Activate Product variants and create a new products with attributes Legs, Size and color.
Now enable Variant Grid Entry and Purchase Agreements from purchase settings and now create a Blanket Order from Purchase -> Orders -> Blanket Orders with any products from above created variants.
Confirm the created blanked order and click on New Quotation, now a new RFQ will be created, and click on add an item button and select the product we have created before, now Choose Product Variants matrix will be opened. Enter some random quantities in multiple lines and click on confirm button.
Exception will be raised
closesodoo/odoo#106572
X-original-commit: ca94ace181675b6e150c0f7486de9495198dc8e8
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a product with both MTO and Buy routes.
- Create a Sale Order containing this product.
- On the created PO, go to Alternatives -> Create Alternative and select
another vendor.
- Go back to the original Sale Order
- Click on the linked Purchase Order
- Go to Alternatives -> Compare Product Lines
When doing this, the `active_id` in the context is the id of the Sale
Order, which raises an issue in the renderer for this list as it's using
the active_id as if it was the Purchase Order.
closesodoo/odoo#106481
X-original-commit: 1b904ece76f55f8e416d868256720f41cba8ceb1
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Wolfs (quwo) <quwo@odoo.com>
the context passed to the method _get_product_purchase_description for the seller_id is wrong. system is expecting to get product.supplierinfo record set in this context key and from this function res.partner record set is passed, which results in the below error:
Record does not exist or has been deleted.
(Record: product.supplierinfo(70,), User: 2)
closesodoo/odoo#105998
X-original-commit: 6e7f778e1d0dbe4795fa9446bfd3542ecec9815c
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
For original specs, see [1].
Some performance changes: the best price/date/unit price fields are now
loaded by JS instead of passed via action context (allows for easier/
consistent reuse of view + now we can refresh without undoing any state
changes due to buttons being pushed).
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f533e40f0e3f1cd34f1047b70dfdf95837d84501closesodoo/odoo#101502
X-original-commit: 41ae508c2e6fc3c40b29b1bfc4b5dd7c4440a719
Signed-off-by: Antony Lesuisse <al@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
In order to post on a document, ``message_post_with_view`` should be called
on a singleton recordset. Otherwise it is done as a mass mailing which is
not really what is expected here.
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean MailThread API)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#100137
Previously the "call to tender" flow involved creating a
`purchase.requisition` record, creating each RFQ via that record, and
then manually going through each RFQ to compare the prices/dates/etc.
By linking the "call to tender" POs within the POs, we remove an
unnecessary `purchase.requestion` record and makes it easier to track
which RFQs are related to each other as an Alternative RFQ.
On top of this, we add some comparision features to make it easier to
determine the best RFQ, specificially the ability to compare PO lines in
the same view with some visual aids (best price/date colored green +
buttons to check these lines to make them easier to view). We also add
an extra feature to set the qty of selected/non-chosen PO lines to 0 to
aid in the RFQ selection process (only applies to non-confirmed/done/
cancelled POs).
Some other features included with this:
- option to cancel alternative POs when confirming one, which purposely
does not cancel ones that have already been confirmed/completed.
- new wizard for creating alternative POs so user can select whether or
not they want to copy the products/qtys from the original PO.
Important Notes:
- JS Customizations:
- custom many2many widget added so user:
- can click between alternative POs in same window + keep breadcrumb.
This is because all alt POs are interconnected and long breadcrumb
chain is possible (+ we want to avoid windows within windows.) It
is expected that user will be aware that unsaved changes will
auto-save when alt PO is clicked on.
- cannot unlink a PO from itself (this is automagically done during
the write) since this will remove all of its linked POs and might
confuse users.
- custom view js for Comparing Order Lines to help highlight best
options, including ensuring that the best options are still
highlighted after clicking on Choose/Clear buttons (since the best
option can change afterwards, we recalc + update via RPC)
- General implementation warnings:
- Anytime any button/alternative PO is clicked on within a PO, the
form will auto-save. This is due to how the current action service
handles changing views.
- POs created via "Create Alternative" button purposely:
- require a vendor to ensure correct lead times/prices
- show all vendor/product warnings in wizard because we cannot
reproduce the pop-up warning that would occur in the PO when
they are selected. We also purposely block the PO creation when a
blocking warning is set since we cannot remove the values
(especially in the case of a blocking vendor message) from a
newly created PO.
- Technical purchase.order.group model created to help with difficult
management of complicated behaviors:
- unlink from self if a PO is no longer linked to any other POs
- linkages must be symmetric (i.e. linkage PO1 => PO2 must
reflect PO2 => PO1 in their form views)
- don't lose existing linkages (i.e. PO1 => PO2 and PO2 => PO3
should auto-link PO1 => PO3)
These last two behaviors are difficult to do without grouping due to
possibility of remove and adding linkages at the same time. To avoid
complex code to ensure these complexities hold when when creating a
new PO, linkaging to alternatives is not allowed when PO is not yet
saved as a record.
Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586closesodoo/odoo#87656
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Instead of having to repeatedly manually call `onchange_quantity` at
different points in the code, it is better to have it be computed
instead.
- Logic is left unchanged,
- onchange calls from other methods are removed, and
- tests are adjusted to properly handle compute. I.e. remove
'date_planned': datetime.today().strftime(DEFAULT_SERVER_DATETIME_FORMAT)
from when PO lines are created since this sometimes resulted in
inconsistent date_planned values for PO line and the PO date_order
(by 1 sec), which could lead to inconsistently created 'date_deadline'
values for stock_moves' created by PO line qty changes. Issue
previously didn't exist because onchange was not always called.
Part of Task: 2695116 (to avoid adding more onchange calls for new
feature)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87656
Steps to reproduce the bug:
1. Activate the 2 language “’English’ , ‘Spanish (AR) / Español (AR)’ ”
2. User -> select the language ‘Spanish (AR) / Español (AR)’
3. Create a new product (Test Product).
4. Create a another product using “Duplicate” function.
5. Rename new product name(Test Product -1)
6. Translate the name ( “Spanish (AR) / Español (AR) : 111 Spanish product “ , “English: English Product” )
7. create a purchase agreement -> select product “111 Spanish product ” -> Save -> confirm -> new quotation.
8. Purchase Quotation -> Order line
Bug:
Description shows “Test Item (copia)”
opw:2582778
closesodoo/odoo#72997
X-original-commit: 947484cd9a082003bfd5b3c2e64d6033b863aa84
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a user with only access rights, Inventory = Administrator, Purchase = user
- Enable feature Purchase order approval in Purchase > Settings
- Agreement Type = Exclusive, lines of Agreement, Quantity of Agreement
- Login as a new created user and navigate to a menu Purchase > Purchase agreement and
create a new Purchase agreement, confirm it
- From the button create two PO (having a total > 5000)
- Cancel one of the PO first and try to approve another one
Bug:
A UserError was riased: You have to cancel or validate every RFQ before closing the purchase requisition.
opw:2368999
closesodoo/odoo#64431
X-original-commit: dfee34b0b9c83beca9aca0b21e7f130ae86c0ee6
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Use correct company to get fiscal positions and properties
Ensure company used to fetch fiscal positions is always the correct one
when coming from a company restricted model (company_id required, or
related.required).
NB: if the company_id isn't defined, with_company doesn't change the
environment.
purchase: get_fiscal_position doesn't consider company_id ctxt key
others: properties were accessed with potentially the wrong company.
Use correct company to get fiscal positions and properties
Ensure company used to fetch fiscal positions is always the correct one
when coming from a company restricted model (company_id required, or
related.required).
purchase: get_fiscal_position doesn't consider company_id ctxt key
others: properties were accessed with potentially the wrong company.
Pre-filter lines based on known products.
Closes#36854
opw-2074824
closesodoo/odoo#37383
X-commit: bd3997b79a075a24afce749474fc32b43ac8c03f
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
When .with_context() is called with a dictionary as 1st positional
argument, it will replace context (and not modify the referenced keys)
It may create bugs when losing the content of the context (e.g. remove
partner's language)
This is a cherry-pick to saas-12.5 of odoo/odoo#36164 of the logistic
part as discussed
closesodoo/odoo#36690
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
This commit simply move code into the right file.
The goal is here to fit the guidelines and prepare
the module for some changes. This will ease the
reading of module code.
Task-1851286
closesodoo/odoo#28795
The purpose of this commit is to make requisition usable with only services. Stock part is extracted in a new module `purchase_requisition_stock` which allows to create requisition based on product availbility or demand, also
we have moved all security access related stock in this bridge module.
Task ID : 1851286
niyasraphy