Files
Alvaro FuentesandChristophe Simonis c18b9f44be [IMP] *: optimize multi-company rule
When we use the `|` (or) version of this rule the ORM generates two
sub-queries when checking the company. This causes sub-optimal and in
some cases really bad planning for the queries and thus PG takes hours
to complete them.

Example (formatted):
```sql
    SELECT "mrp_routing_workcenter".id
      FROM "mrp_routing_workcenter"
 LEFT JOIN "mrp_bom" AS "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"
        ON "mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" = "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."id"
     WHERE "mrp_routing_workcenter"."workcenter_id" in (1)
       AND (  ("mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" in (
                    SELECT "mrp_bom".id
                      FROM "mrp_bom"
                     WHERE ("mrp_bom"."company_id" in (1))
                   )
              )
           OR ("mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" in (
                    SELECT "mrp_bom".id
                      FROM "mrp_bom"
                     WHERE "mrp_bom"."company_id" IS NULL
                   )
              )
           )
  ORDER BY "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."sequence",
           "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."id",
           "mrp_routing_workcenter"."sequence",
           "mrp_routing_workcenter"."id"
```

If we use the single term version the generated query has only one
sub-query:
```sql
    SELECT "mrp_routing_workcenter".id
      FROM "mrp_routing_workcenter"
 LEFT JOIN "mrp_bom" AS "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"
        ON "mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" = "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."id"
     WHERE "mrp_routing_workcenter"."workcenter_id" in (1)
       AND (  ("mrp_routing_workcenter"."bom_id" in (
                    SELECT "mrp_bom".id
                      FROM "mrp_bom"
                     WHERE (("mrp_bom"."company_id" in (1))
                        OR  ("mrp_bom"."company_id" IS NULL))
                   )
              )
           )
  ORDER BY "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."sequence",
           "mrp_routing_workcenter__bom_id"."id",
           "mrp_routing_workcenter"."sequence",
           "mrp_routing_workcenter"."id"
```
In this version PG is able to produce a better query plan resulting in
better execution times.

Also, the `company_id` field is required on some models, so the "= False" comparison is useless.

closes odoo/odoo#159123

X-original-commit: 1b5c41f36801fb886ec591f29dba42787d698526
Related: odoo/enterprise#59378
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis (chs) <chs@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
2024-03-25 17:50:06 +00:00

90 lines
4.3 KiB
XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<odoo>
<record id="base.module_category_human_resources_employees" model="ir.module.category">
<field name="sequence">9</field>
</record>
<record id="group_hr_user" model="res.groups">
<field name="name">Officer: Manage all employees</field>
<field name="category_id" ref="base.module_category_human_resources_employees"/>
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(6, 0, [ref('base.group_user')])]"/>
<field name="comment">The user will be able to approve document created by employees.</field>
</record>
<record id="group_hr_manager" model="res.groups">
<field name="name">Administrator</field>
<field name="comment">The user will have access to the human resources configuration as well as statistic reports.</field>
<field name="category_id" ref="base.module_category_human_resources_employees"/>
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('group_hr_user'))]"/>
<field name="users" eval="[(4, ref('base.user_root')), (4, ref('base.user_admin'))]"/>
</record>
<data noupdate="1">
<record id="base.default_user" model="res.users">
<field name="groups_id" eval="[(4,ref('group_hr_manager'))]"/>
</record>
<record id="hr_employee_comp_rule" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">Employee multi company rule</field>
<field name="model_id" ref="model_hr_employee"/>
<field name="domain_force">[('company_id', 'in', company_ids + [False])]</field>
</record>
<record id="hr_dept_comp_rule" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">Department multi company rule</field>
<field name="model_id" ref="model_hr_department"/>
<field name="domain_force">[('company_id', 'in', company_ids + [False])]</field>
</record>
<record id="hr_employee_public_comp_rule" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">Employee multi company rule</field>
<field name="model_id" ref="model_hr_employee_public"/>
<field name="domain_force">[('company_id', 'in', company_ids + [False])]</field>
</record>
<record id="hr_job_comp_rule" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">Job multi company rule</field>
<field name="model_id" ref="model_hr_job"/>
<field name="domain_force">[('company_id', 'in', company_ids + [False])]</field>
</record>
<record id="ir_rule_res_partner_bank_internal_users" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">HR: Prevent non HR officers from accessing employee bank accounts</field>
<field name="model_id" ref="base.model_res_partner_bank"/>
<field name="domain_force">[('partner_id.employee_ids', '=', False)]</field>
<field name="groups" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_user'))]"/>
</record>
<record id="ir_rule_res_partner_bank_employees" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">HR: Allow HR officers from accessing employee bank accounts</field>
<field name="model_id" ref="base.model_res_partner_bank"/>
<field name="domain_force">[(1, '=', 1)]</field>
<field name="groups" eval="[(4, ref('hr.group_hr_user'))]"/>
</record>
<record id="ir_rule_hr_contract_type_multi_company" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">HR Contract Type: Multi Company</field>
<field name="model_id" ref="model_hr_contract_type"/>
<field name="domain_force">['|', ('country_id', '=', False), ('country_id', 'in', user.env.companies.country_id.ids)]</field>
</record>
<record id="mail_plan_rule_group_hr_manager" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">Manager can edit employee plan</field>
<field name="groups" eval="[(4, ref('group_hr_manager'))]"/>
<field name="model_id" ref="mail.model_mail_activity_plan"/>
<field name="domain_force">[('res_model', '=', 'hr.employee')]</field>
<field name="perm_read" eval="False"/>
</record>
<record id="mail_plan_templates_rule_group_hr_manager" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">Manager can edit employee plan template</field>
<field name="groups" eval="[(4, ref('group_hr_manager'))]"/>
<field name="model_id" ref="mail.model_mail_activity_plan_template"/>
<field name="domain_force">[('plan_id.res_model', '=', 'hr.employee')]</field>
<field name="perm_read" eval="False"/>
</record>
</data>
</odoo>