Steps to reproduce:
- create a subcontracted product (i.e. create subcontract BoM)
- create and confirm PO for subcontracted product (qty > 1)
- try to decrease PO qty for subcontracted product
Expected Result:
Since receipt is not yet validated, the qty in the receipt should
decrease (it will in the subcontract MO as well, but this doesn't matter
since no one should work directly with the MO)
Actual Result:
A validation error occurs saying the qty to produce must be non-negative
We allow neg demand qtys to be proprogated from SOs and POs since
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/76752 . While we added in a check to
make sure MOs are not created when a neg qty change is proprogated, we
forgot to add a check for subcontracted created MOs, hence the
validation error (i.e. the neg qty change is trying to create a
subcontracted MO of a neg amount.)
Task: 2777571 (issue 2 of additional issues)
X-original-commit: 251f146b6ecb0e2d428089669199a6deb3a6c060
Part-of: odoo/odoo#97383
Fixes a few incorrect subcontracting UX behaviors:
- When subcontract BOM is flexible, the record burger should always show
so user can more easily record varying quantities
- When `show_operations=True` then `action_assign_serial` button in
Operations tab should only show if subcontract BOM is NOT strict AND
has no tracked components (instead of always showing regardless of BoM
consumption and its components)
- When a subcontract receipt is backordered, the Done moves should no
longer return `_action_record_components`.
- When 'show_operations=True' for receipts, we shouldn't display the
subcontracting component lines in the Detailed Operations tab
Task: 2777571
X-original-commit: e9b9fe541df984bba33c4f44d48e57820ea4968f
Part-of: odoo/odoo#97383
Usecase to reproduce:
- Install mrp_subcontracting
- Create a user with inventory access but not mrp access
- Validate a receipt for a product
Current behavior:
Access error on `mrp.production`
Expected behavior:
The receipt and the linked subcontracting order are validated
The stock user only receipt the products from the subcontractor so
he doesn't need to know the `mrp.production` behind that's why he
doesn't need access right. However he should be able to validate the
transfer since he receipts the goods. And it should update the quantity
on the subcontractor side by validating the subcontract order, so
we pick the sudo solution.
closesodoo/odoo#90301
X-original-commit: f1660b2254460abe10ce1d0a1fa7639d5c3e2b33
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Adapt db775ffd308638a390be52eba3ca11c9c2d1602d to subcontracting flow,
to avoid performance issues when receiving a large amount of SNs
closesodoo/odoo#85603
Task: 2777451
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
In case of a MRP subcontracting, it is not possible to process the
delivery with several backorders.
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create two products P_compo, P_finished
- Both storable
- P_compo must have the route "Resupply Subcontractor on Order"
2. Update P_compo's quantity: 5
3. Create a BoM:
- Product: P_finished
- BoM type: Subcontracting
- Subcontractors: a partner P
- Components: 1 x P_compo
4. In Inventory, create a planned transfer T:
- Operation Type: Receipt
- Receive From: P
- Operations: 5 x P_finished
5. Mark as Todo
6. Inventory > Resupply Subcontractor, find the delivery of P_compo for
P and process it
7. Back to T, set the done quantity to 1.25
8. Validate T (with backorder)
9. On the backorder BO1, set the done quantity to 1.0
10. Validate BO1 (with backorder)
11. Open the second backorder BO2 and validate it
Error: a Validation Error is displayed "You can not enter negative
quantities.", which doesn't make sense
The issue comes from the inner method `_get_available_move_lines` in
`_action_assign`. When validating a picking, at some point, we are here,
at the beginning of `/mrp_subcontracting._action_done`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6d6b2c41adfa842c82252373b3dbd1ed0a5ebc92/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/stock_picking.py#L36-L37
To understand what happens next, we need to note that, in this method,
the associated MO will be marked as done later (on line 76). Back to the
current line (L37), we are calling `super` which leads to the
problematic `_get_available_move_lines`. Suppose we are on step 10 (we
are validating the first backorder), we have
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/58a9f57c0827a51e46ef0f52a3d48ba343667fe0/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1390-L1391
`move_orig_ids` contains two stock moves, each one associated to one MO.
However, as said above, the second MO is not yet marked as done, this
will be done later on in `/mrp_subcontracting._action_done`. Therefore,
`move_lines_in` is only defined with the first SM, from the first MO,
with a quantity of `1.25`
Further in `_get_available_move_lines`, we have:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/58a9f57c0827a51e46ef0f52a3d48ba343667fe0/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L1403-L1405
`move.move_orig_ids.mapped('move_dest_ids') - move` gives two SM, and
here is the issue: the second one is already processed, so both are kept
in `move_lines_out_done` and the sum of their quantity is equal to
`1.25 + 1 = 2.25`
Therefore, at the end of the method, when computing the difference, it
gives a negative difference. This negative value will be used to create
a SML and later on, it will trigger the validation error.
Once the above issue is fixed, there is another "invisible" issue that
need to be fixed: when generating several backorders on the deliveries,
only the first one will trigger the creation of a new MO. Suppose we are
back in `/mrp_subcontracting._action_done` (still on step 10 in the
above case), in the first for-loop:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6d6b2c41adfa842c82252373b3dbd1ed0a5ebc92/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/stock_picking.py#L39-L43
`move._get_subcontract_production()` returns the two MO (from the
initial picking and from the first backorder). However, since the first
one has already been processed, the if-condition is validated.
Therefore, this for-loop is done and the second MO is not processed (the
quantities are not recorded and its field
`subcontracting_has_been_recorded` is not defined to `True`). As a
result, still in `/mrp_subcontracting._action_done`, we are now in the
second for-loop:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6d6b2c41adfa842c82252373b3dbd1ed0a5ebc92/addons/mrp_subcontracting/models/stock_picking.py#L71-L72
`_subcontracting_filter_to_done` removes the two MOs because the first
one is done and the second one has not its field
`subcontracting_has_been_recorded` set to `True`. The condition in the
first for-loop is not accurate enough.
OPW-2731658
closesodoo/odoo#83658
X-original-commit: 1b740ae148acfc832b124122763817b08ea110ab
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
There is 2 major issues with the production of multiple serials number
- Performance issue
- Duplicated code with classic backorder mechanism
The performance issues exist since backorders were create one by one
and `stock.move` and `stock.move.line` are always recomputed. They
are not created in batch neither.
_generate_backorders is removed and replace by _split_productions. The
functionality are the same. Technicaly it does the maximum in batch,
first it creates all the `mrp.production` then all the `stock.move`
and finaly, it splits the existing `stock.move.line` among the new
`stock.move`
It means that the reservation is not recompute anymore during a
backorder process and will remain the same than the splitted production
order.
Performance metrics (10 components):
| 2 | 10 100 1000
before | 0.47s | 2.84s | 32.25s | 580.53s
-----------------------------------------------
after | 0.13s | 0.36s | 2.60s | 35.17s
task 2633369
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77254
stdout:
stderr:
13:41:03.985365 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git cherry-pick 20858c2a8805d9ec08edb98b090badf6c73fc342
error: Cherry-picking is not possible because you have unmerged files.
hint: Fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>'
hint: as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit.
fatal: cherry-pick failed
----------
status:
closesodoo/odoo#79933
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Take in account the bom consumption of subcontracting BoM:
- In flexible and warning we can now record extra component
(even if there isn't tracked component).
- In the warning case, we get a warning issue in during the recording
of component if we consume more than expected
- In case of script consumption, we cannot record component expected
if some are tracked. In this case we can consume more than expected
only if the user is a mrp manager.
Also fix "Set quantities" Button for the subcontracting
task-2486811
closesodoo/odoo#75041
Related: odoo/enterprise#20350
Related: odoo/upgrade#2750
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Added 'Dropship Subcontractor on Order' route to simplify user interaction
and stay tuned with 'Resupply Subcontractor on Order'.
Task: 2444742
Part-of: odoo/odoo#71732
In subcontracting, there wasn't a way to make
the subcontracting resupply delivery plan before
the subcontracting receipt.
Now the hidden subcontracted MO, take in account
(in his planning) the `produce_delay` (in days) of
the product which is automatically plan the
subcontracting resupply delivery correctly.
task-2486811
closesodoo/odoo#75072
X-original-commit: 829369d3ca0530f1aad0599fbb1598810a928cc3
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this commit, for a subcontracted product with reserved available
tracked components, if at least one component is recorded but not all,
the "Record components" button isn't available anymore.
How to reproduce:
- Create a product and create a subcontracting BOM for this product;
- Add a tracked component for this product;
- Add some qty. for the tracked component in the subcontracting loc.;
- Create a receipt for the subcontracted product (for demand qty. more
than 1) with the subcontractor as partner and confirm it:
=> The "Record components" button should be visible.
- Record a part of the demand qty. then click on "Continue", then on
"Discard":
=> The "Record components" button is now hidden.
It's because the button is hidden if all the MO are done or to close
(they are) and if all the tracked move lines have a SN/LN (they have as
they are reserved).
task-2604728
closesodoo/odoo#73991
X-original-commit: 392bc27c0ef0bc238a7eac98497b293622f0fe1d
Related: odoo/enterprise#19756
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue:
In case of MTO on the component tracked by serial of the subcontracted
MO, if the picking generated by the MTO is complete
before record component on the subcontracted picking, when we
record the component, move lines is duplicated, one for the
reservation (due to the MTO chained move) and a other only with the
quantity done. Then it is painful to register component.
Fixes:
Don't the call of `_set_qty_producing()` when we click on
'Record Component', the user should it self applied the `qty_producing`.
closesodoo/odoo#68151
X-original-commit: e61ae06572db8aa5d1c3ecea754d3be6719eb55b
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Previously, when we find out subcontracted productions of moves, we get
all production_id from the origin moves of the moves. When user use
multple steps manufacturing, moves may also have their move_orig_ids.
In this case, we will consider its production_id as subcontracted
production.
To fix, we filered the moves, consider only move that is_subcontract is
true.
closesodoo/odoo#67101
X-original-commit: 60d799059d60befc976fd0fe5e2c0afec5d3f83b
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang <yhu-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Step to reproduce:
- Create a subcontracting BoM by partner A,
for a tracked product B (by serial or lots)
- Create a incoming transfer coming from A and mark as todo.
- Fill the move with move lines with lot + quantity.
- It is impossible to validate the transfer, "You need to supply lot..."
Also at the creation of the picking a warning popover indicate that
the previous operation (the hidden MO) is set after the transfer.
These issues comes from the refactor of mrp for v14 and the part of
subcontracting wasn't complete obviously.
Fixes done:
- Rewrite the code of the `_action_done` for subcontracting. It is for
the case of tracked finished product without any tracked component,
there wasn't any code to manage that. Now manage it by backorder MO
feature. Fix the main bug
- Set finished_date_planned before the transfer to avoid the alert
popover.
- Avoid to write activity in channel about the hidden MO in case of
cancelling.
- Fix `action_record_components` to manage multiple subcontracting
products with tracked component.
- Remove the `priority` field from the wizard MO (in case of tracked
product. Also the wizard is not really a wizard, just a weird hybrid
MO form)
PR: odoo/odoo#61606
task-2357115
closesodoo/odoo#62109
X-original-commit: 1a34e46eaca14aec981dd0f162e8014c7cb0abea
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
After the odoo/odoo#52949 , the registering of tracked component,
in case of subcontracting, was broken. Fix and try to mimic
the same flow than before. The produce wizard has been replaced
by a clean MO form to register component and use backorder mechanisme
of MO to manage tracked finished product + tracked component.
task-2278147
closesodoo/odoo#54994
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Removed abstract workorder
Removed the integration of expiry wizard in tablet view since it should
be moved in enterprise in the tablet view implementation (not possible
to set consumed lot on workorders on community anymore)
Refactor _set_quantity_done to use ORM command in order to not return a
dict with vals to_create/to_write
task-2241471
Now, by default, a Bill of Material have a flexible
consumption instead of strict consumption. Also
add new consumption choice: a flexible consumption
but with a warning when the bom isn't respected.
Also, now, the strict (a new warning option) consumption
is checked only when we try to mark as done the MO.
task-2241471
When subcontracting a product via a purchase order and not a simple
receipt. Then the cancelation of the receipt will not only cancel
the receipt of the finished product but not the delivery for the
components.
It happens because button_cancel on purchase order will call
_action_cancel the stock.move linked to purchase order line. It will
not call action_cancel on the stock.picking. However the part
responsible for the cancelation of components delivery is in the
stock.picking action_cancel method.
Move the stock.picking action_cancel logic in the stock.move
_action_cancel method since it's always call for both usecase.
Fixes#42551closesodoo/odoo#42653
X-original-commit: 841305f271411c3a67af271ac09da9ce0922f100
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
`action_done`on pickings should be a private method,
and called only trough the picking validation process.
task-1938108
closesodoo/odoo#39174
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
- nothing tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products not tracked and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
- finished products and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
Allow to do a dropshipping with a subcontractor.
If the product uses the routes drophipping and have
a subcontracting BoM. Then a PO for the subcontractors
will genrate a need in the subcontracting location for
the required components.
A module is needed because the picking_type_id for dropshipping
do not have a warehouse_id. The warehouse_id is needed in order to
know from which warehouse the subcontracting components should be
deliver.
If the components have the route resupply subcontractor on order then the
delivery order triggered by the receipt do not have the origin nor the
subcontractor partner. This commit update the procurement group in
order to add those information and propagate it.
Replace the type subcontractor on the partner.
Instead replace it by a property for a subcontracting location.
The purpose is to have a simplier configuration. The user would
just need to add the partner on the BoM in order to start a
subcontracting process.
Currently, the subcontract picking present multiple difficulties:
- The user has to introduce multiple time the lot produced.
In register components button and then create a new move line with
the show details operation button.
- Same problem with the correction system. The user has to modify the
lot in details operation and then go on the subcontract production and
unlock and edit it.
In order to facilitate those behavior. A move line will be automaticaly
created during the register components process. Also the subcontract
moves for components will be available in the detail operations tab.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a receipt of 1 units of a subcontracted product
- Receive 2
- Validate the receipt
-> An extra move for subcontractor of 1 has been validated but a
new move of 2 still in waiting availability and can not be
validated.
It happens due to action_done that will validate existing subcontract
order (with the initial quantity). Then the move is validated and an
extra move is created and merged in the first one. This new merged
move of 2 is then confirmed and validated. That will recreate a
subcontract order of 2 that will not be validated since it was validated
in the picking action_done at the start.
This commit will modify:
- action_done on move in order to validate the subcontract order after
the move validation and the new subcontract order creation too.
- action_confirm in order to create the subcontract order with the
additional quantity and then merge it to the existing moves.
In a few words, it allows to send components to a subcontractor partner
and receive a finished product. The production is managed through classical
manufacturing orders where the raw and finished location is the
subcontracting location. When creating a receipt picking for a
subcontractor partner, the location_id of the moves will be set to the
subcontracting locations by using the property_stock_customer and
property_stock_supplier of the partner. An override of _action_confirm
will create the manufacturing order.
When a subcontracted bom contains tracking, the produce wizard is
available from the picking to record which lots were produced/consumed.
New type on the BoM: subcontract
New type on res.partner: subcontactor
New location per company (we still own the components stored at the
subcontractor so they're still valued)
New routes created to resupply the subcontracting location on order or
not (through a reordering rule).
Override of res.partner to set the property_stock_customer/supplier on
subcontactor partners.
Proper tests were added too.
Joint work with: Arnaud Baes <arb@odoo.com>
task 1831382
niyasraphy