currently the returned warning from the sale, stock and repair apps are not translatable to user languages.
this pr makes the string's translatable and correct the grammer of the warning.
closesodoo/odoo#108379
X-original-commit: 217115e68d117d7cf1eeb94794118819d6082547
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
mrp
===
- no time has been recorded on operations then give warning with apply button
- do not allow to mass edit UOM in any manufacturing state
- set value of lot/serial from MO and set read only on unbuild from MO
- remove "archive operation" icon
repair
======
Currently it is not possible to select a return on a repair order unless save it first. so after this commit user can able to select it without save it.
only show picking related to selected product
closesodoo/odoo#106571
Task: 2845380
X-original-commit: dd60647ce41547ecd00bbde45ddf564a7ada91c7
Related: odoo/enterprise#34403
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Previous fix
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/72dff43a4da277b002966f5fd4045b7f9a3855ad
re-exposed uoms in the view even if the setting is not active, but we
prefer to avoid this if possible. In order to do this we ensure that the
uom is set even if it is not visible in the view. Most of these are
already handled by compute methods, but except for `repair.fee` so we
only add in a guarantee for that model.
Note that the write case is included in cases when:
- the uoms were previously activated and set => deactivated again
- demo data has different uoms set and uoms setting is not active
X-original-commit: 7e64ebb3d8d3f3d3749304a325eb073777b129dc
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104900
The group unification done by https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/95729
missed adding the often mandatory `product_uom` into some views when
`uom.group_uom` is False. This is the case for repair and blocks the
user from saving its form view in this case.
X-original-commit: 72dff43a4da277b002966f5fd4045b7f9a3855ad
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104067
Since odoo/odoo#95729
nodes with a `groups=` are completely removed from the views when
the user is not part of the group, instead of being made invisible.
In that PR, views have been adapted to add back fields, with invisible="1",
when they were required, for instance when they were used in a domain
of another field which was still there despite the user is not part
of the given group.
As `tree` views having `multi_edit="1"` where not considered
as editable views, the domain of fields in these views were not
validated:
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1460
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1321-L1322
while they are well required for the web client,
in `multi_edit="1"` this is possible to edit relational/many2one field,
and therefore it will do `name_search` calls using the domain of the
field, and therefore the fields used in these domains must always
be present in the views. Without it, a crash in the web client occurs
when attempting to edit the relational/many2one field.
This revision targets to consider the `multi_edit="1"` tree views
as editable, to make the field domains validated as they should be.
Hence, views are adapted to add back fields with `invisible="1"`
when they are required in domains of other fields.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103790
Allow our users to modify mail template more easily
- make the list accessible from the settings
- give them a link to update relevant views to update header/footer
- make the list and form of templates more readable
- add a description on templates, allowing to describe their usage
In order to better filter templates, a new category field is added that
is computed based on active flag, description being set and the template
having an xml ID. Master templates are active, with a description and an
xml ID.
Update master data to add description on some templates.
task-2944770
closesodoo/odoo#101730
X-original-commit: dfa867343ee8842f3f127ac62584fd471b41dde1
Related: odoo/enterprise#32079
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
This revision is to make uniform the behavior of the `groups` attribute
on the Python model fields
and on the node in the view architecture.
In both cases, remove the node from the view completely.
Before this revision,
in a back-end view:
- In the Python model, if a field has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the field is removed, completely, from the view.
- In the view architecture, if a node has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the node is made invisible (not completely removed, just
made invisible).
in a front-end view:
- if a node has a "groups" or "t-groups" set and the user
is not part of the groups, the node is removed from the view.
So it's 2/3 cases removing nodes restricted to a group.
and 1/3 case making invisible nodes restricted to a group.
It's simpler to have a uniform behavior for the 3 cases,
simpler to understandard for developers.
In addition, this will help for the goal to cache back-end views.
It makes possible to convert views using the `groups_id` field
by moving the content of these views directly
in the view to which they add content which is suppose to be completely
removed when the user has not the according group.
By getting rid of the `groups_id` many2many field on `ir.ui.view`,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the `groups_id` groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
closesodoo/odoo#95729
Related: odoo/enterprise#29592
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
TLDR:
* invoices are implemented using computed methods instead of onchange
* the synchronization only happens when switching tabs in the Form view
to improve perfs.
_______________________________________________________________________
The whole engine of the synchronization of Invoices to the Journal
Entries has been refactored
* by using computed fields instead of onchange functions
* by synchronizing only from invoice to journal entry in `create` and
`write`
* by saving when switching tabs on the Invoice form, to synchronize
before showing the values
This comes with numerous advantages:
* no need to call the onchange methods manually
* no need to use the Form emulator to build invoices (i.e. EDI, OCR,
intercompany, ...)
* the performance for invoices with many lines improves drastically, going
from 2 minutes to 4 seconds to create an invoice with 500 lines
* the model is more declarative, we can now see how the values are computed
instead of having the values being copied from various places.
* remove the hack in `onchange` that disabled the recursivity of it,
which was unexpected and needed to be managed manually in all the
onchange methods
This means that:
* Some fields need to be exclusively computed on journal entries values
or invoice values, more specifically the Tax Summary widget.
It is now
- computed from entry lines, when opening the view
- computed from invoice lines when changing those, because the tax lines
will need to be recomputed anyways, erasing previously set values
- set with an inverse function when saving; after the sync has been done
* Some possible operations previously possible have been dropped.
(i.e. look at the removed test test_in_invoice_line_onchange_accounting_fields_1)
This is because such a behavior was undefined (how is changing the balance going
to affect the unit price? How is the amount currency going to affect it?)
_______________________________________________________________________
Implementation Details
----------------------
The "dynamic lines", meaning the payment terms and the tax lines are now
only created in the `create` and `write` functions.
In order to reduce code duplication, it has been implemented using
context managers used in both `account.move` and `account.move.line`
These context managers help comparing the values before/after, acting
like a local `onchange`, but getting benefit from the dirty flags from
the `compute` dependences.
This is relying on computed fields on the move (`needed_terms`) and on
the lines (`compute_all_tax`) which contain the values needed for the
related move.
Depending on the needed values and the existing values (`term_key` and
`tax_key`, respectively) the context manager will determine what needs
to be created/updated/deleted.
Some related changes are to produce a `dict` instead of a `str` for the
`tax_totals` (previously `tax_totals_json`) fields, by simplicity to
reduce the complexity of IO, and simplicity of debugging, because the
logic of the field needed to change (cannot be computed at the same time
anymore since it needed the lines to be synced)
By simplicity, and also because it makes more sense, some boolean fields
have been merged into `display_type`:
* `is_rounding_line`
* `exclude_from_invoice_tab`
* `is_anglo_saxon_line`
The `price_unit`, `quantity` and other "invoice fields" are now not set
anymore on lines that are not product lines since it didn't make any
sense to have it.
Performances
------------
You have to keep in mind that a simple `create` didn't compute a lot of
fields, for instance not taxes were set, no payment terms,...
Now it does.
```python
import random
from timeit import timeit
from odoo import Command
domain = [('company_id', 'in', (False, self.env.company.id))]
products = self.env['product.product'].search(domain).ids
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search(domain).ids
taxes = self.env['account.tax'].search(domain).ids
def create(nmove, nline):
self.env['account.move'].create([
{
'move_type': 'out_invoice',
'partner_id': random.choice(partners),
'invoice_line_ids': [
Command.create({
'name': f'line{i}',
'product_id': random.choice(products),
'tax_ids': [Command.set([random.choice(taxes)])],
})
for i in range(nline)
]
}
for j in range(nmove)
])
# After | Before
print(timeit("create(1, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 0.11 | 0.09
print(timeit("create(100, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 2.76 | 2.50
print(timeit("create(500, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 14.56 | 12.34
print(timeit("create(1, 100)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 1.03 | 5.52
print(timeit("create(1, 500)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 3.99 | 125.02
print(timeit("create(50, 50)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 19.44 | 79.55
```
Another metric that can be used is running the test suite with
`--test-tags=/account` (only `account` installed)
* before: 404s, 267127 queries (366 tests)
* after: 318s, 232125 queries (362 tests)
Why this commit title?
----------------------
Someone told me that this was the perfect way of naming your commits.
c04065abd8
task-2711317
closesodoo/odoo#96134
Related: odoo/upgrade#3715
Related: odoo/enterprise#29758
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
This commit aims at removing unuseful help message to:
1/ reduce translators work, to focus on more useful translations
2/ not sending unuseful information in load_views
3/ reduce help message to useful messages, so that we can mark
fields having a tooltip in the future UI.
4/ some cleanup of existing messages too
The main use cases:
- REMOVED: help redundant with the field name, providing no extra info
- MOVED TO COMMENT: technical help messages, that should not be in UX
closesodoo/odoo#97279
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
When creating an invoice from a repair order, the account mapping of the
fiscal position doesn't apply even though the tax one does
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install Repair and Accounting
2. Go to Accounting > Configuration > Invoicing > Fiscal Positions and
create a new fiscal position with:
- Name: 'FP test'
- Tax Mapping from 'Tax 15.00%' to a new tax 'Tax 10.00%'
- Account Mapping from '400000 Product Sales' to '450000 Other
Income'
3. Go to Sales > Products and create a new product 'Product A' with:
- Product Type: 'Consumable'
- Customer Taxes: 'Tax 15.00%'
- Income Account: '400000 Product Sales'
4. Create another product 'Product B' with same values except type which
is 'Service'
5. Go to Repairs and create a new repair order with:
- Any Product to Repair
- Any Customer (once set, edit the customer's fiscal position to 'FP
test')
- Invoice Method: 'Before Repair'
- Parts: add a line of type 'Add' with product 'Product A'
- Operations: add a line with product 'Product A'
6. Confirm the order, create an invoice and open it: the account mapping
of the fiscal position didn't apply (it should be '450000 Other
Income')
Solution:
Apply the fiscal position mapping on the income account of the product
opw-2902056
closesodoo/odoo#96038
X-original-commit: 02975a8a7b1803167a5ba8365cfbf29f80f84b2e
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Merlin (megu) <megu@odoo.com>
In the web client, in a real use case, it's not possible
to write on fields which are invisible,
as it's not possible to write on fields which are readonly.
This is a first step in the goal to change the behavior
of the `groups=` attribute in the back-end views,
to remove them for the view instead of making them invisible.
This is mainly to reduce the diff of the revision that will introduce
the mentioned above behavior change.
As nodes with `groups=` will be removed from the view
when the user doesn't have the group, it's no longer possible
to set a value on a field having a `groups=` the user doesn't have
in the `Form` test class, as the field will no longer be at all in the
view.
However, these unit tests shouldn't have been able to set values
on invisible fields in the first place.
This revision therefore aims to correct the unit tests setting value
on fields which were invisible because the user executing the
test was not part of the required group(s) for these fields
to be visible in the view.
closesodoo/odoo#94337
Related: odoo/enterprise#28936
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
This allows to create a repair.order record without
the need to call the onchanges to set the uom and locations
or to set them manually during the `create` call.
For instance, this makes easier to create repair orders
using XMLRPC when you do not use multiple UOMs or multiple locations.
closesodoo/odoo#95321
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Remove most values uselessly specified because giving the same value as
the default one (see _DEFAULT_MANIFEST in odoo/modules/module.py)
* auto_install is Falsy by default
* author is Odoo SA by default
* summary & description are empty strings by default
* application is False by default
* test, demo, depends and data are empty lists by default
This will reduce noise/inconsistencies between manifests specifications,
simplify analysis of manifests content, ...
closesodoo/odoo#90209
Related: odoo/enterprise#26807
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
This feature supports the use case of:
- a customer receives a delivery from you.
- there is a defective product in the delivery
- they schedule a repair (RO) + return (picking) for the product
We want to ease the creation/management of the repair order associated
with the return, therefore the following features are added:
- Create links between ROs and return pickings (smart button in return
of all repairs associated with it + field in RO)
- Option (requires active setting) to create RO(s) directly from a
return picking
Implementation notes:
- Because return picking type doesn't have its own "Type of Operation"
(it is 'code'='incoming'), we default to only incoming picking types
that have at least 1 other picking type it is the
'return_picking_type_id' of.
- Originally a Wizard for choosing which/how many products should have
ROs created for them was designed (i.e. to match return wizard + to
multi-create ROs), but this was determined to be too complicated due
to SN/lot selection. Instead simple approach of creating a single RO
each time button is pushed was implemented to match the helpdesk >
repair button workflow.
- ROs are purposely allowed for 'draft' and 'cancelled' returns/moves to
support different types of workflows (e.g. RO is confirmed before
return is)
closesodoo/odoo#85157
Task: 2732517
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
The contact widget supports displaying VAT but it was added manually in the reports after contact. This commit fixes this behavior and results in fewer code and an easier way for the l10n modules which may modify VAT display.
closesodoo/odoo#83733
Related: odoo/enterprise#25195
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Reduces load_menus answer size by 32% (between 20kb and 200kb savings
for the initial loading of the backend, depending on the number of apps
installed). Support for SVG icons in the web client for menus/apps.
Reduced PNG icons for apps list (8 bits PNG instead of 24 as our icons
don't need more colors as they are flat designs)
closesodoo/odoo#84280
Related: odoo/enterprise#24200
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
The possible index names have been renamed "btree", "btree_not_null"
(instead of "not null") and "trigram" (instead of "gin").
Task 2742526
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83274
Three supported types:
- btree (default for index=True)
- btree not null (when >90% of the data are null)
- gin trigram search (for char fields)
Review of indexes on all objects.
closesodoo/odoo#83015
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Suppose a tracked-by-usn and consumed product returns in the stock
thanks to a repair order. Using again this component in a new
manufacturing order will raise an error
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Storage Locations"
2. Create two products P_finished, P_compo
- Storable
- P_comp tracked by USN
3. Update the quantity of P_compo:
- WH/Stock: 1 x Lot01
4. Create a manufacturing order MO:
- Product: P_finished
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo
5. Confirm, Check availability and Mark MO as Done
- (Lot01 should be consumed)
6. Create a repair order RO:
- Product: P_finished
- Parts:
- Type: Remove
- Product: P_compo
- Lot: Lot01
- Destination Location: WH/Stock
7. Confirm RO, Start RO, End RO
- (There should be one Lot01 available in stock)
8. Repeat 4-5
Error: When checking the availability on the MO, Lot01 is correctly
reserved. However, when marking the second MO as done, a User Error is
displayed: "The serial number Lot01 used for component P_compo has
already been consumed" although this lot should be available
When checking the uniqueness of the lot, nothing includes the products
back in stock thanks to the repair orders.
OPW-2701668
closesodoo/odoo#82544
X-original-commit: 3d9355f90fa1dd9436f1745c515c89947ed04de0
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
* Do not rely on context, everything should be cleary specified through
parameters
Catch context keys in an unique targeted place to improve code clarity
* Drop strange old API
* do not provide unused partner parameter anymore
* do not provide products, qty as a list of tuple, we only request the
same qty for all products anyway
* Clear methods, add/adapt comments and docstrings
* Reduce potential side-effects of context content.
This commit rename product_uom_qty into reserved_uom_qty and product_qty
into reserved_qty on stock move line to stop mistake them with the stock
move quantities fields.
Task: 2648449
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80434
RATIONALE
Currently we can specify email used for notification layouting through context
use in mail composer. It is then propagated to message_post, stored on
mail.message and used to encapsulate emails sent based on posted messages.
SPECIFICATIONS
Get rid of context usage (``custom_layout``) and use a real field on composer
model: ``email_layout_xmlid``. Use now a default value coming from context
(default_email_layout_xmlid) instead of custom_layout.
Support old context key in composer for backward compatibility, working like
a default value for the field itself.
Task-2621326 (Mail: add 'view' button in 'light notification template')
Task-2647302 (Mail: add layout field in composer)
UPG odoo/upgrade#2829
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76418
This reverts commit 3b3a47f0d3414ae5bee159f6ec4644e64441040f.
task-2667207
closesodoo/odoo#79333
X-original-commit: 09cb77ebf6915e6a98bc3d36869b71f5b495d878
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Steps to follow
- Enable group_show_line_subtotals_tax_included
- Create a repair order and add a tax to a line
-> The subtotal doesn't contain the tax amount
opw-2513287
closesodoo/odoo#78631
X-original-commit: 133888a1859d81a252177b58b046b54d22ba5ca8
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Hubert Van De Walle <hubvd@users.noreply.github.com>
When find a location_id for repair.line, we didn't restrict the location
to have same company_id with the repair.order. Add it.
closesodoo/odoo#78350
X-original-commit: dff911a1b006a542bf9b082c76910a2d8346fef1
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit fixes two issues
* better handle void partner_id;
* get back ``object.origin`` that was removed when converting into QWeb
at odoo/odoo@0a180d04b0
Task-2657930
closesodoo/odoo#77451
X-original-commit: 3b3a47f0d3414ae5bee159f6ec4644e64441040f
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Jinja as a templating engine was problematic in differents respect:
- introduce external dependency to Odoo (less controll)
- add another templating mechanism in the stack
- specific feature in qweb cannot be reused
- difficulty in rendering easily editable templates
- more knowledge required with no betterment
By replacing jinja with qweb we can now build tools to edit a qweb
that will work with the previously jinja encoded document
(essentially `mail.template` records).
There is a catch however. Some email fields (eg. email_to) used jinja
syntax for rendering dynamic variables (ie. ${object.something} and
${object.something_that_should_not_be_escaped | safe}).
We still want user to use dynamic variables for some char fields (eg.
subject, from, to, ...). We made a new rendering engine called
"inline_template" that will render an expression enclosed by `{{` and
`}}`.
To be able to edit the templates from the backend interface, a
plugin to the Odoo editor has been made for seamlessly edit the
document.
This qweb plugin includes:
- make dynamic variables (eg. `<t t-out="variable"/>`) not editable
(for preventing the user to shoot himself in the foot)
- group and hide related logical branching (ie. t-if, t-elif, and t-else)
in order to see only one at once
- a floating select input to switch visibility of a particular logical
branching
Task-27033
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@68182baff4
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77377
Before this commit, User was allowed to delete repair order which
is linked to posted invoice by moving it to Draft.
With this commit, user is not allowed to delete repair order linked to
a posted Invoice.
closesodoo/odoo#75109
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Followup of odoo/odoo@cb4f597410 and odoo/enterprise@971f3ed9ae
We have converted string into markup string in repair as we cannot concatenate
strings directly to Markup string. And if we try to do it we will see the
html elements '<br/>' in field value, so we have to convert '<br/>' string
into markup language to avoid this.
Also avoid adding pseudo-void html content in narration.
LINKS
Task Id-2558824
PR odoo/odoo#74795
PR odoo/enterprise#20117
niyasraphy