NB:
- The option no_delete is not working, a fix will come from chm
- The many2many widget on a sheet creation is not working correctly as
the called command is a (1, id, values) without a (4, id, _) before.
A fix will also come from chm, but a disgusting hack has been
provided for this particular case (to remove after chm fix)
During refactoring of the field view, parent.model has been replaced by
model_id since it is more elegant. (odoo/odoo@4a60a3)
That was correct when you was working directly from the ir.model.field.
But if you was comming from ir.model -> fields -> 'add an item', the
model_id is unknow in the context of pyeval.
This commit close#12455
The group_lines method didn't make the sum of the quantity field, hence resulting in incorrect results when making product based statistics from the account.move.line records.
Courtesy of Luc De Meyer. Was PR #10551
Odoo add the extra letter "s" to the translated word "Active User".
This is caused by adding "s" at the end of the word directly from the template,
which makes no sense in many language.
This prohibits translators from translating the plural form in any language.
The plural form and singular form of "Active User" should be translate
separately.
Fixes#12469Closes#12470
Use case:
-enable multi currency (use UDS as company currency and EUR as secondary currency)
-create account account in a different currency (EUR)
-create journal for the bank account in EUR
-create a new tax included tax
-create a new bank statement in EUR journal and add one line
-reconcile
-Choose a counterpart with the included tax and click on reconcile
Before the fix:
After reconciliation the amount_currency for tax and expense were wrong.
You could check this in the journal items linked to the bank statement.
Video:https://youtu.be/678rFb4OE2Q
opw:680693
The former algorithm was incorrect: when checking two related nodes together,
it returned as if a cycle was found (even when no cycle was present.) The new
algorithm computes the transitive closure of the relation from the root nodes,
and stops as soon as a cycle is found.
The third parameter expects a list of field, not some random string.
This made the constraints for the fields tagged with required_if_provider to be
never checked.
Closes#12458
When grouping result the BaseModel method _read_group_fill_results add
the possible groups which had no result.
But, if the order of the group is not consistent, we can get really
wrong results. The code logic is expecting that the grouped result
gotten and the list of groups (returned by _read_group_stage_ids of
crm.lead) is in the same order.
If the _order attribute of the model is not enough specific (as was the
case in crm.stage) the inconsistent order would kill aggregation values
(displaying 0 instead of what should have been present).
opw-680952
Purpose:
Registration form needs some improvement : When there is lots of question
and answer and sometimes question is too long then view is mashed/weired
Improve the view and show one question and one answer on line, next question
and answer will come on next line,
Also change the common question/answers view, put question answer in
inline and each question/answer should come into next line
Mockup : http://bit.ly/1zpoWju
- Deletion of addon web_tip
- Creation of addon web_tour (a tour being a succession of tips)
- Creation of onboarding tours for several apps:
- Accounting
- CRM
- Discuss
- HR Expense (first step only)
- HR Recruitment
- Project
- Sale
- Various usability improvements (mainly onboarding-oriented)
Also:
- creation of a (archived by default) sample project with tasks, that the
user can activate to discover the project app.
- improvement of the simplified form view to create a new project
Christophe Simonis