The 'drag and drop' function defined in test_utils should be aware of four
different cases, moving up or down, above or below another row.
We need an offset of one pixel for the function to work when moving down
(this is a case of broken symmetry because of <=)
Related to opw 1867049 regarding sequences of resequence moves.
Have ~50 records in a column,
Mark 49 of them as blocked (kanban_state field)
Mark 1 or 2 as done
Before this commit, the bar that showed the proportions of blocked objects was invisible
This was because the min-width of a bar was 10px, without max-width
Leaving the red bar to 95% or something, the green bar to 10px
All of this overflowing 100%
After this commit, we compute max-width and min-width to be able to fit everything
within the progress bar
OPW 1867464
closes#25962
Before this commit, the style of the value and text in some stat buttons were
broken.
The design of the stat button is to have a single value and a single text which
are stacked as follow:
[CSS] [Visually] [Example]
.o_stat_info +---------+ +------------+
.o_stat_value | | | |
.o_stat_text | value | | 10 |
| text | | Forecasted |
| | | |
+---------+ +------------+
However, some stat buttons use multiple values or texts. For example:
[CSS] [Visually] [Example]
.o_stat_info +-------------+ +------------+
.o_stat_value | | | |
.o_stat_info | value text | | 3 Hour(s) |
.o_stat_value | text | | Lost |
.o_stat_text | | | |
.o_stat_text +-------------+ +------------+
[CSS] [Visually] [Example]
.o_stat_info +---------------+ +---------------+
.o_stat_text | | | |
.o_stat_text | text value | | Min: 10.00 |
.o_stat_info | text value | | Max: 20.00 |
.o_stat_value | | | |
.o_stat_value +---------------+ +---------------+
The latter is works fine with block, which guarantees vertical alignment.
However, the former case has some alignment issues like this:
[Visually]
+------------+
| |
| 3 |
| Hour(s) |
| Lost |
| |
+------------+
This is due to the use of `display:block` for any `.o_stat_text` and `.o_stat_text`.
This commit fixes this issue, without affecting the other cases.
Task-ID 1841523
Before this commit, there was a traceback when clicking on a button
that generates a button call action with type `'button'`.
This is due to the handler of such an action that assumes only a small
set of button actions. Each of those cases correctly sets the local
variable `def` to a deferred, so that the post-processing is correct
(i.e. it handles this variable as a deferred). However, this is wrong
with a different button call action, so that this variable is `undefined`
instead of a deferred.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring that the variable `def` is always
a deferred. As a result, the post-processing can make the correct assumption
that this variable is a deferred.
Steps to reproduce:
- Install Google Drive Integration app
- Go to General Settings
- In the category "Google Drive", click on "Get Authorization Code"
(displayed as "Get Author...")
Task-ID 1861630
The value of the statinfo widget is rendered by the qweb after a t-esc.
Say if the python rounding returned 14.0000000001
(supposed to be a two digits precision number through the magic of floats)
then the statinfo widget would print it as-is.
We now format the value at assignation.
opw 1865426
On a database where many modules are installed (e.g. runbot all), with
the option "manage available packaging options per products", doing a groupby
"product" on the "package type" list view triggers a js error.
It comes from the fact that the fixed_group variable contains a "length"
attribute; the _().each function uses this to determine (erroneously)
that the object is an array.
It thus uses fixed_group[0] to get an undefined, and then tries to access
a method of undefined.
We replace the each by a simple js loop.
opw 1863576
In a search view, write text in the input, then hit enter to select
the facet.
Before this commit, the search view was detached and then reattached
when the control panel was refreshed. This led to loosing the focus
momentarily and erasing any supplementary input one might have typed
*during* the rpc call.
After this commit, if the search view is the same as before, we don't
detach it in the first place. Thus, the input is conserved in this
situation.
OPW 1861941
OPW 185614t
closes#25546
In a one2many, if the user clicked the trash button while editing another line,
the row was not unselected.
Thus the modal was not triggered, which entailed that the currently edited line
was always saved.
In particular, it allowed to give empty values to required fields.
opw 1834346
Suppose there is a one2many field embedded in a one2many,
(say we are viewing record A with one2many field B itself with a one2many C).
Furthermore, there is a second page of the one2many field B.
If an onchange is applied on B, then the server replies with a 1 command for all
B records attached to the currently viewed object A.
This includes a list of commands [[5], [4, C_id]*] for each B record,
in particular B records that are on the second page.
Since they are on the second page, they might not have been fetched by the
frontend; in that case the corresponding C_ids are thus unknown.
As a consequence, on save the frontend sends a command 0 to create the records
for all unknown C_ids.
Since it doesn't have any value to give to the 0 command, the row creation
usually crash in the backend.
Another wrong behaviour is fixed at the same time: if the server sends an update
on the list of C ids with 4 commands.
In that case, if the record has not been prefetched, we have no way to know
if the list changed or not.
To solve this, when we receive the 4 commands by the server, we send back 4
commands.
coauthored by @aab-odoo
opw 1835936
Before this commit, there was a traceback in the following scenario:
Let's have a kanban view with groupby and a domain.
If we clear the domain then clear the groupby, there could be a crash.
This crash occurs because when we clear the groupby, it performs a `reload`,
and assumes that the datapoint contains grouped data. However, if this
computation takes some time, it is possible to overwrite the datapoint so that
there is no longer grouped data.
This commit fixes the issue by enforcing at most 1 execution of the method
`reload` active at any time. Consequently, successive reloads operations are
now much slower.
Note that it uses the single non-reentrant mutex on the basic_model to enforce
this rule, which means:
- No more concurrent `reload` and `save`.
- If an execution having the mutex in `reload` come accross the same mutex,
it is blocked forever. This is hopefully not the case at the moment,
however a reentrant mutex should be considered in the future.
Have a view with a field as:
<field name="stuck_in_the_middle" attrs="{'readonly': [('with_you', '=', False)]}"/>
Before this commit, the contents of attrs were parsed and merged into the modifiers
and the attrs attribute of the node was deleted
which might cause divergence between reality and tests
After this commit, the mock server does what the server does in this case
closes#25583
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go on a SO and click on "Send by email"
- Remove the attachment and click on "Add an attachment"
- Choose an attachment A and remove it by clicking on the cross
- Click on "Add an attachment" and choose the attachment A
Bug:
The attachment didn't appear in the modal.
opw:1862482
Before this commit, it was not possible to add an amount to a new
bank statement. The input (.o_form_field_monetary) appeared as disabled.
This bug was due to this commit: @a1224f5ca
This rule should be only applied to .o_form_field_radio.
Closes#18887
Task ID: 35832
*: hr_gamification, point_of_sale, web
Before this commit, no content helper in some form view fields were broken,
due to the style of the classname `.o_view_nocontent` that uses an absolute
position.
This is due to some templates that wrongly use this style for displaying a
help message, although this is only valid for views with no record.
This commit solves the issue by using another classname for those fields
with the nocontent helper, namely `.o_field_nocontent`.
Before this commit, the point of sale displayed a loading message
every 5 secondes if the barcode scanner was configured.
This issue is due to the following commit: @1aacc96
After this commit,some calls may block the interface when they did
not do it before.
It concerns all rpc done with ajax.rpc and all done with a new
session.
We have now to explicitly set shadow property.
opw-1860493
Let's assume a one2many A inside a form view, such that the one2many
views (list, not editable, and form) are defined inline, and there is an
onchange on A. There is another inline one2many B editable list
displayed in the inner form view (and B isn't in the list). There are
two records on the one2many A, both of them having one record in their
one2many B. Edit the first record of A, and edit it's subrecord in B.
Click on save. This triggers an onchange on A and the onchange returns a
command 5 (DELETE_ALL), and two commands 1 (UPDATE). Now edit the second
record of A, and simply close the dialog (e.g. 'Discard'). Save the main
record: the record in one2many B of the second record of A has been duplicated.
This occured because the code in BasicModel messed up information coming
from the onchange (UPDATE command) and from the read (performed when
opening the second record), thus producing a CREATE command instead of
an UPDATE one.
This rev. ensures to properly mix the read data with the onchange
result, by transfering the changes over the list datapoint created after
the read.
opw-1836785
closes#25330
Let's assume a one2many list with two fields A and B, and an
onchange on A that sets B. Before this rev., on new records, the
onchange was only triggered if the one2many list was defined
inline.
Rev. 13c885195 was an attempt to fix the onchange issue in x2manys
with non inline views, but it only worked on existing records. This
rev. fixes the problem for both cases (existing and new records),
and thus reverts the fix of 13c885195.
The idea of this fix is to make both cases behave similarly, w.r.t.
fields and viewFields stuff in the fieldsView. In the inline case
(like in the main view case), fields and viewFields are the same.
In the non inline case, viewFields contained more information than
fields. As fields is used everywhere in BasicModel (and viewFields
is basically ignored), the fix is to set fields to viewFields.
Have an action that opens a dialog, with a specific callback
to execute when the dialog closes
In the dialog, have a button linked to an action that opens
another dialog in target = new
Close this 2nd dialog
Before this commit, the callback was not executed
After this commit the callback is executed
OPW 1853136
closes#25180
When clicking on an action button, the following steps are performed:
1. Buttons are disabled
2. The button call is performed
3. At the end of the call, the buttons are enabled
4. Extra RPC are performed (`read`, `name_get`)
5. When the RPC calls are finished, the form is reloaded
In the case of a validation of a SO, it means that the 'Confirm' button
is enabled at step 3, but hidden at step 5. On a slow network (or an
overloaded server), it means that the user has enough time (step 4) to
click again on the 'Confirm' button and trigger the action more than
once.
The root cause is that we don't retrieve the promise of the `reload`
mechanism (defined in `_callButtonAction`) when executing `on_close`
(triggered after the button call). We return a promise which is resolved
and enable the buttons too early.
We make sure to retrieve the promise of the `reload` and return it, so
that the promise of `saveAndExecuteAction` (defined in
`_onButtonClicked`) is correctly linked to it. This way,
`_enableButtons` is called when the reload is performed.
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
(well, actually he did most of it)
opw-1859027
Revision on b09f0c99
The intent of the previous commit was to no drop records in a list
on discard in the following cases:
- when they have been created from a `default_get`
- when they have been created from an `onchange` that result
from a `default_get`
Before the commit above, the kind of records that were abandoned
in those cases are stated as invalid, which happens when a record
has a required field that is empty.
The case of an `onchange` that is not involved in a `default_get`
was not considered in the fixes above. In fact, this is the intent
behaviour in most cases. However, if the items in the list are
created from such an `onchange`, we should not drop them.
This commit fixes the bug where records in a list that are created
from an `onchange` are wrongly abandoned. Here is the new logic to
abandon a record on discard in a list:
- the record that is marked as "do not abandon" should not be
abandoned;
- a record that is registered as a "not new addition" in the
list should not be dropped;
- a record that is registered as a "new addition" in the list,
and has been updated afterwards, should not be dropped;
- a record that is not new should not be dropped;
opw-806650
Avoid to crash the client web with setValue(false).
false.match, false.split, false.length... will not works.
Before this commit, _render call the setValue after comparing '' !== false
Christophe Simonis