In this commit*, the forward-ported test was not moved with the fix on
stock.picking from delivery to stock_delivery, although the test relies
on real invoicing, which is defined in stock_delivery.
Fixes build error 22434
* e1e04f3a176e15fdce81ce3036093d3951401f52
closesodoo/odoo#130217
X-original-commit: 5518daae14aa91e3c2c6723c6059f337c6ee0914
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Vallaeys Valentin (vava) <vava@odoo.com>
port of this fix
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/70454
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Let's consider a delivery carrier DC with invoice policy = 'real'
- Let's consider a consumable product P with a weight = 1kg and sales price = 10€
- Create a sale order SO with 2 P and add DC as shipping cost
- Process the shipment for 1 P and create a backorder
- Process the second shipment with the last P
Bug:
Two lines L1, L2 with DC were created on SO but only L1 as a price unit and a description.
L2 had a price unit = 0€ and no description.
opw-3219711
closesodoo/odoo#125573
X-original-commit: 79dad0a7599584f14e4ab3e96c393983e95aa519
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart (awt) <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Walid Hanniche (waha) <waha@odoo.com>
This commit prevents inclusion of negative qty SO products from
the calculation of its estimated shipping weight. Negative qtys can
indicate a return, which would be a separate picking from the delivery
=> we shouldn't subtract their weight from the delivery. This
subtraction, may have resulted in shipping rates being calculated as
lower than they should have been within the SO.
Additionally fixes the following use case (requires Fedex connector):
- create a SO with 2 products with the same weight
- set 1st product qty = 1
- set 2nd product qty = -1
- add shipping => Shipping Method = Fedex US
- click on "Get Rate"
An error will occur because the SO._get_estimated_weight() = 0, and
you cannot have a rate for weight = 0
TaskId - 3028023
closesodoo/odoo#118348
X-original-commit: ecf0262e3ef746c33a29c4f2de7868e3ab61cce2
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Extract the Inventory logic from the `delivery` module into a new
`stock_delivery` module. This will allow to integrate the basic delivery
features into the website_sale app in a one-app free database.
task-3074497
Part-of: odoo/odoo#110686
Removes the constraint of using a pricelist and makes all sales flows
rely on the currency of the sale order (or repair order)
task-2735672
closesodoo/odoo#84920
Related: odoo/enterprise#24716
Related: odoo/upgrade#3642
Signed-off-by: Morgane Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a product with replenish on order route
- Create a SO for this product and add a shipping method
- Confirm the SO
The shipping method is not on the product.
It's due to the MTO delivery rule that miss the propagation of carrier
option. It's not set by default while it's is on the classic delivery
rule on the warehouse.
To avoid confusion we add it by default on both rules
opw-3112455
opw-3113180
closesodoo/odoo#109328
X-original-commit: c02df957d9f04c911f330aaaadd80fe97a601509
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
There are three rationales behind this change to set USD as default
currency and to enable it in the demo data, from the beginning.
With a demo database, before this revision:
1. On runbot, with all modules installed, it's already USD the default
company currency. It's only when you install a module not depending
on account that it's EUR the company currency by default (e.g. CRM)
2. in the base demo data,
the company is set in the United States but with the currency EUR,
3. before installing account, the company currency is EUR,
after installing account, the company currency is USD,
this is due to the fact as the company is in the United States,
the US Chart Of Account is installed, switching the company currency
to USD.
4. when you install a demo database with a module not depending on
account, you are left with a database without any active currency,
and the monetary fields therefore do not show any currency.
For instance, install only CRM with demo,
you have no currency symbol before or after the expected revenue,
which is not the best user friendly experience.
On runbot you do not feel it because all modules are installed,
therefore with account installed, which activated the USD currency.
Additional weird thing with point 2.:
- Unit tests in modules not dependent on account with the
post-install tag had to handle this sudden change of currency change
before and after installing account.
For instance, when running their unit tests with only their module,
but not account, the company currency is EUR,
but when executing the same unit test with all modules installed,
the company currency is USD.
The unit tests had to handle this sudden change within the unit test,
for instance by setting a 1.0 rate for their own company currency,
which shouldn't be the case: the rate of your own currency should
always be 1.0.
closesodoo/odoo#107113
Related: odoo/enterprise#34613
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Before this commit the neutralize system introduced in v16 was using ORM
methods in order to change appropriate records. Although flexible, this approach
could lead to call some methods with side effects while neutralizing
(eg: overloads of write).
This patch converts the neutralize system to a safer "inert" SQL based approach
by migrating the generic method _neutralize to SQL files exposed in the
data folder.
Task id: 2961687closesodoo/odoo#102792
X-original-commit: e5dbded9bb363351feff7ca8a56c7f8a6860f492
Related: odoo/enterprise#32580
Signed-off-by: Fabien Meghazi <fme@odoo.com>
Since commit 5ccc32fcf7, it's no longer
possible to write on invisible fields.
Make sure the field product_uom_id is visible to avoid a traceback.
closesodoo/odoo#97313
Signed-off-by: Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
1- install sale, accounting
2- create a fiscal position fp that maps
tax inc t1 to any other tax t2
3- create a delivery product dp with t1 and mark it "can be sold"
4- create a new delivery method with dp
5- in a new sales order, choose fp, click on add delivery
6- the unit_price is wrong, it hasn't mapped t1 to t2
7- try adding the delivery as a product in a new sales order line
8- the unit_price is correct and the taxes are correctly calculated
Bug:
`_create_delivery_line` is not using the same logic used
when normally adding a sales order line although technically
delivery product is still a product
Fix:
use `_get_tax_included_unit_price` to get the correct unit_price
OPW-2806965
closesodoo/odoo#96874
X-original-commit: 03bb18d12606447faaed0de04bb83dde5de53b96
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mohamed Megahed Abbas Megahed SALLAM (mome) <mome@odoo.com>
Task: 2856281
- Remove user_type_id, account.account.type model, internal_type
- Add account_type that is a simple selection field
- Move internal_group and include_initial_balance to account.account
- Because of these changes, type_control_ids on account.journal is also removed
closesodoo/odoo#93212
Related: odoo/documentation#2223
Related: odoo/upgrade#3595
Related: odoo/enterprise#28205
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert <csn@odoo.com>
In module mail, invalidating 'message_ids' on a mail thread also
invalidates its inverse field 'res_id' on messages. If you haven't
flushed it before, your cache will be inconsistent, as shown by the test
/mail:TestMailgateway.test_message_process_bounce_records_channel.
In module purchase_stock, add depends on report.stock.quantity. This
ensures that when the model is queried after changes in other models,
the data on which the SQL view depends is flushed to the database before
querying that model's table.
closesodoo/odoo#66938
Related: odoo/enterprise#16722
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Select any two storable product that has invoicing policy set on 'Delivery'
- Create a sales order lines with these two products and make sure that one of the lines should have a quantity set to 0
- Add shipping
Issue:
- The Invoice Status has changed to 'To Invoice'
Solution:
Add en extra filter to consider only lines that have not been invoiced.
opw-2750861
closesodoo/odoo#89548
X-original-commit: bfeb5f6317786edfd0fa464fe5798c7f7bc65ac9
Signed-off-by: yosa-odoo <yosa@odoo.com>
Observed Behaviour
When using a pricelist with a fixed price for all products with a different
currency than the one of the company, adding shipping cost in a sale order
using this pricelist will give a wrong value of the shipping cost
Expect Behaviour
The computed shipping cost added in the sale order should be the same as the
fixed price defined in the pricelist
Reproducibility
This issue can be reproduced using the following steps :
1. Define a pricelist PL1 with a fixed price for all products and a different
currency than the one used in the company (eg fixed price to 15KR)
2. Create a sale order and select PL1 as pricelist
3. Add a product and add a shipping cost
The shipping cost should be the defined fixed price (15KR) but it gives
another value, depending of the company currency
Fix Description
This fix remove a useless currency conversion coming from the fact that since
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/86484 we get the delivery price from the SO
priceliste (using pricelist.get_product_price) giving us a price that is
already converted to the correct currency
Related issue/PR
opw-2810506
closesodoo/odoo#88861
X-original-commit: 25e2f403e88172d67ea6ce382ac1e3f5e0e37835
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hendrickx Anthony (anhe) <anhe@odoo.com>
Expected Behaviour
When adding a shipping cost in a SO, with the shipping method being
associated to a product, the price should be calculated according to
the price of the product in the order's pricelist if available
Observed Behaviour
When adding a shipping cost related to a product, with a fixed price,
the public price of the product is used instead of the price defined
in the SO pricelist
Reproducibility
1. Create a product "Test Shipping" with a public price of 10
2. Create a shipping method "Test Shipping" associated with the
"Test Shipping" product
3. Create a pricelist "Test Pricelist", where the product "Test
Product" has a cost of 15
4. Create a contact "Test Contact" associated with "Test Pricelist"
5. Create a So for the "Test Contact" with "Test Shipping" as shipping
method -> Shipping cost will be 10 instead of 15.
Fix Description
The issue here was that the price computed by the delivery carrier didn't
took into account the selected pricelist. We tried to then change it in
the delivery chooser wizard, but some issue with particular case (i.e.
when the shipping cost should be 0 if the SO total is bigger than X)
appeared, leading us to add the fix directly in the delivery_carrier
classe.
Related Issues/PR
- opw-2754482
closesodoo/odoo#87028
X-original-commit: bb778cd7be835706f54e9e0f342eecf3e5e4e904
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hendrickx Anthony (anhe) <anhe@odoo.com>
As an overridable _neutralize model method was added in a previous
commit, the method is now implemented for various models.
closesodoo/odoo#67825
Related: odoo/enterprise#19042
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
Have a [TEST] product tracked by serial number
Create a SO with [TEST], quantity N (at least 2)
Add FEDEX int. delivery to the order
Validate and confirm delivery
On the shipping invoice the product is reported on N lines, one for each
serial number, but the price is not splitted accordingly so the total of
the invoice will be the original price multiplied by N
This commit revert f3488749eed3c4e96f1cc50a2bb2cf87b423c890
not needed anymore after
e13f048a78b41d81602e868a3b0c7ded24ce992b
opw-2703581
closesodoo/odoo#81130
X-original-commit: 1ad0e4580814bc5ef76f352ed3ed366654ce69bd
Signed-off-by: Grazioso Andrea (agr) <agr@odoo.com>
Beforehand, if two users independently opened a draft
invoice on their respective sessions, then both of them
clicked on the "Post" button, then the invoice was
posted twice.
On a more general aspect, the view currently "prevents" users
from posting moves several times, but technically speaking,
nothing stops users from posting moves several times.
Now, after checking that the user indeed has the right to post
a move, the next check is about verifying that the move is
not already posted.
opw-2479201
closesodoo/odoo#69178
X-original-commit: b7db7db283d7b9d167201b791e6282b022d59c40
Related: odoo/enterprise#17658
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien CHEVREAU <Julien-CHEVREAU@users.noreply.github.com>
The problem is that the cache still thinks in the test that
it is in EUR and then it does a currency conversion for calculating the
delivery cost and the test will fail in L105 of test_delivery_stock.py
By invalidating the cache after the sql that change the currency of the
company, we solve it.
(someone should refactor those tests though)
closesodoo/odoo#67790
X-original-commit: f0a1e7c35bd8cd17149d1d54bfe5b9eec12a0814
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Josse Colpaert <jco@openerp.com>
This commit sets up the logic and adds the button for "Put in Pack"
action that already exists in stock.picking. Reuse/extension of logic
from stock.picking reused where possible, including extension of pack
wizard to handle products with different destination.
Note that logic to handle "Delivery Packaging" wizard when "Delivery
Methods" is active was purposely not extended to work correctly in batch
pickings due to complexity of adding in a new module just to handle
conflicting carrier_ids across pickings in the same batch. It is
expected that this use case will not occur except in case of user error.
Additionally, stock.picking implementation of 'put_in_pack' method has
been renamed to 'action_put_in_pack' to have consistent naming (and
support enterprise level code).
Part of "1. Improve Batch Pickings" specification of overall barcode
improvements task.
Task: 1884520
Enterprise PR: odoo/enterprise#12086Closes: odoo/odoo#55096
Add an easy way to not post the entries in the future when calling
post() on it, but rather set it to be auto-posted at accounting date.
This is useful when we are creating a lot of entries in batch and some
might be in the future, some in the past, and we don't want to separate
that in two batch every time. (asset, accrual, transfer,... )
l10n runbot builds are all failing when running at least one test depending of AccountTestCommon because it:
- doesn't create a sandboxed testing environnement to manage the multi-currency, multi-company, the default company's currency, the exchange rates...
- doesn't setup a testing user then all tests are done using the superuser.
- doesn't provide a fully setup chart of accounts: exchange difference journal is not set, accounts have bad types, etc...
- is run sometimes at-install.
closesodoo/odoo#54444
--task: 2296213
Related: odoo/enterprise#11833
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
- Create journal entries as soon as bank/cash statement lines are created, temporary booked on a suspense account set on the journal.
- Simplify the management of "blue" lines in the reconciliation widget. A "blue" line is now a journal item using a temporary liquidity account (outstanding payment/receipt accounts, set on the journal).
- Adapt and simplify the bank reconciliation report.
- Remove the bank reconciliation threshold date. The reconciliation report will show the not already reconciled journal entries using a liquidity account and the not already reconciled journal entries using a temporary liquidity account. Without accounting, an account.payment will involve directly the liquidity account and then, will be considered as a statement line directly.
- Remove the post_at bank reconciliation feature. The "paid" state will be set on the invoices only if reconciled with a journal entry involving the journal's liquidity account.
With invoicing, the payment will do that so the "in_payment" state should never be shown up.
With accounting, only the statement lines have the power to move an invoice to the "paid" state.
- Fix various corner cases about the management of multi-currency in bank statement lines.
- Fix the conversion dates in multi-currency: Since the bank/cash is always used on the statement lines, it will use always the real "bank" date instead of the fictive payment one.
- Ensure the 'reconcile' method will raise an error if the involved moves are not posted.
related enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#7019closesodoo/odoo#41301
--task: 2092096
Related: odoo/upgrade#1018
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
The default invoicing policy should be based on the delivered quantities
by default because:
- In countries with anglosaxon accounting, that's mandatory
- Even for other countries, it's probably as frequent as the "based on ordered"
quantities
Task 2159161
closesodoo/odoo#47526
Related: odoo/enterprise#9355
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
`action_done`on pickings should be a private method,
and called only trough the picking validation process.
task-1938108
closesodoo/odoo#39174
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The package creation was done even before the call of the 'choose.delivery.package' wizard, so the 'Discard' button of the wizard was useless.
This commit fix this behaviour by creating the package only when the "put_in_pack" action is called from the wizard.
The default weight is thus no more based on the default package but on the picking related to the package.
The method 'manage_package', 'default_stock_quant_package_id', 'self._default_delivery_packaging_id' were removed since they are no more relevant.
The method 'check_destinations' was refactored to '_pre_put_in_pack_hook' to avoid confusion related to its misleading name
TaskID: 1924875
closesodoo/odoo#30324
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
On a sale order, the delivery carrier choice was done directly
on the form view. To get an estimated delivery price, the user need to
click 'add to order' to create a delivery fee line. To get the exact
delivery price on the sale order, the user needed to leave the sale
order without delivery line in order to get the exact price from the
picking at its validation.
As this flow was not so clear, this commit adds a new wizard to choose
the delivery carrier and check its commition fees. This add a line in
any case.
The wizard will be launched from a new button on the sale order
Task : 1908654
Purpose
=======
The method named "action_invoice_create" in the sale_order model did not make sense:
- this method is not an action (it returns the ids of created invoices)
- it is not used as an action on any xml buttons
- it has no reason to be private
This was probably a "real" action somewhere in the past but now it's just too confusing.
(The method in repair.order was also renamed for the same reasons).
PURPOSE
=======
1. Unified product demo data
2. Less demo: one per use case
3. Demo data for all models
Specification
=============
1. Refactor all the brol in the demo data
2. Adapt the tests to make them green, as some products are
renamed, removed, created in python instead of as demo data
...
Valentin Vallaeys (vava)