Commit Graph
15 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Pablo Montenegro 15bb6d5214 [FIX] l10n_latam_check: payments marked as sent if journal "Use electronic and deferred checks"
Ticket Adhoc: 33103
Task Latam: 1074

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
It is necessary to mark as sent those payments that come from a line with the check payment method and do not include other payment method if the journal "Use electronic and deferred checks". This is needed bacause it is necessary to add payment lines to a batch payment that use payment method different as "check_printing".

Current behavior before PR:
Marked as sent all payments from journal with "Use electronic and deferred checks".

Desired behavior after PR is merged:
Only mark as sent payments with payment method "check_printing".

closes odoo/odoo#132439

X-original-commit: ea71feebd2694533c656a8c2fdcef49936622817
Signed-off-by: Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com>
2023-08-22 09:49:45 +02:00
Gorash 774a3fad0e [REF] base,all: Update modifier syntax: view migration
Apply of the migration script to update all view modifiers.

Part-of: odoo/odoo#104741
2023-08-18 09:49:13 +02:00
Gorash 75a105f46a [REF] base/all: Update modifier syntax: remove 'states' from fields
These changes are made as a result of simplifying attrs and 'states' in
views. However, they should have remained in a separate commit. When
applying the script making the xml changes (used later for the migration
script), the script checked the definition of the python fields in order
to convert the information into a python expression. Therefore, this
commit is not applied when the script is applied to xml changes.

During this attribute deletion pre-existing errors were found. Part of
the code was using the boolean values of 'states' and another part of
the code was not. The behavior could therefore be different (in cases
where readonly on the field had the same value as the ballan in
'states').

Following the deletion of 'states' and without the application of the
view migration, the js tests (tower) were no longer functional. Tests
using the Form view suffered the same effect. There are few tests that
had to be adapted, including two tests in business accounting (updated
by the accounting team). A test for column_invisible did not work. Test
checking if the test system triggers an error if we try to write on an
invisible field. It turns out that Form was testing on the value of
invisible but not taking into account if the column was invisible. The
test system fix is applied separately because there were a lot of tests
that were incorrect.

Part-of: odoo/odoo#104741
2023-08-18 09:49:11 +02:00
Ignacio Cainelli c5fa523904 [FIX] l10n_latam_check: "check False" on entry
Steps to reproduce this bug:

1- On a Bank type journal, set true the "Use electronic and deferred
checks" field
2- Do a new vendor payment with Bank journal and Manual payment method
3- Corresponding journal entry shows "Check False delivered"

closes odoo/odoo#131256

X-original-commit: 4f70fb08af830dd2fece740905c02e598a26b0f6
Signed-off-by: Habib Ayob (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
2023-08-09 03:08:37 +02:00
william-andre 0479b2b594 [IMP] account,*: manage subsidiary companies
Allow sharing records between company
* accounts
* taxes
* fiscal positions
* products
* ...and some related models

These records can be read and used in children companies.

This can be used to
* have different branding for different businesses
* allow more complex security rules
* consolidate branches differently
* manage different tax reports with different tax ids in the same
  country

task-3371677

closes odoo/odoo#125642

Related: odoo/enterprise#43215
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
2023-07-20 11:49:06 +02:00
Julien Carion (juca) 6c412be2ea [IMP] *: coherent hotkey uses
This commit makes hotkey uses more coherent throughout the entire
codebase by setting alt+q as main shortcurt for confirm and default
actions and alt+x for cancel actions.

task-3370463

closes odoo/odoo#127469

Related: odoo/enterprise#43694
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine (dam) <dam@odoo.com>
2023-07-19 18:24:15 +02:00
Rémy Voet (ryv) c5cb357d90 [IMP] *: add dependencies to display_name field
The previous commit introduced an optimization to reduce the number of
queries and fields fetched when we call `name_search`. But it works much
better when the dependencies of `display_name` contain field names used
in the calculation (on the same record/model).

Then, to improve the performance and the cache coherency, add `depends`
and `depends_context` depending on the custom `_compute_display_name`.
Add only the first level of dependencies (never traverse relational
field) because only these have a positive impact on the previous
optimization and the cost is very low (see `modified`).
About `depends_context`, we don't include `lang` because (when `_` is
used by example) it is unlikely to get the same display_name in the same
request with two different lang.

closes odoo/odoo#122085

Related: odoo/documentation#4639
Related: odoo/enterprise#42599
Related: odoo/upgrade#4780
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
2023-06-28 17:41:19 +02:00
Rémy Voet (ryv) 3c62ca1eb9 [REM] core: remove name_get API
Rationale
=========

Since v8, the `display_name` field is present on all models. By default,
`display_name` uses `name_get` which has pretty much the same purpose
(return record name used by the web client). Gradually, many (backend)
developers (and the ORM: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/6da1c3ac4c036eac289597602976538e243cb939)
started using `display_name` (more convenient than
`record.name_get()[0][1]`) but it still had the `name_get` override.
It becomes more complex than necessary and poeple start to misunderstand
the two (and sometimes override both, leading to inconstiencies between
`display_name`/`name_get`).

To simplify the ORM and the API, we decided to keep only one of them,
the `display_name` field:
- It is much more convenient from a backend point of view
(`record.name_get()[0][1]` vs `record.display_name`)
- It is cached during the same transaction (and invalidated if
its dependencies change)
- It can be overridden like any other compute field (override
`_compute_display_name` with any extra dependencies)
- `name_get` is replaced by `read(['display_name'])`
(API perceptive), which can actually be more efficient
(if `display_name`'s depends are correct, the ORM will only fetch the
fields it needs instead of every prefetchable field)

Changes
=======

- Deprecates `name_get` for the v17 and based the method on
`display_name` (the opposite of before)
- Converts all usage of `name_get`
- Overrides of `name_get` are now overrides of `_compute_display_name`
- For `res.partner`, rename the field store `display_name` into
`complete_name` because `display_name` context-dependent and it makes
no sense to have a compute store that is context-dependent.
- Previously, it was possible to return multiple names for the same
record with `name_get`, but it was tricky and most of the usage of
this `name_get` didn't take this into account. The only example of
this is the `name_get` of `product.product`
(now use `", ".join(<names>)`).

Part-of: odoo/odoo#122085
2023-06-28 17:41:19 +02:00
Louis Wicket (wil) 04189318cc [I18N] *: update master translations
Currently, only stable releases see their translations updated. This has
resulted in master accumulating outdated stuff for years, which can be
confusing for users testing master on runbot.

This one-shot commit resynchronizes master translations based on the
content from 16.0 and removes empty PO files (i.e. no longer containing
translations).

closes odoo/odoo#121629

Related: odoo/enterprise#41171
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
2023-05-22 17:52:07 +02:00
Pablo Montenegro 4ff9458dc7 [FIX] l10n_latam_check: prevent selecting checks on payments belonging to other company
Task: 30336

Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
In a payment when selecting checks it is allowed to select checks belonging to different companies but it is necessary to allow only to select companies from the same company (the company of the payment).

Current behavior before PR:
In a payment when selecting checks it is allowed to select checks belonging to different companies.

Desired behavior after PR is merged:
In a payment not allow to select checks belonging to different companies

closes odoo/odoo#119755

X-original-commit: 6d6e385a37fa23597bc58a0e14cfcf08df13d57a
Signed-off-by: Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com>
2023-05-02 14:47:10 +02:00
det 23d32ae167 [IMP] account: filter for unmatched payments
Replace matched filter by unmatched in payment view.

It makes more sense to find payments that are unmatched.

closes odoo/odoo#118249

Task-id: 3231191
X-original-commit: f1143800676dacce3956d207b778d82422b3005a
Signed-off-by: Florian Gilbert (flg) <flg@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Detry Thomas (det) <det@odoo.com>
2023-04-12 08:05:44 +02:00
wan 5125748616 [REF] account: remove chart template
Rewrite the whole chart template mechanism, removing the templates
stored in the database. The new format will mainly use CSV.

Speed up install time
---------------------

* About half of the time of installing a localization for the first time is
  taken by creating the template records. This new in code format gets
  completely rid of this.
* Creating the template records could often not be done in batch because
  of parent/children relations.
* The instanciation of the accounts on the company has been entirely
  reworked too, by
  - optimizing the order of creation of records to avoid UPDATE queries
  - using precomputed fields to avoid UPDATE queries
  - updating the translation in batch
  - deactivating logging in the chatter
  - avoiding access rights checks by checking the rights at the start

Overall, when installing a chart template for the first time, it is 4
times faster because half of the time spent on saving the template in
the database is not done at all anymore, and the instanciation on the
company is more than twice as fast.

Reduce technical debt
---------------------

There is no need to synchronize the templates with the real records
anymore. No need to use hooks to copy the data from one to the other.

It is easier to change a template in a stable version, which can often
be necessary due to legal reasons (i.e. a change of tax rates, reporting
tags,...)

Two modules have been removed:
* `l10n_generic_coa`: since there is nothing left datawise in this
  module, it can be integrated in `account` for free. It is just code
  and CSV.
* `l10n_multilang`: the fields that this module modified to be
  translatable are now always translatable:
  - there was an issue when updating modules that deleted all the
    translations because the fields were not translatable at some point
    during the loading of the registry, then they because translatable
    again but lost all translations because of the column type change.
  - most devs are not able to understand all the languages needed for
    all the localization available. Therefore, english has been added in
    the sources in most localization to understand better issues while
    debugging.
  - no need to call post init hooks anymore, doing the sync with the
    templates.
  - more: see "Translations" section

Because most of the data is now in CSV, it is also easier for product
owners to edit, audit, modify files themselves, removing one layer
during trivial development processes when only data should be changed.

More flexibility for declaration
--------------------------------

The data declaration can now be done easily in python or CSV.
A nice feature is that you can declare everything at once, even for some
more complex chart of accounts:
* if you have to set default taxes on accounts, would need to
  - declare the accounts because accounts are required on the taxes
  - declare the taxes
  - declare the taxes to put on the accounts
  This would lead to scatter information in multiple files. Now,
  everything can be declared in the same place and the loading of the
  chart of accounts will do the 3 steps automatically.
* if you have a relation of child/parent, you would first need to
  declare the parents then the children, and the loading would not be
  efficient because done one by one. Now, everything is done in batch
  automatically without having to think about it.

It is also easier to update fields on records where there was no field
for that on the templates, like
* setting a restriction for journals on accounts
* setting specific values on the company
* modifying journals and linking them easily by using the xml_id instead
  of having to compute it manually

Translations
------------

Some countries have multiple languages (i.e. Belgium uses officially
French, Dutch and German, and the CoA also has an official English
version) and we must support the languages in all these countries.
All these translations are known, and hard coded without using out
translation platform (Transifex). We also like to have the English
version (even if an official one doesn't exist) so that support can be
done more easily in databases using chart templates in other languages
(especially using a non roman alphabet).

Because the translations were not on Transifex for these records, it was
really hard to maintain: the translation templates (`.pot` files) were
not easy to extract as the automatic export would give values mixing
both the CoA and the menuitmes, the fields' strings,... But we don't
want to translate the CoA as we already know the value.
Managing the translations in the `.po` files was also annoying:
- it is easy to forget that the translations need an update too
- it requires a special editor, special terminal commands that everyone
  is not familiar with
- it is easy to make mistakes in the source string

The new format is the following: `field@en_US` where `field` is the
translatable field (usually `name`) and `en_US` is the locale code.
This allows to have the whole declaration on one line, everything in one
file. It also makes the process easier when debugging: instead of
searching for the translation in the `.po` files, it directly appears
next to the configuration of the account/tax/... .

Update of the code
------------------

The code can be updated using this script
https://github.com/william-andre/transform_coa
Forward ports can be managed too by stashing/resetting/checkout the new
modules or the changes in the modules updated in the same PR.

task-2687567

Part-of: odoo/odoo#110016
2023-02-17 19:30:40 +01:00
Victor Feyens 13ccd9cee4 [IMP] test_lint: detect useless manifest content
Keep the manifests as light as possible, to easily see custom behavior/content.
Complete the work of previous commits cleaning the manifests content:

* 42bad1a6d2
* ef7005f524

and make sure this kind of cleanup commit is not necessary in the future
because it is now automatically verified by a dedicated test.

closes odoo/odoo#107735

Related: odoo/enterprise#34903
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <juc@odoo.com>
2022-12-16 16:17:41 +01:00
niyasraphy d04b6404ea [IMP] account, hr, l10n_latam_check: remove non existing image path in manifest
in account and hr module's manifest file non existing image path is specified in images key. removing this images key from manifest and remove empty images key from l10n_latam_check module

closes odoo/odoo#107346

Related: odoo/enterprise#34711
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
2022-12-13 19:11:17 +01:00
Katherine Zaoral a34e5d20c8 [ADD] l10n_latam_check: Checks Management
New features to manage checks and managed them Odoo in latam countries
where they are widely use.

Own Checks Management
---------------------

Extends 'Check Printing Base' module to manage own checks with more features:

* allow using own checks that are not printed but filled manually by the user
* allow to use deferred or electronic checks
  * printing is disabled
  * check number is set manually by the user
* add an optional "Check Cash-In Date" for post-dated checks (deferred payments)
* add a menu to track own checks

Third Party Checks Management
-----------------------------

Add new "Third party check Management" feature.

There are 2 main Payment Methods additions:

* New Third Party Checks:

   * allow the user create a check on the fly from a payment
   * create a third party check from a customer payment

* Existing Third party check:

   * allow the user to reuse a Third party check already created
   * pay a vendor bill using an existing Third party check
   * move an existing checks between journals (i.e. move to Rejected)
   * Send/Receive again a check already used in a Vendor Bill/Customer INV
   * allow the user to do mass check transfers

closes odoo/odoo#107163

X-original-commit: cbec68b414f5b87fe6e146487c532c9a174f40a3
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
2022-12-04 23:41:53 +01:00