This commit makes the override of the `name_search` more
consistent the basic implementation of the ORM (using lazy
name_get and supports the `name_get_uid` parameters)
Task-1911581
This commit adds a missing `depends` on the `debit` and `credit` computed
field on analytic account model. Indeed, without that, the recompute is not
done when accessing thoses fields after adding lines in the same
transaction (like in tests).
Task-1911581
For historical reason (problably the inheritS between project and AA, removed in 12.0), portal
user can read Analytic Account. This makes no sense, as it is a purely internal resource
for companies. Removing the access rights don't change anything for portal user and make
those data secure.
Task-1911581
This version adds full support of string templates.
Before this version, rjsmin may produce wrong code with string
templates. For example:
```js
const url = `https://odoo.com`;
console.log(url);
```
was minified to:
```js
const url=`https:console.log(url);
```
Because `//` was wrongly handled as a comment inside the string
template.
closesodoo/odoo#35867
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
The user can already send a confirmation email when the
Stock Picking is done. It'd be great to communicate the
same information by SMS.
In addition, the current mailing tool requires a manual
action. The idea is to automate the process via a
Setting instead.
id=1972567
closesodoo/odoo#35662
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
When you are creating an invoice from the POS, the report route is
called to download the invoice, since changes made in rev: 118190f3b3
The values for ids where empty, so we give them now the correct id list.
closesodoo/odoo#35889
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
_compute_is_mto was based on the sequence of the routes,
as most of those sequences were hardcoded, some had the same values,
resulting in wrong calculations. Furthermore, the method was setting the so lines
as mto if the sequence of the MTO route had the priority on the other ones, even if
the mto route wasn't set on the product.
This simply ensure to check the mto route is set on the product,
sequences should be set manually to prevent any sequence conflict.
TaskID: 2053703
closesodoo/odoo#35740
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Add possibility to print orders on an ePOS compatible Epson receipt
printer located in the same local network than the browser running the
pos.
TaskID: 2033442
Add possibility to print receipts on an ePOS compatible Epson receipt
printer located in the same local network than the browser running the
pos.
TaskID: 2033442
PURPOSE
=========
When working in restaurants, there are often more than one waiter working on the same floor.
But Odoo doesn't support that.
There can only be one person working on one session for the same tables.
The purpose of this task to allow several people to work on the same session (while synchronizing sessions).
SPECIFICATIONS
===============
- MultiUser is active by default.
- Allow multiple waiters to login on one PoS Config.
- All waiters login to the same session, the waiter that does the paiment is the responsible for the order (same as now).
- Synchonize the information across the multiple instances running on same floors.
Syncronisation will take place at switch of table.
(close tables automaticly if no activity, to force sync)
- Syncro cannot be done if no internet : how do we manage it ? We should inform the user the internet connection has been lost and that synchro cannot be done. What impacts? To check
Useful links
https://github.com/it-projects-llc/pos-addonshttps://apps.odoo.com/apps/modules/11.0/pos_bus_restaurant/
Related PR:
odoo#32789
TASK-ID: 1891130
closesodoo/odoo#33973
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR modify the subcontracting process:
- Support extra quantity
- No more interaction with the subcontract order. Everything is directly accessible on the operation
- Dropshipping with subcontracting
- Bypass reservation process
- The partner type subcontractor is removed and every partner could be set on the BoM
- Update the initial demand will trigger the rules.
- Demo data
- Subcontractor is required on the BoM (no more BoM for all partners of type subcontractor)
Visually:
- Remove the stat button for linked operation.
- Register Components is only available when a subcontract component is tracked
- Button on operations in order to correct tracked components
- Show Operation button will ask to record components until the total quantity is provided(correction on finish lines are allowed after)
More details available in each commit
Task 1962187
closesodoo/odoo#35738
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Before a modification on a quant, stock.move and stock.move.line
check if they satisfy the condition to impact the quant.
However in a new module this condition is hardly editable.
The purpose of this commit is to easily add condition to bypass
reservation.
Before this commit a returns would select the classic
partner location. However in the case of a subcontractor return
it should be returned to the subcontract location
Force to set subcontractors on subcontracting BoM since
it's always used in order to determine if a subcontracting
should be apply on a receipt or not. Also there is not magical
behavior has 'if there is no subcontractor on the BoM then it
means all partners...'
- nothing tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products not tracked and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
- finished products and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
Due to subcontracting. Some documents are hidden from the users since
they are there to ease technicaly. However they are linked to useful
documents and we want to avoid to log an activity on them.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Validate a purchase_order with a user without group inventory user or manufacturing user.
AccessError on operation read for BoM. A purchase user should be able
to validate an order independently of the documents that will be
generate.
Allow to do a dropshipping with a subcontractor.
If the product uses the routes drophipping and have
a subcontracting BoM. Then a PO for the subcontractors
will genrate a need in the subcontracting location for
the required components.
A module is needed because the picking_type_id for dropshipping
do not have a warehouse_id. The warehouse_id is needed in order to
know from which warehouse the subcontracting components should be
deliver.
Test the flow when a product is set as resupply on subcontract
and not MTO, it should be trigger by a reordering rule and not
by a subcontracting receipt.
When a move is created from a location A to a location B and not
via a rule but it wants to apply the rule logic in order to know
if a move is MTS or MTO then _adjust_procure_method is called.
It will check if a rule between A and B for the selected product/
category/warehouse and if it exists it will apply the rule procure
method to the move. If not it will check if the route MTO is ticked,
and will set the move as MTO even if no rule exist. It could be
miss understanding by the user that have moves MTO without matching
rule. It would be easier to have a single proccess with rule.
Add a test for the following usecase:
- Subcontracted product and components tracked by lot.
- Create a receipt
- Use the register components button in order to prefill quantity
- Correct the final lot on details operation form
If the components have the route resupply subcontractor on order then the
delivery order triggered by the receipt do not have the origin nor the
subcontractor partner. This commit update the procurement group in
order to add those information and propagate it.
due to commit 108ee65af2a88d61526dc047043138bddc3f9b63#diff-99ad190cf09687f6efdebc1f7636062c
picking type for subcontracting order use field use_create_components_lots
instead of classic picking type.
Replace the type subcontractor on the partner.
Instead replace it by a property for a subcontracting location.
The purpose is to have a simplier configuration. The user would
just need to add the partner on the BoM in order to start a
subcontracting process.
Create two moves with a product MTO and the same SO.
Confirm them. It will generate a new picking without origin.
However the purpose of removing origin on picking is to avoid
an endless enumaration of all documents but if they only have
one origin it should be display.
In this case, the origin was ignored because moves.mapped('origins')
result in a list of ['doc_origin','doc_origin'] and have a length
of 2 because .mapped do not return a distinct set on fields different
than Many2one, one2Many and M2M.
Currently, the subcontract picking present multiple difficulties:
- The user has to introduce multiple time the lot produced.
In register components button and then create a new move line with
the show details operation button.
- Same problem with the correction system. The user has to modify the
lot in details operation and then go on the subcontract production and
unlock and edit it.
In order to facilitate those behavior. A move line will be automaticaly
created during the register components process. Also the subcontract
moves for components will be available in the detail operations tab.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a receipt of 1 units of a subcontracted product
- Receive 2
- Validate the receipt
-> An extra move for subcontractor of 1 has been validated but a
new move of 2 still in waiting availability and can not be
validated.
It happens due to action_done that will validate existing subcontract
order (with the initial quantity). Then the move is validated and an
extra move is created and merged in the first one. This new merged
move of 2 is then confirmed and validated. That will recreate a
subcontract order of 2 that will not be validated since it was validated
in the picking action_done at the start.
This commit will modify:
- action_done on move in order to validate the subcontract order after
the move validation and the new subcontract order creation too.
- action_confirm in order to create the subcontract order with the
additional quantity and then merge it to the existing moves.
Usecase to reproduce:
- BoM -> 1 component for 1 final product
- Create a MO with a quanity of 5
- Update the quantity to 6
-> The move finished has an initial demand of 4
Stat button "Attendees" of an event now redirects to Kanban view
of attendees (previously redirected to List view).
Task-ID 1935268
closesodoo/odoo#31621
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Removing these margins makes swipe on 'o_mail_preview'
nicer in enterprise without having blank spaces.
Note that these rules should be in enterprise.
Task ID : 1895453
This allow us to reuse this logic in enterprise when you swipe.
Note that we could have directly called the handler but the name
wasn't appropriate. So we preferred to extract some code in a
well named function.
Task ID : 1895453
jem-odoo