When adding several PO to a bill, if they don't have the same currency,
it will lead to incorrect amounts
To reproduce the error:
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Currencies"
2. Invoicing > Configuration > Currencies:
- EUR: Active, Current Rate = 2
- USD: Active, Current Rate = 1
3. Create a PO:
- Currency: USD
- Products:
- One product, no taxes, unit price 1000
4. Confirm PO
5. Edit PO:
- Qty Received: 1
6. Repeat 3 -> 5 with EUR instead of USD
7. Open a new Bill
8. Add the first PO to the field "Auto-Complete"
9. Add the second PO to the field "Auto-Complete"
Error: Both invoice lines are now expressed in EUR and both subtotals
are equal to 1000 even though the exchange rate isn't 1
This commit suggests not to change the currency of the account move if
the latter already has some AML. Moreover, the amounts must be converted
if they come from a PO that uses another currency
OPW-2573748
closesodoo/odoo#73483
X-original-commit: b299e880417026688b2fbde23307bd011de8c44d
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
On a product form, if the purchase UoM is different from the default
UoM, this will lead to an error when creating a RfQ.
To reproduce the error:
(Need stock)
1. In Settings, enable "Unit of Measures"
2. Create a product P:
- Cost: 100
- UoM: Units
- Purchase UoM: Dozens
3. Create a RfQ:
- Add P
Error: The quantity is 1 and UoM is Dozens, however the unit price is
$14400. The ratio has been applied twice.
When setting the product, an onchange method computes the unit price.
However, the computation is wrong: it first converts the product's
standard price using the purchase UoM of the product. Then, it converts
the result, this time using the UoM of the PO line.
OPW-2519294
closesodoo/odoo#72139
X-original-commit: b37a13d7763e4a69695fdb1567dce5d0f69ff78a
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
1. add packaging to PO lines
2. packaging on PO/SO lines can be propagate to MO
3. add package type to packaging
4. on picking types, we can choose to only reserve full packaging. That
means if you want 1 pallet(100 units) and you have 50 units in stock. It
won't be reserved.
5. suggest suitable packaging for PO/SO/MO line according to the product
qty
Task-2357259
PR #68654
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2444
For customer invoices:
* do not set default date because if you prepare an invoice (and it gets
a default date), then validate it the next day, the date will be wrong
* set the date when posting if it wasn't set, because why not?
For vendor bills:
* do not set default date because you rarely encode a bill at the bill
date. Forcing the user to enter it reduces risks of user error
(duplicated vendor bill)
* do not set it when posting, same reason.
opw-2492862
Related #68368Closes#68367closesodoo/odoo#69639
X-original-commit: 41041d8016d11f017d92d28f32ab2cf42f1349a9
Related: odoo/enterprise#17866
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Add an easy way to not post the entries in the future when calling
post() on it, but rather set it to be auto-posted at accounting date.
This is useful when we are creating a lot of entries in batch and some
might be in the future, some in the past, and we don't want to separate
that in two batch every time. (asset, accrual, transfer,... )
l10n runbot builds are all failing when running at least one test depending of AccountTestCommon because it:
- doesn't create a sandboxed testing environnement to manage the multi-currency, multi-company, the default company's currency, the exchange rates...
- doesn't setup a testing user then all tests are done using the superuser.
- doesn't provide a fully setup chart of accounts: exchange difference journal is not set, accounts have bad types, etc...
- is run sometimes at-install.
--task: 2301180m
l10n runbot builds are all failing when running at least one test depending of AccountTestCommon bec
- doesn't create a sandboxed testing environnement to manage the multi-currency, multi-company, the
- doesn't setup a testing user then all tests are done using the superuser.
- doesn't provide a fully setup chart of accounts: exchange difference journal is not set, accounts
- is run sometimes at-install.
--task: 2301180
1. Show only date not datetime on update portal. When update the
scheduled date, set it to be the last minute of that date.
2. Send updated date immediately when user pick a date.
3. If an activity for update the date already exist, update the
note instead of creating a new one.
Task #2265912
PR 52809
Some change to imporve reminder mail usability:
1. Scheduled date on POL of the PO form now is always editable.
2. Improve tooltip for the reminder email
3. don't show number of days when reminder email not checked on
both PO and partner form.
4. only show "confirm receipt date" button in debug model
5. In the mail, format date by partner.lang
6. Add button to send preview reminder mail
7. On default, receipt_reminder_email on res.partner is False
8. merge expected_date with date_planned (done by FP)
Task 2265912
PR #52693
1. automatically send a reminder mail to vendor to confirm the receipt
date. If confirmed, (confirmed by vendor) will be added next to the
receipt date. If not, vendor can update the date on the portal website.
An warning activity will be set for the purchase representative for this
update.
2. Vendor can also comfirm recieption of the PO when we 'send PO by mail'.
If confirm, (confirmed by vendor) will be added next to the confirmation
date. An filter is added in the PO search view to show all unconfirmed
PO.
Task 2230811
PR #49921
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Adds "Expected Date" and "Effective Date" fields to purchase orders to
match what exists in sales orders. "Effective Date" mirrors sales logic
(= first completed stock move). "Expected Date" has simplier logic due
to simplier nature of receiving stock vs shipping (= earliest "Scheduled
Date" of all PO lines). Form view has been updated to include these new fields.
Additionally code was changed to not have PO 'order_line.date_planned' be
overwritten by the 'purchase_order.date_planned' value. Previous behavior
was both confusing and made it so info was lost. Also logic for related
stock move picking line expected date values has been updated to now consider
'purchase_order.date_planned' value if set. Related changes include:
- not overwriting when PO is edited+saved (this only occurred in write()
logic, not create() which caused inconsistent behavior anyways.),
- updating related tests,
- removing PO line date_planned editing restriction when PO date_planned
is set
- updating of relevant stock moves/picking expected date due to
PO.line.propogate_date = True ('purchase_order.date_planned' if
exists, otherwise 'order_line.date_planned')
This change also includes some small related improvements:
- Removal of outdated code comment.
- Addition of Help strings to better explain fields.
- Prevent copy of 'date_planned' value into new POs (now mirrors sales
logic).
This change corresponds to "Receipt Date on PO's" subsection of Purchase
KPIs task.
Task #2198420
========
Purpose
========
Currently, purchase missing some billing functions that we have in sale
invoicing:
- Create credit note when necessary
- Create vendor bill in batch in list view
========
Spec
========
- In case of retures, when create a bill for a purchase order, we check
the total amount we want to bill to decide whether it's a vendor bill or
a credit note.
- In the list view, add a new action to create vendor bill/credit note
for all selected order.
========
Links
========
Task 2170715
PR #44210
Related: odoo/upgrade#919
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
The 'vendor bills' stat button on purchase order, once clicked, will
have a specific behavior depending on the invoice count :
0 : open a new invoice with pre filled fields (not saved yet)
1 : open the form view of the invoice
2+: open the list view of the invoices.
Before this commit, the invoice count was computed with an environment on
the current user. That means a record rule could make the invoice count
lower than the real count and so give an unwanted behavior. Ex: create a
new invoice even if there is already one created because the user cannot
see the other people's invoices.
After this commit, the action_view_invoice with make an explicit read()
in database to fill the cache with all the purchase order's invoices and
make sure the count is the real one.
Task : 2206969
closesodoo/odoo#48274
X-original-commit: e3101d92187946b2bd539e05956e4e83cd9c9097
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Before this patch, the purchase users get an access violation error
at the invoice creation from a purchase order. This was due to
some missing ACL between v12 and v13.
Task : 2206969
X-original-commit: 4c4fb33e4bbc78a85ad309baf5df906cf16566ea
if product have taxes and taxes_id field is empty
then it will fill the 'taxes_id', so price_total field
have taxed Total.
Task- 2093205
closes- #41681
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
**Steps to reproduce**
* Define "Purchase Order" sequence for using date ranges checking "Use subsequences per date_range".
* Change sequence prefix to "PO/%(year)s/".
* Create a purchase order with order date in 2020 (a different year than current one).
**Current behavior**
Got a purchase order with 2019 (current year) number.
**Expected behavior**
Got a purchase order with 2020 number.
closesodoo/odoo#38468
X-original-commit: ce423e6adb6659a1d5885bad158c59b882cb4565
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
If SQL, if you do
```display_type IN ('line_section', 'line_note') OR account_id IS NOT NULL```
and `display_type` is `NULL` then you can only have `'t'` because
`SELECT NULL OR 'f';` yields `NULL`
`SELECT NULL OR 't';` yields `'t'`
The check of NULL is not blocking, hence the constraint doesn't work.
closesodoo/odoo#37075
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Before, we only had a public method that installed
the CoA for the current active company.
With the multi-company changes, it was not
possible anymore to install a module with a
demo company and then have the CoA installed
in that demo company correctly.
We changed that public method to be able to
put an extra optional parameter and shortened
its name to try_loading instead of
try_loading_for_current_company. The method that
it calls when there is no chart installed
is made private and renamed to _load.
closesodoo/odoo#35703
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
Modify purchase report in order to make it consistent with
sales report.
For the RFQ it will show the Order Date and for the Purchase order
menu it will display the Confirmation Date.
Also rewrite a bit the SQL view in order to compute every purchase
order in the company currency.
Technicaly rewrite the SQL alias in order to have a report more
readable in the future.
Task ID : 1857130.
closesodoo/odoo#28248
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
This commit remove force_assign method in every tests of point_of_sale, purchase, sale_mrp,
sale_stock, stock and stock_account . This method is not longer used since V11.
This commit is related to task ID 59417
This wizard allows the stock users to replenish a product using the
routes applied to this product. A specific route can also be applied
to bypass the default route.
This replaces the "request procurement" wizard from v10, lost during the
stock refactoing.
Task ID: 47938
related to #22041
Accounting entries made for invoices and stock valuation on the interim accounts (stock input/output accounts) are now reconciled together for both sales and purchases. This will definitively help to have those accounts zero-outed when all operations are processed.
The reconciliation is made as long as the stock valuation is set in real-time, whatever the costing method.
Note that change change also allow a particular use case to be solved: when a purchase is made in a foreign currency whose rate change between the incoming shipment reception and the bill validation (there will be an automated exchange rate entry created).
Was task 32331. Was PR #22483
Use case to reproduce:
- Create a Product MTO that should be buy
- Create a SO with this product and confirm it
- Confirm the RFQ
- Increase the ordered quantity on the SO
- Confirm the new RFQ
- Receive product from the 2 PO
-> Unable to reserve the quantity on the destination moves
It happens because the link between the reception move from the second PO and the delivery move is missing.
Update the quantity on the SO will create a new move with the missing quantity that will generate the new RFQ
then this move is merged in the main move. However the reception move is only created when the RFQ is confirm
and the move_dest_ids is stored on the purchase order line during this time.
Thus merge moves will unlink the new move with its reference on the purchase order line and the link is lost.
This commit do not merge move that have different RFQ/PO in order to avoid losing MTO information.
Moves UoM models, test and data to a new addon in
order to be able to use uom without product.
A simple example is be to be able to use UoM for
timesheets.
This commit only move code, and adapt xml ids
without chaging any feature or functionnal
behavior.
Note: 'product' module now depends on new
'uom' module.
When creating an extra move, the price_unit field was not copied. It is
normal since the field is copy=False following rev[0].
But there was a side effect: let's say you order 1 product @ $10 and you
receive 5. The received quantity field on the purchase order line is
correctly set to 5 and the valuation inside the stock is correctly set
at $50, but on the picking there is one move line of 5 and a move a 4
and of 1, instead of one of 5. Note that in v10, the pack operation
would be split between the original move and the extra move, but in our
case the extra move is merged back in the original move, so we don't
need to split the move line. The split mechanism is there only when
working with moves without picking[1].
The issue here is that the moves are not merged because they do not have
the same price unit (5 and 0). We thus copy the unit price when creating
the extra move.
When creating a backorder, the price_unit field wasn't copied either.
It's not important when working with the classic flows (the link to
purchase_line_id is kept), but to be consistent we also copy it.
[0] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/a4740861d3fdbecc8b1171b7d2072697e8a36258
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/561b3461a020021d911999cb41154f158b069a1d
Before this commit, the uom defined on the sale order line and on the
purchase order line was propagated to the moves. This is not the
behaviour of v8-10 and may confuse the stock operator (one time he's
working in dozen, another time in units for example). It also leads to
rounding issues if the configuration is not adapted correctly (product's
uom is in units, sale order line is in dozen, the rouding precision on
the uom is left to their defaults, now if a dozen is partially available
there's a good chance converting back and forth form dozen to units will
break).
An ir.config_parameter was added to restore the behaviour before this
commit.
Purpose: When running tests, all the tests for the installed/updated
files are done. This commit adds a 'tagged' decorator that can be used to
tag tests. Combined with a new 'test-tags' CLI option, it adds the ability
to filter which tests are executed. For example, @tagged('slow') will
add a tag 'slow' to the test. The CLI option 'test-tags="slow"' will
only run tests tagged 'slow'.
One can use prefixes to select cases with tags.
'+' or no prefix means that the tests tagged with this tag are selected
for execution. '-' prefix will exclude the tests tagged with this tag.
Exclusion takes precedence over inclusion.
Also, by default, all Odoo tests cases are tagged 'standard' and with
the technical name of the module.
This means that when selecting tests with the 'test-tags'
parameter, if '-standard' is not specified, all tests tags are
going to be executed.
When tagging tests, one can remove such automatic tag by prefixing the
tag name with '-'. E.g. @tagged('-standard') will remove the standard
tag from the test.
Another example, if one wants to test the 'sale' module alone,
even without adding any 'tagged' decorator thos tests can be selected
like that: --test-tags="sale"
Tests are selected or deselected using a TagsSelector. When instanciated,
a string is passed with comma separated tests selectors like
'+slow,-standard'. When the 'check' method is called with a test as argument,
it returns True or False if the test has to be executed or not.
Adrien Widart