The employee should be subscribed to their own record in order to
receive communication send to them.
closesodoo/odoo#112736
Taskid: 2749585
X-original-commit: 43d99b06a792a39aa14b7afb8b48aa79c2da2737
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
When starting an onboarding/offboarding plan on an employee, activities
were only created for the users that were part of the HR Officer group.
Regular users can't access the `hr.employee` model and it's not possible
to have activities on `hr.employee.public`.
A new model has been created to manage those activities and is only
accessible to the user and their manager.
task-3151758
closesodoo/odoo#111505
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
This commit add a mechanism to ensure that someone could never save
changes from an history that diverge (in case there is a partition in
the RTC network or a person A was disconnected while another person B
saved changes that were not transmitted to person A).
task-3002163
closesodoo/odoo#112099
Signed-off-by: David Monjoie (dmo) <dmo@odoo.com>
hr_holidays:
Portal user don't have responsibles group by default. But on each new
portal user we call the `_clean_leave_responsible_users` and make useless
write on res.groups.
After this commit, we only call it if at least one user (of self) have
the group to be removed.
If a user has the group, now we remove the group from the user, instead
to remove the user from the group; it reduces the risk of concurrent
update, and have more readable log.
hr:
Avoid writing on employee model if no employees match the current user.
Calling write on empty recordset call all the override for no reason.
In the case e.g. of the first connection of a portal, the tz will be set
on the res.users which will trigger all the overrides of write (including
the _clean_leave_responsible_users which update group for nothing before
this commit), while we have no employees linked to this portal user).
closesodoo/odoo#111870
X-original-commit: d8d74e6247c359e94584014adb9aeda7179f6f96
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten <jke@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- create an employee and fill in the email address;
- duplicate this employee;
- change the email address of the new employee.
Issue:
The email address is changed on both employees.
Cause:
When we duplicate an employee, we keep the same contact.
By modifying the email address, we will modify the contact's email address.
Then we "synchronise" all employees with their contact
using the contact information.
Solution:
When an employee is duplicated, a new contact must be created.
Therefore it is necessary to avoid copying the `work_contact_id` field.
opw-3144129
closesodoo/odoo#111201
X-original-commit: 1582f6834bee2123f8703b2ae52996b0978e2311
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Lefebvre Thomas (thle) <thle@odoo.com>
- Automatically compute the average number of hours per day on
resource.calendar;
- Don't allow to change the working hours of an employee when they have
a current running contract;
- Seperate smart buttons on resources to distinguish Material / Human.
task-3102517
closesodoo/odoo#109768
Related: odoo/enterprise#35718
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the parameters given to the
`_search_part_of_department` is:
- `operator='!='`
- `value=False`
Then the domain returned by the method does not take into account the
False value.
This commit fixes the issue by changing the `=` into `!=` when the value
is False instead of changing `!=` into `=` when the value is False.
closesodoo/odoo#108589
X-original-commit: 814cdc9a7bccf4dca1cf93403295cf1280ca6c10
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
When creating an employee with an associated user, the work email of the
employee is copied from the user (or actually the partner associated with the
user).
However since this [commit], both the mobile_phone and work_email fields on the
employee are computed fields based on a linked partner in the work_contact_id
field. This partner is created on the fly if it did not previously exist.
Both of these behaviors interact in such a way, that the linked partner of the
employee is created automatically using the email from the linked partner of
the user. This is a bug, since both linked partners of the employee and the
user should be the same.
The bug is easily resolved by adding the work_contact_id field directly to the
values dict for the creation of the employee (instead of the work_email).
Reproduction steps: the bug can be easily triggered by repeatedly installing
and uninstalling the employees app. An extra partner gets created for each
employee in the master or demo data, after each install/uninstall cycle.
[commit]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/3c6060b7bbe9c67aca8073ef43c1e89fb7e820ca
opw-3031187
closesodoo/odoo#108045
X-original-commit: 35b7e0e128f1cfd72c11ebb16d68bc48fdcbdb57
Related: odoo/enterprise#35004
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
*: base, account, crm, hr, hr_attendance, test_access_rights
The various public methods of the ORM can be override in other models,
those overrides sometime don't implement the exact same signature as the
original method in the ORM. In this work we sanitize all the overrides
to ensure a better compatibility. The background objective is to make it
possible to call any public method using kwarg: `search(domain=[...])`.
* `search`, the first parameter was renamed from `args` to `domain` in
0e9adf7 but the overrides were not updated.
* `invalidate_models` and `invalidate_recordset`, a new `flush=True`
parameter was introduced in 9c3b9a4 but the overrides were not
updated.
* `update`, there is a clash between the `update` method responsible for
writing on a record and `update` in bus responsible to update the user
presence. The bus method has been renamed so it doesn't clash with the
ORM.
This sanitization comes with a new linter that verifies that all
overrides of BaseModel public methods share a compatible signature. The
linter has been disabled for `create`, `write` and `default_get` as too
many overrides don't respect the signature of BaseModel.
closesodoo/odoo#106999
Related: odoo/enterprise#34991
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <juc@odoo.com>
Warn user and alias responsible when model creation fails on incoming
message due to alias mis-configuration.
Alias custom default values that references archived or deleted records can
prevent the record to be created when receiving an email.
Unfortunately, correcting values on the fly has too many downsides:
- as the value cannot come from nowhere, we would probably end up with
corrupted record like a task without a project
- as errors are silent, lots of suboptimal record could be created before it
is corrected
- as the code would have to deal with different kind of updates, it would be
heavily depend on the framework meaning additional maintenance cost
- the attempt made had also a performance cost by using savepoint which we
want to avoid
For all those reasons, we have decided to warm the user rather than trying to
solve the problem automatically.
The users are warned:
- through a bounce email sent to the sender and alias responsible
- in the alias interface through an alias status present in the list and the
form view
Technical notes:
- They are multiple kind of errors: error in the message (ex.: user not
authorized to send to a specific alias), error in the alias (ex.: dangling
reference in alias_defaults), other error (ex: technical error like a
service unavailable when receiving the message). Here, we want only to detect
alias error and skip other errors. So rather than doing a big try except around
_message_route_process, we have selected the spot where we should detect alias
error:
-- in _alias_get_error_message where we distinct a message error from an alias
error
-- in inside _message_route_process where record are created using
alias_defaults (custom values with reference to record that might have been
deleted since the alias creation)
- In test, we call mail.thread message_process with sudo as it is the case in
real use case (processed when fetching mail). It is needed as in some test
alias status are modified.
Task-2675209
closesodoo/odoo#101019
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Notify HR when an employee changes their own info and check that everything is logged on the chatter
closesodoo/odoo#102069
Taskid: 3029662
Related: odoo/enterprise#32253
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Steps :
- On a new DB (no demo data). Say created at 15:00. - Go to planning.
- Add a shift for today.
- Set the dates from 08:00 to 17:00.
Issue :
The 'Allocated Time' = 02:00.
Cause :
We used to count from the resource creation min to the departure max. So, in this case, not from 08:00, but from 15:00.
While this might seem logical, it confuses users in onboarding.
Fix :
Calculate the whole time, regardless of the resource lifespan.
Notes :
- Similar issues solved with this commit :
> Once the shift validated, the avatar progress bar uses
the same allocated time.
> Same in Project Task gantt view.
- When contract is installed, if the resource does not have a contract, the Allocated Time = 0. Now, it is calculated from the resource calendar.
task-2983993
closesodoo/odoo#102732
X-original-commit: 6a61d1c4c56075ade36f6f32e7a61f1f6c771a6f
Related: odoo/enterprise#32547
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Set the default value for create_employee to False.
When coming from employee form, hide the create_employee field.
task - 2990426
closesodoo/odoo#100661
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Not all employees have a company car. This commit adds a private license plate field on hr.employee.
The field allows the HR Officer and HR Administrator to search for emloyees based on their license plates.
If fleet and hr apps are installed, the search is based on both the company car and private car license plates.
task-2936873
closesodoo/odoo#101146
Related: odoo/enterprise#31796
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
There was an extra `r` in the name of the super method called, which
produces a traceback.
closesodoo/odoo#100361
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Translated fields no longer use the model ir.translation. Instead they store
all their values as JSON, and store them into JSONB columns in the model's
table. The field's column value is either NULL or a JSON dict mapping language
codes to text (the field's value in the corresponding language), and must
contain an entry for key 'en_US' (as it is used as a fallback for all other
languages). Empty text is allowed in translation values, but not NULL.
Here are examples for a field with translate=True:
NULL
{"en_US": "Foo"}
{"en_US": "Foo", "fr_FR": "Bar", "nl_NL": "Baz"}
{"en_US": "Foo", "fr_FR": "", "nl_NL": "Baz"}
Like before, writing False to the field makes it NULL, i.e., False in all
languages. However, writing "" to the field makes its value empty in the
current language, but does not discard the values in the other languages.
Here are examples for a field with translate=xml_translate:
NULL
{"en_US": "<div>Foo<p>Bar</p></div>", "fr_FR": "<div>Fou<p>Barre</p></div>"}
Change for callable(translate) fields: one can now write any value in any
language on such a field. The new value will be adapted in all languages, based
on the mapping of terms between languages in the old values. Basically the
structure of the value must remain the same in all languages, like before.
Reading a translated field is now both simpler and faster than the former
implementation. We fetch the value of the field in the current language by
coalescing its value with the 'en_US' value of the field:
SELECT id, COALESCE(name->>'fr_FR', name->>'en_US') AS name ...
The raw cache of the field contains either None or a dict which is conceptually
a subset of the JSON value in database (except for missing languages). For the
sake of simplicity, most cache operations deal with the dict and return the text
value in the current language.
Trigram indexes have been adapted to the new storing strategy, and should enable
to search in any language. Before this change, only the source value of the
field ('en_US') could be indexed.
Computed stored translated fields are not supported by the framework, because of
the complexity of the computation itself: the field would need to be computed in
all active languages. We chose to not provide any hook to compute a field in
all languages at once, and the framework always invokes a compute method once to
recompute it.
Code translations are no longer stored into the database. They become static,
and are extracted from the PO files when needed. The worker simply uses a cache
with extracted code translations for performance. This is reasonable, since
fr_FR code translations for all modules takes around 2MB of memory, and the
cache can be shared among all registries in the worker. Changing code
translations requires to update the corresponding PO file and reloading the
worker(s).
Performance summary:
(+) reading 'model' translated fields is faster
(+) reading 'model_terms' translated fields is much faster (no need to inject
translations into the source value)
(+) searching translated fields with operator 'ilike' is much faster when the
field is indexed with 'trigram'
(+) updating translated fields requires less ORM flushing
(-) importing translations from PO files is 2x slower
Some extra fixes:
- make field 'name' of ir.actions.actions translated; because of the PG
inheritance, this is necessary to make the column definition consistent in
all models that inherit from ir.actions.actions.
- add some backend API for the web/website client for editing translations
- move methods get_field_string() to model ir.model.fields
- move _load_module_terms to model ir.module.module
- adapt tests in test_impex, test_new_api
- because env.lang is injected into SQL queries, its returned value is
now guaranteed to correspond to a valid active language or None
- remove wizard to insert missing translations (no longer makes sense)
task-id: 2081307
Co-authored-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Change the default recipient of the simulation link to be the employee's
work email address, instead of the private email address.
Currently the private email of employees is used for this but this doesn't
work because mail.compose.message does not allow allow private partners
to be configured as recipients. Secondly, it also just makes sense to send
work-related email to the work email address.
In addition, since a partner is automatically created when sending an
email to this work email address (which is currently a string field, a new
field is created to keep track of this partner, in addition to other
partners that might be linked to employee.
task-2790044
closesodoo/odoo#95655
Related: odoo/enterprise#27808
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
This commit adds the possibility to link a stress day
to specific departments. If the employee is in a
sub-department of the department subject to a stress
day, the stress day will also apply for that employee.
taskID 2946420
closesodoo/odoo#97888
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
It was no longer possible to load the My Profile for users with an
employee that were not HR Officer.
In the `get_views()` method, the 'search' view was requested after the
'form', thus it omited the fields requested as SUPERUSER in
`get_view()`.
closesodoo/odoo#99750
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
hr_*:
hr
hr_contract
hr_recruitment
website_hr_recruitment
Increase UX and possibilities to postulate to a job on recruitement.
Also moves the model hr.contract.type from hr_contract to hr so that it
can also be used from hr_recruitment without having two models in parallel.
taskID 2898063
closesodoo/odoo#96551
Related: odoo/enterprise#29777
Related: odoo/upgrade#3861
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Introduced by #85428closesodoo/odoo#99672
X-original-commit: e6cef5ab9ec189f1f0b86e21a1400859f021ba06
Signed-off-by: William Braeckman (wbr) <wbr@odoo.com>
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
Current behavior before PR:
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
--
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr
closesodoo/odoo#98242
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The cache key of _get_bindings was not super efficient.
The result of _get_bindings is cached,
but its performance was altered by the cache
key which requires to fetch the user groups for each call to
_get_bindings.
Besides, as there is a lot of possible group
combination, this resulted in a lot of possible cache keys,
and therefore a lot of cached values.
This revision aims to make _get_bindings more efficient
by:
- do not use the groups in the cache keys (less cached values)
- filter out actions not available to the user groups after
retrieving them from the cache
- use has_group to do the above, which is itself cached as well,
and therefore do not need to fetch the user groups
at each call to get_bindings.
In addition, move get_bindings from `get_view`
to `get_views`. If there was 3 views asked by `get_views`
(let's say kanban, list, form)
`get_bindings` was being called 3 times, through `get_view`
with each time the same arguments and therefore the same result :-).
Moving it to `get_views` allows to call it only once for all view types
requested, and for the web client it doesn't change much,
as it always request the toolbar/get_bindings through `get_views` only.
In addition, add the lang to the cache of _get_bindings.
it was actually a bug not to put it: if you had 2 users
with the same group set, using 2 different languages,
the user accessing first the get_bindings would cache
the action names within his language, and then the second
user would see the action name within the language of the first user
:-).
Before
```py
In [1]: %time for i in range(1000): self.env['ir.actions.actions'].get_bindings('res.partner'); self.env.invalidate_all();
CPU times: user 790 ms, sys: 104 ms, total: 893 ms
Wall time: 1.7 s
```
After
```py
In [1]: %time for i in range(1000): self.env['ir.actions.actions'].get_bindings('res.partner'); self.env.invalidate_all();
CPU times: user 23.5 ms, sys: 9.12 ms, total: 32.7 ms
Wall time: 36.9 ms
```
Part-of: odoo/odoo#99417
The icon that is displayed in the employee kanban view is determined by the
field hr_icon_display, computed in the method _compute_hr_icon_display. This
method is overridden in multiple modules such as hr_holidays, hr_attendance
and hr_homeworking.
Currently this field has a state to show no icon (presence_undetermined). In
this change this state is extracted into the a separate field
show_hr_icon_display with the default state of hr_icon_display being
presence_to_define. In this way a module such as hr_attendance, which only
overrides _compute_hr_icon_display to show the default icon for everyone as a
default, now only needs to change this separate field and does not need any
knowledge of what other states exist. This reduces coupling between modules.
When selecting the action "Create User" from the employee view, use the available
employee information as default values for this new user. Additionally, make the
"Create Employee" option invisible as this is not relevant when the employee
already exists and save an extra click by closing the user form upon saving.
task-id 2942602
closesodoo/odoo#97632
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
This commit aims at removing unuseful help message to:
1/ reduce translators work, to focus on more useful translations
2/ not sending unuseful information in load_views
3/ reduce help message to useful messages, so that we can mark
fields having a tooltip in the future UI.
4/ some cleanup of existing messages too
The main use cases:
- REMOVED: help redundant with the field name, providing no extra info
- MOVED TO COMMENT: technical help messages, that should not be in UX
closesodoo/odoo#97279
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Since eb67feb5 we had to redo the hack to read fields from public user and set them in hr_employee.
However in this hack we used `_read`, which doesn't fill the cache with fields that are not stored,
which caused a cache miss when reading the field `avatar_128` from hr.employee, to display the image of
the manager in the kanban view of hr_appraisal.
This fix uses `read` instead.
closesodoo/odoo#96889
Signed-off-by: Vincent Schippefilt (vsc) <vsc@odoo.com>
By enabling the method '_employee_values_sync' the original behavior is
keep. Furthermore, by overriding the method now is possible to decide
either a field is synced or not into employee.
closesodoo/odoo#96609
X-original-commit: 46c12cc0f72b2a6aba907fe903a255aed61a1695
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Steps:
- Schedule some activities to `admin` (users with hr officer)
- Remove hr rights to `admin`
- Log-in with `admin` and click on notification
- Click on `Summary`
- Traceback
If we click on `Summary` a `_search` is executed in `hr.employee`
When a user does not have the required rights we will apply `_search` on
the fields on `hr.employee.public` instead of `hr.employee.private`.
Except that in the case of `activity_ids` this field does not exist in
`hr.employee.public`
opw-2765032
closesodoo/odoo#95802
X-original-commit: c4a5c63b6141424e31d7a7c8bc6d0c00d58643c0
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
In module mail, invalidating 'message_ids' on a mail thread also
invalidates its inverse field 'res_id' on messages. If you haven't
flushed it before, your cache will be inconsistent, as shown by the test
/mail:TestMailgateway.test_message_process_bounce_records_channel.
In module purchase_stock, add depends on report.stock.quantity. This
ensures that when the model is queried after changes in other models,
the data on which the SQL view depends is flushed to the database before
querying that model's table.
closesodoo/odoo#66938
Related: odoo/enterprise#16722
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
Move the definition of class Query to odoo.tools, in order to avoid
circular imports when importing Query in core Odoo modules.
Also reorganize imports in the impacted modules.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#66938
account.account: code was already in unique constraint
account.journal: inverting compound unique constraint to benefit from indexing company_id
hr.employee: user_id already in unique index
phone.blacklist: number already in unique index
stock.orderpoint: product_id already in unique constraint/index
closesodoo/odoo#92932
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Plans can be available for a specific department or global for the
company.
closesodoo/odoo#92648
Taskid: 2868447
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Purpose:
Increase usability of the Plan feature
This change implies changing 'hr.plan.wizard' m2o employee_id
field into m2m employee_ids field.
task - 2797331
closesodoo/odoo#88119
Related: odoo/enterprise#26264
Related: odoo/upgrade#3439
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Refactor the `load_views` API so it no longer sends multiple times the same
fields description.
e.g.
When `load_views` is called to get the kanban, tree and form views,
the list of fields of the model was sent 4 times:
- Once for each view, with only the fields used in the view,
in `['fields_views']['kanban']['fields']` for instance
- Once globally, with all the fields of the model, in `['fields']`
The goal of this revision is to change that so it sends the list of all fields
only once.
In addition, if a view contains x2many fields,
the fields description of the comodel is also sent.
It was sent in the `views` key of the view fields dict.
e.g.
When calling `load_views` of `res.partner` to get the kanban,
tree and form views,
the `res.partner` fields description was actually sent 6 times:
- Once for each view
- Once globally
- Once for each view of the many2many field `child_ids` of the form view, in
- `['fields_views']['form']['fields']['child_ids']['views']['kanban']['fields']`
- `['fields_views']['form']['fields']['child_ids']['views']['form']['fields']`
The change suggested in this revision is to:
- Remove the fields description for each view in `['fields_views']`.
As it no longer contains the fields,
the key becomes `['views']` instead of `['fields_views']`.
- Replace the dict key `['fields']` by `['models']`,
which is a dict with as key the model name and as values
the model fields description. It contains the fields description
for all models implied in the view:
the model of the main view and the model of all one2many and many2many fields.
With this change, the fields description will only be sent once by model
implied in the view.
In addition, the web client was getting the information about the fields
sometimes in the global fields description list (e.g. `['fields']`),
sometimes in the fields description list of the view type
(e.g. `['fields_views']['form']['fields']`),
making it a pain to try to make changes / performance gain
in these field description dictionaries, because you never knew in which dict
the web client was getting its info.
Now, as there is only one place to get the fields description from,
it's clearer and cleaner.
- one2many and many2many fields views are passed directly in the main view
architecture rather than being put in the `views` key
of the field description.
This is actually easier to treat by the web client,
and this will allow in a future work to cache an entire view in one block
of text rather than having to combine multiple cached blocks of text
to return one view.
- one2many and many2many fields which do not have directly embedded views
have their views directly injected in the architecture,
so the web client doesn't have to do RPC calls to `load_views`
for each one2many and many2many fields not having embedded views.
For instance, this allow to reduce the number of RPC calls to `load_views`
from 8 to 1 when loading the form of `product.product`.
Currently, this behavior is limited to 1 level deep but we consider making it
go all the way down in future works. We did not do it for the moment because
in certain cases it rises the processing time and the size (bytes) too much.
e.g. the sale.order view can be 5 levels deep,
meaning you can reach 4 dialogs on top the main view.
```
sale.order form > order_line > sale.order.line form > invoice_lines >
account.move.line form > asset_ids > account.asset form >
depreciation_move_ids > account.move form.
```
This will also benefit in future works to cache an entire view in one block
of text rather to having to combine multiple cached block of text
to get one view.
- `fields_view_get` becomes `get_view`.
As it no longer returns the fields description,
keeping the `fields` in the name `fields_view_get` no longer makes sense.
Hence removing `fields` from the method name, it becomes `view_get`.
As it gets renamed anyway, we take the opportunity to rename it `get_view`,
which is more in line with the general getter/setter guidelines
in the model object world.
- `_fields_view_get` becomes `_get_view`. For the same reasons than above.
- `load_views` becomes `get_views`.
This is not mandatory, there is no technical reason to rename `load_views` as
it practically sends the same info as before,
the view architectures and their fields description. Just in another way.
We just take the opportunity of this pull request to suggest a cleaner API:
`_get_view`, `get_view` and `get_views`.
- Arguments `toolbar=False, submenu=False` fo the methods
`_fields_view_get` and `fields_view_get` are converted to a kwargs `**options`
in `_get_view` and `get_view`.
The rationale is that submenu was already no longer used (deprecated)
and the mobile options is introduced.
The mobile options is necessary to tell the server to send the mobile views
for x2many fields (kanban instead of tree).
Instead of adding a new argument each time we add a new option to
`fields_view_get`, it seems wiser to have a kwargs `**options` to avoid
to re-write all overrides each time a new option is introduced.
- `_fields_view_get` returned a dict containing the arch in text and some of the
view information. Now, `get_view` returns a tuple with the view architecture
as an `etree` node, and the view as a browse record. The rationale is that all
overrides of `_fields_view_get` were about modifying the arch only
(e.g. changing the address format/re-organizing the address related field
nodes of the partner according to the company country).
To do so, all these overrides were doing `etree.fromstring` to parse the arch
which was sent in text to convert it to an `etree`,
then operations were done on the `etree`,
and then `etree.tostring` was called to convert back the arch to string.
With this change of signature to send the arch as an `etree`,
all these back and forth `etree.fromstring` -> `etree.tostring` are avoided,
allowing some performance gain and less code in the end.
- A cleanup of the keys returned in the dict of `fields_view_get`
has been performed in `get_view`:
- `fields` is removed, as explained above,
- `view_id` is renamed `id`,
- `name` is removed, it was unused by the web client,
- `type` is removed, it was unused by the web client,
- `field_parent` is removed, it was unused by the web client,
- `base_model` is removed, it was unused by the web client.
- `filters` is moved from the global dict returned by `load_views`
(now `get_views`) to the dict returned by `fields_view_get` (now `get_view`)
as it applies only to the `search` view type.
- Retro-compatible methods for the 3 methods
`fields_view_get`, `_fields_view_get` and `load_views` are provided,
with deprecation warnings in them.
- The web client could cache the model fields description
(as it already caches the views),
so it doesn't need to fetch them again if it asks for another view of a model
for which he already has the fields description.
If we do so, `get_views` could return only the list of models used by
the views, without the fields description as of now,
and the web client would then call `fields_get` independently only for
the models for which it doesn't have yet the fields description.
This would avoid the server to return the fields description
and to call `fields_get`, which is costly, for each `get_views`,
therefore gaining performances.
- Inject the views of the one2many and many2many fields all the way down,
unlimited depth level, as explained above.
- Cache with `ormcache` the architecture of back-end views.
This is already done for qweb views, it's not done for back-end views.
Therefore the postprocessing of the views is performed for each `get_views`,
which is costly, while the view architecture doesn't change for users
belonging to the same groups, according to the groups implied by the view.
This pull request is co-authored by
Aaron Bohy (aab) for the web client part and
Denis Ledoux (dle) for the server part.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87522
When creating a user and employee from the wizard, the employee was
taking the default name from the context instead of the one chosen
in the wizard.
closesodoo/odoo#88368
Taskid: 2819821
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Departure reasons could be used on business code (eg: payroll).
Currently the mapping is made based on the xmlid, but it could
happen for some customers to create several departure reasons
of the same kind. (ex: "Resigned - Salary" or even
"Resigned - Personal Reasons").
This commit uses the departure reason on _get_default_departure_reasons
to allow considering them together.
closesodoo/odoo#87662
Taskid: 2811192
X-original-commit: c7f46a4760fa2beb7d50b4b95f10e14a1a326423
Related: odoo/enterprise#25771
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Having both an activity type "Request Signature" and "Signature
Request" on the plan were confusing and misleading for the users.
Related odoo/enterprise#25511
Related odoo/upgrade#3398closesodoo/odoo#87082
Taskid: 2796407
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
* Redesign views
* New layout for the job kanban card + redesigned menu
* Create new reports
* Candidate Sources: get a better view on where applicants are
coming from;
* Time in Stage: shows how long an applicant is in the current
stage.
* Archiving a job archives applicants as well
odoo/enterprise#24816odoo/upgrade#3395closesodoo/odoo#85479
Taskid: 2738082
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Kevin Baptiste