**Issue:**
- Open a list view with `expand="1"` and `limit=<arbitrary small number, say 5>`.
- BUG: The pager shows that it's displaying the limited records, but in reality,
it's displaying all records under each group.
**Solution:**
This is because we are *not* limiting the number of records being fetch in the first
read_group rpc. We are now specifying the expand_limit in this commit.
closesodoo/odoo#106238
X-original-commit: e5bba9f5eb63ee95924c892801fe18feaef6d1fc
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Caburnay (jcb) <jcb@odoo.com>
Before this commit, in the list view, clicking on the "export all"
button created an xslx file that did not reproduce the order of the
columns in the view.
Why is this?
The order used was based on the data fetched by a
rpc("/web/export/get_fields".
Solution:
Do not do a rpc("/web/export/get_fields") and use the order of the
columns in archInfo.
How to reproduce:
- Go to a list view
- Click on the "export all" button
Before this commit:
The order of the columns in the created file may be different from the
order in the list view.
After this commit:
The order of the columns in the created file is the same as in the
list view.
closesodoo/odoo#104541
X-original-commit: 734eee368d548fddc6c516ff559d09e853d1ab74
Signed-off-by: Luca Vitali <luvi@odoo.com>
*: base_automation, lunch, mail, mrp, project, web_editor, website
This commit adds a warning if the props validation is not set for a
component.
The props validation is important to tell how a component should be
used, by looking at its code, it's a good documentation of the component.
It's also critical, to test if the component is correctly used, if all
the obligatory props are passed and that there are of the correct type.
For more information, see: https://github.com/odoo/owl/blob/master/doc/reference/props.md#props-validationclosesodoo/odoo#103723
Related: odoo/enterprise#33044
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
This commit solves two bugs:
1. In a grouped empty list view, if you click on a sortable column,
then a crash is displayed.
How to reproduce:
- Go to a grouped empty list view with at least one sortable column
- Click on the sortable column
Before this commit :
A crash is displayed
After this commit:
Nothing happens.
2. In a grouped view with at least one open group, columns that do not
have an aggregates value cannot be sorted.
How to reproduce:
- Go to a grouped list view with at least one open group.
- Click on a sortable column that does not have an aggregates value
Before this commit:
Nothing happens
After this commit:
The records are sorted by the clicked column.
closesodoo/odoo#102143
X-original-commit: 537bbc79fe0ce34fe8b4746bf4cc86f9ebfc8a12
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Georis François (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
In the conversion of the FormViewDialog from legacy to wowl, we
forgot the feature allowing to display a "Remove" button in the
footer, and to execute a custom callback when this button is
clicked. This is used for instance by the Gantt view.
This commit restores the feature.
closesodoo/odoo#102149
X-original-commit: 3eb126d0297a7e3db0cb98cd1ad9555eefaa0cfa
Related: odoo/enterprise#32281
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Before this commit, clicking on view buttons with attribute
`close="1"` in FormViewDialog didn't close the dialog once the
button action was performed. This commit fixes that issue, and
ensures we do not reload the record if we're about to close the
dialog.
X-original-commit: 32d211a6fd5c121fa5f556f1d78b79421edc6f68
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102149
Before this commit, with its default props, the SelectCreateDialog
displayed a "Create" button in its footer, but clicking on it does
nothing.
This commit simply opens a FormViewDialog to create a new record
of the given model, like in legacy. This default behavior can still
be overridden thanks to the props "onCreateEdit".
X-original-commit: 3afaad687e8ca8cb34a7bf7121e75a5a583762ed
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101819
This commit does multiple things:
- The readonly mode of form view is removed but not for the fields.
it means that the fields in the view are always in edit mode except
if we force them to be readonly.
- The control panel is revamped to take less vertical space and shows now
the record editing (dirtiness)/validity status after editing the record.
- The record is saved only when leaving the view or by clicking the save
button when hovering the record status in the control panel.
- The record can still be discarded by clicking the discard button when
hovering the status text in control panel.
task id: 2822553
X-original-commit: 77824ad44b6945a9811120380747f87ef6362ae2
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101118
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
*: hr_org_chart,l10n_gcc_invoice_stock_account,mail,point_of_sale,
purchase,website,website_sale,website_sale_autocomplete,
website_slides_survey
Some commit have added old Bootstrap 4 classes after the merge of
Bootstrap 5.
Note that it's not possible anymore as the merge bot is now able to
detect it.
closesodoo/odoo#98349
Related: odoo/enterprise#30551
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
Have an editable list view, displaying a many2many tags field. The m2m field
has a context, mentioning `active_id`. (`context="{'default_field': active_id}"`)
"basic context keys" is to be understood as the usual suspects: active_id, active_ids, current_company_id, active_model
Type something in the m2m input, and selet create and edit, in order to create a new record in a dialog form view.
Before this commit, there was a crash because active_id was not present in the evaluation context.
After this commit, the new record opens in its form view, with the right value for the field that must have a default.
closesodoo/odoo#96910
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Doing a `search_count` on millions of records could be very slow. On
large databases, the pager counter "1-80 / 8000000" could take several
seconds just to get the total number of records.
This commit limits the counter in list and kanban views to 10k records,
and shows "1-80 / 10000+" if the limit is reached. If you click on
10000+, it updates with the real count (or if you go up to 10000 with
pager or input value).
The search_count on res.partner of odoo.com takes 4s. With this patch,
it will take ~20ms.
Task 2761165
closesodoo/odoo#95642
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Damien Bouvy <dbo@odoo.com>
When unselecting an export template, the list was empty
instead of just keeping the current list. I also added
some tests for this component introduced in Owl recently.
Some scss changes have been done to remove unnecessary
lines from the file and fix the style in a small window.
With a small window, items from the export list are not
draggable and the list must be placed at the bottom
part of the dialog
closesodoo/odoo#95226
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit introduces the new kanban, list and form views written
in owl. Even though it contains the implementation of those 3 views,
only the kanban view is activated for now (the list and form views
aren't 100% ready yet, so they aren't added to the view registry).
Alongside the views, the fields (<field name="..."/> in archs) and
widgets (<widget name="..." in archs) of web/ have been implemented
in owl as well. Legacy ones remaining in other addons are supported
in our new views, thanks to a compatibility layer. The goal is to convert
them asap though.
Legacy views, fields and widgets are kept for now, which explains the
number of added lines in this PR (around half of them concern tests).
They are still extended by custom code in other addons, that still need
to be converted (a lot of them are already on the way). Moreover,
they are still used in Studio as well. The plan is to lazy load them in
the Studio bundle when all custom code extending them will be
converted. Studio will be converted for v17.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#92475
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
Joseph Caburnay