install purchase_requisition module, and create an RFQ in db, check the alternatives tab in the notebook, currently the button Create Alternatives will not be visible unless user click the save button manually. button no longer needs to be hidden when creating a new PO since v16 added in the auto-save feature
closesodoo/odoo#107733
X-original-commit: a6a830e89c724f993b930442573d8d0c4e692b07
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Previous commit 0501bbd62e made it so
the `product_uom_id` for the `line_ids` of a purchase.requsition (i.e. a
blanket order) were no longer being saved when the UoM setting is not
active. This would cause an error to occur when the "New Quotation"
button is pushed because the missing uom is expected by purchase
_onchange_requisition_id.
Steps to reproduce:
- Have UoM setting NOT active
- Create a blanket order for any product/vendor
- Confirm the blanket order
- Click on "New Quotation"
Expected Behavior:
New RFQ created
Actual Behavior:
Stacktrace
We also properly restrict the product_uom_id in the form view of the
line_ids to when the uom setting is active.
closesodoo/odoo#104900
X-original-commit: e90200a7b927ecccb8d4d6f31e3ddecba24d0b6d
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
The `analytic_distribution` field is a Json.
It was stored temporarily as a char.
Search is not available yet, so we do queries by hand when we need to search on keys.
Also added a constraint on account_analytic_distribution_model,
so we don't have models with accounts specific to a company when the model has no company or another company.
It would cause an issue when looking at the models from another company.
X-original-commit: 7064c95aa04e5138bb12ae97acfee04ebb67cc0e
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103097
Add choices for the business domain on applicability rules, so rules are more precise
Also put 'general' as domain from the view when it's what should have been.
Make analytic field visible since owl migration (for sale and purchase)
closesodoo/odoo#102461
X-original-commit: c5867d5009a7fb448fff1be487b9e9c3e7945d4b
Related: odoo/enterprise#32421
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Wala Gauthier (gawa) <gawa@odoo.com>
Adapt to the new css grid for groups. Without this, the values in the
`<p>` are squished into a small fraction of their columns.
Part of task-2985735
X-original-commit: 8544fd84916153ffe903a639f3b88b2e83554337
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102495
For original specs, see [1].
Some performance changes: the best price/date/unit price fields are now
loaded by JS instead of passed via action context (allows for easier/
consistent reuse of view + now we can refresh without undoing any state
changes due to buttons being pushed).
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f533e40f0e3f1cd34f1047b70dfdf95837d84501closesodoo/odoo#101502
X-original-commit: 41ae508c2e6fc3c40b29b1bfc4b5dd7c4440a719
Signed-off-by: Antony Lesuisse <al@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to get rid of the analytic tags as they were confusing, serving tag purposes as well as distribution on analytic accounts.
Everywhere analytic tags were used as a distribution have been replaced with a new widget that will dispatch distribution on analytic accounts. If there was an analytic account field next to the tags, it has been included in the distribution.
Analytic tags that were used simply as information tags have been removed.
To fill the new widget, there are now 2 kind of rules that will help fill and prefill it.
The first are applicability: previous groups have been removed, and have by replaced by plans. Each account is required to have a plan. These plans define when they are available in the widget: a default applicability per plan and applicability lines that can specify rules following the context of the widget.
The second one are distribution models, that will replace previous default rules but follow the same principles. The accounts (and so the plans) that will be given by the distribution model can override the applicability rules from before.
closesodoo/odoo#98914
Related: odoo/upgrade#3885
Related: odoo/enterprise#30743
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
This revision is to make uniform the behavior of the `groups` attribute
on the Python model fields
and on the node in the view architecture.
In both cases, remove the node from the view completely.
Before this revision,
in a back-end view:
- In the Python model, if a field has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the field is removed, completely, from the view.
- In the view architecture, if a node has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the node is made invisible (not completely removed, just
made invisible).
in a front-end view:
- if a node has a "groups" or "t-groups" set and the user
is not part of the groups, the node is removed from the view.
So it's 2/3 cases removing nodes restricted to a group.
and 1/3 case making invisible nodes restricted to a group.
It's simpler to have a uniform behavior for the 3 cases,
simpler to understandard for developers.
In addition, this will help for the goal to cache back-end views.
It makes possible to convert views using the `groups_id` field
by moving the content of these views directly
in the view to which they add content which is suppose to be completely
removed when the user has not the according group.
By getting rid of the `groups_id` many2many field on `ir.ui.view`,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the `groups_id` groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
closesodoo/odoo#95729
Related: odoo/enterprise#29592
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Previously the "call to tender" flow involved creating a
`purchase.requisition` record, creating each RFQ via that record, and
then manually going through each RFQ to compare the prices/dates/etc.
By linking the "call to tender" POs within the POs, we remove an
unnecessary `purchase.requestion` record and makes it easier to track
which RFQs are related to each other as an Alternative RFQ.
On top of this, we add some comparision features to make it easier to
determine the best RFQ, specificially the ability to compare PO lines in
the same view with some visual aids (best price/date colored green +
buttons to check these lines to make them easier to view). We also add
an extra feature to set the qty of selected/non-chosen PO lines to 0 to
aid in the RFQ selection process (only applies to non-confirmed/done/
cancelled POs).
Some other features included with this:
- option to cancel alternative POs when confirming one, which purposely
does not cancel ones that have already been confirmed/completed.
- new wizard for creating alternative POs so user can select whether or
not they want to copy the products/qtys from the original PO.
Important Notes:
- JS Customizations:
- custom many2many widget added so user:
- can click between alternative POs in same window + keep breadcrumb.
This is because all alt POs are interconnected and long breadcrumb
chain is possible (+ we want to avoid windows within windows.) It
is expected that user will be aware that unsaved changes will
auto-save when alt PO is clicked on.
- cannot unlink a PO from itself (this is automagically done during
the write) since this will remove all of its linked POs and might
confuse users.
- custom view js for Comparing Order Lines to help highlight best
options, including ensuring that the best options are still
highlighted after clicking on Choose/Clear buttons (since the best
option can change afterwards, we recalc + update via RPC)
- General implementation warnings:
- Anytime any button/alternative PO is clicked on within a PO, the
form will auto-save. This is due to how the current action service
handles changing views.
- POs created via "Create Alternative" button purposely:
- require a vendor to ensure correct lead times/prices
- show all vendor/product warnings in wizard because we cannot
reproduce the pop-up warning that would occur in the PO when
they are selected. We also purposely block the PO creation when a
blocking warning is set since we cannot remove the values
(especially in the case of a blocking vendor message) from a
newly created PO.
- Technical purchase.order.group model created to help with difficult
management of complicated behaviors:
- unlink from self if a PO is no longer linked to any other POs
- linkages must be symmetric (i.e. linkage PO1 => PO2 must
reflect PO2 => PO1 in their form views)
- don't lose existing linkages (i.e. PO1 => PO2 and PO2 => PO3
should auto-link PO1 => PO3)
These last two behaviors are difficult to do without grouping due to
possibility of remove and adding linkages at the same time. To avoid
complex code to ensure these complexities hold when when creating a
new PO, linkaging to alternatives is not allowed when PO is not yet
saved as a record.
Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586closesodoo/odoo#87656
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
This commit removes the call for tender feature via a
purchase.requisition. This feature is to be replaced with the ability to
directly compare prices/options of POs/RFQs within a PO to remove extra
steps to compare them. The linkage between POs previously provided by a
purchase.requistion is replaced by the POs being directly linked to each
other. Feature to auto-create call to tenders via a product option is
removed and the user is expected to know/be responsible for when they
should do a call to tender themselves.
All references to old Call to Tenders replaced with Blanket Order, and
we remove/rename the menu items since Blanket Order is now the only
purchase.requisition.type option (we expect minimal customizated types).
Follow-on refactoring to switch purchase.requisition to
purchase.blanket.order to come later. Follow-on refactoring to switch
purchase.requisition to purchase.blanket.order to come later.
Part of Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87656
Schedule date was hide in the view for a back to basic task in order to
simplify the view.
But it was at the time, the optional parameter did not exist, we could
readd it under the hide option
opw-2842963
closesodoo/odoo#90790
X-original-commit: b21a960ca925ea03e32d71c5d69098f98dfde239
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Some html field are not in their ideal style.
As the style for html fields is now dependent of
where you are in the xml view ( in group or not),
we have to adapt some views and flags some fields
to ensure they have the correct look.
This change is only be a visual enhancement
and should not prevent the function of said html fields
even if the views are not updated.
task-2637488
# Conflicts:
# addons/mail/wizard/mail_compose_message_views.xml
# addons/website_slides/views/slide_channel_views.xml
# Conflicts:
# addons/sale/views/sale_views.xml
closesodoo/odoo#83792
Related: odoo/enterprise#23911
Signed-off-by: Antoine Guenet <age@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Geelen Sébastien (sge) <sge@odoo.com>
Before this commit, suppose we have a scenario like below
Task-A:
Activity-1:
name: Email ( Today )
Assigned to: User-1
Task-B:
Activity-1:
name: Email ( Today )
assigned to: User-2
Activity-2:
name: Call ( Due in 3 Days )
assigned to: User-1
When User-1 goes through the systray 'Today' filter shortcut he gets both
Task-A and Task-B in the list instead of only Task-A. Indeed currently
activities are not filtered based on current user with its deadlines.
However purpose of systray is to indicate activities current user has to
perform instead of global activities.
After this commit activities will be filtered based on deadlines as well as the
current user. In order to achieve this behavior we needed to pass a domain like
[
('activity_ids.date_deadline','=', fields.Date.today()),
('activity_ids.user_id','=', 1)
]
And for that purpose we introduced a non-stored compute field with a search
method.
Task ID-2438822
COM PR odoo/odoo#72219
X-original-commit: f4eaf4d8fb2f97240201104dcd4fc7e2674bce02
* account, analytic, calendar, coupon, crm, crm_iap_lead_website,
delivery, digest, event, event_crm, fleet, gamification, hr,
hr_expense, hr_skills, im_livechat, lunch, mail, maintenance,
mass_mailing, membership, mrp, point_of_sale, pos_mercury, product,
purchase, purchase_requisition, sale_management, sales_team, sms,
stock, stock_landed_costs, survey, website_crm_partner_assign,
website_event_exhibitor, website_event_track, website_forum,
website_slides, base
This commit removes oe_edit_only labels and adds placeholder
on fields in form views from a lot of apps to minimize the
shift when switching mode.
task 2330101
Related fields are by default readonly and they should be when it
is possible. A editable related field will write on the related
model and will cause extra unwanted write of data. These unwanted write
can cause performance issues in some case (see odoo/odoo#63865).
Then remove the `readonly=False` of some related fields
(where it is useless):
- In 'mrp.workorder' (mrp): `working_state` and `production_date`
should be readonly.
- In 'purchase.order' (purchase): `product_id` should be readonly.
- In 'purchase.order.line' (purchase): `state` should be readonly.
- In 'product.supplierinfo' (purchase_requisition):
`purchase_requisition_id` should be readonly.
- In 'purchase.requisition' (purchase_requisition):
`product_id` should be readonly.
- In 'product.template' (stock):
`route_from_categ_ids` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.move.line' (stock):
`is_initial_demand_editable` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.move' (stock):
`product_tmpl_id` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.production.lot' (stock):
`product_uom_id` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.quant' (stock):
`product_tmpl_id` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.rule' (stock):
`route_sequence` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.change.product.qty' (stock):
`product_variant_count` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.return.picking.line' (stock):
`uom_id` should be readonly and also because it
is forced by `_prepare_stock_return_picking_line_vals_from_move`,
it should be related to the product uom not the one on the move.
task-2424248
And other reported English mistakes in source string
Courtesy of Transifex translators
And remove leftover from gengo
closesodoo/odoo#59022
X-original-commit: 26efc84c5cac47a2cc83d7b084f8b71528fec6c7
Related: odoo/enterprise#13781
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
- Install "purchase_requisition"
- Go to Inventory > Settings and activate "Units of Measure"
- Go to Purchase > Purchase Agreements and create one:
* select a product and remove UOM
- Confirm it and click on "NEW QUOTATION"
An exception occurs with the following message:
"ValueError: Expected singleton: uom.uom()"
"product_uom_id" field of "purchase.requisition.line" model should be required.
opw-2332654
closesodoo/odoo#57313
X-original-commit: 82c727a766f5b7a9554d9766e4eb5c448eae8e31
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <kitan191@users.noreply.github.com>
Followup on ca707502a6
During replacing `partner_id` field in `purchase_requisition` module, widget and context key `show_vat` was not preserved.
With this commit we add missing attributes of the field.
closesodoo/odoo#52383
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
This commit sets attribute sample="1" in a bunch of list and
kanban views, to enable the new sample data feature when views are
empty.
Task 2232801
X-original-commit: 5471309b35619f307242c2704c7681ba63d2be42
This commit is a significant rewriting of client-side discuss, chatter,
chat window, and messaging menu using OWL. The behavior should be broadly
the same, with some slight functional changes here and there.
From a technical standpoint, the code of messaging is mainly organized in 2
main groups of modules:
- models, which are logical entities that depict the client-side state of
messaging as a whole.
- components, which are in charge of displaying information from models.
This refactoring also introduces new JS guidelines regarding folder structure
(/static) and naming rules for JS modules.
Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/39023
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/6249
Task-1914207
This PR is a collaborative work by Alexandre, Julien, Sébastien and Xavier,
with the precious help of Lucas to speed it up towards the end.
closesodoo/odoo#39023
Related: odoo/enterprise#6249
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Giannone <jgi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dubuc <xdu@odoo.com>
This commit adapts several views to make them use newly defined
widgets, the new decoration-xxx mechanism on fields, and to adapt
them to the new design of buttons.
used following widgets and designs -
1) decoration-bf
2) many2one_avatar_user widget
3) badge widget
Task-2248231
closesodoo/odoo#51074
Related: odoo/enterprise#10528
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
The following task implemented new widgets/features in the listview for better UI.
https://www.odoo.com/web#id=2195254&action=327&model=project.task&view_type=form&cids=1&menu_id=4720
The goal of the current task is to use those to upgrade our listviews
Specification
=============
Below are change requests on various listviews.
Remove decoration-bf="message_needaction==True" from every listview in every module.
PRODUCT - stock.view_stock_product_template_tree (product template)
remove all decorations from <tree>
set the following decorations on 'virtual_available' and 'qty_available'
decoration-danger="virtual_available<0"
decoration-warning="virtual_available==0"
also set decoration-bf on 'virtual_available'
apply the same modifications on stock.view_stock_product_tree for product variants
SUBSCRIPTION - sale_subscription.sale_subscription_view_list
remove all decorations from <tree>
'stage_id' field
set <field name="stage_id" widget="badge" decoration-info="stage_category == 'draft'" decoration-success="stage_category == 'progress'"/>
'recurring_next_date' field
set <field name="recurring_next_date" string="Next Invoice" widget="remaining_days" attrs="{'invisible': [('stage_category', '!=', 'progress')]}"/>
set decoration-bf on 'code' and 'recurring_total_incl'
move 'percentage_satisfaction' before 'recurring_total_incl'
set widget="many2one_avatar_user" on 'user_id'
add <field name="activity_ids" widget="list_activity"/> after 'user_id'
ELEARNING - website_slides.slide_channel_view_tree
set widget="many2one_avatar_user" on 'user_id'
'enroll' field
set <field name="enroll" widget="badge" decoration-success="enroll == 'public'" decoration-info="enroll == 'invite'" decoration-warning="enroll == 'payment'"/>
POS - point_of_sale.view_pos_order_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
make visible and move it at the end of the view
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-success="state not in ('draft','cancel')"/>
set decoration-bf on 'name'
APPRAISAL - hr_appraisal.view_hr_appraisal_tree
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state in ('new','pending')" decoration-success="state == 'done'"/>
'date_close' field
set <field name="date_close" widget="remaining_days" attrs="{'invisible': ['|',('state','=','done'),('state','=','cancel')]}"/>
PAYMENT - account.view_account_payment_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-success="state == 'posted'"/>
move 'company_id' before 'amount'
CONTRACT - hr_contract.hr_contract_view_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-warning="state == 'close'" decoration-success="state == 'open'"/>
set widget="many2one_avatar_employee" on 'employee_id'
PAYSLIPS - hr_payroll.view_hr_payslip_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-warning="state == 'verify'" decoration-success="state in ('done','paid')"/>
set decoration-bf on 'number' and 'net_wage'
move 'company_id' before 'basic_wage'
set widget="many2one_avatar_employee" on 'employee_id'
SURVEY - survey.survey_tree
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-success="state == 'open'"/>
APPLICATION - hr_recruitment.crm_case_tree_view_job
set widget="date' on 'create_date'
set widget="priority' on 'priority'
set widget="many2one_avatar_user" on 'user_id'
TIME OFF - hr_holidays.hr_leave_view_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-warning="state in ('confirm','validate1')" decoration-success="state == 'validate'"/>
apply the same changes in hr_holidays.hr_leave_allocation_view_tree
closesodoo/odoo#51305
Taskid: 2256589
Related: odoo/enterprise#10614
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The purpose of task is to update the 'user/employee avatar' to the new
widget in all the kanban view across all modules.
The below new widget are introduced for avatar:
- many2one_avatar_user (for user_id fields)
- many2one_avatar_employee (for employee_id fields)
which displays the avatar (i.e. picture) of a user/employee in front
of his name and clicking on the avatar will open a chatbox to message
that specific user/employee.
So in this commit, For each kanban view with a user or employee avatar,
replaced it by the field with the new 'many2one_avatar' widget.
TaskID: 2244928
Related Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/10420
closes odoo/odoo#50789
Closes: #50789
Related: odoo/enterprise#10420
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Impacted modules: account_analytic_default, crm, event,
hr_recruitment, maintenance, mass_mailing, project,
purchase_requisition, stock_picking_batch, website_slides
The default image displayed when the record is unassigned is
confusing, so we are removing it.
FP request
Task 2234524
closesodoo/odoo#49333
Related: odoo/enterprise#9834
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Several improvements in order to improve user interface are done here.
[IMP] purchase: Prevent create PO&RFQ in calendar
It was possible to create PO's and RFQ's from the calendar view.
The Product Owner wanted to prevent the users from doing so.
[IMP] purchase: Add tooltip to Receipt Date
[FIX] purchase: Align report & stat button data on product form
The use of Last 365 days time_range in the purchase analysis was automatically
excluding today's purchases wich was confusing users as the stat button info
was taking those into account.
Different behaviours were implemented for product template and product product
in the filters that were used which makes no sense.
Use of context_today() instead of datetime.now() in order to take the user's
timezone into account.
[IMP] purchase: Use relevant dates for RFQ's and PO's in calendar view
The date used in order to display RFQs and POs in the calendar was date_planned
which is not mandatory and so not always filled. It has been decided to use the
order_date for the RFQ's and date_approve for PO's.
[IMP] purchase_requisition: Making Agreement selection type more explicit
[IMP] purchase: Show UOM menu only if installed
[IMP] purchase: Add product variant in settings
[IMP] purchase: Remove Favorites predefined filters
[IMP] purchase: Rephrase PO action helper
[IMP] purchase: Allow open/edit Agreement Type
[IMP] purchase: Rephrase RFQ action helper
[IMP] purchase: Remove PO's and RFQ's name from fields in calendar
The Product Owner originally wanted to have a link on the PO name field
that was shown in the calendat popover. As the Edit button already allows
to edit the PO's or RFQ's from the popover it was decided to simply remove
the field (as it was already displayed at the top of the popover)
[IMP] purchase: Open the right view when click on Reporting top menu
Task ID #2196688Closes#47810
Related: odoo/enterprise#9294
Related: odoo/upgrade#961
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Commit abef168389 adds the fields
'product_description_variant' on mrp.production and purchase.requisition
models. This text is taken from the product variant.
This commit make them invisible in case they are empty.
closesodoo/odoo#47716
Related: odoo/upgrade#948
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Purpose of this task is to prevent users from setting portal users on
internal documents by mistake, and preventing noise and performance
issues resulting from loading all the portal users in those fields.
This commit fixes internal many2x fields to res.users which are now
restricted to internal users by setting domain (share=false) on form view.
closesodoo/odoo#47553
Taskid: 2172779
Related: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/9204
Related: odoo/enterprise#9204
Closes: #47553
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Followup on c058562d73
Before this commit, Domain for `purchase_ok` on the field `product_id` was applied on the field level which was Replaced by multi-company domain on views.
With this commit, we combine both domains to Display only `Can be Purchased` products.
closesodoo/odoo#47778
X-original-commit: 842b8a383b7868a89cbd3d81b0065cce37606db4
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
If a view is present multiple times in the same module, the "last
instance" is going to win (by replacing any previous instance's arch
with its own).
Most cases of duplications are probably views which got moved then
either not removed (from the original location) or revived (through a
forward-port), the first instance can just be removed entirely.
For the few which seemed to be more than just trivial mistakes, merge
the two views instead.
closesodoo/odoo#44463
Related: odoo/enterprise#8107
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
1/ When the new database is created without demo data, the admin has a
'silhouette' as a default picture. When a new user is created without
picture given by the current user, the new user will have a 'silhouette'
as a default profile picture.
2/ web: image for fa-user-slash. This image will be used when a record is
unassigned.
3/ web, *: Change placeholder by default when record is unassigned.
We want to have a fa-user-slash icon when a record is unassigned instead
of 'placeholder.png'. A method is created in the BaseModel to have a
generic method to change easily the placeholder for other models.
4/ Adapt kanban test to keep the same behaviour. Attention the behaviour is
a bit different. Because, now the default image is given by the server to
change easily the default image when a record doesn't have an image.
Thus, we don't say if it's the default placeholder, but we can say it's
not the same image of the record (in this test, the record, it's the
partner).
5/ misc: display 'Unassigned' in the hover on kanban cards if record is unassigned
closesodoo/odoo#41356
Taskid: 2060206
Related: odoo/enterprise#7758
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: jdoutreloux <jud@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Yannick Tivisse <yti@odoo.com>
Previously, when grouped by state, user was able to drag
and drop kanban boxes to alter the state of an unbuild, a
purchase requistion or work order. However the state should
be readlonly and could only be modify via public methods on
those objects. Those methods do additional required stuff than
just modifying the state.
task-2087309
closesodoo/odoo#40759
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
* use an editable tree to edit the supplier info
* keep the original forms because they're used in the "vendor pricelist"
menuitem
* updated tour
* change the position of requisition_id
Task-2029380
closesodoo/odoo#35972
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
*: account
crm
event
fleet
hr_expense
hr_holidays
hr_recruitment
mail
maintenance
mrp
note
project
purchase_requisition
repair
stock_landed_costs
stock_picking_batch
survey
website_event_track
This commit is making sure that the exception activities filters are
only defined where it make sense (i.e. where the system can actually
create an exception activity).
We have therefore removed 'exception activities' filters where the
system won't be creating any.
Task-2056425
closes odoo/odoo#36027
Closes: #36027
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
There are too many image sizes. Since they are stored resized this takes time to
generate when saving a new image, it's more rows on the attachment table, more
files on the disk, ...
64px is close enough to 128px that it can be removed without a big impact on
download size.
It will even reduce download and number of requests when both images are
displayed because now only one has to be downloaded and then benefit from cache.
The difference between the two is typically around 1.5kB which is negligible
these days, especially when the request overhead is around 0.5kB already, not
even taking into account other factors such as latency.
If a 64px image must absolutely be returned, it is still possible to pass the
size parameters to the image route. But the current guideline is to handle
resizing in the views when necessary.
Views
=====
- remove width and height attributes when existing CSS rules are overriding them
(eg. `.oe_kanban_avatar` in the right context)
- add CSS rules instead of width and height attributes when possible
- use `object-fit: cover;` where width and height are forced to avoid distortion
of non-square images
- for products, use `object-fit: contain;` instead, keep ratio but without crop
- add new CSS rules where the expected size was max 64px*64px before due to the
image size itself
- remove `img-fluid` where using size classes to avoid conflicting rules
task-2060865
closesodoo/odoo#36147
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
When the many2xxx field relates to a model where company_id is required, set
this domain [('company_id','=',company_id.id)]
When the company_id field of the related model is not required, set this domain
['|',('company_id','=',company_id.id),('company_id','=',False)]
When setting the domain on a field which is in the treeview of a xxx2many field
evaluate against the company_id of the 'parent'.
Some constraints have been added on sereval models. Take a look at the complete
specification for more details.
TaskID: 2024446
Closes: #35266
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The new visual indicator for exception activities has been added on all
corresponding kanban and list views.
A new filter "Exception Activities" has also been added in the
corresponding search views.
Task 1889379
closesodoo/odoo#31839
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
All activity filters are now invisible in the corresponding search views.
These filters were only used by activity redirection (when clicking on
the activity item in the systray) so we hide them to reduce the noise
for the user.
"My Activity" filter has also been removed, its corresponding domain is
now directly set in the action where it was used.
Task 2036392
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
niyasraphy