Commit Graph
25 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Aaron Bohy ff6e89052d [REF] web,*: regroup custom hooks in core/utils/hooks
*base_automation,iap,im_livechat,point_of_sale

This commit introduces a new file in core/utils: hooks.js
This file contains custom hooks (useEffect, useService, useBus...).

The useHotkey hook is tightly related to hotkeys, so it has been
moved to core/hotkeys.

closes odoo/odoo#74535

Related: odoo/enterprise#20003
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
2021-08-02 11:13:52 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) 70353a2063 [REF] web: action_service: dialog is null when absent
Before this commit, the current dialog (in the action service's state) was either an empty object
when there was no dialog, and a filled object when the dialog was present.

After this commit, when there is no dialog, the dialog state is null.

closes odoo/odoo#74442

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-08-02 07:58:09 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) 83eb9f9ebd [FIX] web: action_service: onClose callback can execute history-back
Have an action in the breadcrumb (A)

Do an action (B) that has a button which spawns a dialog with a onClose callback executing an`history-back` event.
This may be useful when the action (B) acts as a selection buffer between (A) and the dialog.
(e.g. stock_barcode: execute `stock_barcode_client_action` from a picking)

Before this commit, the history-back event just closed the dialog without going back to the action (A)
This was because the wrong condition was used to determine if the dialog was still alive or not.

After this commit, the action (A) is displayed when closing the dialog from any point.
2021-08-02 07:55:52 +00:00
Aaron Bohy 4b3dc07b52 [FIX] web: better handle error in actions
Before this commit, if there was a crash in a view or client
action during an update (i.e. the action is already in the DOM,
but an update triggers a re-rendering), the error was caught by
the action service, it wasn't displayed to the user, and the
action was re-rendered again (which could obviously result in the
same error being thrown again and again).

With this commit, we properly show the error, and we do not try
to re-render the action.

closes odoo/odoo#73507

Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-07-12 13:40:26 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) a935096e51 [FIX] web: webclient: remove bootstrap tooltips more accurately
Before this commit, when hovering a button with a bootstrap tooltip set on it
(form view with header button in debug mode) and then clicking while staying hover
the tooltip was not destroyed and there was no easy means to destroy it.

After this commit, any click within a legacy context remove any bootstrap tooltip from the DOM,
since popper and tooltip are not meant to be used in the future in a wowl setting.

closes odoo/odoo#73447

Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-07-08 15:28:01 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) c00fb3cede [FIX] web: register template of dynamic classes once
Before this commit, the template of some dynamic classes (usually as WOWL to legacyAdapters)
were registered at each definition of the class which is potentially at every doAction/switchView

After this commit, they are all registered only once, as early as possible.

closes odoo/odoo#72476

Related: odoo/enterprise#19199
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-06-23 15:47:56 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) 0cec54b92c [FIX] web: action_service: better error handling
on a legacy form view, do an action in target new
The view in target new should, during its onchange, trigger a ValidationError

Before this commit, the dialog_container was stuck in an error loop.
This was because the received error was never an instance of Error, rather it was
a legacy error event. So it was never transmitted upstream were the ErrorHandler could remove
the dialog in error from is dialog array.

After this commit, the ValidationError mesage is displayed.

This commit additionally fixes another issue:
An action in target main that failed to render erased the whole DOM. This is not what we want,
at least for now. Imagine a list view, open a record, this record fails to load. We still want to be
on the list view, not in a blank state.
2021-06-23 15:47:56 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) 77a59f8d6a [FIX] web: action_service: do not commit a dialog that has failed
Open a action in target new that you'll know will fail to open.
Make sure you put an onClose callback when executing doAction.

Open another action in target new, that will succeed.

Before this commit, the onClose of the first dialog is executed, while it should not.
Indeed, if the dialog fails, the whole business flow is invalid altogether
and no more business operation (in the onClose) should be executed

After this commit, the onClose callback of the failing dialog is not executed.
2021-06-23 15:47:55 +00:00
Mathieu Duckerts-AntoineandLucas Perais db2092d8d3 [REF] web,mail: action_service: doAction passes props to component
Before this commit the doAction method of the action_service did not support
to pass props directly to the Component. Only a few ad-hoc options were passed though.

After this commit, doAction can take a key "props" in options, that will be passed to the Component
(a View or a ClientAction)

the new API becomes
```ts

interface Options {
  props: { [key: string]: any };
  ...
}

doAction(action: ActionRequest, options: Options);

Note that some props (like withFilters) are set by the action service
and cannot be set via the key "props".

Alongside the change mentioned above, we take the opportunity to align the
terminology used in action service to the one used server side: we know use
the terms resModel, resId, and resIds instead of model, recordId, and recordIds.

```

closes odoo/odoo#72397

Related: odoo/enterprise#19127
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
2021-06-21 13:21:53 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) 13a6c13666 [FIX] web: legacy client action push state
Before this commit, the push state from client actions to the URL did
not work properly:
1. the action.params key was ignored
2. some "reserved" keys (active_id) were not handled properly
3. within a legacy client action, the call to parent.do_push_state did not work

After this commit, all of those work properly letting discuss in particular have the right URL

It is worth noting that in the full wowl stack, that the right way to push something
in the URL from a component is always to call the router service's pushState when the component is mounted

closes odoo/odoo#72408

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-06-21 12:37:43 +00:00
Michael Mattiello (mcm) aa819f892d [REF] web: change effect service API
Before this commit, effect service provided two functions:
  create(type, params)
  rainbowMan(params)

Now, it provides one function add which is create but renamed
rainbowMan function can be called by doing:
  service.add("rainbowman", ...);

closes odoo-dev/odoo#969

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:34 +02:00
Francois (fge) 2aca56f0f0 [FIX] web: doAction supports controllerState passed in option
In legacy, doAction can be passed the `controllerState` key, which contains `searchModel`
and `searchPanel`, that an AbstractController can export.

This commit re-implements this in the action service.
2021-06-18 21:31:33 +02:00
Michael Mattiello (mcm) 580533ecfb [REF] web, *: change dialog service api
* iap, web_tour

This commit changes the API of the dialog service.

Before, the API gave 2 functions: "open" and "close".
Now, there is only one function "add" which is the same as "open"
but returning a callback that does the close.

closes odoo-dev/odoo#940

Related: odoo-dev/enterprise#171
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:33 +02:00
Aaron Bohy 840f914a4e [FIX] web: concurrency issue when opening form view
From a list or kanban view, quickly click multiple times on a
record or on the Create button: a lot of bad stuff could happen
from there (e.g. crashes, form view that could not be open
anymore afterward).

The reason was that we destroyed the legacy form view whereas we
shouldn't, as it was still used. In more details, when we clicked
first on a record to open it, we created an owl Component to
instantiate and wrap the form view (legacy). When we clicked a
second time, we another owl Component was instantiated and the
first one was destroyed. As an unwanted side-effect, the legacy
form view was destroyed as well, but the new controller wanted to
reuse it. From that point, anything bad could happen as we were
trying to use a destroyed widget.

closes odoo-dev/odoo#941

Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:32 +02:00
Aaron Bohy fc7c431840 [FIX] web: actionService: handle async client actions
A client action can be a function. This function may return another
action to be executed afterwards. This function may also be async.
This is for instance the case of the studio client action. Before
this commit, the code handling it directly called doAction with the
promise as action, which could lead to unexpected results. For
instance, studio tours sometimes fail to load the studio client
action.

closes odoo-dev/odoo#935

Related: odoo-dev/enterprise#169
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:31 +02:00
Jorge Pinna Puissant 5437fb98ca [IMP] web: close action service dialog using the 'x' button
Until now, if a dialog was opened using the action service with an
on_close callback, this callback wasn't called if the dialog was closed
without using the action "ir.actions.act_window_close".

Now, the on_close callback is called after the dialog is closed.

closes odoo-dev/odoo#929

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:31 +02:00
Michael Mattiello (mcm) 41e5435d97 [REF] web, *: refactor notification service
* bus, calendar

This commit changes the notification API and adapts codes that use it
Notification API before:
    - create(...): number
    - close(id: number, wait?: number)

Notification API now:
    - add(...): RemoveCallback

closes odoo-dev/odoo#908

Related: odoo-dev/enterprise#158
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:30 +02:00
Jorge Pinna Puissant d73309de28 [IMP] web: use dialog service on action service
Until now, the action container opened/closed an action dialog directly
on the template, and relayed on the bus to communicate with the action service.
Now the action service opens/closes the action dialogs using the action service.
To do this, a new close method is created on the action service.
This commit also separates the code of dialog service and dialog container to
be more standard.

closes odoo-dev/odoo#900

Related: odoo-dev/enterprise#156
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:30 +02:00
Géry Debongnie c0494af680 [IMP] web: improve handling of invalid actions
Before this commit, the web client was not behaving in an
optimal way when trying to load an invalid action.

This scenario actually occurs quite frequently for developers:
- have odoo open in a tab
- drop the db, reinstall odoo with possibly different addons
- reload the tab (so, it has an action_id in the url)

Doing so would most likely lead to an invalid action_id, which in
turns displayed a traceback, because we assumed in the code that
the return value from the /action/load call is valid.

With this commit, we handle this case, and also display an empty
screen with a notification to give some feedback to the user.
2021-06-18 21:31:29 +02:00
Michael Mattiello (mcm) 4377241d8c [IMP] web: improve error definitions
This commit adds some error types to have more accurate errors.
These types can be more easily found as they have an other name
than Error.

closes odoo-dev/odoo#885

Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:29 +02:00
Samuel Degueldre 8daff40725 [IMP] web: add support for custom handlers for ir.actions.report
closes odoo-dev/odoo#873

Related: odoo-dev/enterprise#144
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:29 +02:00
Géry Debongnie ba9fd57592 [IMP] web: improve registry.get api with default value
closes odoo-dev/odoo#870

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:28 +02:00
Julien Mougenot d2985c033e [IMP] web: use original router service in tests
Before this commit, the router service used in tests was almost
entirely mocked and some of the mocked features didn't correspond to
their original counterparts.

Now, the actual router service is used in tests and the browser object
is mocked instead, allowing to correctly test the routing features.
2021-06-18 21:31:28 +02:00
Jorge Pinna PuissantandLucas Perais (lpe) 36e03d1b98 [FIX] web: take into account the view flags
Co-authored-by: "Lucas Perais (lpe)" <lpe@odoo.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:28 +02:00
+1 0573acae23 [REF] web: rewrite the webclient in OWL (phase 1)
This commit is the first phase of the conversion of the web/ JS
codebase to the owl framework. The impact of this commit is two-fold.

First, it rewrites the framework part of web with a new system of
services and registries. Services allow to execute code (e.g. do rpcs,
setup things) before launching the application. They can also expose
an API to be used by other parts of the application (e.g. a notification
service would expose a function to display notifications). Services are
often a good extension point for external modules that want to execute
code at webclient startup. Registries offer another way to extend the
application. They provide well designed extension points to add
elements/behaviors from the outside (for instance, to add a systray item,
an error handler...).

Second, this commit initiates the conversion of the webclient to owl
with a top-down approach, around those notions of services and registries.
The root of the web application is now an owl application. Among others,
the WebClient, ActionManager, Navbar, UserMenu, DebugManager, Dialogs,
services (e.g. notification, ajax...) have been converted to the new
framework/architecture.

Legacy views and client actions are still supported (and used). They
will be converted in the next months, and at some point, the support
will be dropped.

Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
2021-06-18 21:31:27 +02:00