model has been renamed to mail.channel to prepare the slack modeling. In future commits the mail.group model will be merged with the channel model from im_chat. The first move is to rename mail.group into mail.channel to have a model that will unite both features.
62 lines
3.3 KiB
XML
62 lines
3.3 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
|
|
<openerp>
|
|
<data noupdate="1">
|
|
|
|
<!-- RULES -->
|
|
<record id="mail_channel_rule" model="ir.rule">
|
|
<field name="name">Mail.channel: access only public and joined groups</field>
|
|
<field name="model_id" ref="model_mail_channel"/>
|
|
<!-- This rule has to be improved for employee only groups -->
|
|
<field name="domain_force">['|', '|', ('public', '=', 'public'), ('message_follower_ids', 'in', [user.partner_id.id]), '&', ('public','=','groups'), ('group_public_id','in', [g.id for g in user.groups_id])]</field>
|
|
<field name="perm_create" eval="False"/>
|
|
</record>
|
|
|
|
<record id="mail_followers_read_write_own" model="ir.rule">
|
|
<field name="name">mail.followers: read and write its own entries</field>
|
|
<field name="model_id" ref="model_mail_followers"/>
|
|
<field name="groups" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_user'))]"/>
|
|
<field name="domain_force">[('partner_id', '=', user.partner_id.id)]</field>
|
|
<field name="perm_create" eval="False"/>
|
|
<field name="perm_unlink" eval="False"/>
|
|
</record>
|
|
|
|
<!-- If technical rights then read and write others subscriptions -->
|
|
<record id="mail_followers_read_write_others" model="ir.rule">
|
|
<field name="name">mail.followers: read and write others entries</field>
|
|
<field name="model_id" ref="model_mail_followers"/>
|
|
<field name="groups" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_no_one'))]"/>
|
|
<field name="domain_force">[]</field>
|
|
<field name="perm_create" eval="False"/>
|
|
<field name="perm_unlink" eval="False"/>
|
|
</record>
|
|
|
|
<record id="mail_notification_read_write_own" model="ir.rule">
|
|
<field name="name">mail.notification: read and write its own entries</field>
|
|
<field name="model_id" ref="model_mail_notification"/>
|
|
<field name="domain_force">[('partner_id', '=', user.partner_id.id)]</field>
|
|
<field name="perm_create" eval="False"/>
|
|
<field name="perm_unlink" eval="False"/>
|
|
</record>
|
|
|
|
<record id="mail_message_subtype_rule_public" model="ir.rule">
|
|
<field name="name">mail.message.subtype: portal/public: read public subtypes</field>
|
|
<field name="model_id" ref="model_mail_message_subtype"/>
|
|
<field name="domain_force">[('internal', '=', False)]</field>
|
|
<field name="groups" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_portal')), (4, ref('base.group_public'))]"/>
|
|
</record>
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
This rule can not be uncommented, because we have a more wide method in mail.message. When we implement a many2one_variable field, we will be able to uncomment this.
|
|
<record id="mail_message_read_partner_or_author" model="ir.rule">
|
|
<field name="name">mail.message: read if notified or author</field>
|
|
<field name="model_id" ref="model_mail_message"/>
|
|
<field name="domain_force">['|', ('partner_ids', 'in', user.partner_id.id), ('author_id', '=', user.partner_id.id)]</field>
|
|
<field name="perm_create" eval="False"/>
|
|
<field name="perm_write" eval="False"/>
|
|
<field name="perm_unlink" eval="False"/>
|
|
</record>
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
</data>
|
|
</openerp>
|