PURPOSE
Simplify 'mail.tracking.value' model and code. Remove unnecessary fields and
computation. Make code easier to handle and more batch-enabled.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename 'field' to 'field_id' on tracking model. It better indicates it is a
many2one and not a char field holding a field name for example.
Task-3345979 (Mail: Simplify tracking model)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#124182
When user import records of project and if it contains tags in the file,
a traceback will appear.
Steps to reproduce the error:
- Go to project > Favorites > Import records > Upload File
Note: Make sure that file contains tags
Error: A traceback appears:
"TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +=: NoneType and list"
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/0480005e4498d76fe7a3446693f41500122e41d7/addons/project/models/project.py#L2763
When user import records that contains tags, here args will be None.
So it will lead to above traceback.
sentry-4494554048
closesodoo/odoo#136973
X-original-commit: 9e14cf0fb618c517fe12138416e40c3e66383276
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Add a new column, after tasks that shows the following information :
Tasks: Total done tasks / Total tasks (ratio in percentage)
Timesheet: Hours spent/ allocated hours (ratio in percentage)
\> visibility: only show if the timesheet setting is activated.
Right side panel :
Add the Done icon before Tasks
Add hours spent/allocated hours information under the Timesheet
Extra time: Add a new stat button that shows
the overall extra time used for the project.
visible if hours spent > allocated hours.
By clicking on this it will redirect to the same view
as we have for the timesheet stat button.
task-3432102
closesodoo/odoo#129177
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Version:
--------
- saas-16.4 only
Issue:
------
When a project is duplicated, all tasks and sub-tasks
are visible in the new project's kanban view.
Cause:
------
When writing `project.write({'tasks': [Command.set(new_tasks.ids)]})`,
we trigger an inverse which writes the `project_id` field to the tasks.
This will set the value of `display_in_project` to `True`.
Solution:
---------
Rewrite the `display_in_project` field if necessary.
opw-3479714
closesodoo/odoo#136527
X-original-commit: 6f62d156b65b331a0a15406a90b174c265100491
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
As `handle_history_divergence` is not used in the controllers, it makes
no sense to have it in `controllers/main.py`.
task-3217965
closesodoo/odoo#136277
Signed-off-by: David Monjoie (dmo) <dmo@odoo.com>
Adding a company_id field in project.project.stage will allow companies
to have their own individual stages, which was not possible before since
all the stages were shared between all companies.
task-3330285
closesodoo/odoo#122597
Signed-off-by: Vincent Larcin (vila) <vila@odoo.com>
Issue:
After 213b6885312f3da3bf5bff995861758a1afcde76, some custom filters
on tags can throw a stacktrace.
Steps to reproduce:
- Install Project
- Project > Custom Filter > Tags contains 'Internal'
- Stacktrace
Cause:
When `limit=None`, which is explicitly set when creating custom
filters, the `name_search` crashes when comparing an `int` (the len
(ids)) with the limit which is `None`.
Fix:
Elaborate the condition to handle the case when `limit=None`.
Affected versions:
16.0 up to master
Reference:
opw-3510309
closesodoo/odoo#135982
X-original-commit: 5aefba4399f25e4e3cd3c205e0a6511173dffd11
Signed-off-by: Audric Onockx (auon) <auon@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Piryns Victor (pivi) <pivi@odoo.com>
Description:
The commit 05855b6bb6d8a22ceb1f8b25332a146eed912660 introduced a
fast-path for the name_search on tags from the form view of tasks.
But the implementation was too complex and wasn't handling correctly
all possible operators (it just had a fallback on the default
parent name_search implementation).
The aim is to simplify the code for better robustness and
maintainability long term.
Fix:
Convert the query to it's equivalent python code. It has a slight
performance regression than the previous implementation (we are
making 3 queries worse-case instead of 1), but the regression is
non-significant and not critical.
Affected versions:
16.0 up to master
Reference:
task-3503721
closesodoo/odoo#135631
X-original-commit: 9d95314aaca7c087d7159e3f603bcea99f69b217
Signed-off-by: Audric Onockx (auon) <auon@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Piryns Victor (pivi) <pivi@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the group by in the gantt view of project didn't
allow the user to find records for which there were not scheduled tasks.
For example, if a Sale Order didn't have a scheduled task, when grouping
by Sale Order, the latter was not displayed. And searching for its name
was not displaying it either.
After this commit, when a user is searching for a sale order, even if
the latter does not have any scheduled task, it is displayed in order to
facilitate the scheduling of new tasks.
In order to do so, a group expand on sale_order_id for the project.task
model have been introduced.
closesodoo/odoo#121819
Taskid: 3251630
Related: odoo/enterprise#41257
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the conversion from a subtask to a standalone task
or the opposite was possible in debug mode. In order to provide for
users a way to convert task to subtask or the opposite without polluting
the interface, a action is added. Also, when the user clicks on search
more on a many2one field pointing on `project.task`, if the active_model
and the active_id are defined then if we will try to load the last
update status by using `active_id` even if `active_model` is not the
`project.project` model.
This commit adds a action that opens a form dialog. The user
can choose to put a parent task or not. If not, the task becomes a
standalone task. Otherwise, the selected parent task becomes the parent.
This commit adds also an additional check before loading and displaying
the last update status of the project active to be sure the `active_id`
is the id of a project, that is, `active_model` has to be equal to
`project.project` to be able to load the last project update status.
Moreover, a UI change in the stat button showing the number of subtask
is modified in order to display also the number of closed sub tasks.
task-3251617
closesodoo/odoo#120911
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Currently, the field date_last_stage_update is updated when the state of the task is changed,
but only if the target stage is a closing state.
It could however be useful to know when the state was last changed regardless of if it's closing or not.
This commit makes it so that the field is updated after any state change.
Task-3455177
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130880
Before this commit 'project.task' model 'planned_hours' field
is inconsistent to the 'allocated_hours' field.
After this commit rename the 'planned_hours' to 'allocated_hours'
and related string change to 'Allocated Time'.
task-3231680
closesodoo/odoo#120405
Related: odoo/upgrade#4617
Related: odoo/enterprise#40643
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This will improve the following generic UX
- rename 'personal user stage' into 'personal stage' for private task
- added the 'personal stage' field to the right of the stage optional=hide
- earlier gantt view open with the user now it will open with groupby project
- removed groupby stage in pivot view
- rename 'undefined' into 'private' for graph view of private task
task-3251648
closesodoo/odoo#120094
Related: odoo/upgrade#4607
Related: odoo/enterprise#40515
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
As sub-tasks are a sub-set of a task that should logically be completed
for the parent task to be completed, it would make sense for the
sub-tasks to share the same milestone as their parent task by default.
The milestone of a parent task is automatically set to its subtasks if:
- The subtask has no milestone set
- AND They belong to the same project or the subtask has no project set
- OR they shared the same milestone before the change on the parent
task (side effect for that case: if an invalide milestone is set on the
parent task, both parent task's and subtasks' milestones which are equal
are gonna be reset)
task-3450281
closesodoo/odoo#130439
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Cleanup alias usage and definition. Prepare code to ease future changes and
improvements. Notably
* add a 'alias_email' computed field on the mixin allowing to have the
complete alias email when set, and False in case it is inactive or linked
to an inactive alias domain;
* remove unnecessary alias_id field definition when just the help differs
from the standard definition coming from the 'mail.alias.mixin';
* use fields coming from 'inherits' instead of using alias_id and its sub-
fields; notably use 'alias_display_name' and 'alias_email' fields;
* remove useless custom code and management;
* improve alias parameters support code in configuration parameters;
Task-3453343 (Mail: Cleanup Alias Usage)
Prepares Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130632
This commit's purpose is to allow the user to remove the planned date
end, or the planned date start of a project from the list view, or the form
view of the project. If the user removes either the planned date end, or
the planned date start, both dates will be removed. If the user tries to
add only a date end or a date start while keeping the other date empty
on a project with no planned date, these changes will be discarded.
The goal of this fix is for the projects to always have either both dates
set, or both dates set to False.
closesodoo/odoo#130651
X-original-commit: 250a0d233c8c2e074b967d59d53b1d4aac5feba2
Related: odoo/enterprise#45131
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when deleting a task with subtasks, only the parent
task was deleted. As child tasks are the required to have the same
project_id as their parent, they could end up views of another project
with no clear link to it. Generally speaking, keeping child task, when
their container (parent task) is removed does not make sense.
Therefore, this commit changes the default behavior for task
deletion. When a parent task is removed, all its child tasks are removed
as well. To avoid such a behavior in exceptional situation where child
task can make sense without their parents, the user first need to remove
this link before unlinking the parent task.
A warning is added in all the views where a task can be deleted (form,
calendar and list) to warn the user of this new behavior when he deletes
a task.
task-3044991
closesodoo/odoo#121260
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, planning option is view in project
setting.
This commit planning option is move from project to planning setting
with named 'Project Planning'
task-3251687
closesodoo/odoo#125341
Related: odoo/enterprise#42675
Related: odoo/upgrade#4940
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
_*: hr_timesheet,sale_project,sale_timesheet
Generally, you don't want subtasks to be displayed at the same level
as their parent tasks. You want to consider the subtasks as part of
their parent's project, but don't want to see them directly in this
project. Rather, you want them to be accessible only via their parent.
(There are exceptions to that and we want to stay flexible.)
First solution that comes to mind is to have `project_id` set to False
for the latter tasks, but then how to get the value of the fields that
are related to the project?
So, second solution would be to have a field `project_root_id`,
which would be the project of the parent, or the grand-parent, etc.
The issue now is that we have to fields "project", and it isn't obvious
when to use one or the other.
The most simple way to answer this need is to keep one field "project",
that will always be set for (non-private) tasks,
and create a boolean field : `display_in_project`.
But we want it to be technical (no checkbox in the view).
So, when the user unsets the project on a subtask, the view will act
as if the project was unset, but in the back-end,
we'll set `display_in_project` to False and set `project_id` back.
The fact that all tasks have a project allows us to know if action x
can be perform on this task t, dependind on t.project_id.allow_x.
task-3367246
closesodoo/odoo#128281
Related: odoo/enterprise#43996
Related: odoo/upgrade#4930
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit's purpose is to allow the user to set the company_id of a project to False, meaning the project is no longer restricted for the user who does not have access to the company of the project. This change induces a lot of other small behavior changes/approximation. Since some fields (currency_id, resource_calendar_id, etc) were company dependent, we had to updates some use cases.
task-3084819
closesodoo/odoo#122144
Related: odoo/enterprise#41363
Related: odoo/upgrade#4947
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit implements the `mail.tracking.duration.mixin` with the
`statusbar_duration` widget for `crm.lead` and `project.task`.
The goal is to compute and display how long a record has spent in each stage in
the statusbar of their form view.
Task-3032773
Part-of: odoo/odoo#108554
Current behaviour:
If you disable the recurrence for 1 task in a suite of recurrence,
if you had other tasks belonging to the same recurrence suite, they
would still be with recurrence activated.
Expected behaviour:
It doesn't make sense for some of the tasks in a suite of tasks in a
recurrence to enabled and others disabled. If we disable the
recurrence on 1 such tasks, all tasks should linked to that
recurrence should be set as non-recurrent, regardless if the
edit-mode is set on "This task".
Steps to reproduce:
- For 14.0 -> saas-16.1:
- Install Project, Studio
- Turn on in Settings the "Recurrent Tasks"
- Create a new project and a task in it
- With studio, in debug mode, add a related field to the task form
that relates to `next_recurrence_date`. Make sure it's not "read
only"
- On the task, turn on the recurrence, set the frequency to each
day, set the `next_recurrence_date` as a day in the past
- Run the Scheduled Action "Project : Create Recurring Tasks"
- On one of the task, disable the recurrence
- Go to the other task, see that their recurrence is still active,
and the frequency changed to the defaults values of once a week.
- For saas-16.2 -> master:
- Install Project
- Turn on in Settings the "Recurrent Tasks"
- Create a new project and a task in it
- Activate the recurrence on the task, set a planned date in the past
- Set the task as "Done", this should create an new instance of the
recurrence.
- Disable the recurrence option in one of the task, observe that
is doesn't change for the other task, and the recurrence
frequency is reset to default values.
Reason for the problem:
When disabling the recurrence on 1 task, with the edit-mode set as
"This task", the recurrence is being deleted, but we don't disable
the recurrence of the other tasks linked to that recurrence.
Fix:
When we are writing `False` on `recurring_task` on a task, we
explicitely write `False` on `recurring_task` on all tasks that belong
to the recurrence after the deletion of the recurrence itself.
Affected versions:
- 14.0
- 15.0
- saas-15.2
- 16.0
- saas-16.1
- saas-16.2
- saas-16.3
- master
opw-3265212
closesodoo/odoo#128703
X-original-commit: 0a83f4030b07aba25b054aa453d81c0e27b98cc8
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Adds missing index on `project.task` `state`, this field is used in
a lot of searches as a search criteria like "open tasks".
task-3416393
closesodoo/odoo#127841
X-original-commit: 147446d86d7d33a83f83a8699c930fcdd3dbb99b
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Piryns Victor (pivi) <pivi@odoo.com>
Issue:
------
When we want to add a newly-created user
who does not yet have "personal stages" to an fsm task,
it triggers a User Error.
Cause:
------
There's a mistake in the `project_id` field,
which is missing the 's'.
Therefore, when creating the personal stage,
the ORM does not find the value in the context
and inserts the command to set the default project.
As a result, when checking constraints,
we will trigger an error for the
`_check_personal_stage_not_linked_to_projects` method.
opw-3390169
closesodoo/odoo#127694
X-original-commit: 05722c9710f74a073833235de9bbe4743485174a
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lefebvre (thle) <thle@odoo.com>
If a project had a single rating associated to its tasks, opening the
customer rating view would create a traceback. This happened because
both the mail.thread model and the rating.parent.mixin model have a
rating_ids field, and project inherits from both of them (mail.thread
on its own doesn't have it, but the rating mixin adds it).
In the action_view_all_rating method, we try to access the first element of the
rating_ids recordset, if the rating_count field is equal to 1. But since
the rating_ids field belonged to the mail.thread mixin, and not to
the rating.parent.mixin, there could be occurences where rating_count was equal
to 1 while the recordset was actually empty ; accessing the first element of the
recordset would then create a traceback.
To fix this, the rating.parent.mixin model was put before the
mail.thread model in the _inherit list, this way the rating_ids field
from rating.parent.mixin has the priority. A test was also added to check
if the rating_ids is working correctly.
task-3360029
closesodoo/odoo#127243
X-original-commit: 1039c80a8ff5e219e9c2679505015288c8d8dd35
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Steps
=====
- Install module industry_fsm
- Create a task from the kanban view
- In the form view, add a title but no customer
- Open the subtasks tab of the notebook
- Add a subtask and add a title to it
- Save the created parent task
- A pop-up indicate that the customer is missing
- Add a customer and save the task
Issue
=====
A pop-up indicate that the subtasks field is invalid and there is no way
to save the current task with its subtask.
Cause
=====
the module industry_fsm introduces a required=True for the field
"partner_id" when edited from a view in the app Field Service. When a
parent task is created without a "partner_id" id set, it can not be
saved, but subtasks can still be created from it. Those child tasks
should have the "partner_id" set to the same value as the one of their
parent. As it is not set in the parent task, its value will be False for
the child task, and changing it in the parent task (by adding a
customer) will not update the child task. As this field is required when
a task is edited from the app Field Service, the task can not be saved.
Fix
===
A dependency to "parent_id.partner_id" is added to the method
"_compute_partner_id" of model project.task allowing to updating it if
needed when a "partner_id" is set on the parent task.
task-3343423
closesodoo/odoo#127088
X-original-commit: 7f8da6a4148c86b61d994bf692725378f8dafc52
Related: odoo/enterprise#43515
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit In the task's form view, the parent field shows the other
task but also shows the current task.
In this commit, the domain is applied, ensuring that the id is not the same
as the current id. As a result, the parent field of the task does not
include itself
task-3330841
closesodoo/odoo#122286
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the user installs `sale_project` and some
of his projects has no partner set but a partner is set on some
tasks of those projects then the user will no longer see the partner
field in those tasks because the project is not billable.
This commit checks if one of the tasks has a partner set to make the
project linked billable if it is not yet the case.
closesodoo/odoo#126880
X-original-commit: b0cb255577a7a0c49c2c764dbad715d3842b9508
Related: odoo/enterprise#43384
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
*: account, event_booth, gamification, hr, project,
website_event_track, website_hr_recruitment, website_slides
HTML fields that appear in the front-end can be modified using the
website editor. Some of them are sanitized in a way that breaks the
behavior of snippets that can be dropped within them.
This commit adapts the sanitization of those HTML fields so that the
snippets behave as expected.
opw-3267589
closesodoo/odoo#126708
X-original-commit: 7fd28afaf3e45cafbef80b69aa45c58b31fb3de6
Related: odoo/enterprise#43311
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Socias (bso) <bso@odoo.com>
When a user creates the task without a name field and directly clicks on the
'Mark as Done' button, will give UnboundLocalError like the local variable
'task' referenced before assignment.
Steps to produce:
- Install the 'Field Service' module.
- Field Service > My Tasks > Open any task.
- Make the name field unrequired (Studio or Edit form View)
- Create a new task > Set the Customer field and leave the Name field as blank.
- Before saving the task click on the 'Mark as Done' button > Discard Changes.
- Error will be produced.
Fixing the indentation for `task.date_last_stage_update = now` will solve this
issue. We have used the task variable in for loop.
Sentry-4276832131
closesodoo/odoo#126752
X-original-commit: c3649a32c98d7093610a4367b1e72c1b4b0085b7
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The previous commit introduced an optimization to reduce the number of
queries and fields fetched when we call `name_search`. But it works much
better when the dependencies of `display_name` contain field names used
in the calculation (on the same record/model).
Then, to improve the performance and the cache coherency, add `depends`
and `depends_context` depending on the custom `_compute_display_name`.
Add only the first level of dependencies (never traverse relational
field) because only these have a positive impact on the previous
optimization and the cost is very low (see `modified`).
About `depends_context`, we don't include `lang` because (when `_` is
used by example) it is unlikely to get the same display_name in the same
request with two different lang.
closesodoo/odoo#122085
Related: odoo/documentation#4639
Related: odoo/enterprise#42599
Related: odoo/upgrade#4780
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Rationale
=========
Since v8, the `display_name` field is present on all models. By default,
`display_name` uses `name_get` which has pretty much the same purpose
(return record name used by the web client). Gradually, many (backend)
developers (and the ORM: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/6da1c3ac4c036eac289597602976538e243cb939)
started using `display_name` (more convenient than
`record.name_get()[0][1]`) but it still had the `name_get` override.
It becomes more complex than necessary and poeple start to misunderstand
the two (and sometimes override both, leading to inconstiencies between
`display_name`/`name_get`).
To simplify the ORM and the API, we decided to keep only one of them,
the `display_name` field:
- It is much more convenient from a backend point of view
(`record.name_get()[0][1]` vs `record.display_name`)
- It is cached during the same transaction (and invalidated if
its dependencies change)
- It can be overridden like any other compute field (override
`_compute_display_name` with any extra dependencies)
- `name_get` is replaced by `read(['display_name'])`
(API perceptive), which can actually be more efficient
(if `display_name`'s depends are correct, the ORM will only fetch the
fields it needs instead of every prefetchable field)
Changes
=======
- Deprecates `name_get` for the v17 and based the method on
`display_name` (the opposite of before)
- Converts all usage of `name_get`
- Overrides of `name_get` are now overrides of `_compute_display_name`
- For `res.partner`, rename the field store `display_name` into
`complete_name` because `display_name` context-dependent and it makes
no sense to have a compute store that is context-dependent.
- Previously, it was possible to return multiple names for the same
record with `name_get`, but it was tricky and most of the usage of
this `name_get` didn't take this into account. The only example of
this is the `name_get` of `product.product`
(now use `", ".join(<names>)`).
Part-of: odoo/odoo#122085
Issue:
In the portal view of the project AGR project has 11 Tasks on the list view
but when you click on it, inside there are 12 tasks, not 11
Cause:
The Kanban view of the project includes a button for task
count, which displays the total number of open tasks in the project.
It seems that the task count button displays the correct count because the form
view of the task includes a default filter for 'Open Tasks'.
The form view of the project-sharing feature does not have the default filter of
'Open Tasks'. As a result, the count displayed by the task count button in the
kanban view is different from the count displayed in the list and Kanban views.
Fix:
In this commit, a default filter is passed through the context to ensure that
the task count displayed by the task count button is the same as that displayed
in the list and Kanban views.
task-3289941
X-original-commit: 96304e9b237c06a5d0b459d304df3afbf7607f04
Part-of: odoo/odoo#126446
Steps to reproduce:
-------------------
- create a stage without selecting a project.
Issue:
------
The new stage is inaccessible.
Cause:
------
When the project is not defined, the following ORM command is used:
`[6, False, []]` for the `project_ids` field.
Solution:
---------
When we create a project stage (project task type),
it is essential that we link it to a project.
Add the possibility to override `_get_default_project_ids`.
Set default project as first fsm project if not project in
the context.
opw-3322992
closesodoo/odoo#126338
X-original-commit: 69c09684e37accdaf1248f31a7c97f0c20434b76
Related: odoo/enterprise#43134
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lefebvre (thle) <thle@odoo.com>
This commit increases the priority of the sequence in the ordering of tasks
so that reordering by drag & dropping is more useful.
Task-3371921
closesodoo/odoo#125073
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Currently, when selecting tags for a task with no project (private
task) on mobile, a warning is displayed. On top of that, the amount
available tags is way more limited than in classical view and the
selection of some exesting tags is impossible.
Steps
=====
1. Warning when selecting tags
- Install module project
- In mobile view, go to the view "Tasks -> My Tasks"
- Open or create a private task (task with no project)
- Click on the tags field
A warning is displayed (on the server logs) stating:
"The domain term '('project_ids', 'in', False)' should use the '=' or
'!=' operator."
2. Limited tag choice
- Install module project
- In mobile view, go to the view "Tasks -> My Tasks"
- Open or create a private task (task with no project)
- Click on the tags field
- The tags that are only related to project(s) are not displayed in this
view
- Try to create a tag with the same name than an existing tag that does
not appear.
- A traceback is displayed because this tag already exists.
Cause
=====
As noted from the test of expression.py, M2M fields in the domain should
be compared to list of elements. It is not the case here. When a
project_id exits in the context, nothing happens, but there exists a
check in the ORM to ensure that '=' or '!=' operator is used if the
second element of the domain leaf is a boolean. In this case, there is
not project_id set in the context for private task, resulting in
the previous warning (False used instead of project_id).
Fix
===
We use the improved implementation of _name_search to get the ordered
list of id of records project.tags to display. This list has the
advantage to not be restricted to the current project, while still
presenting the tags of the current project at the top of the list. The
mobile view uses the method search_read to get the list of project.tags
record values, therefore we call the _name_search in this method and use
an optimized sorting function to sort the resulting records accordingly.
task-3302370
closesodoo/odoo#126091
X-original-commit: a03a93aa8cf5567f79dd66ced5911721b82a3802
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
- steps to reproduce bug:
In project.task sharing form view, When clicking on any of the stat buttons (subtasks or parent task)
when you arrive on the actual task formview a MissingError saying 'missing record' appears
- Issue:
The record loads accordingly but the Missing Error shouldn't appear
- Cause:
It is coming from the project_sharing_form_compiler which gave the projectSharingId props to the ChatterContainer element
but the projectSharingId is equal to the "props.record.context.active_id" of the action, and in the context of the
chatter we want the active_id to be equal to the project_id, which was the case when we are coming from the KanbanView and
sub-list views but when coming from the task stat button the active_id is equal to the task_id and the env can't find
the document 'project.project' with the id of the task. (in portal.py _document_check_access())
- Fix:
We simply change the projectSharingId to take the "props.record.contect.active_id_chatter" the give an
active_id_chatter= active_id in the Project Sharing task_action which will always equal the Id of the project
Task-3284755
closesodoo/odoo#126092
X-original-commit: 22c0825b70bbe8234dee57060bdd5640001f74d7
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
In 16.2, we have implemented a nice tool to set various fields at the creation of a task from
the Kanban quick create using shortcuts.
This implementation is simple (only a few lines of code), but is not very flexible.
Indeed, shortcuts need to be in a specific order and at a specific place for them to work.
As a consequence, it is very easy for the user to fail in the creation of their tasks using shortcuts.
This task aims at making this feature more robust and complex so that it works in more cases.
In this commit:
It should be possible for the #tag, 23h, @demo, ! shortcuts to be put in whatever order, as long as they are at the end of the name
task-3349154
closesodoo/odoo#124155
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
In this commit we change following points:
- changed string of analytic_plan_id field in res setting.
- project set as default in the analytic plan of the project setting
task-3251642
closesodoo/odoo#120522
Related: odoo/enterprise#40702
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
When the hr_timesheet module is not installed and a customer uses the
action_project_timesheets action through customization, a traceback will
occur because he will not get the action of hr_timesheet.
closesodoo/odoo#125600
X-original-commit: cdeeb70ada8364c681c93961c2bd29f1069cebbf
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Prior this commit:
In project when tasks was moved to different stages users will get notify with
emails where there is a field showing assigned_date and deadline.
After this commit:
Instead of those fields it's showing only Stage: Stage name
Task-3285822
closesodoo/odoo#119973
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
This commit removes the tooltip of the `fold` field because
the second part is no longer true and the first part does not
provide any added value.
It also makes `project_ids` field required in the form view of
Task Stage model (`project.task.type`) to force the user to link
his new stage to a project. Otherwise, the stage won't ever be
visible anywhere in the interface. Indeed, stages not holding
tasks are hidden in cross-projects views.
task-3251621
closesodoo/odoo#121154
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The following changes are made in this PR:
- sort projects by favorite > sequence > name for project
- add the 'tasks' stat button for project form view
- when creating a project on the fly from a task's form view, allow_billable
should be set to true by default
- Display only the colored dot, hide the status label for project list view
- remove following fields from project
allow_recurring_tasks
task-3251656
closesodoo/odoo#119154
Related: odoo/upgrade#4569
Related: odoo/enterprise#40050
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
- Removal of 'my team's ratings' and the 'my department's ratings'
filters in order to be more consistent with the project.task search view
- UI improvements in the project form ratting settings
TaskId-3251609
closesodoo/odoo#120633
Related: odoo/upgrade#4632
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
New features developed in this PR:
- Write Javascript tests for the project.task.state widget
- Tests are in the project_task_state_selection.js
- rewrite Research & Development demo data
- Created a digest tip for task state selection (in Settings > technical > digest tips)
- Tip: Use task state to keep track of the task progression
- Fix Sharingview (Readonly) icons for the project.task.state widget, previously only the color bubble were displayed in readonly sharing views, now all of the icons are displayed
- Display state in the Calendar view
- Display the same widget as in the kanban/list views
- Remove is_closed References
- Adapt Kanban stages Exemples
- Kanban exemples are available when creating a new stage in kanban view
- improve Progressbar colors (different color for approved/done, in_progress/waiting)
Task-3213526
closesodoo/odoo#117968
Related: odoo/enterprise#39714
Related: odoo/upgrade#4548
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Allow timesheeting on sub-tasks with no project_id set.
Instead, refer to the project_id set on its parent_id, and so on,
recursively.
task-3336215
X-original-commit: d794e41619a36a8c9ad1e77a816e57051207cdcf
Part-of: odoo/odoo#124563
X2many fields tracking was not supported in the implementation of
`mail` module:
* not needed in the past
* the logic was not hooked in the same place before. Now that it is
managed pre-commit, x2many values don't have to be handled as commands,
but can be compared as records.
* ...
The support was added for two specific models in specific modules, but
it's a good opportunity to clean that and to support it directly in `mail`.
Task-3316528
Part-of: odoo/odoo#121244
This commit reverts a previous commit which allowed to
display the current stage when the state is changed.
The reverted PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/119925
The reversion was done as what was implemented does not
follow the standard display of tracking messages and
because it doesn't look good in the chatter.
Task-3336184
closesodoo/odoo#123797
X-original-commit: eff511140175ba8224c2f9be59a798a3e1dee6da
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Thibault Delavallée