Steps to reproduce
==================
- Create a blanket order
- Choose a vendor
- Add a product P
- Set a price
- Save and Confirm
- Click on the RFQs/Orders smart button
- Create a new RFQ
- Delete the line
- Add a new line with the same product P
- Save
-> A validation error appears because the date_planned is not set
Cause of the issue
==================
`_compute_price_unit_and_date_planned_and_name` is overriden and passes
an empty recordset to the super method.
Solution
========
We can compute the `date_planned` using the selected seller
opw-3416573
closesodoo/odoo#132428
X-original-commit: d7db1d799fe042ef248968c6dee53eaf6e0ed3db
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang (tic) <tic@odoo.com>
During the test, the rate are created on UTC timezone.
However the test could be run with a different timezone.
Since the rate doens't have a name, by default they have the
create date name. However due to timezone difference, it could
be different day and the newly created rate for the test will be
filter out
closesodoo/odoo#131708
X-original-commit: 300fe8ad36163b6ad7f8a37ac26b014c1510d64f
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a PO:
- Add a product
- Add a note or section
- Go To Alternatives:
- Click on “Create Alternative”
- Add another vendor
- Try to validate
Problem:
An error is triggered: “The operation cannot be completed: Description
(name) is mandatory”
The “display_type” and “name” fields must be copied in the vals to
create a `purchase.order.line`
opw-3164863
closesodoo/odoo#115070
X-original-commit: 66f806399d173f53b61db80b81d06a93421c75a3
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Previous commit 0501bbd62e made it so
the `product_uom_id` for the `line_ids` of a purchase.requsition (i.e. a
blanket order) were no longer being saved when the UoM setting is not
active. This would cause an error to occur when the "New Quotation"
button is pushed because the missing uom is expected by purchase
_onchange_requisition_id.
Steps to reproduce:
- Have UoM setting NOT active
- Create a blanket order for any product/vendor
- Confirm the blanket order
- Click on "New Quotation"
Expected Behavior:
New RFQ created
Actual Behavior:
Stacktrace
We also properly restrict the product_uom_id in the form view of the
line_ids to when the uom setting is active.
closesodoo/odoo#104900
X-original-commit: e90200a7b927ecccb8d4d6f31e3ddecba24d0b6d
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the quantity of a PO line is changed, its unit
price is recomputed, which means it will be set to 0 if there is no
compatible vendor price for the selected partner/product.
It can be annoying because if the price unit was set manually by the
user, this info is lost.
To avoid that, we don't recompute the unit price if the PO line matches
the following conditions:
- The PO line has already a price unit;
- There is actually no vendor price list for the partner (in such case,
we prefer to avoid to stick to a price who doesn't match that list);
- The UoM wasn't changed, because if the UoM was changed, the price
should obviously recomputed (the price unit for 1 unit is not the same
than for 1 dozen).
How to reproduce:
- Install Stock and Purchase modules;
- In purchase settings, enable "Purchase Agreements";
- Create a product and in its vendor price list (in "Purchase" tab), add
a price for Partner A (e.g. 10$);
- Create a PO for Partner B, add a PO line for the created product and
set the `price_unit` higher than the created vendor price (e.g. 15$);
- Confirm the order and go in the "Alternatives" tab;
- Click on "Create Alternative" and select Partner A as the vendor;
- Click on "Compare Product Lines" and choose the line for Partner A;
- Go back in the first created PO (with Partner B as vendor)
-> the PO line's quantity is to 0, which is good, but its unit price
is also set to 0 which is annoying.
Additionnaly, in `_get_stock_move_price_unit`, `float_round` the value
just before it was returned because previously, the rouding was done
before the multiplication by the UoM's factor which can cause some
rounding issue if the rouding is not done after that.
closesodoo/odoo#104206
X-original-commit: f5a24b10cb3a4cf32c6c185df65f3099c8da3ff1
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
How to reproduce the problem:
- Install the purchase_requistion, purchase_requistion_stock, and any Localization modules such as l10n_be or l10n_in
(apart from USD currency any localization module)
- error caught only when at the time of module installation but it must have a different currency_id apart from USD
https://watch.screencastify.com/v/1C7GQKHBASyiluGGkFfV
Cause of the problem:
static values Currency USD cause the problem.
the following module will be set the currency value
l10n_be - EUR
l10n_in - INR
l10n_br - BRL
when we installed the following modules then cls.env.user.company_id.currency_id values get changes accordingly
will lead to this error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/odoo/src/odoo/addons/purchase_requisition/tests/common.py, line 70, in setUpClass
cls.env.user.company_id.currency_id = cls.env.ref(base.USD).id
File /home/odoo/src/odoo/odoo/fields.py, line 1217, in __set__
records.write({self.name: write_value})
File /home/odoo/src/odoo/addons/account/models/company.py, line 301, in write
raise UserError(_('You cannot change the currency of the company since some journal items already exist'))
odoo.exceptions.UserError: You cannot change the currency of the company since some journal items already exist
opw-2945581
closesodoo/odoo#98512
Closes: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/98174
X-original-commit: 70b7c57f7ea0a619a149461e0e738ddc25b822f6
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
For original specs, see [1].
Some performance changes: the best price/date/unit price fields are now
loaded by JS instead of passed via action context (allows for easier/
consistent reuse of view + now we can refresh without undoing any state
changes due to buttons being pushed).
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f533e40f0e3f1cd34f1047b70dfdf95837d84501closesodoo/odoo#101502
X-original-commit: 41ae508c2e6fc3c40b29b1bfc4b5dd7c4440a719
Signed-off-by: Antony Lesuisse <al@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Previously the "call to tender" flow involved creating a
`purchase.requisition` record, creating each RFQ via that record, and
then manually going through each RFQ to compare the prices/dates/etc.
By linking the "call to tender" POs within the POs, we remove an
unnecessary `purchase.requestion` record and makes it easier to track
which RFQs are related to each other as an Alternative RFQ.
On top of this, we add some comparision features to make it easier to
determine the best RFQ, specificially the ability to compare PO lines in
the same view with some visual aids (best price/date colored green +
buttons to check these lines to make them easier to view). We also add
an extra feature to set the qty of selected/non-chosen PO lines to 0 to
aid in the RFQ selection process (only applies to non-confirmed/done/
cancelled POs).
Some other features included with this:
- option to cancel alternative POs when confirming one, which purposely
does not cancel ones that have already been confirmed/completed.
- new wizard for creating alternative POs so user can select whether or
not they want to copy the products/qtys from the original PO.
Important Notes:
- JS Customizations:
- custom many2many widget added so user:
- can click between alternative POs in same window + keep breadcrumb.
This is because all alt POs are interconnected and long breadcrumb
chain is possible (+ we want to avoid windows within windows.) It
is expected that user will be aware that unsaved changes will
auto-save when alt PO is clicked on.
- cannot unlink a PO from itself (this is automagically done during
the write) since this will remove all of its linked POs and might
confuse users.
- custom view js for Comparing Order Lines to help highlight best
options, including ensuring that the best options are still
highlighted after clicking on Choose/Clear buttons (since the best
option can change afterwards, we recalc + update via RPC)
- General implementation warnings:
- Anytime any button/alternative PO is clicked on within a PO, the
form will auto-save. This is due to how the current action service
handles changing views.
- POs created via "Create Alternative" button purposely:
- require a vendor to ensure correct lead times/prices
- show all vendor/product warnings in wizard because we cannot
reproduce the pop-up warning that would occur in the PO when
they are selected. We also purposely block the PO creation when a
blocking warning is set since we cannot remove the values
(especially in the case of a blocking vendor message) from a
newly created PO.
- Technical purchase.order.group model created to help with difficult
management of complicated behaviors:
- unlink from self if a PO is no longer linked to any other POs
- linkages must be symmetric (i.e. linkage PO1 => PO2 must
reflect PO2 => PO1 in their form views)
- don't lose existing linkages (i.e. PO1 => PO2 and PO2 => PO3
should auto-link PO1 => PO3)
These last two behaviors are difficult to do without grouping due to
possibility of remove and adding linkages at the same time. To avoid
complex code to ensure these complexities hold when when creating a
new PO, linkaging to alternatives is not allowed when PO is not yet
saved as a record.
Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586closesodoo/odoo#87656
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
This commit removes the call for tender feature via a
purchase.requisition. This feature is to be replaced with the ability to
directly compare prices/options of POs/RFQs within a PO to remove extra
steps to compare them. The linkage between POs previously provided by a
purchase.requistion is replaced by the POs being directly linked to each
other. Feature to auto-create call to tenders via a product option is
removed and the user is expected to know/be responsible for when they
should do a call to tender themselves.
All references to old Call to Tenders replaced with Blanket Order, and
we remove/rename the menu items since Blanket Order is now the only
purchase.requisition.type option (we expect minimal customizated types).
Follow-on refactoring to switch purchase.requisition to
purchase.blanket.order to come later. Follow-on refactoring to switch
purchase.requisition to purchase.blanket.order to come later.
Part of Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87656
Create data for all tests in order to speed data test creation. We don't want the test to be demo data dependent
What we are testing in this test case.
-> Check that procurement is creating requisition with correct details or not.
-> Check that purchase order created is consistent when we create it with supplier info.
-> Two blanket orders on different 'make to order' products must generate two different purchase orders.
Task ID : 1851286
closesodoo/odoo#30187
The purpose of this commit is to make requisition usable with only services. Stock part is extracted in a new module `purchase_requisition_stock` which allows to create requisition based on product availbility or demand, also
we have moved all security access related stock in this bridge module.
Task ID : 1851286
Before the fix we were requiring for product.supplierinfo.requisition_id
which is a non existing field of the model 'product.supplierinfo'. I
just change it then to purchase_requisition_id which is the required
field.
This triggered an error when you add a product selled by the defined
vendor for an aggreement type defined as 'Blanket order'.
opw-1914712
closesodoo/odoo#29342
We want to break the dependency between stock and purchase
for our furtur developpement. For more modularity, a new
bridge module 'purchase_stock' is created.
This commti move part of business code, views, data, ...
related to stock management from purchase into purchase_stock
without changing any feature.
Task #47927
The reified view on the res users will be dropped in the following commit.
The previous commit adds support to define each group as a computed field on the res users.
This commit defines:
- A boolean field for each 'isolated' res.group, i.e. a group in the hidden category.
- A selection field for each 'Application' res.group, i.e. a group in a application category.
Example:
- The group to manage pricelist in sales becomes a boolean field
- The groups project user/manager become a selection field
Moves UoM models, test and data to a new addon in
order to be able to use uom without product.
A simple example is be to be able to use UoM for
timesheets.
This commit only move code, and adapt xml ids
without chaging any feature or functionnal
behavior.
Note: 'product' module now depends on new
'uom' module.
If two blanket order are active with the same vendor, we have to produce
two separate purchase orders even if the two products are ordered in the
same operation.
If the parameter multi currency is enabled, the field currency is added
in the purchase requisition form. The currency chosen will be the one by
default in the PO attached to the BO
When creating a blanket order, it will generate a supplier info for the
associated product. If there is already a supplier info for the same product
and same vendor, the sequence should be adapted to take the one created via
blanket order before the other(s) one(s).
The blanket order is a contract between you and a supplier on a
different
price (usually lower than normal) for a big quantity of some specific
products.
The goal is to generate a supplier info for each product of the blanket
order and
remove them when the BO is either closed or cancel.
Previously mrp, stock and purchase used _run methon on procurement
group and start with a if checking for the action type. This commit
instead launch a specific method depending the rule's action's type
Also _run method and their submethod used in procurement group
was always called with a rule. Thus we choose to move this method
on the rule object himself.
This removes the procurement.order model. To fufill their needs SO, PO, MO and
stock moves now call the _run method of the relevant procurement.group.
This mecanism is now only used for stockable product, tasks now uses their own
independent mecanism.
The _run method will check all the applicable rules and create directly the
needed model to fufill the need.
The modules stock, purchase, mrp, extends the _run method to implement their
specific strategy relevant for the rule type they define.
If an exception happens the message will be logged as a mail messsage on the
source model, for example, if a sales order cannot be fufilled the salesperson
will now see directly the reason.
OLD commit messages:
[WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
fixup! [WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
[IMP] Basic tests
[FIX] test not necessary anymore
[FIX] remove unnecessary print statement
[FIX] unnecessary test + why passing warehouse worked before?
[IMP] purchase: one move by purchase order line
[FIX] purchase: correct inventory tests and pass move_dest_ids among procurements
[FIX] because of bad cherry-pick merge
[IMP] make mrp pass by adding move_dest_ids there too
[IMP] tests of sale_mrp, no need for cancelpropagation then
[IMP] better to consistently use recordsets also for one2many
[FIX] purchase_requisition
[FIX] Exceptions should trigger errors, which should be caught in the tests
[FIX] sale_mrp: remove usage of procurement.order and use sale order name instead of sol
[FIX] stock_dropshipping: add sale_line_id on purchase_line_id
[FIX] Remove pdb
[IMP] add stock_dropshipping files
[IMP] stock: search carrier through sale line instead of procurement group
[IMP] add procrule test and preision needed when updating sol
[FIX] sale_order_dates + [IMP] procurement exceptions by scheduler
[FIX] No need to return task
[IMP] move file as name changes and add corrections
[FIX] Continue Run Schedulers wizard fix
[FIX] name issues of takss
[FIX] updating sale order line, but there is still a problem with the recompute
Hubert Van de Walle (huvw)