Behavior prior to this commit:
When a PO is generated (via reordering rule, mto rule, or manual replenish),
the description on the PO line includes the internal notes.
Behavior after this commit:
The description on the PO line does not include the internal notes.
Note:
Per c324526ad0, the description on the picking also does not include
the internal notes (anymore), and the test has been updated to reflect
that.
opw-24222438
closesodoo/odoo#64883
X-original-commit: 5db67fb2931517ae94fe0396ef80e9ad997e59cd
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Galler <ngaller@users.noreply.github.com>
Improve onboarding by removing the replenish on order route.
Companies that do MTO process could unarchive the route in
order to have a basic configuration.
closesodoo/odoo#55147
Task: 2245882
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Allow to propagate custom information to upper document. It could be
usefull in many buisness that do custom stuff for people
(t-shirt with user defined text, poster with own pictures...)
The customes values are pass throught procurements'values and are
display on MO or purchase order line.
Task: 1970476
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Improve the procurement requests performance. Instead of processing
procurement request one by one, search rules that apply for each of
them and group them by rule's actions.
The main technical change is the record creation order.
E.g. 2 SO lines with pick ship delivery.
-Before this commit:
line1 -> LAUNCH_RULE -> PICK MOVE1 -> MOVE1 CONFIRM -> OUT MOVE1
line2 -> LAUNCH RULE -> PICK MOVE2 -> MOVE2 CONFIRM -> OUT MOVE2
-After this commit:
line1/2 -> LAUNCH RULE -> PICK MOVE1/2 -> MOVE1/2 CONFIRM -> OUT MOVE1/2
Also there is one batch creation by company_id. It implies that values
are group by company_id. Since company_id are passed by previous
procurement or by the rule, it become a required value and it's added to
the procurement arguments (it was already always passed in the values,
no functional modification).
_run_buy is reworked. It receives a bathc of procurements, those
procurements could be merged in the same PO or the same PO lines.
However the PO/PO lines are created (if procurement couldn't be
merged in an existing one) at the end of the method. It implies
that 2 procurements creating a PO and merged inside, would now create
2 distinct PO (same for po lines). _run_buy in order to fix this issue:
- group procurements by PO search domain. If the PO doesn't exist,
create only one.
- Inside the same PO: merge quantities, move_dest_ids for procurements
with the same product and UoM.
Other _run_ methods are just adjusted in order to process batch.
For a pick pack ship scenario, without procurment_jit confirm a SO
containing 500 lines will take 40s instead of 15 minutes.
Usability improvement:
- Common view for push and pull rules
- Add an help text in order to describe the rule
- Rules menu
- Warehouse checked by default on route created by a warehouse
- Lower the MTO route sequence in order to take it first.
- Tooltip cleaning
Technical improvement:
The purpose of this task was also to merge stock.location.path(push rule) and
procrement.rule. Those two model were design to execute the same task
but in a different direction. Thus it contains duplicate code.
Task ID 1852969.
William Henrotin