Collisions in table names of ORM models with built-in PG structures such
as "attributes", "domains", "routines", "parameters", ... could occur
and render the result of `table_kind` meaningless.
Based on what was done via https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/16651 more
than 2 years ago, it seems relying on our tables being in the 'public'
schema is safe, even though it's only a default from PG. We reuse that
same logic rather than the alternative of excluding
('information_schema', 'pg_catalog', ...), even though it looks safer at
first. If we did the latter we'd have to change the other comparison for
consistency, i.e. more risks.
closesodoo/odoo#42358
X-original-commit: d8e74eb14990c82f65a44ffe163aa84159d6ccc4
Signed-off-by: Denis Vermylen <Icallhimtest@users.noreply.github.com>
Denis Vermylen
cf0146934d