Improve the returns process by adding the following improvements:
- Removal of the 'return' operations type. Returns of deliveries now
become receipts.
- Update of the `stock_picking_return` wizard by removing the onchange
on picking_id.
- Show returns in the sale portal, with a new 'return label' PDF report
- Enable returns for multi-step receipts on purchases
Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/118568
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/39761closesodoo/odoo#118568
Task: 3081370
Related: odoo/upgrade#4660
Related: odoo/enterprise#39761
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
This commit changes the process flow of stock pickings. A new picking will
always be created in immediate transfer mode and 'ready' state. From
their, it can be validated directly or 'reset to draft'. This second action
switch the immediate mode to planned mode and reset the state as draft.
From their the classical workflow is processed
confirm -> (assigned ->) validated
Task: 3256447
Part-of: odoo/odoo#117513
In the web client, in a real use case, it's not possible
to write on fields which are invisible,
as it's not possible to write on fields which are readonly.
This is a first step in the goal to change the behavior
of the `groups=` attribute in the back-end views,
to remove them for the view instead of making them invisible.
This is mainly to reduce the diff of the revision that will introduce
the mentioned above behavior change.
As nodes with `groups=` will be removed from the view
when the user doesn't have the group, it's no longer possible
to set a value on a field having a `groups=` the user doesn't have
in the `Form` test class, as the field will no longer be at all in the
view.
However, these unit tests shouldn't have been able to set values
on invisible fields in the first place.
This revision therefore aims to correct the unit tests setting value
on fields which were invisible because the user executing the
test was not part of the required group(s) for these fields
to be visible in the view.
closesodoo/odoo#94337
Related: odoo/enterprise#28936
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Instead of having to repeatedly manually call `onchange_quantity` at
different points in the code, it is better to have it be computed
instead.
- Logic is left unchanged,
- onchange calls from other methods are removed, and
- tests are adjusted to properly handle compute. I.e. remove
'date_planned': datetime.today().strftime(DEFAULT_SERVER_DATETIME_FORMAT)
from when PO lines are created since this sometimes resulted in
inconsistent date_planned values for PO line and the PO date_order
(by 1 sec), which could lead to inconsistently created 'date_deadline'
values for stock_moves' created by PO line qty changes. Issue
previously didn't exist because onchange was not always called.
Part of Task: 2695116 (to avoid adding more onchange calls for new
feature)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87656
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a storable product “P1”:
- Standard price: 20$
- Add vendor in the Purchase tab:
- name: Azure Interior
- min qty: 10
- price: $15
- Create a PO:
- Vendor: "Azure Interior"
- Product line: “P1”
Automatically, the Quantity field will automatically get populated as 10 Units
and price:$15 as per the pricelist
- Confirm the PO
A picking will be created containing a stock_move with a price of $15 and a QTY of 10
- Edit the Quantity to 9 Units and save the PO
The price will be updated to $20 on the PO line, but not in the `stock.move`
Problem:
When we update the qty in the PO line, a new move with a quantity of “-1” and
a price of “$20” will be created.
Then, it will be merged with the initial move, but since they are not identical in the price,
we can't merge them, so a new picking is created:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/dda9700d8236091626cbd78efc0ca4116e1e1acd/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L869-L881
Solution:
when the price is updated in a PO line, the price of its linked `stock.move` must also be updated
opw-2825160
closesodoo/odoo#92208
X-original-commit: c8d74a1cb4bfed8226e52e0bc6f243b4e483fc98
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
This commit rename product_uom_qty into reserved_uom_qty and product_qty
into reserved_qty on stock move line to stop mistake them with the stock
move quantities fields.
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
In a lot of test class, we use `setUp` instead of
`setUpClass`. `setUp` is execute for each test method and `setUpClass`
will be execute only once by Class (and use savepoint + rollback).
Then change setUp into setUpClass reduce the time to make all tests
and avoid to repeat this error for the future.
closesodoo/odoo#78082
Related: odoo/enterprise#21563
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Allow the quantity decrease of Sale Order line of a MTO product.
When increasing de quantities, the related pickings, RFQ / PO are
increased as well, but it wasn't the case if decreasing the quantity.
It should allow the cascade of the decrease in the related pickings as
it would work for the increase. Also modifies a related Purchase Order
if it wasn't yet validated (and thus still a RFQ).
merge_moves was modified so it would allow the merge of negative moves
with positive ones, while trying to "deplete" as much quantity as
possible for each mergeable move.
But negative moves don't always have all required properties to be
compared to the positive ones (some keys might be missing, such as
'created_production_id'). That means we will merge strictly the positive
moves at first as it was done before. But then we try to merge them "less
strictly", using less keys to compare.
Let's say we have those moves (and all other relevant keys matches) :
- move_1 : {qty : 5, created_production_id: 1}
- move_2 : {qty : 3, created_production_id: 2}
- move_3 : {qty : -6, created_production_id: False}
move_1 and move_2 cannot be merged as they don't share the same
created_production_id. But to merge move_3, we'll need to merge it into
move_1 and move_2. It will then deplete move_1 and decrease move_2.
Which will leave us with :
- move_1 : {qty : 0, created_production_id: 1}
- move_2 : {qty : 2, created_production_id: 2}
move_3 will be unliked as its purpose is done.
Task-2513592
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78070
Divide "Delivery"/"Incoming Shipment" smart button of "Sale"/"Purchase"
order form between normal "Delivery"/"Incoming Shipment" and a
"dropship" picking.
Also clean a little bit technically
task-2486811
Part-of: odoo/odoo#75041
Currently stock moves are auto-assigned (i.e. reserve free stock) both
when the scheduler is run and when a corresponding stock move that can
assign a move is completed. This strictness was causing issues for
prioritization of moves to assign, for example a picking with a
scheduled_date far in the future could automatically reserve all stock
if it was created before another picking that an immediate
scheduled_date. To ease this, an extra setting has been added to
stock.picking.type to let users choose how reservations should occur for
moves assigned to that picking_type (or picking with that picking_type):
1. 'at_confirm' = automatically when:
- stock is available when the move's associated picking/MO is
confirmed,
- when new stock becomes available,
- when the scheduler is triggered (+ stock available).
2. 'manual' = user must always manually click "Check Availability"
button (scheduler will no longer reserve).
3. 'by_date' = automatically when within the move's reservation_date
and:
- stock is available when the move's associated picking/MO is
confirmed,
- new stock becomes available when move is already confirmed, or
- the scheduler is run (+ stock is available).
'by_date' has an extra option of # days before the move's scheduled
date that affects the move.reservation_date.
Task: 2359317
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#1868
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#15050
And other reported English mistakes in source string
Courtesy of Transifex translators
And remove leftover from gengo
closesodoo/odoo#59022
X-original-commit: 26efc84c5cac47a2cc83d7b084f8b71528fec6c7
Related: odoo/enterprise#13781
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Lessen use of mail-specific calls and variables
SPECIFICATIONS
Use mail_new_test_user tool in tests, lessening use of mail-specific context
keys in tests.
LINKS
Task ID-2326281 (context keys use cleaning)
PR odoo/odoo#56631
PR odoo/enterprise#12707
X-original-commit: 910559c092dc7dfa00b91339a5423e16cd4668e1
- The deadline of MO generated via procurements is calculated differently.
Now, it doesn't take anymore in account the manufacturing_lead
of the company (Security Lead Time of MO). The computation of planned date remains unchanged.
- The date_expected fields was duplicated with the date fields
except when the move was done. Merge both fields.
The only information lost is: we can't know what was the
scheduled date before processing move (`state` == done).
Indeed, the date becomes the actual move processing datetime.
- The `date` in `stock.picking` field contained the time of
(purchase) order `date_order` (`purchase.order`).
This field is was wrongly used in the kanban view where we
expected to see date_planned instead. Also, the `_order` used
this date instead of date_planned too.
- The `delay_alert` is activate independently of stock rules.
Then it is now activate in all case.
- Remove the auto-reschedulting process of stock move via
the stock rule (`propagate_date` and `propagate_date_minimum_delta`).
Replace it by a automatic deadline date (`date_deadline`) propagation.
The deadline is the promise done to/by vendor/client (SO/PO)
then it is a readonly fields on picking/move and MO.
- Now the Scheduled date (`date`) of stock move is never propagate
and it is only related to the Scheduled date of
related document (MO or picking).
- Now when a move is created from procurement (sale),
`date_planned` = `date_deadline` - `security_lead`.
- The `delivery_date` of sale is no editable after confirmation
and propagate as the deadline to related stock move linked to order_line
- Adapt filter and decoration of MO and picking.
- Because we are the client in case of purchase (PO), the promise of vendor
can be not respected. Then we add the lead security to the deadline
(inverse the sale order logic) of PO picking (promise reciept date
+ security lead) to match with the replenishment.
task-2246665
1. When reservation can't be done for some products, we automatically
evaluate their reordering rules and create the corresponding
replenishment document.
2. When receiving products in stock, automatically check if some stock
moves are available and assign them.
Task 2244230
PR #52433
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
- Create a PO, order 5 items
- Validate Receipt with 5 items
- Return 1 item to Vendor
- Update Order Quantity on PO, from 5 to 8
A picking of 3 units is created.
If the same workflow is used in Sales, a picking of 4 units would be
created, which is the expected behavior.
We adapt the logic of Sales [1] to Purchase.
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/8a3284685856b6980e3b620abdbbb3e2c79f57c4
opw-2233826
closesodoo/odoo#51174
X-original-commit: 74e8b9ab2311ed2c1c9cea53d09e3b352db3dbe6
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
- Install Inventory, Purchase
- General Settings/tick Multi-step routes
- In Warehouses/YourCompany
Incoming Shipments: Receive goods in input, then quality and then
stock (3 steps)
- Create a PO and add the same products on 2 lines. One has a scheduled
date in the future
- Go to transfers, where "Picking List" or "Procurement Group"
correspond to your PO
=> the 3 scheduled_date correspond to Datetime.now()
- Validate the first picking (WH/IN)
The scheduled_date (resp date_expected) in the remaining pickings WH/INT
(resp. stock moves) are changed to the past.
This is due to the fact that both moves are merged in subsequent
pickings. The cleanest solution would be to avoid the merge in case the
expected dates are different. Although this makes sense, that also
implies a change of behavior.
Therefore, we avoid such situation by preventing the propagation of an
expected date in the past, which does not make much sense when
propagating.
opw-2171509
closesodoo/odoo#47155
X-original-commit: c7b2341b35aabe394a34e14c48a913a8595737fc
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Increasing the quantity on a purchase order line will create a stock
move with the delta quantity. In case the purchase order has a return
among its picking_ids, the delta will be wrong.
This is due to the fact a return move is considered like a move_dest
of the original incoming move. The delta quantity will be computed
from the return move which doens't make sense.
This commit excludes outgoing moves from move_dest to avoid taking
return move into account.
closesodoo/odoo#44551
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
`action_done`on pickings should be a private method,
and called only trough the picking validation process.
task-1938108
closesodoo/odoo#39174
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
- Set the rounding of Unit(s) to 1.0
- Create a PO for 1.4 Unit(s), validate => the picking contains
1.4 Unit(s)
- Validate the picking
The backorder wizard is displayed, and if no backorder is selected, a
crash occurs.
The quantity should be rounded when the picking is created. Otherwise,
inconsistencies will appears when it is rounded in subsequent processes.
opw-2046965
closesodoo/odoo#35560
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Implement the propagation minimum delta per rule in purchase_stock. Override
properly the write to handle both RFQ and PO. Take care of not merging po lines
where the expecte date should be different
Add propre test cases.
task-1913401
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
We want to break the dependency between stock and purchase
for our furtur developpement. For more modularity, a new
bridge module 'purchase_stock' is created.
This commti move part of business code, views, data, ...
related to stock management from purchase into purchase_stock
without changing any feature.
Task #47927
Pieter Claeys (clpi)