The new backend version of read_group can simplify the
current overrides of read_group. Do it for each of them and
avoid making extra search (done with __domain) when it is possible.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#110737
Current behavior:
Partial and reversed payment were not taken into account for the
product margin calculation.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a product with an common avco setup.
2. Go to purchase 1 unit at 10 dollars.
3. Upon confirming the invoice your cost is updated in the product margin
report.
4. Create a partial payment on the bill. This creates issues as the
product margin report is looking for paid or open not partially
paid so it won't show up in the cost calculation.
5. Once the bill is fully paid then it shows up in the cost section
of the product margin report again as its payment status moves to
Paid.
6. Create a sales order for the unit at 100 dollars.
7. Invoice for the full amount then cancel it by creating a full credit
note to put the original invoice in reversed status. This will have
only the credit note show up in the turnover calculation as it is in
paid status while the original invoice doesn't have a paid or open
status so it isn't taken into account.
opw-2887240
closesodoo/odoo#108992
X-original-commit: ddca80ebee20f75ee9b9da2828de5a9170ea683e
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Engels Robin (roen) <roen@odoo.com>
PG12 introduced an optimization for CTEs that automatically inlines
CTEs if they are only refered once in the parent query. Prior to that
CTEs were always materialzed, meaning that PG created a sort of temp
table on the fly to store the result of the CTE's evaluation.
Whereas this leads to performance improvements in general, in the
particular case of _select_companies_rates this inlining becomes a
performance bottleneck. This is because while the currency_rate CTE
is only refered once in both purchase_report and product_margin,
the join condition (cr.date_end is null or cr.date_end > ...)
requires evaluating the CTE's date_end subquery twice. This, combined
with the fact that in PG12 the planner goes for a Nested Loop JOIN instead
of a HASH Join in PG10 makes the performances of the whole query
much worse in PG12 than in PG10.
Adding MATERIALIZED before the CTE definition forces PG to evaluate the
subquery first using its own plan. This removes the need to rescan the
subquery each time the Merge JOIN filter has to be applied, which
is a good strategy in this specific situation.
Examples of query timings change before and after PR:
Number of POs | Before PR | After PR
2000 | 7s | 345ms
7000 | 23s | 1.1s
opw-2930578
closesodoo/odoo#106100
X-original-commit: c4d841e81904745a24669e1a05f0d21ca7f2c85d
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Van Delft Aurélien (avd) <avd@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Onchange methods are executed in "edit-mode", so you need to save to get the definitive
values saved on the DB, but if you do a write on it, that changes are immediately saved
to the DB, so if you discard the changes on UI, you will have inconsistent data. That's
why you have to do update instead, that only modifies the temporary dataset.
Courtesy of https://github.com/OCA/pylint-odoo/issues/356closesodoo/odoo#104539
Taskid: 3046426
X-original-commit: 5f18f068e62ba6cf6296c5f818b2cdfabed1fdfb
Related: odoo/enterprise#33409
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
TLDR:
* invoices are implemented using computed methods instead of onchange
* the synchronization only happens when switching tabs in the Form view
to improve perfs.
_______________________________________________________________________
The whole engine of the synchronization of Invoices to the Journal
Entries has been refactored
* by using computed fields instead of onchange functions
* by synchronizing only from invoice to journal entry in `create` and
`write`
* by saving when switching tabs on the Invoice form, to synchronize
before showing the values
This comes with numerous advantages:
* no need to call the onchange methods manually
* no need to use the Form emulator to build invoices (i.e. EDI, OCR,
intercompany, ...)
* the performance for invoices with many lines improves drastically, going
from 2 minutes to 4 seconds to create an invoice with 500 lines
* the model is more declarative, we can now see how the values are computed
instead of having the values being copied from various places.
* remove the hack in `onchange` that disabled the recursivity of it,
which was unexpected and needed to be managed manually in all the
onchange methods
This means that:
* Some fields need to be exclusively computed on journal entries values
or invoice values, more specifically the Tax Summary widget.
It is now
- computed from entry lines, when opening the view
- computed from invoice lines when changing those, because the tax lines
will need to be recomputed anyways, erasing previously set values
- set with an inverse function when saving; after the sync has been done
* Some possible operations previously possible have been dropped.
(i.e. look at the removed test test_in_invoice_line_onchange_accounting_fields_1)
This is because such a behavior was undefined (how is changing the balance going
to affect the unit price? How is the amount currency going to affect it?)
_______________________________________________________________________
Implementation Details
----------------------
The "dynamic lines", meaning the payment terms and the tax lines are now
only created in the `create` and `write` functions.
In order to reduce code duplication, it has been implemented using
context managers used in both `account.move` and `account.move.line`
These context managers help comparing the values before/after, acting
like a local `onchange`, but getting benefit from the dirty flags from
the `compute` dependences.
This is relying on computed fields on the move (`needed_terms`) and on
the lines (`compute_all_tax`) which contain the values needed for the
related move.
Depending on the needed values and the existing values (`term_key` and
`tax_key`, respectively) the context manager will determine what needs
to be created/updated/deleted.
Some related changes are to produce a `dict` instead of a `str` for the
`tax_totals` (previously `tax_totals_json`) fields, by simplicity to
reduce the complexity of IO, and simplicity of debugging, because the
logic of the field needed to change (cannot be computed at the same time
anymore since it needed the lines to be synced)
By simplicity, and also because it makes more sense, some boolean fields
have been merged into `display_type`:
* `is_rounding_line`
* `exclude_from_invoice_tab`
* `is_anglo_saxon_line`
The `price_unit`, `quantity` and other "invoice fields" are now not set
anymore on lines that are not product lines since it didn't make any
sense to have it.
Performances
------------
You have to keep in mind that a simple `create` didn't compute a lot of
fields, for instance not taxes were set, no payment terms,...
Now it does.
```python
import random
from timeit import timeit
from odoo import Command
domain = [('company_id', 'in', (False, self.env.company.id))]
products = self.env['product.product'].search(domain).ids
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search(domain).ids
taxes = self.env['account.tax'].search(domain).ids
def create(nmove, nline):
self.env['account.move'].create([
{
'move_type': 'out_invoice',
'partner_id': random.choice(partners),
'invoice_line_ids': [
Command.create({
'name': f'line{i}',
'product_id': random.choice(products),
'tax_ids': [Command.set([random.choice(taxes)])],
})
for i in range(nline)
]
}
for j in range(nmove)
])
# After | Before
print(timeit("create(1, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 0.11 | 0.09
print(timeit("create(100, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 2.76 | 2.50
print(timeit("create(500, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 14.56 | 12.34
print(timeit("create(1, 100)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 1.03 | 5.52
print(timeit("create(1, 500)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 3.99 | 125.02
print(timeit("create(50, 50)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 19.44 | 79.55
```
Another metric that can be used is running the test suite with
`--test-tags=/account` (only `account` installed)
* before: 404s, 267127 queries (366 tests)
* after: 318s, 232125 queries (362 tests)
Why this commit title?
----------------------
Someone told me that this was the perfect way of naming your commits.
c04065abd8
task-2711317
closesodoo/odoo#96134
Related: odoo/upgrade#3715
Related: odoo/enterprise#29758
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
This commit aims at removing unuseful help message to:
1/ reduce translators work, to focus on more useful translations
2/ not sending unuseful information in load_views
3/ reduce help message to useful messages, so that we can mark
fields having a tooltip in the future UI.
4/ some cleanup of existing messages too
The main use cases:
- REMOVED: help redundant with the field name, providing no extra info
- MOVED TO COMMENT: technical help messages, that should not be in UX
closesodoo/odoo#97279
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
The graph view of product margins cannot be displayed because it raises
an error
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install Accounting
2. Go to settings and enable Margin Analysis
3. Go to Accounting > Reporting > Management > Product Margins
4. Go to the graph view
5. A User Error is thrown
Solution:
Remove the `:sum` operators for non-stored fields in read_group
Problem:
The graph view tries to sum up the total_margin with `total_margin:sum`
but as the field is not stored, it is not possible to compute it and it
raises the error
opw-2738456
closesodoo/odoo#92719
X-original-commit: fbaedeb18e49e5ed055c597cab33061153aaf1da
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Merlin (megu) <megu@odoo.com>
1. Define a product [TEST] with automated inventory valuation (AVCO)
2. Define a landed cost product in the same way
3. Create a RFQ for [TEST], Confirm and Receive product
4. Create Bill, add the landed cost on the bill
5. Confirm the Bill and create the landed cost (from transfer of point 3)
6. Create a SO for [TEST], confirm, delivery and create the invoice
7. Generate product margin analysis, [TEST] will be present
8. Register a payment for the invoice (it should have the status 'In
Payment')
Generate product margin analysis again, [TEST] entries will be missing
This occur because, when the invoice is in 'in_payment' state the
records are not taken into account
opw-2631974
closesodoo/odoo#76605
X-original-commit: f62c20d38844c50c678e4233913a97845420d766
Signed-off-by: agr-odoo <agr-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Group by products margins computations to reduce SQL queries sent
to postgre server, improving overall performances.
Replace setattr for loop by product.write to reduce the number
of write queries.
closesodoo/odoo#74556
X-original-commit: 4884a2b0d035cb58d21cdee481cff3c636825020
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
- Install product_margin
- Go to Invoicing > Customers > Invoices and create an Invoice
- Add a Credit Note
- Go to Accounting > Reporting > Product Margins and check Product used in the Invoice
The "Avg. Sale Unit Price" is incorrect. It should be 0 as it is for "# Invoiced in Sale"
Credit Notes are not taken into consideration when computing "Avg. Sale Unit Price".
This is also the case for discount.
opw-2382797
closesodoo/odoo#65777
X-original-commit: 8c7feb45f1ee8581e259f3c2aaff7a139f516d94
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <kitan191@users.noreply.github.com>
- Create a product P with a Sales Price of 5000 and a Cost of 3000.
- Create a bill for 10 units @ 3000, post
- Create an invoice for 10 units @ 5000, post
- Create a customer credit note for 5 units
- Open the Product Margin report
The # Purchased is 15 while the # Invoiced in Sale is 10.
The query incorrectly sums the invoice lines based on their type. We
should group customer invoices with customer refunds, and group vendor
bills with vendor refunds. When grouping we should subtract invoices
and refunds.
Note that the `avg_unit_price` is not modified since there is no reason
to refund a product at a different unit price.
opw-2211636
closesodoo/odoo#49349
X-original-commit: d3c6b16e2ad2166b636372b537292e06d4d575c4
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Install account_accountant,stock,purchase,sale_management
Activate 'Margin Analysis' in Accounting settings
Create a new product (on the category set FIFO and Automated Inventory
Valuation). Set $100 for the price and $60 for the cost,
update 2 quantity on hand.
Receive 1 more product via PO ($70 as the cost), and deliver 1 via
SO. With 2 quantity left (inventory value is $135 for 1 $60 and 1
$75) open Accounting>Reporting>Product Margins
The Avg. Sale Unit Price and #Invoiced in Sale are incorrect,
we only sold 1 item so far, but the report display 3.
This occur because accounting lines are kept into the calculation of the
sale line. Using 'exclude_from_invoice_tab' to filter out such lines fix the issue.
opw-2196625
closesodoo/odoo#46741
X-original-commit: 5f28d1865aa6b4e204e052bf43ecfbfe7d45252b
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
- 'partial' payment state corresponds to invoices whose payable/receivable move line has been partially reconciled with some other line.
- 'reversed' payment state corresponds to entries that have been cancelled by the creation of a single reverse entry (using the dedicated button on the form view). This state can be set on invoice as well as on regular entries.
=> To stay consistent with the naming conventions, this commit also renames invoice_payment_state field to payment_state, since it's no longer only applicable on invoices.
closesodoo/odoo#41723
Related: odoo/enterprise#7202
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Install accounting.
- Go to Accounting Settings and activate multi-currencies and margin analysis.
- Company currency in EUR
- Currency rate for EUR is 1.0 and 1.5 for USD
- Create two invoices, one in USD and the other in EUR. Both for 30 and for product P.
- Confirm and register payment to make them fully payed.
- Go to Accounting > Reporting > Product Margins > Open Margins.
Bug:
The average sale unit price for P was 60 instead of 25
opw:2035968
closesodoo/odoo#34998
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Now that we're closer to switching to P3 for good, these helpers have
outlived their usefulness, and mostly add noise.
All remaining dict.iter*() or dict.view*() must be converted to the
normal keys(), values() or items() calls.
Whenever the result is likely to be used for more than the scope of a
loop, or when the dict needs to be modified during iteration, the calls
must be wrapped in a ``list()``, to protect the new P3 semantics.
Those cases are very exceptional.
Also removed some dead code or improved the API to remove unnecessary
conversions.
In Python 3:
* various builtins and dict methods were changed to return
view/iterable objects rather than lists
* and the separate Python 2 view/iterable builtins and methods were
removed altogether
This is problematic when using these items as list (which the happens
repeatedly in Odoo), but more viciously when iterating *multiple times*
over them (which also happens, which I've messed up multiple times while
writing this, and which is a pain to debug even when you've just created
the issue).
Convert all code using these to semantics-matching cross-version
helper functions to get the LCD behaviour between P2 and P3, and
forbid the builtins via lint.
issue #8530
All the fields defined in model "product.product" from module product_margin
are computed and not stored with the same function which is _compute_product_margin_fields_values.
This function has a deprecated argument which is field_names and this agrument is only used in
function read_group overwritten in this module in model "product.product. This overwrite of
read_group uses a variable "fields_list" with almost all the fields defined in "product.product"
in this module (excepted: date_from, date_to and invoice_state which are read from the context).
Each time, the fields total_margin, expected_margin, total_margin_rate, expected_margin_rate,
date_from, date_to, invoice_state were needed, nothing was returned due to the empty argument
field_names passed to this method. For example, when opening product.margin.form.inherit form
view.
In old API, it works because the compute was called with the list of the fields and in new API, it is not the case.
Closes#15604
opw:709962
Trying to use "group by" in the product margins menu creates a traceback with a keyError.
The problem is that the function stores a recordset in the dictionary and then tries to
get it back with an integer.
This commit solves the problem by storing the product id in the dictionary instead of
the product itself.
Rémy Voet (ryv)