*: base_automation, lunch, mail, mrp, project, web_editor, website
This commit adds a warning if the props validation is not set for a
component.
The props validation is important to tell how a component should be
used, by looking at its code, it's a good documentation of the component.
It's also critical, to test if the component is correctly used, if all
the obligatory props are passed and that there are of the correct type.
For more information, see: https://github.com/odoo/owl/blob/master/doc/reference/props.md#props-validationclosesodoo/odoo#103723
Related: odoo/enterprise#33044
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Before: On a map view, a bunch of points get loaded one by one. Each of
them triggering a new render of the controller. Currently, the useModel
hook does a deep render no matter what. If you are trying to set a
custom filter un the filter menu in the control panel, the content would
systematically diseapear (rerendered) when a new map point loaded.
After: To prevent this, setting the input node as t-model is a solution.
It allows owl to keep track of the value of the input and correctly
set it back when a render occurs.
closesodoo/odoo#100421
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Before this commit in tests, when creating a view with makeView, the same env was shared for services, view and
main_components_container. This is rather wrong as bugs in prod could not be reproduced in tests.
For example: env.config was present in the env for every services and components, this is wrong as
only View must receive it in its env.
After this commit, makeView separates the env for services and top-level components from the one dedicated for View.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#96618
Form views in dialogs should not display a control panel. Before
this commit, they did. To fix the issue, we reworked a bit how we
pass to the Layout component its "display" information (e.g.
whether it should display a control panel, and which parts of it).
Before this commit, it retrieved this info from the searchModel, in
the env. This doesn't allow a specific view to override it, for
instance the form view when it's in a dialog. To ease this, we
changed the Layout component s.t. it now takes a "display" props,
and no longer looks in the searchModel. Each view thus needs to
pass this as props.
closesodoo/odoo#96818
Related: odoo/enterprise#29857
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit introduces the new kanban, list and form views written
in owl. Even though it contains the implementation of those 3 views,
only the kanban view is activated for now (the list and form views
aren't 100% ready yet, so they aren't added to the view registry).
Alongside the views, the fields (<field name="..."/> in archs) and
widgets (<widget name="..." in archs) of web/ have been implemented
in owl as well. Legacy ones remaining in other addons are supported
in our new views, thanks to a compatibility layer. The goal is to convert
them asap though.
Legacy views, fields and widgets are kept for now, which explains the
number of added lines in this PR (around half of them concern tests).
They are still extended by custom code in other addons, that still need
to be converted (a lot of them are already on the way). Moreover,
they are still used in Studio as well. The plan is to lazy load them in
the Studio bundle when all custom code extending them will be
converted. Studio will be converted for v17.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#92475
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
In the next version of Owl, all exported terms are directly available
from the top level `owl` object. This commit aims to adapt existing
imports to this new system. This is done by importing any Owl property
used in files at the top, right after the `import` or `require`
statements.
closesodoo/odoo#82736
Related: odoo/enterprise#23609
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
The motivation of this commit comes from breadcrumbs.
Breadcrumbs work as follows: for each controller in the stack of
the ActionService, there is an entry in the breadcrumbs. Except
for the last entry (which corresponds to the currently displayed
controller), the value to display is computed by the ActionService
and stored in this.env.config.breadcrumbs. For the last entry,
we use the displayName set in this.env.config.
When a view wants to update its displayName (e.g. the form view
when we switch to another record), it updates the displayName in
the config, which thus correctly updates the breadcrumbs. However,
this doesn't change the internal values in the ActionService, so if
another controller is stacked over the current one, the penultimate
entry is wrong. To update the internal state of the ActionService,
the event 'controller-title-updated' must be triggered as well,
which is cumbersome. Note that we don't really face the issue yet
because among already converted views, none of them need to update
its displayName in the breadcrumbs.
This commit aims at uniformizing the way the (n-1) first entries
and the last one behave, by making the "breadcrumbs" key encode
all breadcrumbs entries (the n-1 first ones, and the last, current
one). We also replace the "displayName" key by "getDisplayName"
such that it uses a single source of truth, located in the
ActionService, and we provide a function "setDisplayName" to update
it. Finally, this commit introduces the notion of "default config"
which ensures that standalone views, or views in tests, have a
valid config with expected keys.
closesodoo/odoo#81031
Related: odoo/enterprise#22799
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
This commit removes all the 'extend' initially introduced to avoid code
repetition and ensure visual consistency across Bootstrap and Owl dropdowns.
Despite achieving the desired results, using 'extend' in this context
was seriously impacting the bundle generation time, probably due to an
underestimated amount of Apps' legacy-code applied on these elements.
In order to achieve the same results, the chosen strategy is to add
Bootstrap default classes directly into Owl dropdowns.
Also, it moves code related to bootstrap dropdown in 'webclient.scss',
leaving 'core/dropdown/dropdown.scss' for Owl code only.
Due to the discrepancies between Bootstrap and Owl html
structure, the '.dropdown-item' class could not have been added
directly to Owl's '.o_dropdown_item' itself, without refactoring
the Dropdown component structure.
// ==== Bootstrap 4.6 default Structure ================================
<div class="dropdown-menu">
<button class="dropdown-item" type="button">Action</button>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="#">Another action</a>
</div>
// ==== OWL default Structure before this commit =======================
<ul class="o_dropdown_menu">
<li class="o_dropdown_item">
<span>Action</span>
</li>
<li class="o_dropdown_item">
<a href="#">Another action</a>
</li>
</ul>
// ==== OWL Structure after this commit ================================
<div class="o-dropdown--menu dropdown-menu">
<span class="dropdown-item">Action</span>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="#">Another action</a>
</div>
// ==== web.assets_backend.css Bundle Generation Comparison ============
With all modules installed (enterprise edition over runbot):
Before this commit, bundle took ~2.5s and ~4s to generate and weighted ~322kB (~2.5MB uncompressed)
After this commit, it takes between ~1.2s and ~1.6s and weights ~257kB (~1.6MB uncompressed)
closesodoo/odoo#77649
X-original-commit: 84715436d87bb05b421bc9ccaacda67d07571690
Related: odoo/enterprise#21370
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Stefano Rigano <sri@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: François Georis <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
This commit introduces a new component: the layout component.
Its purpose is to make abstraction of most generic components and
classes when writing a view template or an action.
To make use of this component, we also needed a new system to pass slot
from the parent of the layout to the control panel. This was done in a
hacky way and is meant to be replaced as soon as Owl provides a built-in
way to pass slots.
The control panel has also been slightly tweaked to default its props
from an environment's newly introduced key: the 'config'. This has been
done to reduce the amount of props passed to the layout and search
subcomponents.
X-original-commit: 3b29dd230acd961a72fb0cb971f9363958f65b60
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77463
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
This commit replaces the control panel dropdowns with the new <Dropdown/> component, in order to get consistent through the new/legacy views (because the current Odoo version is in a state where some views uses the new infrastructure and some others are still not converted - see odoo/odoo#73311).
The diff seems massive, but it is mostly due to tests adaptations.
closesodoo/odoo#77001
X-original-commit: d679cd0d8ba9a2420e81a42a698763e9be2327e1
Related: odoo/enterprise#21077
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
We refactor the action service and allow the legacy and new views to share
a global state within a same action.
We introduce two new components View and WithSearch along with
the search infrastructure: ControlPanel, FilterMenu,...
Part-of: odoo/odoo#73311
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Stefano Rigano <sri@odoo.com>
Joseph Caburnay