Split project to move portal features to a new module named website_project.
Portal users may now access their projects and tasks throught the
website_portal My account page. The Backend portal menuitem is removed.
Simplify the privacy settings of project, to be visible to portal users the
project must be in 'portal' mode.
Original authors: Vipul Bhatt, Florian Wintjens
Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
[FIX] account: move some ir.model.access to sale module
[FIX] payment: Move some ir.rule to website_sale
[FIX] stock: move some ir.model.access rule to sale_stock
[FIX] project: Move some ir.model.access rules to crm_project_issue
[FIX] mrp: Move some ir.model.access rules to sale_mrp
[FIX] calendar: move some ir.model.access rules to crm
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
[ADD] sales_team: See own documents => See only his sales team
Moved the "User: Own Leads Only", "User: All Leads" and "Manager" groups from sale and crm
into sales_team module. Add the record rules so that user can see only his Own Sales Team
if "See Own Leads" is sales right and can see all sales teams if he is having sales rights
of "See All Leads" or manager.
This branch need more testing instead of doing 10 fixes. A lot of issues are occuring
when installing modules in different orders.
This reverts commit fa6e415cdb.
Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
- Hide account_id field and add a required project_id field on timesheet entries
- Remove is_timesheet field: as project_id is only required for timesheet entries and not for other analytic lines, it can be used to determine wether a line is a timeheet entry or not.
- Remove project_timesheet module as all its functionalities are moved to hr_timesheet
- Replace timesheets on contract option on products by timesheets on project
- Small fixes and improvements in timesheets and projects views and groups
Coming from a bug in web_settings_dashboard. Invited user didn't have any rights
when created from the dashboard, which was leading to an error.
This bug leaded to a new discussion. Better to have basic employee having user
rights for all main applications. For bigger entreprises there is an admin that
will carefully remove extra rights, if necessary. The target is small businesses,
it makes sense that every way to create a user gives the same result.
In conclusion, each new user has a full access to the applications by default
How is it implemented ?
We added an inactive default user which original access right to the groups
'base.group_user' and 'base.group_partner_manager' in base. Each
application will extend the default user's access right by adding the maximal
access right for this application.
On user creation, we will use by default the 'group_id' field from the default
user. We will in the same time remove the ugly 'default_groups_ref' key which
was passed sometimes in the context for some fields in some views, and sometimes
nothing.
So, the user can modify the access rights for the default user, but he should be
aware that removing project user access rights for a default user will prevent
a *created on the fly in a task* user will not be able to access the task.
This change avoid to display the tasks
that a user is not permitted to see
in the reporting view 'Task analysis'
Closes#4399
Courtesy of jkei
https://github.com/jkei
Major changes:
- New start and expiration dates
- Remove field Contract Status
- Simplified because use of sale_timesheet
Reason: complete rewrite of the Sale module.
Responsible: fp, dbo, nim
Employees (base.group_user) can read tasks. However they miss the right to read
task stages (project.task.type). This causes issues when reading the form view
of a task. This commit fixes this issue.
Followers can now be partners or channels. Partners following a document
will receive needaction, as previously. However people can follow documents
through channels. Members of a channel are able to listen to a stream
of messages using the channel. Those messages do not create needaction
messages. It is therefore possible to follow documents without receiving
too much notifications. For interesting documents subscribing with its
partner will create notification.
message_follower_ids fields is udpated. It is now a many2many to
mail.followers, not to res.partner anymore. A subscription can be either
a partner (partner_id) or a channel (channel_id).
Some access rules have been updated accordingly.
[REM] portal_project: move ALL the things
- move portal access rights from portal_project and website_project_issue to project and project_issue
- move portal menuitems back to their respective module
- remove public visibility of projects
- adapt demo data to have a 'Demo Portal' project
- add correct access rights for account.analytic.line for portal users
- small view tweak (do not display 'timesheet' tab if one can't see antyhing in it anyway)
- remove unnecessary copy() method from project/res_partner.py
- remove old methods on project.project
- progress is not used anymore on project.project
- use clickable statusbar for project states
- remove _resolve_project_id_from_context
- rename project.category becomes project.tag to be more explicit
- remove old methods on tasks
- issues: remove option fetchmail_issue
For privacy_visibility 'followers' or 'portal', the user should be follower of the project (not the task).
Remove public access to portal task
Fixes#2372
If no project on the task (or other rule), an employee (not a portal) can access if is follower of the task.
Follower rule is not enough as a user creating a rule will subscribe to the rule but to subscribe to record, the user should have access to it in the first place.
To make sure the snake does not bit its tail, fallback to give access on task where the user is reponsible (user_id = user.id).
Fixes#139
Adapted the tests to the new behaviour (removed not relevant and added some on creation)
Backport of 79bed94 (project user access to resource.calendar) and adding the access to resource.calendar.attendance.
It is needed to compute function fields such as day_open (present in form view of project.issue)
Fixes#3201
ir.rule records are in noupdate data blocks to let the admin
alter them without fear of them being reset at next update.
Other records such as groups are in normal mode, so they
can be updated whenever necessary
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20121218232001-t425t4hi7qbmsip2
Antony Lesuisse