When loading a page on an existing starting database, registry is not
fully loaded causing potential error when trying to access model
existing in database (views, menitem, ...) since model added in last
loaded module does not exist in registry.
Thus, executing browser js test may lead to errors when executed during
an update on a database with other modules installed.
HTTPCase should be executed post_install to ensure that registry is
fully loaded to avoid this problem.
Since HTTPCase are slower than other test, it is also a good idea to
execute them at the end, in order to prioritize fast fail.
With this commit, a warning is isued if such a test class is tagged to
run at install time.
While at it, remove deprecated at_install and post_install helpers and
remove the deprecated phantom_js alias.
closesodoo/odoo#39462
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
There are too many image sizes. Since they are stored resized this takes time to
generate when saving a new image, it's more rows on the attachment table, more
files on the disk, ...
64px is close enough to 128px that it can be removed without a big impact on
download size.
It will even reduce download and number of requests when both images are
displayed because now only one has to be downloaded and then benefit from cache.
The difference between the two is typically around 1.5kB which is negligible
these days, especially when the request overhead is around 0.5kB already, not
even taking into account other factors such as latency.
If a 64px image must absolutely be returned, it is still possible to pass the
size parameters to the image route. But the current guideline is to handle
resizing in the views when necessary.
Views
=====
- remove width and height attributes when existing CSS rules are overriding them
(eg. `.oe_kanban_avatar` in the right context)
- add CSS rules instead of width and height attributes when possible
- use `object-fit: cover;` where width and height are forced to avoid distortion
of non-square images
- for products, use `object-fit: contain;` instead, keep ratio but without crop
- add new CSS rules where the expected size was max 64px*64px before due to the
image size itself
- remove `img-fluid` where using size classes to avoid conflicting rules
task-2060865
closesodoo/odoo#36147
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
Before this commit, the No Change status wasn't properly set because
the `filehash` wasn't passed to `_binary_set_headers` and because
the status was not changed to 304 if it was already set to 200 earlier.
This commit fixes this issue and also prevents images to be processed
in `content_image` if the status is 304.
opw-2008426
closesodoo/odoo#34032
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
* = website_partner, website_profile, website_sale, website_slides
Before
======
Since commit: 2e3848b394
The images that are resized have additional borders if the target ratio is
different than the image ratio. Those borders are transparent if the image
format supports it, and are white otherwise.
With that current solution, if the background where the image is displayed is
another color than white, it is looking really bad.
Moreover, most images are stored resized like this, so it is not even possible
to decide if it should have borders or not depending on the context, the
original image and ratio is forever lost.
It is also inconsistent because if the image is already smaller than the target
size then it doesn't include borders. In that case it keeps the original ratio
instead of the target ratio. So it isn't even guaranteed that the target
ratio is going to be respected.
After
=====
This commit will solve all of those problems by always keeping the ratio of the
original image.
This implies the views should be taking care of adding borders when necessary.
task-1958000
PR: #31811
This commit will add tests for the PR #30656 which added the following commit:
7daa85dd12
The tests in the current commit achieve 100% code coverage for:
- the `image.mixin`
- the overridden `image.mixin` methods in `product.product`
- the `_get_images` methods of ecommerce
- the size logic in method `content_image` (route `/web/image`)
PR: #31181
In 3d2ca8104e some change were introduced to the graph view.
But part of it had no sense when displaying data over 2 group by.
eg. if the first level has 2 groups (2018, 2019) and each second level 2
groups (Done,Cancelled), we could have:
2018/Done: 0
2018/Cancelled: 5
2019/Done: 8
2019/Cancelled: 9
this gives us two main groups [2018: 5] / [2019: 17], the code
remove the 2018 because [2018/Done] is 0 so we have something odd
with columns not in order, and in stacked bar chart some part of
a bar at the wrong offset
opw-1932517
closes#30529
Christophe Monniez