fw-bot
fccaa703c4
Purpose Fix multi-company access issues following the big changes that happened (the 13.0). Make the usability better in order to avoid potential multi-company issues for the user. Specification Check the related commits to see the different fixes that have been made. For more information about the technical/functional considerations, check the related task. Taskid: 2088891 X-original-commit: 5c8df3a5e5f7960e5eab6439e0a32a06224ba826
76 lines
3.6 KiB
Python
76 lines
3.6 KiB
Python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
|
# Part of Odoo. See LICENSE file for full copyright and licensing details.
|
|
|
|
from odoo.addons.hr_expense.tests.common import TestExpenseMultiCompanyCommon
|
|
from odoo.tests import tagged
|
|
|
|
@tagged('post_install','-at_install')
|
|
class TestExpenseMultiCompany(TestExpenseMultiCompanyCommon):
|
|
|
|
@classmethod
|
|
def setUpClass(cls):
|
|
super(TestExpenseMultiCompany, cls).setUpClass()
|
|
|
|
cls.bank_journal = cls.env['account.journal'].create({
|
|
'name': 'Payment Journal',
|
|
'code': 'PAY',
|
|
'type': 'bank',
|
|
'company_id': cls.env.company.id,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
cls.outbound_pay_method = cls.env['account.payment.method'].create({
|
|
'name': 'outbound',
|
|
'code': 'out',
|
|
'payment_type': 'outbound',
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
def test_expense_multicompany_company_propagation(self):
|
|
# The company on the expense sheet should be the same as the one from the expense
|
|
expense = self.env['hr.expense.sheet'].create({
|
|
'name': 'Expense for employee a',
|
|
'employee_id': self.employee.id,
|
|
'journal_id': self.sale_journal0.id,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expense_line = self.env['hr.expense'].create({
|
|
'name': 'Sword Sharpening',
|
|
'employee_id': self.employee.id,
|
|
'product_id': self.product_1.id,
|
|
'unit_amount': 1,
|
|
'quantity': 1,
|
|
'sheet_id': expense.id,
|
|
'analytic_account_id': self.analytic_account.id,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(expense_line.company_id.id, self.env.company.id)
|
|
self.assertEqual(expense.company_id.id, self.env.company.id)
|
|
|
|
expense.with_context(allowed_company_ids=[self.company_B.id, self.env.company.id], company_id=self.company_B.id).action_submit_sheet()
|
|
self.assertEqual(expense.state, 'submit', 'Expense is not in Reported state')
|
|
self.assertEqual(expense.company_id.id, self.env.company.id)
|
|
|
|
expense.with_context(allowed_company_ids=[self.company_B.id, self.env.company.id], company_id=self.company_B.id).approve_expense_sheets()
|
|
self.assertEqual(expense.state, 'approve', 'Expense is not in Approved state')
|
|
|
|
expense.with_context(allowed_company_ids=[self.company_B.id, self.env.company.id], company_id=self.company_B.id).action_sheet_move_create()
|
|
self.assertEqual(expense.state, 'post', 'Expense is not in Waiting Payment state')
|
|
self.assertTrue(expense.account_move_id.id, 'Expense Journal Entry is not created')
|
|
|
|
exp_move_lines = expense.account_move_id.line_ids
|
|
payable_move_lines = exp_move_lines.filtered(lambda l: l.account_id.internal_type == 'payable')
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(payable_move_lines), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(payable_move_lines[0].company_id.id, expense.company_id.id, 'The company of the move line should be the same as the one from the expense.')
|
|
|
|
#The company on the payment should be the same as the one on the expense, even if we are in a another company
|
|
WizardRegister = self.env["hr.expense.sheet.register.payment.wizard"].with_context(
|
|
active_model=expense._name, active_id=expense.id, active_ids=expense.ids, allowed_company_ids=[self.company_B.id, self.env.company.id], company_id=self.company_B.id
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
register_payement = WizardRegister.create({
|
|
'journal_id': self.bank_journal.id,
|
|
'payment_method_id': self.outbound_pay_method.id,
|
|
'amount': 300,
|
|
})
|
|
self.assertEqual(register_payement.company_id.id, expense.company_id.id, 'The company of the payement should be the same as the one from the expense.')
|
|
register_payement.expense_post_payment()
|