Before this commit when user create a global without calendar then
it'll not create any timesheets for any employee but global leave
without calendar is taken as leave global leave for all calendar
in that company's calendar and should create timesheet for all
calendars employee in company.
This commit create timesheets for all calendars employee in that
company if global leave does not have specific calendar set on it.
task-2969791
Part-of: odoo/odoo#100141
Purpose
=======
Add a new type on the working schedule, adding "Lunch" to Morning and Afternoon. It's mandatory,
because, if you don't do that, you can't assume the difference between a time that should be
recorded as extra hours and a time that should not be counted because it's lunch time.
A company is not another, so to be clear, they will define what are the imposed lunch time
where the employee is not paid during the week.
Specification
=============
Lunch between Morning and Afternoon
When a time period is under Lunch :
- There is no working entry generated for that period of time.
- If you work before the lunch time and after it, it's not considered as extra time.
- The employee is not paid for the Lunch time.
TaskID: 3102363
-steps to reproduce:
do a search in project.task on is_timeoff_task when no
timesheet_task_id is defined on any hr.leave_type.
This will trigger the _search_is_timeoff_task method
-before this commit:
crash when no leave_type with timesheet_task_id is found
-after this commit:
creation of an empty list as expected
opw-3086486
closesodoo/odoo#110091
X-original-commit: b98949b1cb85514ee5a56ff1a5860591c10b0994
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit prevent user write on time off timesheets and create timesheet
on time off tasks and add test for this feature.
task-2826265
Part-of: odoo/odoo#90744
Steps to reproduce:
- Install Time off and timesheet modules
- Create a public holiday with no "working hours"
- Then edit it and add it with working hours used by some employees
Expected behavior:
Adding the working hours makes that the global time off meets the
requirements to create timesheets. Then the employee related to the
new "working hours" is going to have timesheets created for this
holiday.
Current behavior:
No timesheet is created.
Explanation:
The write function of the global time off only updated timesheets
when the dates where modified. We add the update in the calendar_id
modification case and with it the new conditions to create the
timesheets. (working hours = calendar_id)
opw-2879882
closesodoo/odoo#96226
X-original-commit: a255a743b5296570aab166a5e275a323a1792b60
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the test is launched at the end of the working
date, the first global time off created will start at the end of the
next Monday and so no timesheet will be generated for this day.
This commit adds a `freeze_time` for this test to have the expected
behavior. That is, a timesheet should be generated per global time off
created.
closesodoo/odoo#95658
X-original-commit: 6a72c81b5b435fc79e139531a8b38d97ed04e994
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the employee is generated with the salary
configurator, the employee is archived since the employee will not
directly start in the company. Even if the employee is archived and the
timesheets are generated for this employee based on the global time offs
found in the future. The problem is the timesheets cannot be created
for archived employees and so a user error is raised.
This problem could also happen if the user creates an archived employee.
This commit fixes the issue by preventing the timesheets generation when
the employee created is archived. When this employee will be updated and
active field will be set to True, the timesheets generation will be
applied. In the inverse use case, when the user will archive an employee
and timesheets generated for the future global time offs will be removed.
opw-2887727
opw-2870739
closesodoo/odoo#95644
X-original-commit: 160afba28d88ddd9d84856cc90639586bc2ea7b6
Related: odoo/enterprise#29273
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Fockedey Martin (mafo) <mafo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the user cancels his validated time off planned
in the future, the timesheets generated for this time off are not
deleted. The problem is since the timesheets are not removed we could
have duplicated timesheets if the user adds a new time off in the same days
for instance, because the newest timesheets are generated and thus we have
duplicated timesheets generated instead of having only timesheets generated
for the newest time off.
This commit removes the timesheets generated for the time off when this
time off is canceled (=archived). Also, It also prevent the user to
manually unarchive the time off since this operation is not really
managed and could introduced eventual problems.
Related PR: #76722
Part of task-2791386
closesodoo/odoo#89246
X-original-commit: a9e63ebe32079e2215acafcd4bca15b371ee9bc2
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: William Braeckman <wbr@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Time Off : New Dashboard, Accruals feature, Public holidays, New time off type configuration view.
- Review of Dashboard
- Accrual feature : Currently, when you create an allocation, it's possible to create an
Accrual, but there is no appraisal Plan. An Appraisal plan is use to define steps of accruals
for each employee.
In Belgium, we use accrual Allocation for European Leaves, or compensatory hours, it's a
simple use case. But in USA, it's possible to change the calculation mode each year.
Also, in USA, it's possible to deal your accrual plan when you arrive on the company. It's a
HR Officer task to create the right Accrual allocation for each new employee.
- Public Holidays :
Improvement of global time off feature located on Working hours calendar. Now, Time off
application have to manage Public Holidays.
- Review of Time Off type configuration
COM PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/72511
ENT PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/19157
UPG PR: https://github.com/odoo/upgrade/pull/2791
TaskID:2475413
closesodoo/odoo#72511
Related: odoo/enterprise#19157
Related: odoo/upgrade#2791
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: William Braeckman <wbr@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier BOL (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Laurent Stukkens (LTU) <ltu@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Yannick Tivisse <yti@odoo.com>
Generate timesheet entries for each employee when a global time off is created
if module_project_timesheet_holidays is true.
This only impacts the employees with the corresponding resource calendar
The entries are linked to the project and task set in the settings.
The number of hours timesheeted corresponds to the timeframe during which both the global time off
and the working hours of the employee overlap (same behavior as for regular time off).
If the global time off is modified or deleted, the timesheet entry is adapted accordingly.
Task-2352428
Closes#67021
Co-authored-by: Laurent Stukkens (LTU) <ltu@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: jdoutreloux <jud@odoo.com>
Purpose of the commit is to improve the usability and onboarding
of the project app.
So in this commit, done the below changes:
- Rename column "Kanban state" in list view screens
- Hide column "analytic account" when not needed
- Do not show "Internal" project
PS: Moved leave_timesheet_project_id into hr_timesheet and rename
it as internal_project_id and we used it in the domain in the
kanban/action to the kanban in order not to have it in the result.
closesodoo/odoo#68857
Taskid: 2451722
Related: odoo/upgrade#2479
Signed-off-by: LTU-Odoo <IT-Ideas@users.noreply.github.com>
It is currently impossible to create a company.
The reason being that the newly created company is
not yet in context `allowed_company_ids`.
Therefore, every consequent access to a record protected with
a multi company `ir.rule` fails for that company.
Here, the module automatically creates a project in that company
and later read that project to check a constraint.
The read raises an AccessError, hence the company is not created.
On the other hand, a user without project creation access rights
but erp manager could want to create a company. It should work
in that case too, as the project creation is transparent to the
user and the project is archived.
closesodoo/odoo#34920
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
- Create a leave type valid from June 1st
- Create a leave in May using the created leave type
Nothing prevents the user to do it.
It is because the constraint is implemented only if there is a validity
start and end date.
Fixes#32107
opw-2009800
closesodoo/odoo#34225
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
We try to define common classes in test with helpers to
set testing data. Here, we had a test extended a class
with test methods, making those tests executed twice:
when hr_timesheet was installed, and on project_timesheet_holidays
installation.
This is not very stable, as some behavior might change when
other are installed.
closesodoo/odoo#29538
Purpose of this commit is to simplify fields used in leave and allocation
used to store the duration of the requests. We want notably to get rid
of "number of days temp" that, contrary to its name, is not temporary
at all as it stores the real number of days. We also want to clarify
the hours or days encoding that is different on leave and allocation models.
Specifications
* number_of_days on leave and allocation is the master field holding the
leave or allocation duration in days;
* two fields are used for interface that are suffixed by _display in order
to indicate they are UX only: number_of_hours_display and number_of_days_
display. They are interface fields used for the user and correct number
of days is computed and stored in number_of_days;
* more specifically for leave model
* display fields are readonly as it is computed based on dates given by
the user, directly (from / to) or indirectly (half-day leaves for example);
* duration field is computed through an onchange. It could be directly
set by hand by managers if some confusion in the number of days appear;
* more specifically for allocation model
* display fields trigger an inverse as they are the real duration given
by HR officers or managers;
* duration field is computed through the inverse of display fields;
Various reports, data and use of leave / allocation models are updated to
use the correct field.
This commit is linked to task ID 1876795 and PR #26571.
Purpose of this commit is to simplify the configuration of leave type and
use the job of HR officers / manager by making options clearer and easier
to use.
Specifications for leave type :
* display name as header;
* remove accrual option from leave type. It is now configured directly
on allocation requests;
* add a "X days allocated" stmart button. If you set a general allocation
of 20 days, the stat button will display 20 days. Even if you go update
the allocation by employee after that. Purpose is to have the value of
main allocation done in group, not individual cases of some employees;
* add a "Group leaves" stmart button. It leads to a new leave requests
in group mode where mode is visible;
* have a unique allocation type field replacing the setting allowing to make
leave or allocation as well as limit and negative fields;
* limit leave duration encoding to two options, either day-based (allowing to
take full days or half a day), either hours-based (allowing to take full
days, half a day or some specific hours in a given day);
More technically
* limit and negative fields are removed. It was confusing as limit set to
True means you can actually exceed the limit). It can be computed based
on allocation_type ('no' meaning you can bypass the limit);
* request_unit is simplified. Day and half are merged into day;
* accrual and balance limit are moved to allocation model;
Specifications for allocation requests
* set accrual specific on allocation itself and not coming from the leave
type configuration anymore. Indeed we now consider accrual to be done
case by case independently from the leave type;
* remove negative and balance_limit. Indeed we now consider people have to
check by hand what is done by accrual;
Leave and allocation are slightly impacted by other changes, such as domain
for default leave types. Changes have been made as small as possible. Future
commits will still improve leave and allocation models and views, going
further in the cleaning process. Some tests are udpated to match the new
configuration of leave type.
This commit is linked to task ID 1876795 and PR #26571.
To avoid harcorded dates in this test, we use next
monday as starting date for leaves and timesheets.
But today (19/03/2018), next monday will be after
the daylight savings time, so resource module gives
one additionnal day with one hour to be worked, so
one more timesheet is generated and fails the test.
To avoid this, we are now hardcoded dates to a monday
(to avoid weekend and global leaves) and be sure the
number of working days will be 3.
The data in tests use 'datetime.today()'. This can
add second and milli seconds: if those are not zero,
a 4th day of work will be count (hence the '+1').
The test craches with "3 != 4" when the test was executed
on a 'zero second' time.
As Dr Emmett Brown would say : "Time traveling is just
too dangerous !"
For some unknown reason (for now), this module tests fails when comparing
generated timesheet number and leaves duration (in days).
By improving the log message, we can have more informations to understand
why the failure happens 'randomly'.
Purpose
=======
Have a clear distinction between leave and allocation requests instead of
using the same model to mix 2 different concepts.
Splitting the model will allow different business code to be run on each
model as allocations and leaves are not exactly the same thing; this
will add some code but simplify future improvements
Specification
=============
1/ Completely separate the models
Model hr.holidays has been split into leave.request and
leave.allocation.
2/ Make reporting working again by using an SQL view aggregating data
from leaves and allocations
A new report has been added in order to aggregate
datas from both allocations and requests. The views have been modified
accordingly.
When using this module, the default behavior is to generate timesheet.
This timsheet is linked to a project and a task and there is a
constrain that verify that the task and project are set on model.
If another module (like l10n_fr_hr_payroll for example) tries to
create holidays.status without a project and task, it causes a
traceback.
This commit adds default values for these fields in order fullfill
the constrains.
Notice that the order of the imports in the __init__ is important
because the columns have to be created on the res.company before the
status is initialized.
When refusing leave, we can not remove linked timesheet,
since they are attached to the leave.
We need to first detach it, then remove the timesheet
entries.
Also, add a test about the removal of linked timesheets.
Handling datetime is not a good idea, mostly
when computing different in terms of days.
Forcing the hour (time) will set the tests correctly
regarding the working hours, and the datetime
difference, independently of the execution time
of the test.
Rémy Voet (ryv)