In order to post on a document, ``message_post_with_view`` should be called
on a singleton recordset. Otherwise it is done as a mass mailing which is
not really what is expected here.
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean MailThread API)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#100137
This revision is to make uniform the behavior of the `groups` attribute
on the Python model fields
and on the node in the view architecture.
In both cases, remove the node from the view completely.
Before this revision,
in a back-end view:
- In the Python model, if a field has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the field is removed, completely, from the view.
- In the view architecture, if a node has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the node is made invisible (not completely removed, just
made invisible).
in a front-end view:
- if a node has a "groups" or "t-groups" set and the user
is not part of the groups, the node is removed from the view.
So it's 2/3 cases removing nodes restricted to a group.
and 1/3 case making invisible nodes restricted to a group.
It's simpler to have a uniform behavior for the 3 cases,
simpler to understandard for developers.
In addition, this will help for the goal to cache back-end views.
It makes possible to convert views using the `groups_id` field
by moving the content of these views directly
in the view to which they add content which is suppose to be completely
removed when the user has not the according group.
By getting rid of the `groups_id` many2many field on `ir.ui.view`,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the `groups_id` groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
closesodoo/odoo#95729
Related: odoo/enterprise#29592
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
When generating an alternative request for quotation from a dropship
purchase, the delivery address is not copied
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install Sales and stock_dropshipping module
2. Go to Settings > General Settings > Users > Manage Users, open user
Mitchell Admin and in the Access Rights tab enable 'Manage Multiple
Stock Locations'
3. Go to Settings > Sales > Quotations & Orders and enable Customer
Addresses
4. Go to Settings > Purchase > Orders and enable Purchase Agreements
5. Go to Sales > Products > Products and edit a product (e.g. 'Acoustic
Bloc Screens')
- In the Inventory tab enable routes 'Buy' and 'Dropship'
6. Create a Sale Order for this product with a different Delivery
Address then the Customer and confirm it
7. Go to the purchase order
8. In the Alternatives tab create an alternative
9. The Dropship Address is not repercuted on the new RFQ
Solution:
Add a method `_get_alternative_values` which sets the dest_address_id
and is extended in `purchase_requisition_stock` to add the
picking_type_id
opw-2880042
closesodoo/odoo#94109
X-original-commit: a7ef5d93650c262497d3a02b934284829cfc5021
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Merlin (megu) <megu@odoo.com>
Previously the "call to tender" flow involved creating a
`purchase.requisition` record, creating each RFQ via that record, and
then manually going through each RFQ to compare the prices/dates/etc.
By linking the "call to tender" POs within the POs, we remove an
unnecessary `purchase.requestion` record and makes it easier to track
which RFQs are related to each other as an Alternative RFQ.
On top of this, we add some comparision features to make it easier to
determine the best RFQ, specificially the ability to compare PO lines in
the same view with some visual aids (best price/date colored green +
buttons to check these lines to make them easier to view). We also add
an extra feature to set the qty of selected/non-chosen PO lines to 0 to
aid in the RFQ selection process (only applies to non-confirmed/done/
cancelled POs).
Some other features included with this:
- option to cancel alternative POs when confirming one, which purposely
does not cancel ones that have already been confirmed/completed.
- new wizard for creating alternative POs so user can select whether or
not they want to copy the products/qtys from the original PO.
Important Notes:
- JS Customizations:
- custom many2many widget added so user:
- can click between alternative POs in same window + keep breadcrumb.
This is because all alt POs are interconnected and long breadcrumb
chain is possible (+ we want to avoid windows within windows.) It
is expected that user will be aware that unsaved changes will
auto-save when alt PO is clicked on.
- cannot unlink a PO from itself (this is automagically done during
the write) since this will remove all of its linked POs and might
confuse users.
- custom view js for Comparing Order Lines to help highlight best
options, including ensuring that the best options are still
highlighted after clicking on Choose/Clear buttons (since the best
option can change afterwards, we recalc + update via RPC)
- General implementation warnings:
- Anytime any button/alternative PO is clicked on within a PO, the
form will auto-save. This is due to how the current action service
handles changing views.
- POs created via "Create Alternative" button purposely:
- require a vendor to ensure correct lead times/prices
- show all vendor/product warnings in wizard because we cannot
reproduce the pop-up warning that would occur in the PO when
they are selected. We also purposely block the PO creation when a
blocking warning is set since we cannot remove the values
(especially in the case of a blocking vendor message) from a
newly created PO.
- Technical purchase.order.group model created to help with difficult
management of complicated behaviors:
- unlink from self if a PO is no longer linked to any other POs
- linkages must be symmetric (i.e. linkage PO1 => PO2 must
reflect PO2 => PO1 in their form views)
- don't lose existing linkages (i.e. PO1 => PO2 and PO2 => PO3
should auto-link PO1 => PO3)
These last two behaviors are difficult to do without grouping due to
possibility of remove and adding linkages at the same time. To avoid
complex code to ensure these complexities hold when when creating a
new PO, linkaging to alternatives is not allowed when PO is not yet
saved as a record.
Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586closesodoo/odoo#87656
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Instead of having to repeatedly manually call `onchange_quantity` at
different points in the code, it is better to have it be computed
instead.
- Logic is left unchanged,
- onchange calls from other methods are removed, and
- tests are adjusted to properly handle compute. I.e. remove
'date_planned': datetime.today().strftime(DEFAULT_SERVER_DATETIME_FORMAT)
from when PO lines are created since this sometimes resulted in
inconsistent date_planned values for PO line and the PO date_order
(by 1 sec), which could lead to inconsistently created 'date_deadline'
values for stock_moves' created by PO line qty changes. Issue
previously didn't exist because onchange was not always called.
Part of Task: 2695116 (to avoid adding more onchange calls for new
feature)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87656
This commit removes the call for tender feature via a
purchase.requisition. This feature is to be replaced with the ability to
directly compare prices/options of POs/RFQs within a PO to remove extra
steps to compare them. The linkage between POs previously provided by a
purchase.requistion is replaced by the POs being directly linked to each
other. Feature to auto-create call to tenders via a product option is
removed and the user is expected to know/be responsible for when they
should do a call to tender themselves.
All references to old Call to Tenders replaced with Blanket Order, and
we remove/rename the menu items since Blanket Order is now the only
purchase.requisition.type option (we expect minimal customizated types).
Follow-on refactoring to switch purchase.requisition to
purchase.blanket.order to come later. Follow-on refactoring to switch
purchase.requisition to purchase.blanket.order to come later.
Part of Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87656
Schedule date was hide in the view for a back to basic task in order to
simplify the view.
But it was at the time, the optional parameter did not exist, we could
readd it under the hide option
opw-2842963
closesodoo/odoo#90790
X-original-commit: b21a960ca925ea03e32d71c5d69098f98dfde239
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
In case of purchase agreement, call for tender still appears everywhere
and it's confusing for the user in case of purchase agreement. It would
be better to create another action to have a correct pdf name and report
name but it will be modify in master and we could keep a minimal diff
here.
Also the conditions where not present, so the report could be hard to
communicate to a supplier. Same for the agreement deadline
closesodoo/odoo#88164
X-original-commit: c3b9de36e40c24d0bb521ec0f161d4415b1d86ff
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Some html field are not in their ideal style.
As the style for html fields is now dependent of
where you are in the xml view ( in group or not),
we have to adapt some views and flags some fields
to ensure they have the correct look.
This change is only be a visual enhancement
and should not prevent the function of said html fields
even if the views are not updated.
task-2637488
# Conflicts:
# addons/mail/wizard/mail_compose_message_views.xml
# addons/website_slides/views/slide_channel_views.xml
# Conflicts:
# addons/sale/views/sale_views.xml
closesodoo/odoo#83792
Related: odoo/enterprise#23911
Signed-off-by: Antoine Guenet <age@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Geelen Sébastien (sge) <sge@odoo.com>
Current behavior:
If you have 2 time the same product in the agreement and you confirm an order with just one line of this item
the 2 lines in the agreement will have the quantity.
Expected behavior:
Only the ordered item should have the quantity applied. In this case the products are compared with the price and
product ID. If you modify the price in the PO the first line of the agreement will have the quantity by default.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a new Purchase Agreement
-Add two lines with the same product
- First line has a scheduled date and price that are different from the second line
2. Generate RFQ and confirm PO with only the first product line and a set quantity
3. Once the PO has been confirmed, going back to the Purchase Agreement, the ordered quantities on both lines will be the same, although the PO was generated for only the first line.
opw-2627898
closesodoo/odoo#79322
X-original-commit: c09a16fb2483e8cec4c9c9e6a936ae2bcc490646
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Engels Robin (roen) <roen@odoo.com>
Setting a default value on a readonly related field without an inverse
method is nonsense. We log some warning when it happens.
We also fixed other cases where a related field has a default value
that overrides the target field's value.
closesodoo/odoo#67762
Related: odoo/enterprise#17313
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
1. Activate the 2 language “’English’ , ‘Spanish (AR) / Español (AR)’ ”
2. User -> select the language ‘Spanish (AR) / Español (AR)’
3. Create a new product (Test Product).
4. Create a another product using “Duplicate” function.
5. Rename new product name(Test Product -1)
6. Translate the name ( “Spanish (AR) / Español (AR) : 111 Spanish product “ , “English: English Product” )
7. create a purchase agreement -> select product “111 Spanish product ” -> Save -> confirm -> new quotation.
8. Purchase Quotation -> Order line
Bug:
Description shows “Test Item (copia)”
opw:2582778
closesodoo/odoo#72997
X-original-commit: 947484cd9a082003bfd5b3c2e64d6033b863aa84
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Before this commit, suppose we have a scenario like below
Task-A:
Activity-1:
name: Email ( Today )
Assigned to: User-1
Task-B:
Activity-1:
name: Email ( Today )
assigned to: User-2
Activity-2:
name: Call ( Due in 3 Days )
assigned to: User-1
When User-1 goes through the systray 'Today' filter shortcut he gets both
Task-A and Task-B in the list instead of only Task-A. Indeed currently
activities are not filtered based on current user with its deadlines.
However purpose of systray is to indicate activities current user has to
perform instead of global activities.
After this commit activities will be filtered based on deadlines as well as the
current user. In order to achieve this behavior we needed to pass a domain like
[
('activity_ids.date_deadline','=', fields.Date.today()),
('activity_ids.user_id','=', 1)
]
And for that purpose we introduced a non-stored compute field with a search
method.
Task ID-2438822
COM PR odoo/odoo#72219
X-original-commit: f4eaf4d8fb2f97240201104dcd4fc7e2674bce02
Replace text fields to html fields as we have our own 'OdooEditor'.
Indeed, it gives more options to users in the way they format their
content without weighting too much on the UI
(tools appear on demand and not by default).
Models -> Fields
1) purchase.order -> notes
2) purchase.requisition -> description
Task Id: 2499504
X-original-commit: 43958eff2b9346420104002d628d5ca9225f8090
Modify manually for the languages where the language is not on Transifex
closesodoo/odoo#65564
X-original-commit: 793dc3fc1002aca15f5e0a7c33baf36a4550d180
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
* account, analytic, calendar, coupon, crm, crm_iap_lead_website,
delivery, digest, event, event_crm, fleet, gamification, hr,
hr_expense, hr_skills, im_livechat, lunch, mail, maintenance,
mass_mailing, membership, mrp, point_of_sale, pos_mercury, product,
purchase, purchase_requisition, sale_management, sales_team, sms,
stock, stock_landed_costs, survey, website_crm_partner_assign,
website_event_exhibitor, website_event_track, website_forum,
website_slides, base
This commit removes oe_edit_only labels and adds placeholder
on fields in form views from a lot of apps to minimize the
shift when switching mode.
task 2330101
Related fields are by default readonly and they should be when it
is possible. A editable related field will write on the related
model and will cause extra unwanted write of data. These unwanted write
can cause performance issues in some case (see odoo/odoo#63865).
Then remove the `readonly=False` of some related fields
(where it is useless):
- In 'mrp.workorder' (mrp): `working_state` and `production_date`
should be readonly.
- In 'purchase.order' (purchase): `product_id` should be readonly.
- In 'purchase.order.line' (purchase): `state` should be readonly.
- In 'product.supplierinfo' (purchase_requisition):
`purchase_requisition_id` should be readonly.
- In 'purchase.requisition' (purchase_requisition):
`product_id` should be readonly.
- In 'product.template' (stock):
`route_from_categ_ids` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.move.line' (stock):
`is_initial_demand_editable` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.move' (stock):
`product_tmpl_id` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.production.lot' (stock):
`product_uom_id` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.quant' (stock):
`product_tmpl_id` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.rule' (stock):
`route_sequence` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.change.product.qty' (stock):
`product_variant_count` should be readonly.
- In 'stock.return.picking.line' (stock):
`uom_id` should be readonly and also because it
is forced by `_prepare_stock_return_picking_line_vals_from_move`,
it should be related to the product uom not the one on the move.
task-2424248
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a user with only access rights, Inventory = Administrator, Purchase = user
- Enable feature Purchase order approval in Purchase > Settings
- Agreement Type = Exclusive, lines of Agreement, Quantity of Agreement
- Login as a new created user and navigate to a menu Purchase > Purchase agreement and
create a new Purchase agreement, confirm it
- From the button create two PO (having a total > 5000)
- Cancel one of the PO first and try to approve another one
Bug:
A UserError was riased: You have to cancel or validate every RFQ before closing the purchase requisition.
opw:2368999
closesodoo/odoo#64431
X-original-commit: dfee34b0b9c83beca9aca0b21e7f130ae86c0ee6
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
With this commit, all instances of errors being raised inside
`BaseModel.unlink` overrides are moved into methods decorated with
`api.ondelete` which is safer.
And other reported English mistakes in source string
Courtesy of Transifex translators
And remove leftover from gengo
closesodoo/odoo#59022
X-original-commit: 26efc84c5cac47a2cc83d7b084f8b71528fec6c7
Related: odoo/enterprise#13781
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
- Install "purchase_requisition"
- Go to Inventory > Settings and activate "Units of Measure"
- Go to Purchase > Purchase Agreements and create one:
* select a product and remove UOM
- Confirm it and click on "NEW QUOTATION"
An exception occurs with the following message:
"ValueError: Expected singleton: uom.uom()"
"product_uom_id" field of "purchase.requisition.line" model should be required.
opw-2332654
closesodoo/odoo#57313
X-original-commit: 82c727a766f5b7a9554d9766e4eb5c448eae8e31
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <kitan191@users.noreply.github.com>
PURPOSE
Clean code. Be more performance oriented.
SPECIFICATIONS
Improvements applied in this commit
* not all() --> any(not) for earlier returns;
* all([generator]) --> all(generator) to avoid unnecessary list casting.
This code construct is better managed by all;
This commit will probably not have a big performance effect on standard
production databases. However each performance and cleaning improvement
is welcomed.
LINKS
Task ID-2328619
closesodoo/odoo#56810
X-original-commit: 1cc6bb1231401ea7f501d2f5b5e9641ec8734850
Related: odoo/enterprise#12802
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Replace wrong usages of any(list|recordset), by any(generator)
to speed up computations, avoiding list creations and/or looping twice on a recordset
for nothing.
any([generator]) => any(generator)
any(filtered) => any(generator)
closesodoo/odoo#55768
Related: odoo/enterprise#12360
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Followup on ca707502a6
During replacing `partner_id` field in `purchase_requisition` module, widget and context key `show_vat` was not preserved.
With this commit we add missing attributes of the field.
closesodoo/odoo#52383
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
This commit sets attribute sample="1" in a bunch of list and
kanban views, to enable the new sample data feature when views are
empty.
Task 2232801
X-original-commit: 5471309b35619f307242c2704c7681ba63d2be42
Using a few regex like
\((_\(.*%s.*)(\) % )([\w\[\]][\w .\[\]\(\)'"]*)\)
($1, $3))
Old syntax is still compatible but starts the migration to the new
syntax that catches error.
This commit is a significant rewriting of client-side discuss, chatter,
chat window, and messaging menu using OWL. The behavior should be broadly
the same, with some slight functional changes here and there.
From a technical standpoint, the code of messaging is mainly organized in 2
main groups of modules:
- models, which are logical entities that depict the client-side state of
messaging as a whole.
- components, which are in charge of displaying information from models.
This refactoring also introduces new JS guidelines regarding folder structure
(/static) and naming rules for JS modules.
Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/39023
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/6249
Task-1914207
This PR is a collaborative work by Alexandre, Julien, Sébastien and Xavier,
with the precious help of Lucas to speed it up towards the end.
closesodoo/odoo#39023
Related: odoo/enterprise#6249
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Giannone <jgi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dubuc <xdu@odoo.com>
This commit adapts several views to make them use newly defined
widgets, the new decoration-xxx mechanism on fields, and to adapt
them to the new design of buttons.
used following widgets and designs -
1) decoration-bf
2) many2one_avatar_user widget
3) badge widget
Task-2248231
closesodoo/odoo#51074
Related: odoo/enterprise#10528
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
The following task implemented new widgets/features in the listview for better UI.
https://www.odoo.com/web#id=2195254&action=327&model=project.task&view_type=form&cids=1&menu_id=4720
The goal of the current task is to use those to upgrade our listviews
Specification
=============
Below are change requests on various listviews.
Remove decoration-bf="message_needaction==True" from every listview in every module.
PRODUCT - stock.view_stock_product_template_tree (product template)
remove all decorations from <tree>
set the following decorations on 'virtual_available' and 'qty_available'
decoration-danger="virtual_available<0"
decoration-warning="virtual_available==0"
also set decoration-bf on 'virtual_available'
apply the same modifications on stock.view_stock_product_tree for product variants
SUBSCRIPTION - sale_subscription.sale_subscription_view_list
remove all decorations from <tree>
'stage_id' field
set <field name="stage_id" widget="badge" decoration-info="stage_category == 'draft'" decoration-success="stage_category == 'progress'"/>
'recurring_next_date' field
set <field name="recurring_next_date" string="Next Invoice" widget="remaining_days" attrs="{'invisible': [('stage_category', '!=', 'progress')]}"/>
set decoration-bf on 'code' and 'recurring_total_incl'
move 'percentage_satisfaction' before 'recurring_total_incl'
set widget="many2one_avatar_user" on 'user_id'
add <field name="activity_ids" widget="list_activity"/> after 'user_id'
ELEARNING - website_slides.slide_channel_view_tree
set widget="many2one_avatar_user" on 'user_id'
'enroll' field
set <field name="enroll" widget="badge" decoration-success="enroll == 'public'" decoration-info="enroll == 'invite'" decoration-warning="enroll == 'payment'"/>
POS - point_of_sale.view_pos_order_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
make visible and move it at the end of the view
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-success="state not in ('draft','cancel')"/>
set decoration-bf on 'name'
APPRAISAL - hr_appraisal.view_hr_appraisal_tree
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state in ('new','pending')" decoration-success="state == 'done'"/>
'date_close' field
set <field name="date_close" widget="remaining_days" attrs="{'invisible': ['|',('state','=','done'),('state','=','cancel')]}"/>
PAYMENT - account.view_account_payment_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-success="state == 'posted'"/>
move 'company_id' before 'amount'
CONTRACT - hr_contract.hr_contract_view_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-warning="state == 'close'" decoration-success="state == 'open'"/>
set widget="many2one_avatar_employee" on 'employee_id'
PAYSLIPS - hr_payroll.view_hr_payslip_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-warning="state == 'verify'" decoration-success="state in ('done','paid')"/>
set decoration-bf on 'number' and 'net_wage'
move 'company_id' before 'basic_wage'
set widget="many2one_avatar_employee" on 'employee_id'
SURVEY - survey.survey_tree
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-success="state == 'open'"/>
APPLICATION - hr_recruitment.crm_case_tree_view_job
set widget="date' on 'create_date'
set widget="priority' on 'priority'
set widget="many2one_avatar_user" on 'user_id'
TIME OFF - hr_holidays.hr_leave_view_tree
remove all decorations from <tree>
'state' field
set <field name="state" widget="badge" decoration-info="state == 'draft'" decoration-warning="state in ('confirm','validate1')" decoration-success="state == 'validate'"/>
apply the same changes in hr_holidays.hr_leave_allocation_view_tree
closesodoo/odoo#51305
Taskid: 2256589
Related: odoo/enterprise#10614
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The purpose of task is to update the 'user/employee avatar' to the new
widget in all the kanban view across all modules.
The below new widget are introduced for avatar:
- many2one_avatar_user (for user_id fields)
- many2one_avatar_employee (for employee_id fields)
which displays the avatar (i.e. picture) of a user/employee in front
of his name and clicking on the avatar will open a chatbox to message
that specific user/employee.
So in this commit, For each kanban view with a user or employee avatar,
replaced it by the field with the new 'many2one_avatar' widget.
TaskID: 2244928
Related Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/10420
closes odoo/odoo#50789
Closes: #50789
Related: odoo/enterprise#10420
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Impacted modules: account_analytic_default, crm, event,
hr_recruitment, maintenance, mass_mailing, project,
purchase_requisition, stock_picking_batch, website_slides
The default image displayed when the record is unassigned is
confusing, so we are removing it.
FP request
Task 2234524
closesodoo/odoo#49333
Related: odoo/enterprise#9834
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Thibault Delavallée