Currently, only stable releases see their translations updated. This has
resulted in master accumulating outdated stuff for years, which can be
confusing for users testing master on runbot.
This one-shot commit resynchronizes master translations based on the
content from 16.0 and removes empty PO files (i.e. no longer containing
translations).
closesodoo/odoo#121629
Related: odoo/enterprise#41171
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
They dates from < 2027 and are quite outdated. Favour the nl
translation instead.
n_BE is not on Transifex so it was not possible to correct bad
translations.
closesodoo/odoo#115845
X-original-commit: d04c8b7e484db8306d858c891a7a2b11885fdcd9
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Since a recent commit[1] (that added invisible fields to avoid their removal
from the view when there's group applied on it and logged in user does not
fall under this group), the view definition were changed and so there were
few xpath broken which dependent on such fields.
- In event (event.view_event_form form view), invisible 'company_id' field
was added, which broke the the xpath in website_event since it was not
not robust and considered first invisible 'company_id' field, which now
should be the later one after commit[1].
- In mass_mailing_event_track, 'track_count' filed was added, that broke the
xpath in website_event_track_gantt.
This commit addresses both of the issues by:
- putting group name "right_event_details" in the "event.event.form"
form view and providing an xpath with group name in the
"event.event.view.form.inherit.website" form view to adapt the changes.
- removing the 'track_count' invisible field from 'mass_mailing_event_track'
module because that field in the original view does not have any group
applied at view or model level so we don't need to add the same one as
invisible field in the view
This commit also remove the invisible 'seats_expected' field from event
form view in 'mass_mailing_event' module for same reason as 'track_count'
field; it does not has any groups applied at view or model level so we
don't need to add the same one as invisible field once again.
commit[1] - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/0501bbd62e517f6c215d9e7e36d61747c7f5816b
task-2964291
closesodoo/odoo#99212
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
This revision is to make uniform the behavior of the `groups` attribute
on the Python model fields
and on the node in the view architecture.
In both cases, remove the node from the view completely.
Before this revision,
in a back-end view:
- In the Python model, if a field has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the field is removed, completely, from the view.
- In the view architecture, if a node has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the node is made invisible (not completely removed, just
made invisible).
in a front-end view:
- if a node has a "groups" or "t-groups" set and the user
is not part of the groups, the node is removed from the view.
So it's 2/3 cases removing nodes restricted to a group.
and 1/3 case making invisible nodes restricted to a group.
It's simpler to have a uniform behavior for the 3 cases,
simpler to understandard for developers.
In addition, this will help for the goal to cache back-end views.
It makes possible to convert views using the `groups_id` field
by moving the content of these views directly
in the view to which they add content which is suppose to be completely
removed when the user has not the according group.
By getting rid of the `groups_id` many2many field on `ir.ui.view`,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the `groups_id` groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
closesodoo/odoo#95729
Related: odoo/enterprise#29592
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Not much content but still to be translated
closesodoo/odoo#78259
X-original-commit: aba5e3877cfab96493fcfd073c101b4447f49a51
Related: odoo/enterprise#21643
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
When performing an email or SMS mailing on functional models a default domain
is a good start to avoid sending notifications to dead records, aka
* canceled registrations;
* canceled tracks;
* canceled sale orders;
Task ID-2431217
COM PR odoo#67322
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#16876
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2236closesodoo/odoo#67322
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Remove hardcoded list of models on which mailing is possible. Indeed it is
not modular and not really smart with enterprise code not being reachable
in community.
SPECIFICATIONS
Replace hardcoded list of models on which mailing (both mail or sms) is
possible by a computed searchable field on ``ir.model`` based on a class
attribute.
It allows to cleanly define models having mass mailing capabilities and add
this attribute in bridge modules (when existing) or directly on base model
definition to avoid bridge modules.
In this commit we introduce a basic ``_mailing_enabled`` class attribute
activating mailing on model.
Mailing models may also have a ``_mailing_get_default_domain`` method allowing
to define a custom default domain when sending a marketing mailing on records
on this class.
Mailing models can now define a ``_mailing_get_opt_out_list(_sms)`` method
allowing to define custom behavior to fetch opt-outed records. Instead of
defining a model-based behavior on Mailing itself, it now calls the model
defined one. We still have two methods, one for mailing and one for SMS
opt out computation as it relies on different underlying models and fields.
LINKS
Task ID-2431217
COM PR odoo/odoo#67322
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#16876
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2236
Purpose
=======
A user without the group "Marketing User" might see the button
"Contact Track Speakers" in the event form view. If he click
on the button, an error is raised.
Task-2320370
closesodoo/odoo#58405
X-original-commit: cf69e172f3f22a477686a23be1c3575a19f70c05
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Change the event form view to improve its usability and make it clearer.
SPECIFICATIONS
- Change some stats buttons icons
- Change order of the fields and put the range date field in second
place since it's a mandatory field.
LINKS
Task ID : 2198660
PR : #46659
Kanban view
===========
- add a field ``sales_total_price`` which contains the total sum of all sale order lines (care about the currency)
- this field is used in ``event_sale``
- display the number of expected and confirmed
- when clicking on these buttons, redirect to the tree view with the correct filter
- display this new field in the kanban view
- display the location instead of the country in the kanban view
Form view
=========
Change the order of the buttons in the header of the event form view
Preview Badge > Contact Attendee > Contact Speaker
Add a note field on the model `event.event`
Search
======
Remove the default filter "Upcoming/Running"
Task #2088538
Purpose
=======
Remove the state on the event and add a stage.
So, we can have more control on the event flow, and we will have less constrains.
Website event
=============
Before
------
People can register for an event if "seats are available" and if the state is "confirmed".
After
-----
People can register for an event if `event_registrations_open` is True,
- Event: seats are available and the event is not finished
- Event sale: One or more ticket has `sale_available` set to True
Task #2088538
In this commit we rewrite the compute on mailing domain to simply reset it
once the mailing domain is changed. Indeed trying to keep a previous domain
based on try / except has no meaning from functional point of view. If model
changes then domain should change as it is a business record, not just a
technical domain to try to apply.
LINKS
Task ID 2088577
PR #41877
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#7278
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com>
Followup of a425695e
The terms were back in 12.0
Courtesy of Juan José Scarafía
closesodoo/odoo#41624
X-original-commit: 85d0c7001a997748d7691205bbb8d066597591a5
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Do like Mail Speakers, but with SMS, in a single "Contact" button.
SPECIFICATIONS
Specifications:
* on event form view, rename "Mail Speakers" button to "Contact Speakers"
and open a mixed for view on mailing.mailing allowing to choose the type
of mailing;
* send SMS to all speakers;
* see https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-7iDaNJSZbdTW1PYMU2vWtfPHGJmN7SF/edit
FP "Testing Weekend nothing works" request
LINKS
Task ID 2075183 (sms on speakers)
PR #37185
PURPOSE
Mass mailing is currently a bit messy. As SMS will be added as a way to notify
people in mass through SMS let us take this opportunity to somehow clean this
application: organization, light code cleaning, model renaming.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename mail.mass_mailing model to mailing.mailing. Rationale :
* mailing is now a prefix for mass mailing models;
* mailing.mailing is easier to read / find / understand;
Note that mail.mass_mailing.campaign is not updated as it is likely to be
removed soon and replaced by simple utm.campaign model.
MIGRATION
mail.mass_mailing model -> mailing.mailing
mail_mass_mailing table -> mailing_mailing
LINKS
Task ID 2037906
Preparing task ID 1997464 (SMS addition in mass mailing)
PR #34938
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closesodoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>