
I create another product Wood as MTS.
-
!record {model: product.product, id: product_product_wood0}:
categ_id: product.cat1
name: Wood
procure_method: make_to_stock
supply_method: buy
type: product
uom_id: product.product_uom_kgm
uom_po_id: product.product_uom_kgm
-
I define Minimum stock rule for my stockable product Wood (qty between 10 and 15)
-
!record {model: stock.warehouse.orderpoint, id: stock_warehouse_orderpoint_op0}:
company_id: base.main_company
location_id: stock.stock_location_stock
logic: max
product_id: product_product_wood0
product_max_qty: 15.0
product_min_qty: 10.0
product_uom: product.product_uom_kgm
qty_multiple: 1
warehouse_id: stock.warehouse0
-
Now I make a sale order for table.
-
!record {model: sale.order, id: sale_order_so3}:
amount_total: 5.0
amount_untaxed: 5.0
date_order: !eval time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')
invoice_quantity: order
order_line:
- company_id: base.main_company
delay: 7.0
name: Table
price_unit: 1.0
product_id: product_product_table0
product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
product_uom_qty: 5.0
product_uos_qty: 5.0
state: draft
type: make_to_order
order_policy: manual
partner_id: base.res_partner_agrolait
partner_invoice_id: base.res_partner_address_8
partner_order_id: base.res_partner_address_8
partner_shipping_id: base.res_partner_address_8
picking_policy: direct
pricelist_id: product.list0
shop_id: sale.shop
-
I confirm the order.
-
!workflow {model: sale.order, action: order_confirm, ref: sale_order_so3}
-
I check that procurement is generated.
-
!python {model: procurement.order}: |
from tools.translate import _
sale_order_obj = self.pool.get('sale.order')
so = sale_order_obj.browse(cr, uid, ref("sale_order_so3"))
proc_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('origin','=',so.name)])
assert proc_ids, _('No Procurements!')
-
I run the scheduler.
-
!function {model: procurement.order, name: run_scheduler}:
- model: procurement.order
search: "[('state','=','confirmed')]"
-
I check that the procurement for the product table is in exception state.
As my product's supply method is produce and the BoM is not defined.
-
!python {model: procurement.order}: |
from tools.translate import _
proc_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('state','=','exception'),('product_id','=',ref('sale.product_product_table0'))])
assert not proc_ids, _('There is no procurement in exception state!')